Cited by 320Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Instant transformation of learned repulsion into motivational “wanting”

Open access
Robinson, Mike J.F., Berridge, Kent C.·2013·Current Biology

Abstract

Background Learned cues for pleasant reward often elicit desire, which, in addicts, may become compulsive. According to the dominant view in addiction neuroscience and reinforcement modeling, such desires are the simple products of learning, coming from a past association with reward outcome.Results We demonstrate that cravings are more than merely the products of accumulated pleasure memories-even a repulsive learned cue for unpleasantness can become suddenly desired via the activation of mesocorticolimbic circuitry. Rats learned repulsion toward a Pavlovian cue (a briefly-inserted metal lever) that always predicted an unpleasant Dead Sea saltiness sensation. Yet, upon first reencounter in a novel sodium-depletion state to promote mesocorticolimbic reactivity (reflected by elevated Fos activation in ventral tegmentum, nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, and the orbitofrontal prefrontal cortex), the learned cue was instantly transformed into an attractive and powerful motivational magnet. Rats jumped and gnawed on the suddenly attractive Pavlovian lever cue, despite never having tasted intense saltiness as anything other than disgusting.Conclusions Instant desire transformation of a learned cue contradicts views that Pavlovian desires are essentially based on previously learned values (e.g., prediction error or temporal difference models). Instead desire is recomputed at reencounter by integrating Pavlovian information with the current brain/physiological state. This powerful brain transformation reverses strong learned revulsion into avid attraction. When applied to addiction, related mesocorticolimbic transformations (e.g., drugs or neural sensitization) of cues for already-pleasant drug experiences could create even more intense cravings. This cue/state transformation helps define what it means to say that addiction hijacks brain limbic circuits of natural reward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.01.016

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sodium depletion causes a robust and highly specific motivation to consume sodium, such that salt solutions that are negative/aversive in the replete state become preferred/rewarding in sodium-depleted animals.

    “Sodium depletion causes a robust and highly specific motivation to consume sodium, such that salt solutions that are negative/aversive in the replete state become preferred/rewarding in sodium-depleted animals”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Toates F Motivational Systems 1986 New York Cambridge University Press
  2. [7]Rackham H Jones WHS Pliny the Elder (77AD) Natural history Cambridge Harvard University Press
  3. [20]Dickinson A Balleine B Hedonics cognitive motivation interface Pleasures of the Brain 2010 United States Oxford University Press 74 84

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, M. J. F., & Berridge, K. C.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Mike J.F.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
282-289
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016865357
Cited by
320
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 5
FWCI
12.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-63649, R01MH063649)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA015188, DA015188-01-A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
craving, classical conditioning, mesocorticolimbic circuitry, Fos activation, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, orbitofrontal cortex, sodium depletion, addiction, natural reward, neural sensitization
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Female, Food Deprivation, Learning, Motivation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Sodium Chloride, Behavior, Addictive, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Substance-Related Disorders, Rats, Pleasure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review