Cited by 97Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Consolidation/reconsolidation therapies for the prevention and treatment of PTSD and re-experiencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Astill Wright, Laurence, Horstmann, Louise, Holmes, Emily A., Bisson, Jonathan I.·2021·Translational Psychiatry

Abstract

Translational research highlights the potential of novel 'memory consolidation/reconsolidation therapies' to treat re-experiencing symptoms and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy of so-called memory consolidation/reconsolidation therapies in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for prevention and treatment of PTSD and symptoms of re-experiencing in children and adults (PROSPERO: CRD42020171167). RCTs were identified and rated for risk of bias. Available data was pooled to calculate risk ratios (RR) for PTSD prevalence and standardised mean differences (SMD) for PTSD/re-experiencing severity. Twenty-five RCTs met inclusion criteria (16 prevention and nine treatment trials). The methodology of most studies had a significant risk of bias. We found a large effect of reconsolidation interventions in the treatment of PTSD (11 studies, n = 372, SMD: -1.42 (-2.25 to -0.58), and a smaller positive effect of consolidation interventions in the prevention of PTSD (12 studies, n = 2821, RR: 0.67 (0.50 to 0.90). Only three protocols (hydrocortisone for PTSD prevention, Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories (RTM) for treatment of PTSD symptoms and cognitive task memory interference procedure with memory reactivation (MR) for intrusive memories) were superior to control. There is some emerging evidence of consolidation and reconsolidation therapies in the prevention and treatment of PTSD and intrusive memories specifically. Translational research should strictly adhere to protocols/procedures describing precise reconsolidation conditions (e.g. MR) to both increase the likelihood of positive findings and more confidently interpret negative findings of putative reconsolidation agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-021-01570-w

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A large proportion of the reviews (N=15) reported the distress-related outcomes of interventions employing a variety of psychological strategies including acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), behavioural therapy, goal setting and self-management strategies.

    “A large proportion of the reviews (N=15) reported the distress-related outcomes of interventions employing a variety of psychological strategies including acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), behavioural therapy, goal setting and self-management strategies.3444 50 62 6472 75 82”

    From Impact of healthcare interventions on distress following acute musculoskeletal/orthopaedic injury: A scoping review of systematic reviews (2024) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports PTSD symptom outcomes for RTM, a psychological intervention, so this paper supports the claim that a review reported distress-related outcomes of a psychological strategy. It does not establish the citing paper’s count of 15 reviews or report outcomes for the listed strategies such as acceptance and commitment therapy, goal setting, or self-management. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [30]Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2014.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Astill Wright, L., Horstmann, L., Holmes, E. A., & Bisson, J. I.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2021-09-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
453-453
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3191562800
Cited by
97
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 13
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (ISSF3 Clinical Primer)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, memory reconsolidation, memory consolidation, re-experiencing symptoms, intrusive memories, PTSD prevention, cortisol, memory reactivation, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adult, Child, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review