Cited by 25Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Disrupting reconsolidation: memory erasure or blunting of emotional/motivational value?

Open access
Cogan, Elizabeth S., Shapses, Mark A., Robinson, Terry E., Tronson, Natalie C.·2019·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

When memories are retrieved they become labile, and subject to alteration by a process known as reconsolidation. Disruption of memory reconsolidation decreases the performance of learned responses, which is often attributed to erasure of the memory; in the case of Pavlovian learning, to a loss of the association between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US). However, an alternative interpretation is that disrupting reconsolidation does not erase memories, but blunts their emotional/motivational impact. It is difficult to parse the predictive vs. emotional/motivational value of CSs in non-human animals, but studies on variation in the form of conditioned responses (CRs) in a Pavlovian conditioned approach task suggest a way to do this. In this task a lever-CS paired with a food reward (US) acquires predictive value in all rats, but is attributed with emotional/motivational value to a greater extent in some rats (sign-trackers) than others (goal-trackers). We report that the post-retrieval administration of propranolol selectively attenuates a sign-tracking CR, and the associated neural activation of brain "motive circuits", while having no effect on conditioned orienting behavior in sign-trackers, or on goal-tracking CRs evoked by either a lever-CS or a tone-CS. We conclude that the disruption of reconsolidation by post-retrieval propranolol degrades the emotional/motivational impact of the CS, required for sign-tracking, but leaves the CS-US association intact. The possibility that post-retrieval interventions can reduce the emotional/motivational aspects of memories, without actually erasing them, has important implications for treating maladaptive memories that contribute to some psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41386-018-0082-0

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other drugs can reduce the motivating power of reward cues without disrupting their ability to convey learned information.

    “Conversely, other drugs can reduce the motivating power of reward cues, without disrupting their ability to convey learned information (Cogan et al., 2018).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Cogan et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Reichelt AC, Lee JL. Memory reconsolidation in aversive and appetitive settings. Front Behav Neurosci. 2013;7:118
  2. Kolber AJ. Therapeutic forgetting: the legal and ethical implications of memory dampening. Vand L Rev. 2006;59:1559.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cogan, E. S., Shapses, M. A., Robinson, T. E., & Tronson, N. C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Tronson, Natalie C.
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2018-05-03
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
399-407
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2802670763
Cited by
25
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (4p01da031656-05)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P01-DA-031656)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
memory reconsolidation, memory erasure, propranolol, Pavlovian conditioned approach, sign-tracking, goal tracking, maladaptive memory, rats
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Emotions, Male, Motivation, Nadolol, Propranolol, Reward, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review