Cited by 373Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies multiple longevity genes

Open access
Deelen, Joris, Evans, Daniel S., Arking, Dan E., Tesi, Niccolò, Nygaard, Marianne, Liu, Xiaomin, Wojczynski, Mary K., Biggs, Mary L., van der Spek, Ashley, Atzmon, Gil, Ware, Erin B., Sarnowski, Chloé, Smith, Albert V., Seppälä, Ilkka, Cordell, Heather J., Dose, Janina, Amin, Najaf, Arnold, Alice M., Ayers, Kristin L., Barzilai, Nir, Becker, Elizabeth J., Beekman, Marian, Blanché, Hélène, Christensen, Kaare, Christiansen, Lene, Collerton, Joanna C., Cubaynes, Sarah, Cummings, Steven R., Davies, Karen, Debrabant, Birgit, Deleuze, Jean-François, Duncan, Rachel, Faul, Jessica D., Franceschi, Claudio, Galan, Pilar, Gudnason, Vilmundur, Harris, Tamara B., Huisman, Martijn, Hurme, Mikko A., Jagger, Carol, Jansen, Iris, Jylhä, Marja, Kähönen, Mika, Karasik, David, Kardia, Sharon L. R., Kingston, Andrew, Kirkwood, Thomas B. L., Launer, Lenore J., Lehtimäki, Terho, Lieb, Wolfgang, Lyytikäinen, Leo-Pekka, Martin-Ruiz, Carmen, Min, Junxia, Nebel, Almut, Newman, Anne B., Nie, Chao, Nohr, Ellen A., Orwoll, Eric S., Perls, Thomas T., Province, Michael A., Psaty, Bruce M., Raitakari, Olli T., Reinders, Marcel J. T., Robine, Jean-Marie, Rotter, Jerome I., Sebastiani, Paola, Smith, Jennifer, Sørensen, Thorkild I. A., Taylor, Kent D., Uitterlinden, André G., van der Flier, Wiesje, van der Lee, Sven J., van Duijn, Cornelia M., van Heemst, Diana, Vaupel, James W., Weir, David, Ye, Kenny, Zeng, Yi, Zheng, Wanlin, Holstege, Henne, Kiel, Douglas P., Lunetta, Kathryn L., Slagboom, P. Eline, Murabito, Joanne M.·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

Human longevity is heritable, but genome-wide association (GWA) studies have had limited success. Here, we perform two meta-analyses of GWA studies of a rigorous longevity phenotype definition including 11,262/3484 cases surviving at or beyond the age corresponding to the 90th/99th survival percentile, respectively, and 25,483 controls whose age at death or at last contact was at or below the age corresponding to the 60th survival percentile. Consistent with previous reports, rs429358 (apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4) is associated with lower odds of surviving to the 90th and 99th percentile age, while rs7412 (ApoE ε2) shows the opposite. Moreover, rs7676745, located near GPR78 , associates with lower odds of surviving to the 90th percentile age. Gene-level association analysis reveals a role for tissue-specific expression of multiple genes in longevity. Finally, genetic correlation of the longevity GWA results with that of several disease-related phenotypes points to a shared genetic architecture between health and longevity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-11558-2

