The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration
Open accessAbstract
Bone defects combined with tumors, infections, or other bone diseases are challenging in clinical practice. Autologous and allogeneic grafts are two main traditional remedies, but they can cause a series of complications. To address this problem, researchers have constructed various implantable biomaterials. However, the original pathological microenvironment of bone defects, such as residual tumors, severe infection, or other bone diseases, could further affect bone regeneration. Thus, the rational design of versatile biomaterials with integrated bone therapy and regeneration functions is in great demand. Many strategies have been applied to fabricate smart stimuli-responsive materials for bone therapy and regeneration, with stimuli related to external physical triggers or endogenous disease microenvironments or involving multiple integrated strategies. Typical external physical triggers include light irradiation, electric and magnetic fields, ultrasound, and mechanical stimuli. These stimuli can transform the internal atomic packing arrangements of materials and affect cell fate, thus enhancing bone tissue therapy and regeneration. In addition to the external stimuli-responsive strategy, some specific pathological microenvironments, such as excess reactive oxygen species and mild acidity in tumors, specific pH reduction and enzymes secreted by bacteria in severe infection, and electronegative potential in bone defect sites, could be used as biochemical triggers to activate bone disease therapy and bone regeneration. Herein, we summarize and discuss the rational construction of versatile biomaterials with bone therapeutic and regenerative functions. The specific mechanisms, clinical applications, and existing limitations of the newly designed biomaterials are also clarified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage
Koh, T. J., & DiPietro, L. A. (2011) · Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1017/s1462399411001943 · Cited by 1,667
Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: A review
Nikolova, M. P., & Chavali, M. S. (2019) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005 · Cited by 907
3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds
Wang, C., Huang, W., Zhou, Y., He, L., He, Z., Chen, Z., He, X., Tian, S., Liao, J., Lu, B., et al. (2020) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.01.004 · Cited by 661
Macrophages modulate the viability and growth of human mesenchymal stem cells
Freytes, D. O., Kang, J. W., Marcos‐Campos, I., & Vunjak‐Novakovic, G. (2013) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.24357 · Cited by 255 · cited 1×
“M1 macrophages mainly regulate the osteoclastic process, while M2 macrophages are mainly involved in tissue repair during the middle and end stages of bone regeneration,(137) when they secrete a variety of cytokines, such as BMP-2 and VEGF, to ultimately induce bone formation.(138) In addition to secreting various cyt…”
BackgroundAutophagy in bone homeostasis and the onset of osteoporosis
Yin, X., Zhou, C., Li, J., Liu, R., Shi, B., Yuan, Q., & Zou, S. (2019) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-019-0058-7 · Cited by 235
Sadowska, J. M., & Ginebra, M.-P. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry B · doi:10.1039/d0tb01379j · Cited by 144
Cited by
Arif, Z. U., Khalid, M. Y., Noroozi, R., Sadeghianmaryan, A., Jalalvand, M., & Hossain, M. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.140 · Cited by 395
Stimuli-Responsive Polymer-Based Nanosystems for Cancer Theranostics
Wei, D., Sun, Y., Zhu, H., & Fu, Q. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c06019 · Cited by 303
Bioactive Materials for Bone Regeneration: Biomolecules and Delivery Systems
Szwed-Georgiou, A., Płociński, P., Kupikowska-Stobba, B., Urbaniak, M. M., Rusek-Wala, P., Szustakiewicz, K., Piszko, P., Krupa, A., Biernat, M., Gazińska, M., et al. (2023) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00609 · Cited by 269
Toward Sex-Specific Biomaterials Innovation: A Perspective
Koons, G. L. (2025) · ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00342 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, H., Cui, J., Lin, K., Xie, J., & Wang, X.
- Venue
- Bone Research
- Published
- 2022-02-23
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-17
- ISSN
- 2095-4700 (ISSN-L)
- 2095-6231
- OpenAlex
- W4214748463
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 25.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41413-021-00180-y
- The paper
- Wei, H., Cui, J., Lin, K., Xie, J., & Wang, X. (2022). Recent advances in smart stimuli-responsive biomaterials for bone therapeutics and regeneration. Bone Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-021-00180-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.