Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanism and evolution of the Zn-fingernail required for interaction of VARP with VPS29

Crawley-Snowdon, Harriet, Yang, Ji-Chun, Zaccai, Nathan R., Davis, Luther J., Wartosch, Lena, Herman, Emily K., Bright, Nicholas A., Swarbrick, James S., Collins, Brett M., Jackson, Lauren P., Seaman, Matthew N. J., Luzio, J. Paul, Dacks, Joel B., Neuhaus, David, Owen, David J.·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

VARP and TBC1D5 are accessory/regulatory proteins of retromer-mediated retrograde trafficking from endosomes. Using an NMR/X-ray approach, we determined the structure of the complex between retromer subunit VPS29 and a 12 residue, four-cysteine/Zn ++ microdomain, which we term a Zn-fingernail, two of which are present in VARP. Mutations that abolish VPS29:VARP binding inhibit trafficking from endosomes to the cell surface. We show that VARP and TBC1D5 bind the same site on VPS29 and can compete for binding VPS29 in vivo. The relative disposition of VPS29s in hetero-hexameric, membrane-attached, retromer arches indicates that VARP will prefer binding to assembled retromer coats through simultaneous binding of two VPS29s. The TBC1D5:VPS29 interaction is over one billion years old but the Zn-fingernail appears only in VARP homologues in the lineage directly giving rise to animals at which point the retromer/VARP/TBC1D5 regulatory network became fully established.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-18773-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AlphaFold2 predicted the association of a conserved surface-exposed hydrophobic cavity on VPS29 (defined by Leu152) with Pro-Leu (PL) motifs from TBC1D5 (141PL142) and VARP (713PL714), and for TBC1D5, the association of an additional 283Ile-Pro-Phe285 hydrophobic motif with VPS35.

    “Consistent with published structural data, AlphaFold2 predicted the association of a conserved surface-exposed hydrophobic cavity on VPS29 (defined by Leu152) with Pro-Leu (PL) motifs from TBC1D5 (141PL142) and VARP (713PL714) and for TBC1D5, the association of an additional 283Ile-Pro-Phe285 hydrophobic motif with VPS35 (Supplementary Fig. 5)77,82.”
  • The Retromer proximity proteome has highlighted a close association with regulators of small GTPases, including well-established Retromer accessory proteins TBC1D5 and ANKRD27.

    “The Retromer proximity proteome has highlighted a close association with regulators of small GTPases, including well-established Retromer accessory proteins TBC1D5 and ANKRD2777,82.”
  • The Retromer sub-domain proximity proteome included the RAB7 GAP TBC1D5, the RAB21/RAB32/RAB38 GEF VARP, and the RAB10 GEFs DENND4A and DENND4C.

    “These included known Retromer accessory proteins, the RAB7 GAP TBC1D546,77–81, the RAB21/RAB32/RAB38 GEF VARP (a.k.a. ANKRD27)47,48,82, and the RAB10 GEFs DENND4A and DENND4C83,84.”
  • In all cases, the accessory protein directly associates with Retromer through presentation of PL motifs to the same hydrophobic pocket in VPS29 that accommodates PL motifs from TBC1D5, ANKRD27 and the FAM21 subunit of the WASH complex.

