Cited by 123Barrier Structure and Function StudiesNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Post-capillary venules are the key locus for transcytosis-mediated brain delivery of therapeutic nanoparticles

Open access
Kucharz, Krzysztof, Kristensen, Kasper, Johnsen, Kasper Bendix, Lund, Mette Aagaard, Lønstrup, Micael, Moos, Torben, Andresen, Thomas Lars, Lauritzen, Martin Johannes·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

Effective treatments of neurodegenerative diseases require drugs to be actively transported across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, nanoparticle drug carriers explored for this purpose show negligible brain uptake, and the lack of basic understanding of nanoparticle-BBB interactions underlies many translational failures. Here, using two-photon microscopy in mice, we characterize the receptor-mediated transcytosis of nanoparticles at all steps of delivery to the brain in vivo. We show that transferrin receptor-targeted liposome nanoparticles are sequestered by the endothelium at capillaries and venules, but not at arterioles. The nanoparticles move unobstructed within endothelium, but transcytosis-mediated brain entry occurs mainly at post-capillary venules, and is negligible in capillaries. The vascular location of nanoparticle brain entry corresponds to the presence of perivascular space, which facilitates nanoparticle movement after transcytosis. Thus, post-capillary venules are the point-of-least resistance at the BBB, and compared to capillaries, provide a more feasible route for nanoparticle drug carriers into the brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-24323-1

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. [1]Abbott NJ Patabendige AA Dolman DE Yusof SR Begley DJ Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier Neurobiol. Dis. 2010 37 13 25 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 19664713 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Tietz S Engelhardt B Brain barriers: crosstalk between complex tight junctions and adherens junctions J. Cell Biol. 2015 209 493 506 10.1083/jcb.201412147 26008742 PMC4442813 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Pardridge WM Drug transport across the blood-brain barrier J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2012 32 1959 1972 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.126 22929442 PMC3494002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Mollgard K Dziegielewska KM Holst CB Habgood MD Saunders NR Brain barriers and functional interfaces with sequential appearance of ABC efflux transporters during human development Sci. Rep. 2017 7 11603 10.1038/s41598-017-11596-0 28912477 PMC5599687 · DOI
  5. [5]De Bock M Into rather unexplored terrain-transcellular transport across the blood-brain barrier Glia 2016 64 1097 1123 10.1002/glia.22960 26852907 · DOI
  6. [6]Ben-Zvi A Mfsd2a is critical for the formation and function of the blood-brain barrier Nature 2014 509 507 511 10.1038/nature13324 24828040 PMC4134871 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [7]Banks WA From blood-brain barrier to blood-brain interface: new opportunities for CNS drug delivery Nat. Rev. Drug Disco. 2016 15 275 292 10.1038/nrd.2015.21 26794270 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [8]Pardridge WM Drug and gene delivery to the brain: the vascular route Neuron 2002 36 555 558 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01054-1 12441045 · DOI
  9. [9]Allen TM Cullis PR Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream Science 2004 303 1818 1822 10.1126/science.1095833 15031496 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [10]Sercombe L Advances and challenges of liposome assisted drug delivery Front Pharm. 2015 6 286 10.3389/fphar.2015.00286 PMC4664963 26648870 · DOI
  11. [11]Couch JA Addressing safety liabilities of TfR bispecific antibodies that cross the blood-brain barrier Sci. Transl. Med. 2013 5 181 112 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005338 23636093 · DOI
  12. [12]Pardridge WM Blood-brain barrier and delivery of protein and gene therapeutics to brain Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 11 373 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00373 31998120 PMC6966240 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [13]Johnsen KB Burkhart A Thomsen LB Andresen TL Moos T Targeting the transferrin receptor for brain drug delivery Prog. Neurobiol. 2019 181 101665 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101665 31376426 · DOI
