Cited by 894ECG Monitoring and AnalysisMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Automatic diagnosis of the 12-lead ECG using a deep neural network

Open access
Ribeiro, Antônio H., Ribeiro, Manoel Horta, Paixão, Gabriela M. M., Oliveira, Derick M., Gomes, Paulo R., Canazart, Jéssica A., Ferreira, Milton P. S., Andersson, Carl R. +4 more·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

The role of automatic electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis in clinical practice is limited by the accuracy of existing models. Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are models composed of stacked transformations that learn tasks by examples. This technology has recently achieved striking success in a variety of task and there are great expectations on how it might improve clinical practice. Here we present a DNN model trained in a dataset with more than 2 million labeled exams analyzed by the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais and collected under the scope of the CODE (Clinical Outcomes in Digital Electrocardiology) study. The DNN outperform cardiology resident medical doctors in recognizing 6 types of abnormalities in 12-lead ECG recordings, with F1 scores above 80% and specificity over 99%. These results indicate ECG analysis based on DNNs, previously studied in a single-lead setup, generalizes well to 12-lead exams, taking the technology closer to the standard clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-15432-4

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep learning models analyze the entire ECG waveform and can detect subtle patterns distributed across multiple leads.

    “Rather than focusing solely on established ECG features such as intervals, amplitudes, and segment morphology, deep learning models analyze the entire waveform and can detect subtle patterns distributed across multiple leads [9].”

    From Deep Learning Applied to 12-Lead ECGs for Detection of Structural, Metabolic and Systemic Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion says the end-to-end classifier takes the raw ECG signal and learns features rather than relying on features extracted by traditional methods. Methods > Neural network architecture and training says the input contains the sampled signal from each lead. The paper does not establish that the detected patterns are subtle or distributed across multiple leads. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7]Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1097–1105 (Curran Associates, Inc,. 2012).
  2. [37]Goldberger AL PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals Circulation 2000 101 E215 E220 10851218
  3. [49]Ioffe, S. & Szegedy, C. Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In Proc. 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Bach, F. & Blei, D.) 448–456 (JMLR.org, PMLR, 2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ribeiro, A. H., Ribeiro, M. H., Paixão, G. M. M., Oliveira, D. M., Gomes, P. R., Canazart, J. A., Ferreira, M. P. S., Andersson, C. R., Macfarlane, P. W., Meira, W., Schön, T. B., & Ribeiro, A. L. P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Ribeiro, Antônio H.
  • Schön, Thomas B.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-04-09
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1760-1760
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015226328
Cited by
894
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 235 · 2025: 207 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 14
FWCI
46.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (465518/2014-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
12-lead ECG, automated ECG analysis, deep neural network, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiology, Electrocardiography, Humans, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Neural Networks, Computer, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review