    “In all cases, the accessory protein directly associates with Retromer through presentation of PL motifs to the same hydrophobic pocket in VPS29 that accommodates PL motifs from TBC1D5, ANKRD27 and the FAM21 subunit of the WASH complex44,77,82,114.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Chen, K. E., Healy, M. D. & Collins, B. M. Towards a molecular understanding of endosomal trafficking by Retromer and Retriever. Traffic 20, 465–478 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Seaman, M. N. The retromer complex - endosomal protein recycling and beyond. J. Cell Sci. 125, 4693–4702 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Trousdale, C. & Kim, K. Retromer: Structure, function, and roles in mammalian disease. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 94, 513–521 (2015). · DOI
  4. Koumandou, V. L. et al. Evolutionary reconstruction of the retromer complex and its function in Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Sci. 124, 1496–1509 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lee, J. J., Radice, G., Perkins, C. P. & Costantini, F. Identification and characterization of a novel, evolutionarily conserved gene disrupted by the murine H beta 58 embryonic lethal transgene insertion. Development 115, 277–288 (1992). · DOI
  6. Radice, G., Lee, J. J. & Costantini, F. H beta 58, an insertional mutation affecting early postimplantation development of the mouse embryo. Development 111, 801–811 (1991). · DOI
  7. Reitz, C. Retromer dysfunction and neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Genomics 19, 279–288 (2018). · DOI
  8. Harterink, M. et al. A SNX3-dependent retromer pathway mediates retrograde transport of the Wnt sorting receptor Wntless and is required for Wnt secretion. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 914–923 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Rojas, R., Kametaka, S., Haft, C. R. & Bonifacino, J. S. Interchangeable but essential functions of SNX1 and SNX2 in the association of retromer with endosomes and the trafficking of mannose 6-phosphate receptors. Mol. Cell Biol. 27, 1112–1124 (2007). · DOI
  10. Temkin, P. et al. SNX27 mediates retromer tubule entry and endosome-to-plasma membrane trafficking of signalling receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 715–721 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wassmer, T. et al. A loss-of-function screen reveals SNX5 and SNX6 as potential components of the mammalian retromer. J. Cell Sci. 120, 45–54 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gomez, T. S. & Billadeau, D. D. A FAM21-containing WASH complex regulates retromer-dependent sorting. Dev. Cell 17, 699–711 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Harbour, M. E. et al. The cargo-selective retromer complex is a recruiting hub for protein complexes that regulate endosomal tubule dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 123, 3703–3717 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  14. Jimenez-Orgaz, A. et al. Control of RAB7 activity and localization through the retromer-TBC1D5 complex enables RAB7-dependent mitophagy. EMBO J. 37, 235–254 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Seaman, M. N., Harbour, M. E., Tattersall, D., Read, E. & Bright, N. Membrane recruitment of the cargo-selective retromer subcomplex is catalysed by the small GTPase Rab7 and inhibited by the Rab-GAP TBC1D5. J. Cell Sci. 122, 2371–2382 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  16. Shi, A. et al. Regulation of endosomal clathrin and retromer-mediated endosome to Golgi retrograde transport by the J-domain protein RME-8. EMBO J. 28, 3290–3302 (2009). · DOI
  17. Zhang, J. et al. Rabankyrin-5 interacts with EHD1 and Vps26 to regulate endocytic trafficking and retromer function. Traffic 13, 745–757 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hesketh, G. G. et al. VARP is recruited on to endosomes by direct interaction with retromer, where together they function in export to the cell surface. Dev. Cell 29, 591–606 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  19. McGough, I. J. et al. Identification of molecular heterogeneity in SNX27-retromer-mediated endosome-to-plasma-membrane recycling. J. Cell Sci. 127, 4940–4953 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Burgo, A. et al. Role of Varp, a Rab21 exchange factor and TI-VAMP/VAMP7 partner, in neurite growth. EMBO Rep. 10, 1117–1124 (2009). · DOI
  21. Schafer, I. B. et al. The binding of Varp to VAMP7 traps VAMP7 in a closed, fusogenically inactive conformation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1300–1309 (2012). · DOI
  22. Tamura, K. et al. Varp is a novel Rab32/38-binding protein that regulates Tyrp1 trafficking in melanocytes. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 2900–2908 (2009). · DOI
  23. Zhang, X., He, X., Fu, X. Y. & Chang, Z. Varp is a Rab21 guanine nucleotide exchange factor and regulates endosome dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 119, 1053–1062 (2006). · DOI