  14. [15]Kariolis, M. S. et al. Brain delivery of therapeutic proteins using an Fc fragment blood-brain barrier transport vehicle in mice and monkeys. Sci. Transl. Med.12, eaay1359 (2020). 32461332
  15. [16]Cabezon I Trafficking of gold nanoparticles coated with the 8D3 anti-transferrin receptor antibody at the mouse blood-brain barrier Mol. Pharm. 2015 12 4137 4145 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5b00597 26440359 · DOI
  16. [17]Engelhardt B Vajkoczy P Weller RO The movers and shapers in immune privilege of the CNS Nat. Immunol. 2017 18 123 131 10.1038/ni.3666 28092374 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [18]Wardlaw JM Perivascular spaces in the brain: anatomy, physiology and pathology Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020 16 137 153 10.1038/s41582-020-0312-z 32094487 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [20]Lee HJ Engelhardt B Lesley J Bickel U Pardridge WM Targeting rat anti-mouse transferrin receptor monoclonal antibodies through blood-brain barrier in mouse J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 2000 292 1048 1052 10688622
  19. [21]Johnsen KB Antibody affinity and valency impact brain uptake of transferrin receptor-targeted gold nanoparticles Theranostics 2018 8 3416 3436 10.7150/thno.25228 29930740 PMC6010987 · DOI
  20. [22]Johnsen KB Modulating the antibody density changes the uptake and transport at the blood-brain barrier of both transferrin receptor-targeted gold nanoparticles and liposomal cargo J. Control Release 2019 295 237 249 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.01.005 30633947 · DOI
  21. [23]Khennouf L Active role of capillary pericytes during stimulation-induced activity and spreading depolarization Brain 2018 141 2032 2046 10.1093/brain/awy143 30053174 PMC6022680 · DOI
  22. [24]Cai C Stimulation-induced increases in cerebral blood flow and local capillary vasoconstriction depend on conducted vascular responses Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2018 115 E5796 E5804 10.1073/pnas.1707702115 29866853 PMC6016812 · DOI
  23. [25]Owens T Bechmann I Engelhardt B Perivascular spaces and the two steps to neuroinflammation J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2008 67 1113 1121 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31818f9ca8 19018243 · DOI
  24. [26]Santisakultarm TP In vivo two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy reveals cardiac- and respiration-dependent pulsatile blood flow in cortical blood vessels in mice Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012 302 H1367 H1377 10.1152/ajpheart.00417.2011 22268102 PMC3330793 · DOI
  25. [27]Wiley DT Webster P Gale A Davis ME Transcytosis and brain uptake of transferrin-containing nanoparticles by tuning avidity to transferrin receptor Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2013 110 8662 8667 10.1073/pnas.1307152110 23650374 PMC3666717 · DOI
  26. [28]Clark AJ Davis ME Increased brain uptake of targeted nanoparticles by adding an acid-cleavable linkage between transferrin and the nanoparticle core Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2015 112 12486 12491 10.1073/pnas.1517048112 26392563 PMC4603510 · DOI
  27. [29]Lindqvist A Friden M Hammarlund-Udenaes M Pharmacokinetic considerations of nanodelivery to the brain: using modeling and simulations to predict the outcome of liposomal formulations Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016 92 173 182 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.07.003 27393342 · DOI
  28. [30]van Rooy I Mastrobattista E Storm G Hennink WE Schiffelers RM Comparison of five different targeting ligands to enhance accumulation of liposomes into the brain J. Control Release 2011 150 30 36 10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.11.014 21087646 · DOI
  29. [31]Freskgard PO Urich E Antibody therapies in CNS diseases Neuropharmacology 2017 120 38 55 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.03.014 26972827 · DOI
