PreprintCited by 334Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Different mechanisms of fear extinction dependent on length of time since fear acquisition

Open access
Myers, Karyn M., Ressler, Kerry J., Davis, Michael·2006·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Fear extinction is defined as a decline in conditioned fear responses (CRs) following nonreinforced exposure to a feared conditioned stimulus (CS). Behavioral evidence indicates that extinction is a form of inhibitory learning: Extinguished fear responses reappear with the passage of time (spontaneous recovery), a shift of context (renewal), and unsignaled presentations of the unconditioned stimulus (reinstatement). However, there also is evidence to suggest that extinction is an "unlearning" process corresponding to depotentiation of potentiated synapses within the amygdala. Because depotentiation is induced more readily at short intervals following LTP induction and is not inducible at all at a sufficient delay, it may be that extinction initiated shortly following fear acquisition preferentially engages depotentiation/"unlearning," whereas extinction initiated at longer delays recruits a different mechanism. We investigated this possibility through a series of behavioral experiments examining the recoverability of conditioned fear following extinction. Consistent with an inhibitory learning mechanism of extinction, rats extinguished 24-72 h following acquisition exhibited moderate to strong reinstatement, renewal, and spontaneous recovery. In contrast, and consistent with an erasure mechanism, rats extinguished 10 min to 1 h after acquisition exhibited little or no reinstatement, renewal, or spontaneous recovery. These data support a model in which different neural mechanisms are recruited depending on the temporal delay of fear extinction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.119806

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pavlov, I.P. 1927. Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myers, K. M., Ressler, K. J., & Davis, M.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2006-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
216-223
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2156746271
Cited by
334
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9876754)
  • Woodruff Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 47840, R37MH047840, R01MH047840)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
fear extinction, spontaneous recovery, reinstatement, renewal, inhibitory learning, depotentiation, unlearning, long-term potentiation, amygdala, fear conditioning
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Male, Retention, Psychology, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review