Cited by 1,580Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchStress Responses and Cortisol

Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear

Open access
LeDoux, JE, Iwata, J, Cicchetti, P, Reis, DJ·1988·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether lesions of areas projected to by the central amygdaloid nucleus (ACE) would disrupt the classical conditioning of autonomic and/or behavioral emotional responses. The areas studied included 3 projection targets of the ACE: the lateral hypothalamic area (LH), midbrain central gray (CG) region, and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST). Lesions were made either electrolytically or by microinjection of ibotenic acid, which destroys local neurons without interrupting fibers of passage. Two weeks later, the animals were classically conditioned by pairing an acoustic stimulus with footshock. The next day, conditioned changes in autonomic activity (increases in arterial pressure) and emotional behavior (“freezing,” or the arrest of somatomotor activity) evoked by the acoustic conditioned stimulus (CS) were measured during extinction trials. Electrolytic and ibotenic acid lesions of the LH interfered with the conditioned arterial pressure response, but did not affect conditioned freezing. Electrolytic lesions of the rostral CG disrupted conditioned freezing but not conditioned changes in arterial pressure. Ibotenic acid injected into the rostral CG reduced neither the arterial pressure nor the freezing response. Injection of ibotenic acid in the caudal CG, like electrolytic lesions of the rostral CG, disrupted the freezing, but not the arterial pressure response. Injection of ibotenic acid into the BNST had no effect on either response. These data demonstrate that neurons in the LH are involved in the autonomic, but not the behavioral, conditioned response pathway, whereas neurons in the caudal CG are involved in the behavioral, but not the autonomic, pathway. Different efferent projections of the central amygdala thus appear to mediate the behavioral and autonomic concomitants of conditioned fear.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.08-07-02517.1988

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Connections from the central nucleus of the amygdala to the periaqueductal grey are responsible for behavioural aspects of the defence cascade.

    “However, connections from the central nucleus of the amygdala (CE) to the periaqueductal grey (PAG) [47] are responsible for behavioural aspects of the defence cascade.”

    From Freeze for action: neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing (2017) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Conclusion (page unavailable) says the findings are consistent with the hypothesis that central-amygdala projections to the midbrain central gray mediate conditioned emotional behavior. The Midbrain central gray lesions section reports reduced conditioned freezing after caudal lesions. The source supports a role in this behavioral fear response, but the claim states the connection’s responsibility for behavioral aspects of the broader defence cascade more definitively than the paper does. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Activation of autonomic centers in the dorsal hypothalamus causes a generalized sympathetic response that includes activation of the heart and increased vascular resistance in the viscera, which increases perfusion pressure of tissues, especially muscles, heart, and brain.

    “Activation of autonomic centers in the dorsal hypothalamus causes a generalized sympathetic response that includes activation of the heart (increased heart rate and cardiac output) and increased vascular resistance in the viscera, which increases the perfusion pressure of tissues, especially the muscles, heart, and brain.24,28”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [24]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Direct projections from the amygdala and limbic forebrain activate specific areas within the LPAG to produce these basic patterns, which control not only limb muscles but also laryngeal muscles resulting in snarling, growling, and howling.

    “Direct projections from the amygdala and limbic forebrain activate specific areas within the LPAG to produce these basic patterns, which control not only limb muscles but also laryngeal muscles resulting in snarling, growling, and howling.24,48,49”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [24]

    The amygdala–central gray behavioral conditioned response pathway section (page unavailable in our copy) describes projections from the limbic forebrain, including the central amygdala, through the central gray toward spinal motor systems involved in fear behavior. It does not establish activation of specific LPAG areas or describe laryngeal muscle control, snarling, growling, or howling. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Flight or fight is the sum total of distinct components activated concurrently: a somatomotor component, a visceromotor component, and a pain-modulation component.

    “Studies suggest that flight or fight is the sum total of distinct components activated concurrently: a somatomotor (skeletal muscle) component, a visceromotor (autonomic) component, and a pain-modulation component (see Figures 1 and 2).24,45,46”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [24]

    The section on conditioned fear-response pathways (page unavailable) describes defensive behavior accompanied by autonomic changes and distinguishes freezing from cardiovascular responses. It does not establish a pain-modulation component of the response or say that all three components are activated concurrently; its discussion of pain sensitivity concerns whether that could explain a lesion result. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All defense responses in the animal model of the defense cascade-arousal, freezing, flight or fight, tonic immobility, collapsed immobility, and quiescent immobility-are responses to threat mediated by neural circuits involving the extended amygdala, hypothalamus, periaqueductal gray, ventral pontine tegmentum, ventral and dorsal medulla, and spinal cord.