  30. [32]Mestre H Flow of cerebrospinal fluid is driven by arterial pulsations and is reduced in hypertension Nat. Commun. 2018 9 4878 10.1038/s41467-018-07318-3 30451853 PMC6242982 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [33]Bakker EN Lymphatic clearance of the brain: perivascular, paravascular and significance for neurodegenerative diseases Cell Mol. Neurobiol. 2016 36 181 194 10.1007/s10571-015-0273-8 26993512 PMC4844641 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [34]Niewoehner J Increased brain penetration and potency of a therapeutic antibody using a monovalent molecular shuttle Neuron 2014 81 49 60 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.061 24411731 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [35]Yu YJ Boosting brain uptake of a therapeutic antibody by reducing its affinity for a transcytosis target Sci. Transl. Med. 2011 3 84ra44 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002230 21613623 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [39]Kalucka J Single-cell transcriptome atlas of murine endothelial cells Cell 2020 180 764 779 e720 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.015 32059779 · DOI
  35. [40]Janiurek, M., Soylu-Kucharz, R., Christoffersen, C., Kucharz, K. & Lauritzen, M. Apolipoprotein M-bound sphingosine-1-phosphate regulates blood-brain barrier paracellular permeability and transcytosis. Elife8, e49405 (2019). PMC6877292 31763978
  36. [41]Jefferies WA Transferrin receptor on endothelium of brain capillaries Nature 1984 312 162 163 10.1038/312162a0 6095085 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [42]Moos T Oates PS Morgan EH Expression of the neuronal transferrin receptor is age dependent and susceptible to iron deficiency J. Comp. Neurol. 1998 398 420 430 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980831)398:3<420::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-1 9714152 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [43]van Gelder W Huijskes-Heins MI van Dijk JP Cleton-Soeteman MI van Eijk HG Quantification of different transferrin receptor pools in primary cultures of porcine blood-brain barrier endothelial cells J. Neurochem. 1995 64 2708 2715 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.64062708.x 7760051 · DOI
  39. [44]Sweeney PW Walker-Samuel S Shipley RJ Insights into cerebral haemodynamics and oxygenation utilising in vivo mural cell imaging and mathematical modelling Sci. Rep. 2018 8 1373 10.1038/s41598-017-19086-z 29358701 PMC5778006 · DOI
  40. [45]Gromnicova R Transport of gold nanoparticles by vascular endothelium from different human tissues PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0161610 10.1371/journal.pone.0161610 27560685 PMC4999129 · DOI
  41. [46]Cheng MJ Kumar R Sridhar S Webster TJ Ebong EE Endothelial glycocalyx conditions influence nanoparticle uptake for passive targeting Int. J. Nanomed. 2016 11 3305 3315 10.2147/IJN.S115364 PMC4959595 27499624 · DOI
  42. [48]Thomsen MS Routhe LJ Moos T The vascular basement membrane in the healthy and pathological brain J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2017 37 3300 3317 10.1177/0271678X17722436 28753105 PMC5624399 · DOI
  43. [49]Zhang ET Inman CB Weller RO Interrelationships of the pia mater and the perivascular (Virchow-Robin) spaces in the human cerebrum J. Anat. 1990 170 111 123 2254158 PMC1257067
  44. [50]Hadaczek P The “perivascular pump” driven by arterial pulsation is a powerful mechanism for the distribution of therapeutic molecules within the brain Mol. Ther. 2006 14 69 78 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.02.018 16650807 PMC2730223 · DOI
  45. [51]Foley CP Nishimura N Neeves KB Schaffer CB Olbricht WL Real-time imaging of perivascular transport of nanoparticles during convection-enhanced delivery in the rat cortex Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2012 40 292 303 10.1007/s10439-011-0440-0 22009318 PMC3288849 · DOI
  46. [52]Muldoon LL A physiological barrier distal to the anatomic blood-brain barrier in a model of transvascular delivery AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1999 20 217 222 10094341 PMC7056106
  47. [53]Toth AE The endo-lysosomal system of brain endothelial cells is influenced by astrocytes in vitro Mol. Neurobiol. 2018 55 8522 8537 10.1007/s12035-018-0988-x 29560581 · DOI
  48. [55]Grant BD Donaldson JG Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009 10 597 608 10.1038/nrm2755 19696797 PMC3038567 · DOI
  49. [56]Bien-Ly N Transferrin receptor (TfR) trafficking determines brain uptake of TfR antibody affinity variants J. Exp. Med. 2014 211 233 244 10.1084/jem.20131660 24470444 PMC3920563 · DOI
  50. [57]Johnsen KB Moos T Revisiting nanoparticle technology for blood-brain barrier transport: Unfolding at the endothelial gate improves the fate of transferrin receptor-targeted liposomes J. Control Release 2016 222 32 46 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.032 26658072 · DOI
  51. [58]Toth AE Holst MR Nielsen MS Vesicular transport machinery in brain endothelial cells: what we know and what we do not Curr. Pharm. Des. 2020 26 1405 1416 10.2174/1381612826666200212113421 32048959 · DOI