  24. Burgo, A. et al. A molecular network for the transport of the TI-VAMP/VAMP7 vesicles from cell center to periphery. Dev. Cell 23, 166–180 (2012). · DOI
  25. Linding, R., Russell, R. B., Neduva, V. & Gibson, T. J. GlobPlot: exploring protein sequences for globularity and disorder. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3701–3708 (2003). · DOI
  26. Collins, B. M., Skinner, C. F., Watson, P. J., Seaman, M. N. & Owen, D. J. Vps29 has a phosphoesterase fold that acts as a protein interaction scaffold for retromer assembly. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 594–602 (2005). · DOI
  27. Eustermann, S. et al. Structural basis of detection and signaling of DNA single-strand breaks by human PARP-1. Mol. Cell 60, 742–754 (2015). · DOI
  28. Gobl, C., Madl, T., Simon, B. & Sattler, M. NMR approaches for structural analysis of multidomain proteins and complexes in solution. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson Spectrosc. 80, 26–63 (2014). · DOI
  29. Mackereth, C. D. et al. Multi-domain conformational selection underlies pre-mRNA splicing regulation by U2AF. Nature 475, 408–411 (2011). · DOI
  30. Wishart, D. S. & Sykes, B. D. The 13C chemical-shift index: a simple method for the identification of protein secondary structure using 13C chemical-shift data. J. Biomol. NMR 4, 171–180 (1994). · DOI
  31. Harbour, M. E. & Seaman, M. N. Evolutionary variations of VPS29, and their implications for the heteropentameric model of retromer. Commun. Integr. Biol. 4, 619–622 (2011). · DOI
  32. Krissinel, E. Stock-based detection of protein oligomeric states in jsPISA. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W314–W319 (2015). · DOI
  33. Andreini, C., Bertini, I. & Cavallaro, G. Minimal functional sites allow a classification of zinc sites in proteins. PLoS ONE 6, e26325 (2011). · DOI
  34. Kluska, K., Adamczyk, J. & Krezel, A. Metal binding properties of zinc fingers with a naturally altered metal binding site. Metallomics 10, 248–263 (2018). · DOI
  35. Medina, A. et al. ALEPH: a network-oriented approach for the generation of fragment-based libraries and for structure interpretation. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 76, 193–208 (2020). · DOI
  36. Steinberg, F. et al. A global analysis of SNX27-retromer assembly and cargo specificity reveals a function in glucose and metal ion transport. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 461–471 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Seaman, M. N. J., Mukadam, A. S. & Breusegem, S. Y. Inhibition of TBC1D5 activates Rab7a and can enhance the function of the retromer cargo-selective complex. J. Cell Sci. 131, 217398 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  38. de Beer, T. et al. Molecular mechanism of NPF recognition by EH domains. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1018–1022 (2000). · DOI
  39. Edeling, M. A., Smith, C. & Owen, D. Life of a clathrin coat: insights from clathrin and AP structures. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 32–44 (2006). · DOI
  40. Mukhopadhyay, A., Pan, X., Lambright, D. G. & Tissenbaum, H. A. An endocytic pathway as a target of tubby for regulation of fat storage. EMBO Rep. 8, 931–938 (2007). · DOI
  41. Barlocher, K. et al. Structural insights into Legionella RidL-Vps29 retromer subunit interaction reveal displacement of the regulator TBC1D5. Nat. Commun. 8, 1543 (2017). · DOI
  42. Jia, D. et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into regulation of the retromer coat by TBC1d5. Nat. Commun. 7, 13305 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Romano-Moreno, M. et al. Molecular mechanism for the subversion of the retromer coat by the Legionella effector RidL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E11151–E11160 (2017). · DOI
  44. Yao, J. et al. Mechanism of inhibition of retromer transport by the bacterial effector RidL. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1446–E1454 (2018). · DOI
  45. Haft, C. R. et al. Human orthologs of yeast vacuolar protein sorting proteins Vps26, 29, and 35: assembly into multimeric complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 4105–4116 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kovtun, O. et al. Structure of the membrane-assembled retromer coat determined by cryo-electron tomography. Nature 561, 561–564 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kendall, A. K. et al. Mammalian retromer is an adaptable scaffold for cargo sorting from endosomes. Structure 28, 393–405 e394 (2020). · DOI
  48. Lucas, M. et al. Structural mechanism for cargo recognition by the retromer complex. Cell 167, 1623–1635.e1614 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Norwood, S. J. et al. Assembly and solution structure of the core retromer protein complex. Traffic 12, 56–71 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Dennis, M. K. et al. BLOC-1 and BLOC-3 regulate VAMP7 cycling to and from melanosomes via distinct tubular transport carriers. J. Cell Biol. 214, 293–308 (2016). · DOI
