Cited by 11Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and Health

Probiotics’ effect on visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Porchia, Leonardo M., Vazquez-Marroquin, Gabriela, Ochoa-Précoma, Renata, Pérez-Fuentes, Ricardo, Gonzalez-Mejia, M. Elba·2022·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Probiotics are shown to alter the microbiota, leading to a favorable environment, in which weight loss and metabolic parameters are improve. However, the results on probiotics' effect on specific types of central adipose tissues, mainly visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), are conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review, aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotics on VAT and SAT. PubMed, SCOPUS, EBSCO, and LILACS databases were searched for studies that investigated the effect of probiotics on VAT and SAT. Fixed effects were used to calculate the pooled difference in means (DM) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Fourteen publications met the inclusion criteria, which consisted of 1523 participants. For VAT, overall, there was a significant decrease (DM = -3.63 cm 2, 95% CI: -5.08 to -2.17, p < 0.001). When stratified by type of probiotic, single Bifidobacterium (DM = -4.49 cm 2, 95% CI:-7.37 to -1.61, p = 0.002) and single Lactobacillus probiotics (DM = -3.84 cm 2, 95% CI:-5.74 to -1.93, p < 0.001) resulted in significant reductions. Mixed probiotics had no effect. For SAT, overall, there was a significant decrease (DM = -2.91 cm 2, 95% CI:-4.82 to -1.01, p = 0.003), and when stratified by type of probiotic, single Lactobacillus (DM = -3.39 cm 2, 95% CI:-5.90 to -0.88, p = 0.008) and mixed probiotics (DM = -5.97 cm 2, 95% CI:-10.32 to -1.62, p = 0.007) resulted in a significant decrease. Single Bifidobacterium probiotics had no effect. Using meta-regression, no association was observed between the total daily probiotic dose and VAT or SAT reduction. This study shows that probiotics have a beneficial effect on central adiposity. Single Lactobacillus-based probiotics reduced VAT and SAT, whereas Bifidobacterium-based probiotics reduce VAT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-022-01135-0

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Porchia, L. M., Vazquez-Marroquin, G., Ochoa-Précoma, R., Pérez-Fuentes, R., & Gonzalez-Mejia, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Mexican Social Security Institute (MX)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala (MX)
  • Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (MX)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2022-04-13
Volume
76
Issue
12
Pages
1646-1656
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W4223419578
Cited by
10
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Programa para el Desarrollo Profesional Docente (CA-160 FACMED) Vicerrectorıa de Investigacion, Benemerita Universidad Autonoma de Puebla, Mexico (GOMM-SAL21-G).
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotics, Bifidobacterium, subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, abdominal obesity, gut microbiota, weight loss, probiotic dosage, Lactobacillus
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Probiotics, Subcutaneous Fat, Intra-Abdominal Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review