  52. [59]Zylberberg C Matosevic S Pharmaceutical liposomal drug delivery: a review of new delivery systems and a look at the regulatory landscape Drug Deliv. 2016 23 3319 3329 10.1080/10717544.2016.1177136 27145899 · DOI
  53. [60]Hatakeyama H Akita H Maruyama K Suhara T Harashima H Factors governing the in vivo tissue uptake of transferrin-coupled polyethylene glycol liposomes in vivo Int. J. Pharm. 2004 281 25 33 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.05.025 15288340 · DOI
  54. [61]Hu Y Rip J Gaillard PJ de Lange ECM Hammarlund-Udenaes M The impact of liposomal formulations on the release and brain delivery of methotrexate: an in vivo microdialysis study J. Pharm. Sci. 2017 106 2606 2613 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.03.009 28322936 · DOI
  55. [63]Tonnesen J Inavalli V Nagerl UV Super-resolution imaging of the extracellular space in living brain Tissue Cell 2018 172 1108 1121 e1115 29474910
  56. [64]Nance EA A dense poly(ethylene glycol) coating improves penetration of large polymeric nanoparticles within brain tissue Sci. Transl. Med. 2012 4 149ra119 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003594 22932224 PMC3718558 · DOI · Paper page
  57. [65]Tian, X. et al. On the shuttling across the blood-brain barrier via tubule formation: mechanism and cargo avidity bias. Sci. Adv.6, eabc4397 (2020). PMC7695481 33246953
  58. [67]Lam FC Enhanced efficacy of combined temozolomide and bromodomain inhibitor therapy for gliomas using targeted nanoparticles Nat. Commun. 2018 9 1991 10.1038/s41467-018-04315-4 29777137 PMC5959860 · DOI
  59. [68]Claudio L Kress Y Factor J Brosnan CF Mechanisms of edema formation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Contribution Inflamm. Cells Am. J. Pathol. 1990 137 1033 1045 PMC1877669 2240157
  60. [69]Knowland D Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke Neuron 2014 82 603 617 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.03.003 24746419 PMC4016169 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [70]Tarasoff-Conway JM Clearance systems in the brain-implications for Alzheimer disease Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2015 11 457 470 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119 26195256 PMC4694579 · DOI · Paper page
  62. [71]Motoike T Universal GFP reporter for the study of vascular development Genesis 2000 28 75 81 10.1002/1526-968X(200010)28:2<75::AID-GENE50>3.0.CO;2-S 11064424 · DOI
  63. [72]Kucharz K Lauritzen M CaMKII-dependent endoplasmic reticulum fission by whisker stimulation and during cortical spreading depolarization Brain 2018 141 1049 1062 10.1093/brain/awy036 29538620 · DOI
  64. [73]Holtmaat A Long-term, high-resolution imaging in the mouse neocortex through a chronic cranial window Nat. Protoc. 2009 4 1128 1144 10.1038/nprot.2009.89 19617885 PMC3072839 · DOI
  65. [74]Kristensen K Engel TB Stensballe A Simonsen JB Andresen TL The hard protein corona of stealth liposomes is sparse J. Control Release 2019 307 1 15 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.05.042 31170467 · DOI
  66. [75]Weimann L A quantitative comparison of single-dye tracking analysis tools using Monte Carlo simulations PLoS ONE 2013 8 e64287 10.1371/journal.pone.0064287 23737978 PMC3667770 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kucharz, K., Kristensen, K., Johnsen, K. B., Lund, M. A., Lønstrup, M., Moos, T., Andresen, T. L., & Lauritzen, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Aalborg University (DK)
Corresponding author
  • Kucharz, Krzysztof
  • Lauritzen, Martin Johannes
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-07-05
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
4121-4121
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3182913217
Cited by
123
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (#R392-2018-2266)
  • Det Frie Forskningsråd (#0602-01965B)
  • Nordea-fonden (#114995)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
postcapillary venules, blood-brain barrier, transcytosis, nanoparticle drug delivery, transferrin receptor, nanoliposomes, endothelium, perivascular spaces, capillaries, arterioles, neurodegenerative diseases
MeSH terms
Animals, Arterioles, Biological Transport, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Capillaries, Drug Carriers, Endothelium, Kinetics, Liposomes, Receptors, Transferrin, Venules, Mice, Nanoparticles, Transcytosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review