Cited by 19Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataECG Monitoring and AnalysisMachine Learning in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Federated Learning With Deep Neural Networks: A Privacy-Preserving Approach to Enhanced ECG Classification

Open access
Weimann, Kuba, Conrad, Tim O. F.·2024·IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics

Abstract

In response to increasing data privacy regulations, this work examines the use of federated learning for deep residual networks to diagnose cardiac abnormalities from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. This approach allows medical institutions to collaborate without exchanging raw patient data. We utilize the publicly available data from the PhysioNet/Computing in Cardiology Challenge 2021, featuring diverse ECG databases, to compare the classification performance of three federated learning methods against both central training with data sharing and isolated training scenarios. We show that federated learning outperforms ECG classifiers trained in isolation. In particular, our findings demonstrate that a globally trained model fine-tuned to specific local datasets surpasses non-collaborative approaches. This shows that models trained in federation learn general features that can be tailored to specific tasks. Furthermore, federated learning almost matches the performance of central training with data sharing on out-of-distribution data from non-participating institutions. These results highlight the ability of federated learning in developing models that generalize well across diverse patient data, without the need to share data among institutions, thus addressing data privacy concerns.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jbhi.2024.3427787

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ECG-specific studies have demonstrated the feasibility of federated training across heterogeneous datasets, including deep neural networks applied to raw 12-lead ECG signals.

    “ECG-specific studies have demonstrated the feasibility of federated training across heterogeneous datasets, including deep neural networks applied to raw 12-lead ECG signals [68].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.5555/3045118.3045167 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-3-030-01261-8_1 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weimann, K., & Conrad, T. O. F.
Affiliations
Zuse Institute Berlin (DE)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
Published
2024-11
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
6931-6943
ISSN
  • 2168-2194 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2208
OpenAlex
W4400646195
Cited by
19
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • German Ministry for Education and Research
  • Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data - BIFOLD (01IS18025A, 01IS18037I)
  • Forschungscampus MODAL (3FO18501)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
federated learning, ECG classification, cardiac abnormality detection, ResNet, data privacy, out-of-distribution generalization, fine-tuning, data sharing
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Electrocardiography, Humans, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Databases, Factual, Neural Networks, Computer, Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review