  51. Itzhak, D. N., Tyanova, S., Cox, J. & Borner, G. H. Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein subcellular localization. Elife 5, e16950 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  52. Roy, S., Leidal, A. M., Ye, J., Ronen, S. M. & Debnath, J. Autophagy-dependent shuttling of TBC1D5 controls plasma membrane translocation of GLUT1 and glucose uptake. Mol. Cell 67, 84–95 e85 (2017). · DOI
  53. Ye, H. et al. Retromer subunit, VPS29, regulates synaptic transmission and is required for endolysosomal function in the aging brain. Elife 9, e51977 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Gabernet-Castello, C., O’Reilly, A. J., Dacks, J. B. & Field, M. C. Evolution of Tre-2/Bub2/Cdc16 (TBC) Rab GTPase-activating proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 1574–1583 (2013). · DOI
  55. Herman, E. K., Ali, M., Field, M. C. & Dacks, J. B. Regulation of early endosomes across eukaryotes: evolution and functional homology of Vps9 proteins. Traffic 19, 546–563 (2018). · DOI
  56. Elias, M., Brighouse, A., Gabernet-Castello, C., Field, M. C. & Dacks, J. B. Sculpting the endomembrane system in deep time: high resolution phylogenetics of Rab GTPases. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2500–2508 (2012). · DOI
  57. Kloepper, T. H., Kienle, C. N. & Fasshauer, D. An elaborate classification of SNARE proteins sheds light on the conservation of the eukaryotic endomembrane system. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3463–3471 (2007). · DOI
  58. Vedovato, M., Rossi, V., Dacks, J. B. & Filippini, F. Comparative analysis of plant genomes allows the definition of the “Phytolongins”: a novel non-SNARE longin domain protein family. BMC Genomics 10, 510 (2009). · DOI
  59. Bean, B. D. et al. Rab5-family guanine nucleotide exchange factors bind retromer and promote its recruitment to endosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 1119–1128 (2015). · DOI
  60. Goody, R. S., Rak, A. & Alexandrov, K. The structural and mechanistic basis for recycling of Rab proteins between membrane compartments. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 62, 1657–1670 (2005). · DOI
  61. Simpson, J. C. et al. A role for the small GTPase Rab21 in the early endocytic pathway. J. Cell Sci. 117, 6297–6311 (2004). · DOI
  62. Stenmark, H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 513–525 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  63. Vranken, W. F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59, 687–696 (2005). · DOI
  64. Schwieters, C. D., Kuszewski, J. J., Tjandra, N. & Clore, G. M. The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J. Magn. Reson 160, 65–73 (2003). · DOI
  65. Hierro, A. et al. Functional architecture of the retromer cargo-recognition complex. Nature 449, 1063–1067 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  66. Swarbrick, J. D. et al. VPS29 is not an active metallo-phosphatase but is a rigid scaffold required for retromer interaction with accessory proteins. PLoS ONE 6, e20420 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  67. Kuszewski, J., Gronenborn, A. M. & Clore, G. M. Improving the quality of NMR and crystallographic protein structures by means of a conformational database potential derived from structure databases. Protein Sci. 5, 1067–1080 (1996). · DOI
  68. Hommel, U., Harvey, T. S., Driscoll, P. C. & Campbell, I. D. Human epidermal growth factor. High resolution solution structure and comparison with human transforming growth factor alpha. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 271–282 (1992). · DOI
  69. Laskowski, R. A., Rullmannn, J. A., MacArthur, M. W., Kaptein, R. & Thornton, J. M. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 8, 477–486 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  70. Diamond, R. Coordinate-based cluster analysis. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 51, 127–135 (1995). · DOI
  71. Bright, N. A., Davis, L. J. & Luzio, J. P. Endolysosomes are the principal intracellular sites of acid hydrolase activity. Curr. Biol. 26, 2233–2245 (2016). · DOI
  72. Eddy, S. R. A probabilistic model of local sequence alignment that simplifies statistical significance estimation. PLoS Comput Biol. 4, e1000069 (2008). · DOI
  73. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  74. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: a Conserved Domain Database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D225–D229 (2011). · DOI
  75. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Crawley-Snowdon, H., Yang, J.-C., Zaccai, N. R., Davis, L. J., Wartosch, L., Herman, E. K., Bright, N. A., Swarbrick, J. S., Collins, B. M., Jackson, L. P., Seaman, M. N. J., Luzio, J. P., Dacks, J. B., Neuhaus, D., & Owen, D. J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-10-06
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
35
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (090909/Z/09/Z)
  • RCUK | Medical Research Council (MR/R009015/1)
  • RCUK | MRC | Medical Research Foundation (U105178934)
  • Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1136021, APP1156493)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM119525)
  • Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review