Cited by 583Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Functional neuroimaging studies of alcohol cue reactivity: A quantitative meta-analysis and systematic review

Open access
Schacht, Joseph P., Anton, Raymond F., Myrick, Hugh·2013·Addiction Biology

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the neurobiology of alcohol cue reactivity is critical in identifying the neuropathology of alcohol use disorders (AUD) and developing treatments that may attenuate alcohol craving and reduce relapse risk. Functional neuroimaging studies have identified many brain areas in which alcohol cues elicit activation. However, extant studies have included relatively small numbers of cases, with AUD of varying severity, and have employed many different cue paradigms. We used activation likelihood estimation, a quantitative, coordinate-based meta-analytic method, to analyze the brain areas activated by alcohol-related cues across studies, and to examine whether these areas were differentially activated between cases and controls. Secondarily, we reviewed correlations between behavioral measures and cue-elicited activation, as well as treatment effects on such activation. Data analyzed were from 28 studies of 679 cases and 174 controls. Among cases, alcohol cues elicited robust activation of limbic and prefrontal regions, including ventral striatum, anterior cingulate and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. As compared to controls, cases demonstrated greater activation of parietal and temporal regions, including posterior cingulate, precuneus and superior temporal gyrus. Cue-elicited activation of ventral striatum was most frequently correlated with behavioral measures and most frequently reduced by treatment, but these results were often derived from region-of-interest analyses that interrogated only limbic regions. These findings support long-standing theories of mesolimbic involvement in alcohol cue processing, but suggest that cue-elicited activation of other brain areas may more clearly differentiate cases from controls. Prevention and treatment for AUD should consider interventions that may reduce cue-elicited activation of these areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00464.x

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging studies consistently demonstrate that exposure to alcohol cues increases activation in the NAc and striatum, which is correlated with subjective alcohol craving.

    “Neuroimaging studies consistently demonstrate that exposure to alcohol cues increases activation in the NAc and striatum, which is correlated with subjective alcohol craving”

    From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [113]

    The Discussion reports robust alcohol-cue activation in the ventral striatum, including a cluster encompassing the nucleus accumbens. The Results report correlations between ventral-striatal activation and in vivo craving in 3 of 5 relevant studies. The claim overstates the consistency of that correlation and does not distinguish the ventral striatum from the nucleus accumbens specifically; the Discussion also cautions that many correlations came from region-of-interest analyses. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schacht, J. P., Anton, R. F., & Myrick, H.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Schacht, Joseph P.
Venue
Addiction Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-10
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
121-133
ISSN
  • 1355-6215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1600
OpenAlex
W1551563638
Cited by
583
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA017633, K05AA017435, P50AA010761, T32AA007474)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
alcohol cue reactivity, alcoholism, alcohol craving, relapse risk, ventral striatum, mesolimbic system, anterior cingulate cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, superior temporal gyrus, alcohol prevention
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Cues, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Case-Control Studies, Behavior, Addictive, Prefrontal Cortex, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Positron-Emission Tomography, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review