    “All defense responses in the animal model of the defense cascade—arousal, freezing, flight or fight, tonic immobility, collapsed immobility, and quiescent immobility—are responses to threat mediated by neural circuits involving the extended amygdala, hypothalamus, periaqueductal gray (PAG), ventral pontine tegmentum, ventral and dorsal medulla, and spinal cord.22–25”

    From Fear and the Defense Cascade (2015) · cites this paper as [24]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Covle. J. T.. and R. Schwartz (1983) The use of excitatorv amino acids as selective neurotoxins. In Handbook of Chemical Neuroanat- omy, vol. I: Methods in Chemical Neuroanatomy, A. Bjijrklund and T. Hokfelt, eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  2. de Olmos, J., G. F. Alheid, and C. A. Beltramino (1985) Amygdala. In The Rat Nervous System, I. Forebrain and Midbrain, G. Paxinos, ed., pp. 223-234, Academic, Sydney.
  3. Flynn, J. P. (1967) The neural basis of agression in cats. In Biology and Behavior: Neurophysiology and Emotion, David C. Glass, ed., pp. 40-60, Rockefeller U. P. and Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
  4. Fonberg, E. (1972) Control of emotional behavior through the hy- pothalamus and amygdaloid complex. In Physiology, Emotion, and Psychosomatic Illness, pp. 13 l-l 50, Ciba Foundation Symposium 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  5. Kaada, B. R. (1967) Brain mechanisms related to aggressive behavior. In Aggression and Defense-Neural Mechanisms and Social Patterns, C. Clemente and D. B. Lindsley, eds., pp. 95-133, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. cortical structures related to uain. In Pain. A. Soulairac. J. Chan. and J. Charpentier, eds., pp. 33-42, Academic, New York.
  6. Price, J. L. (198 1) The efferent projections of the amygdaloid complex in the rat, cat and monkey. In The Amygdaloid Complex, Y. Ben- Ari, ed., pp. 12 l-l 32, Inserm Symposium 20, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  7. Kapp, B. S., J. P. Pascoe, and M. A. Bixler (1984) The amygdala: A neuroanatomical systems approach to its contributions to aversive conditioning. In The Neuropsychology of Memory, N. Buttlers and L. R. Squire, eds.. pp. 473488. Guilford. New York.
  8. LeDoux, J. E. (1986) Neurobiology of emotion. In Mind and Brain: Dialogues in Cognitive Neuroscience, J. E. LeDoux and W. Hirst, eds., pp. 301-354, Cambridge U. P., New York.
  9. LeDoux, J. E. (1987) Emotion. In Handbook of Physiology: Nervous System V, F. Plum, ed., pp. 419-459, American Physiological Society, Washington, DC.
  10. Saper, C. B. (1979) Anatomical substrates for the hypothalamic control of the autonomic nervous system. In Integrative Functions of the Autonomic Nervous System, C. McBrooks, K. Loizumi, and A. Sato, eds., pp. 333-341, U. Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
  11. Siegel, A., and H. Edinger (1981) Neural control of aggression and rage behavior. In Handbook of the Hypothalamus, vol. 3: Behavioral Studies of the Hypothalamus, P.J. Morgane and J. Panksevv, eds., pp. 203-240, Dekker, New York.
  12. A.. C. A. Astlev. J. L. DeVito. J. M. Stein. and R. E. Walsh (1980) Functional analysis of hypothalamic control of the cardio- vascular responses accompanying emotional behavior. Fed. Proc. 29: 2487-2494.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeDoux, J., Iwata, J., Cicchetti, P., & Reis, D.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1988-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
2517-2529
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1738778520
Cited by
1,580
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 49
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-18974)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH38774)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
central amygdala, fear conditioning, classical fear conditioning, lateral hypothalamus, periaqueductal gray, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, freezing behavior, autonomic responses, fear extinction, ibotenic acid lesions, efferent projections
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Autonomic Nervous System, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Fear, Hypothalamus, Male, Mesencephalon, Synaptic Transmission, Periaqueductal Gray, Rats, Inbred Strains, Thalamus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review