CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 307Microbial metabolism and enzyme functionMetalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteinsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

The reductive glycine pathway allows autotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans

Open access
Sánchez-Andrea, Irene, Guedes, Iame Alves, Hornung, Bastian, Boeren, Sjef, Lawson, Christopher E., Sousa, Diana Z., Bar-Even, Arren, Claassens, Nico J., Stams, Alfons J. M.·2020·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-18906-7PMC PMC7547702
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Six CO 2 fixation pathways are known to operate in photoautotrophic and chemoautotrophic microorganisms. Here, we describe chemolithoautotrophic growth of the sulphate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (strain G11) with hydrogen and sulphate as energy substrates. Genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analyses reveal that D. desulfuricans assimilates CO 2 via the reductive glycine pathway, a seventh CO 2 fixation pathway. In this pathway, CO 2 is first reduced to formate, which is reduced and condensed with a second CO 2 to generate glycine. Glycine is further reduced in D. desulfuricans by glycine reductase to acetyl-P, and then to acetyl-CoA, which is condensed with another CO 2 to form pyruvate. Ammonia is involved in the operation of the pathway, which is reflected in the dependence of the autotrophic growth rate on the ammonia concentration. Our study demonstrates microbial autotrophic growth fully supported by this highly ATP-efficient CO 2 fixation pathway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-18906-7