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Results of the European genome-wide association meta-analyses. Manhattan plot presenting the –log10 P-values from the European genome-wide association meta-analysis of the 90th percentile cases versus all controls (a) and 99th percentile cases versus all controls (b). The red line indicates the threshold for genome-wide significance (P ≤ 5 × 10−8), while the blue line indicates the threshold for genetic variants that showed a suggestive significant association (P ≤ 1 × 10−6). The variants that are reported in Table 2 are highlighted in green. For representation purposes, the maximum of the y-axis was set to 14. Regional association plot for the APOE (c) and GPR78 (d) loci based on the results from the 90th percentile cases versus all controls meta-analysis. The colour of the variants is based on the linkage disequilibrium with rs429358 (ApoE ε4) (c) or rs7676745 (d)
Fig. 1 Results of the European genome-wide association meta-analyses. Manhattan plot presenting the –log10 P-values from the European genome-wide association meta-analysis of the 90th percentile cases versus all controls (a) and 99th percentile cases versus all controls (b). The red line indicates the threshold for genome-wide significance (P ≤ 5 × 10−8), while the blue line indicates the threshold for genetic variants that showed a suggestive significant association (P ≤ 1 × 10−6). The variants that are reported in Table 2 are highlighted in green. For representation purposes, the maximum of the y-axis was set to 14. Regional association plot for the APOE (c) and GPR78 (d) loci based on the results from the 90th percentile cases versus all controls meta-analysis. The colour of the variants is based on the linkage disequilibrium with rs429358 (ApoE ε4) (c) or rs7676745 (d)CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Study-specific results for the genetic variants in APOE and GPR78. Forest plots for the ApoE ε4 (a) and ε2 (b) variants and rs7676745 (c) based on the results from the 90th percentile versus all controls analysis. The size of the boxes represents the sample size of the cohort. We had no data available for ApoE ε4 in LLFS and for rs7676745 in DKLS, GEHA Italy, GEHA Danish, LLS (combined with GEHA Dutch), Longevity, and Newcastle 85 + . The data for ApoE ε2 in FHS was based on imputation using the Haplotype Reference Consortium reference panel due to the low-imputation quality of this variant when using the 1000 Genomes reference panel
Fig. 2 Study-specific results for the genetic variants in APOE and GPR78. Forest plots for the ApoE ε4 (a) and ε2 (b) variants and rs7676745 (c) based on the results from the 90th percentile versus all controls analysis. The size of the boxes represents the sample size of the cohort. We had no data available for ApoE ε4 in LLFS and for rs7676745 in DKLS, GEHA Italy, GEHA Danish, LLS (combined with GEHA Dutch), Longevity, and Newcastle 85 + . The data for ApoE ε2 in FHS was based on imputation using the Haplotype Reference Consortium reference panel due to the low-imputation quality of this variant when using the 1000 Genomes reference panelCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Results of the trans-ethnic genome-wide association meta-analyses. Manhattan plot presenting the –log10 P-values from the trans-ethnic genome-wide association meta-analysis of the 90th percentile cases versus all controls (a) and 99th percentile cases versus all controls (b). The red line indicates the threshold for genome-wide significance (P ≤ 5 × 10−8), while the blue line indicates the threshold for genetic variants that showed a suggestive significant association (P ≤ 1 × 10−6)
Fig. 3 Results of the trans-ethnic genome-wide association meta-analyses. Manhattan plot presenting the –log10 P-values from the trans-ethnic genome-wide association meta-analysis of the 90th percentile cases versus all controls (a) and 99th percentile cases versus all controls (b). The red line indicates the threshold for genome-wide significance (P ≤ 5 × 10−8), while the blue line indicates the threshold for genetic variants that showed a suggestive significant association (P ≤ 1 × 10−6)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Oeppen, J. & Vaupel, J. W. Demography. Broken limits life Expect. Sci. 296, 1029–1031 (2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Deelen, J., Evans, D. S., Arking, D. E., Tesi, N., Nygaard, M., Liu, X., Wojczynski, M. K., Biggs, M. L., van der Spek, A., Atzmon, G., Ware, E. B., Sarnowski, C., Smith, A. V., Seppälä, I., Cordell, H. J., Dose, J., Amin, N., Arnold, A. M., Ayers, K. L., Barzilai, N., Becker, E. J., Beekman, M., Blanché, H., Christensen, K., Christiansen, L., Collerton, J. C., Cubaynes, S., Cummings, S. R., Davies, K., Debrabant, B., Deleuze, J.-F., Duncan, R., Faul, J. D., Franceschi, C., Galan, P., Gudnason, V., Harris, T. B., Huisman, M., Hurme, M. A., Jagger, C., Jansen, I., Jylhä, M., Kähönen, M., Karasik, D., Kardia, S. L. R., Kingston, A., Kirkwood, T. B. L., Launer, L. J., Lehtimäki, T., Lieb, W., Lyytikäinen, L.-P., Martin-Ruiz, C., Min, J., Nebel, A., Newman, A. B., Nie, C., Nohr, E. A., Orwoll, E. S., Perls, T. T., Province, M. A., Psaty, B. M., Raitakari, O. T., Reinders, M. J. T., Robine, J.-M., Rotter, J. I., Sebastiani, P., Smith, J., Sørensen, T. I. A., Taylor, K. D., Uitterlinden, A. G., van der Flier, W., van der Lee, S. J., van Duijn, C. M., van Heemst, D., Vaupel, J. W., Weir, D., Ye, K., Zeng, Y., Zheng, W., Holstege, H., Kiel, D. P., Lunetta, K. L., Slagboom, P. E., & Murabito, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • California Pacific Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • Centre for Life (GB)
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Sema4 (United States) (US)
  • Fondation Jean Dausset-CEPH (FR)
  • Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna (IT)
  • University of Iceland (IS)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Turku (FI)
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • The Lundquist Institute (US)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (DE)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Deelen, Joris
  • Evans, Daniel S.
  • Slagboom, P. Eline
  • Murabito, Joanne M.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-08-14
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
3669-3669
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967338832
Cited by
370
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Opin vísindi (Opin vísindi) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
human longevity, longevity genes, apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, APOE ε2, tissue-specific gene expression, genetic correlation, heritability of longevity, genetic overlap
MeSH terms
Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiP, Heat-Shock Proteins, Humans, Longevity, Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E2, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review