Cited by 961Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Extinction-Reconsolidation Boundaries: Key to Persistent Attenuation of Fear Memories

Open access
Monfils, Marie-H., Cowansage, Kiriana K., Klann, Eric, LeDoux, Joseph E.·2009·Science

Abstract

Reversing Pavlov: Memories of fearful associations, such as hearing a tone before receiving a low-voltage shock, are labile when they are retrieved, such that the association can be extinguished or reconsolidated. Monfils et al. (p. 951 , published online 2 April) demonstrate that applying a standard extinction treatment (sounding the tone multiple times in the absence of any shocks) within a window of time during which reconsolidation would normally occur has the effect of overwriting the original memory. Rats treated in this fashion display much lower levels of renewal (fear induced by sounding the tone once by itself), reinstatement (fear induced by giving the shock once by itself), and spontaneous recovery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1167975

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Schiller D Cain CK Curley NG Schwartz JS Stern SA Ledoux JE Phelps EA Learn Mem 2008 15 394 18509113 PMC2414250

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monfils, M.-H., Cowansage, K. K., Klann, E., & LeDoux, J. E.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Monfils, Marie-H.
Venue
Science
Published
2009-05-15
Volume
324
Issue
5929
Pages
951-955
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2060160772
Cited by
960
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 65
FWCI
23.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH038774, P50MH058911, F31MH083472, K05MH067048, R01MH046516, R01MH091147)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-047384, NS-034007, R01NS047384)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
fear memory, extinction, reconsolidation blockade, memory reconsolidation, memory retrieval, fear extinction, fear conditioning, traumatic memory, rats
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Male, Memory, Phosphorylation, Mental Recall, Receptors, AMPA, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review