Cites

84 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Comparison of growth of D. desulfuricans under autotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. Autotrophic growth (H2/CO2/sulphate) after some adaptation transfers (a) is similar to heterotrophic growth (acetate/H2/CO2/sulphate (b). Increasing ammonium concentrations do have an effect on the autotrophic growth (c), but not on heterotrophic growth (d). All growth experiments were performed at 30 °C and 175 rpm in triplicates in 250 ml glass bottles containing 100 ml anoxic minimal medium. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Source data are provided with this paper, and raw data can be found in Supplementary Data 1.
Fig. 1 Comparison of growth of D. desulfuricans under autotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. Autotrophic growth (H2/CO2/sulphate) after some adaptation transfers (a) is similar to heterotrophic growth (acetate/H2/CO2/sulphate (b). Increasing ammonium concentrations do have an effect on the autotrophic growth (c), but not on heterotrophic growth (d). All growth experiments were performed at 30 °C and 175 rpm in triplicates in 250 ml glass bottles containing 100 ml anoxic minimal medium. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Source data are provided with this paper, and raw data can be found in Supplementary Data 1.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Volcano plot for protein up-regulation of autotrophic vs. heterotrophic growth conditions. Autotrophic (H2/CO2/sulphate) and heterotrophic (acetate/H2/CO2/sulphate) cultivations were performed in four biological replicates to perform proteomic analysis. Growth conditions were 30 °C and 175 rpm in 250 ml glass bottles containing 100 ml anoxic minimal medium. ACK (acetate kinase); ACS (acetyl-CoA synthetase); FDHa, FDHb, and FDHc (formate dehydrogenase: alpha, beta and gamma subunits); FTL (formate–tetrahydrofolate ligase); METCD (methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase); GCS_Pa and GCS_Pb (glycine dehydrogenase/decarboxylating, subunit 1 and 2, glycine cleavage system P-protein); GCS_H (glycine cleavage system H-protein); GCS_T (aminomethyltransferase, glycine cleavage system T-protein); GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase); GR_A (glycine reductase complex, component A); GR_Ba (glycine reductase complex; component B, subunit beta); GR_Ca and GR_Cb (glycine reductase complex, component C, subunit alpha and beta); GR_TRX (thioredoxin domain); GR_TRXR (thioredoxin-disulphide reductase); GS (glutamate-ammonia ligase or glutamine synthetase); METCD (methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase); PFOR (pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase) and SHMT (serine hydroxymethyltransferase). Source data are provided with this paper, and complete proteomics data can be found in Supplementary Data 5.
Fig. 2 Volcano plot for protein up-regulation of autotrophic vs. heterotrophic growth conditions. Autotrophic (H2/CO2/sulphate) and heterotrophic (acetate/H2/CO2/sulphate) cultivations were performed in four biological replicates to perform proteomic analysis. Growth conditions were 30 °C and 175 rpm in 250 ml glass bottles containing 100 ml anoxic minimal medium. ACK (acetate kinase); ACS (acetyl-CoA synthetase); FDHa, FDHb, and FDHc (formate dehydrogenase: alpha, beta and gamma subunits); FTL (formate–tetrahydrofolate ligase); METCD (methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase); GCS_Pa and GCS_Pb (glycine dehydrogenase/decarboxylating, subunit 1 and 2, glycine cleavage system P-protein); GCS_H (glycine cleavage system H-protein); GCS_T (aminomethyltransferase, glycine cleavage system T-protein); GDH (glutamate dehydrogenase); GR_A (glycine reductase complex, component A); GR_Ba (glycine reductase complex; component B, subunit beta); GR_Ca and GR_Cb (glycine reductase complex, component C, subunit alpha and beta); GR_TRX (thioredoxin domain); GR_TRXR (thioredoxin-disulphide reductase); GS (glutamate-ammonia ligase or glutamine synthetase); METCD (methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase); PFOR (pyruvate: ferredoxin oxidoreductase) and SHMT (serine hydroxymethyltransferase). Source data are provided with this paper, and complete proteomics data can be found in Supplementary Data 5.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Comparative omics for genes and proteins involved in the reductive glycine pathway. Plots per enzyme represent the log10-fold change in autotrophic condition (H2/CO2/sulphate) versus heterotrophic condition (acetate/H2/CO2/sulphate) and versus heterotrophic growth on lactate as sole energy source (lactate/CO2/sulphate), for both proteome and transcriptome analysis. Long-dashed lines are the transporters involved, short dashes incidate the alternative variant route via serine. Cultures were performed in four biological replicates. Growth conditions were 30 °C and 175 rpm in 250 ml glass bottles containing 100 ml anoxic minimal medium. Abbreviations are described in the legend of Fig. 2, with the addition of: ATP/ADP (adenosine tri/diphosphate); CoA (co-enzyme A); cytred/ox (reduced/oxidised cytochrome); FDHap (formate dehydrogenase, accessory protein); FT (formate transporter); GR_Bb (glycine reductase complex; component B, subunit alpha); NAD(P)H (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate)); SDA (serine dehydratase-like); THF: tetrahydrofolate; ND: not detected. Source data are provided with this paper, and complete transcriptomics and proteomics data can be found in Supplementary Data 4 and 5, respectively.
Fig. 3 Comparative omics for genes and proteins involved in the reductive glycine pathway. Plots per enzyme represent the log10-fold change in autotrophic condition (H2/CO2/sulphate) versus heterotrophic condition (acetate/H2/CO2/sulphate) and versus heterotrophic growth on lactate as sole energy source (lactate/CO2/sulphate), for both proteome and transcriptome analysis. Long-dashed lines are the transporters involved, short dashes incidate the alternative variant route via serine. Cultures were performed in four biological replicates. Growth conditions were 30 °C and 175 rpm in 250 ml glass bottles containing 100 ml anoxic minimal medium. Abbreviations are described in the legend of Fig. 2, with the addition of: ATP/ADP (adenosine tri/diphosphate); CoA (co-enzyme A); cytred/ox (reduced/oxidised cytochrome); FDHap (formate dehydrogenase, accessory protein); FT (formate transporter); GR_Bb (glycine reductase complex; component B, subunit alpha); NAD(P)H (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate)); SDA (serine dehydratase-like); THF: tetrahydrofolate; ND: not detected. Source data are provided with this paper, and complete transcriptomics and proteomics data can be found in Supplementary Data 4 and 5, respectively.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Confirmation of the reductive glycine pathway via 13C-labelled metabolomics. 13C-labelled carbon signature expected in the serine route (a), glycine route (b) and obtained pattern of D. desulfuricans grown in autotrophic conditions (c) with addition of 13C-formate. Autotrophic cultures (H2/CO2/sulphate) were supplemented with 75 mM sodium 13C-formate (99% 13C, Sigma-Aldrich) and grown in 30 mL bottles in 10 mL anoxic medium, cultivations were performed in biological triplicates. The dotted arrows indicate anaplerotic production of oxaloacetate via pyruvate carboxylase. Gly (glycine); Ser (serine); Ala (alanine); Val (valine); Leu (leucine); Thr (threonine); Pro (proline). Source data are provided with this paper, and data can be found in Supplementary Data 6.
Fig. 4 Confirmation of the reductive glycine pathway via 13C-labelled metabolomics. 13C-labelled carbon signature expected in the serine route (a), glycine route (b) and obtained pattern of D. desulfuricans grown in autotrophic conditions (c) with addition of 13C-formate. Autotrophic cultures (H2/CO2/sulphate) were supplemented with 75 mM sodium 13C-formate (99% 13C, Sigma-Aldrich) and grown in 30 mL bottles in 10 mL anoxic medium, cultivations were performed in biological triplicates. The dotted arrows indicate anaplerotic production of oxaloacetate via pyruvate carboxylase. Gly (glycine); Ser (serine); Ala (alanine); Val (valine); Leu (leucine); Thr (threonine); Pro (proline). Source data are provided with this paper, and data can be found in Supplementary Data 6.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 307

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sánchez-Andrea, I., Guedes, I. A., Hornung, B., Boeren, S., Lawson, C. E., Sousa, D. Z., Bar-Even, A., Claassens, N. J., & Stams, A. J. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Claassens, Nico J.
  • Stams, Alfons J. M.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-10-09
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
5090-5090
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-020-18906-7
PMC
PMC7547702
OpenAlex
W3092013556
Cited by
306
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 5
FWCI
12.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (024.002.002, Gravitation Grant 024.002.002, SIAM Gravitation Grant 024.002.002, 019.163LW.035, VI.Veni.192.156)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
reductive glycine pathway, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, chemolithoautotrophic growth, CO2 fixation, sulfate reduction, glycine reductase, acetyl-CoA, sulfate-reducing bacteria
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Ammonia, Bacterial Proteins, Carbon Dioxide, Glycine, Genome, Bacterial, Gene Expression Profiling, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, Autotrophic Processes, Metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review