Cited by 65Neurological disorders and treatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in treatment-resistant alcohol use disorder: A double-blind randomized controlled multi-center trial

Open access
Bach, Patrick, Luderer, Mathias, Müller, Ulf Joachim, Jakobs, Martin, Baldermann, Juan Carlos, Voges, Jürgen, Kiening, Karl, Lux, Anke +9 more·2023·Translational Psychiatry

Abstract

Treatment resistance in alcohol use disorders (AUD) is a major problem for affected individuals and for society. In the search of new treatment options, few case studies using deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens have indicated positive effects in AUD. Here we report a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing active DBS ("DBS-EARLY ON") against sham stimulation ("DBS-LATE ON") over 6 months in n = 12 AUD inpatients. This 6-month blind phase was followed by a 12-month unblinded period in which all patients received active DBS. Continuous abstinence (primary outcome), alcohol use, alcohol craving, depressiveness, anxiety, anhedonia and quality of life served as outcome parameters. The primary intention-to-treat analysis, comparing continuous abstinence between treatment groups, did not yield statistically significant results, most likely due to the restricted number of participants. In light of the resulting limited statistical power, there is the question of whether DBS effects on secondary outcomes can nonetheless be interpreted as indicative of an therapeutic effect. Analyses of secondary outcomes provide evidence for this, demonstrating a significantly higher proportion of abstinent days, lower alcohol craving and anhedonia in the DBS-EARLY ON group 6 months after randomization. Exploratory responder analyses indicated that patients with high baseline alcohol craving, depressiveness and anhedonia responded to DBS. The results of this first randomized controlled trial are suggestive of beneficial effects of DBS in treatment-resistant AUD and encourage a replication in larger samples.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41398-023-02337-1

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that RCT, secondary outcome analyses showed a significantly higher proportion of abstinent days, lower alcohol craving, and lower anhedonia in the DBS group.

    “However, secondary outcome analyses showed a significantly higher proportion of abstinent days, lower alcohol craving, and anhedonia in the DBS group.”
  • In that RCT, findings suggested that patients with high baseline alcohol craving, depression, and anhedonia responded positively to DBS.

    “Furthermore, findings suggested that patients with high baseline alcohol craving, depression, and anhedonia responded positively to DBS”
  • In a recent RCT of 12 AUD inpatients comparing DBS to sham stimulation over 6 months, the primary intention-to-treat analysis did not yield statistically significant results for continuous abstinence.

    “In a recent RCT with 12 AUD inpatients, comparing DBS to sham stimulation over 6 months, the primary intention-to-treat analysis did not yield statistically significant results for continuous abstinence.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [48]First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams J. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders, clinician version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.
  2. [58]Voges J Müller U Bogerts B Münte T Heinze H-J Deep brain stimulation surgery for alcohol addiction World Neurosurg 2013 80 S28.e1 S.e31 22824557

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bach, P., Luderer, M., Müller, U. J., Jakobs, M., Baldermann, J. C., Voges, J., Kiening, K., Lux, A., Visser-Vandewalle, V., the DeBraSTRA study group, Klosterkötter, J., Huys, D., Sommer, W., Weber, T., Bogerts, B., Kuhn, J., & Mann, K.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • University Hospital Magdeburg (DE)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • Die Johanniter (DE)
Corresponding author
Bach, Patrick
Venue
Translational Psychiatry
Published
2023-02-08
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
49-49
ISSN
2158-3188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319593946
Cited by
65
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 9
FWCI
11.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bo 799/8-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, nucleus accumbens, alcohol craving, anhedonia, continuous abstinence, depressiveness, quality of life, responder analysis
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Alcoholism, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Nucleus Accumbens, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Deep Brain Stimulation, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review