CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 168Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrative proteogenomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma across etiologies and stages

Open access
Ng, Charlotte K. Y., Dazert, Eva, Boldanova, Tuyana, Coto-Llerena, Mairene, Nuciforo, Sandro, Ercan, Caner, Suslov, Aleksei, Meier, Marie-Anne, Bock, Thomas, Schmidt, Alexander, Ketterer, Sylvia, Wang, Xueya, Wieland, Stefan, Matter, Matthias S., Colombi, Marco, Piscuoglio, Salvatore, Terracciano, Luigi M., Hall, Michael N., Heim, Markus H.·2022·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-022-29960-8PMC PMC9068765
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Proteogenomic analyses of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) have focused on early-stage, HBV-associated HCCs. Here we present an integrated proteogenomic analysis of HCCs across clinical stages and etiologies. Pathways related to cell cycle, transcriptional and translational control, signaling transduction, and metabolism are dysregulated and differentially regulated on the genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and phosphoproteomic levels. We describe candidate copy number-driven driver genes involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, the Wnt-β-catenin, AKT/mTOR and Notch pathways, cell cycle and DNA damage regulation. The targetable aurora kinase A and CDKs are upregulated. CTNNB1 and TP53 mutations are associated with altered protein phosphorylation related to actin filament organization and lipid metabolism, respectively. Integrative proteogenomic clusters show that HCC constitutes heterogeneous subgroups with distinct regulation of biological processes, metabolic reprogramming and kinase activation. Our study provides a comprehensive overview of the proteomic and phophoproteomic landscapes of HCCs, revealing the major pathways altered in the (phospho)proteome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-022-29960-8

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Deregulated pathways in HCC. a–c Principal component analysis plots of (a) transcriptome (grade 1 n = 7, grade 2 n = 66, grade 3 n = 41, grade 4 n = 8), b proteome (grade 1 n = 5, grade 2 n = 25, grade 3 n = 16, grade 4 n = 5), c phosphoproteome (grade 1 n = 5, grade 2 n = 25, grade 3 n = 16, grade 4 n = 5) of HCC biopsies (colored by Edmondson grade) and normal liver biopsies. d Intra-group (within Edmondson grade) variability as measured by pairwise Euclidean distance between samples according to principal components (sample size as in (a–c)). e Distance of each HCC to the median of normal livers as measured by Euclidean distance according to principal components. d, e Statistical comparisons were performed using Spearman’s correlation tests. Thick middle line in the boxplot denotes the median; box extends to the 1st and 3rd quartiles; whiskers extend to the ±1.5 IQR of the box; dots depict the outliers. f Scatter plot of (y-axis) the moderated t-statistics from the differential protein expression analysis of HCC vs normal liver against (x-axis) the F-statistics from the differential gene expression analysis of HCC vs normal liver. Points are colored according to the four quadrants. Enrichment maps show the top 10 enriched Reactome pathways from over-representation tests of the genes/proteins in each of the four quadrants. In each enrichment map, gene sets with overlapping gene sets are joined by edges. Nodes are colored according to p-value, where gray indicates a higher p value and dark blue/violet/purple/red indicates a lower p value. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of genes in the quadrant within a given gene set. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 1 Deregulated pathways in HCC. a–c Principal component analysis plots of (a) transcriptome (grade 1 n = 7, grade 2 n = 66, grade 3 n = 41, grade 4 n = 8), b proteome (grade 1 n = 5, grade 2 n = 25, grade 3 n = 16, grade 4 n = 5), c phosphoproteome (grade 1 n = 5, grade 2 n = 25, grade 3 n = 16, grade 4 n = 5) of HCC biopsies (colored by Edmondson grade) and normal liver biopsies. d Intra-group (within Edmondson grade) variability as measured by pairwise Euclidean distance between samples according to principal components (sample size as in (a–c)). e Distance of each HCC to the median of normal livers as measured by Euclidean distance according to principal components. d, e Statistical comparisons were performed using Spearman’s correlation tests. Thick middle line in the boxplot denotes the median; box extends to the 1st and 3rd quartiles; whiskers extend to the ±1.5 IQR of the box; dots depict the outliers. f Scatter plot of (y-axis) the moderated t-statistics from the differential protein expression analysis of HCC vs normal liver against (x-axis) the F-statistics from the differential gene expression analysis of HCC vs normal liver. Points are colored according to the four quadrants. Enrichment maps show the top 10 enriched Reactome pathways from over-representation tests of the genes/proteins in each of the four quadrants. In each enrichment map, gene sets with overlapping gene sets are joined by edges. Nodes are colored according to p-value, where gray indicates a higher p value and dark blue/violet/purple/red indicates a lower p value. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of genes in the quadrant within a given gene set. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 CNA-mRNA-protein correlation. Histograms of the distributions of the per-gene Spearman correlation coefficients (a) for CNA-mRNA and (b) mRNA-protein expression. sig.: significant. c Venn diagram of the number of enriched Reactome pathways for genes/proteins ranked by CNA-mRNA expression correlation (orange) and mRNA-protein expression correlation (blue). Enrichment and statistical significance were defined by gene set enrichment analysis. Multiple correction was performed using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Barplot of selected Reactome pathways enriched among genes with high CNA-mRNA expression correlation (orange) and/or with high mRNA-protein expression correlation (blue). Statistically significant normalized enrichment scores (NES, p < 0.05) are shown in darker shades (dark orange/blue) while non-significant NESs are shown in lighter shades (light orange/blue). d Scatterplot of the per-gene Spearman correlation coefficients (y-axis) between mRNA and protein expression against (x-axis) between CNA and mRNA. Genes in five of the recurrently altered regions as defined by GISTIC2 are colored according to the color key. Inset shows the genes with >0.5 correlation coefficients in both comparisons. Dysregulated genes (compared to normal livers) on both the mRNA and protein levels are underlined. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2 CNA-mRNA-protein correlation. Histograms of the distributions of the per-gene Spearman correlation coefficients (a) for CNA-mRNA and (b) mRNA-protein expression. sig.: significant. c Venn diagram of the number of enriched Reactome pathways for genes/proteins ranked by CNA-mRNA expression correlation (orange) and mRNA-protein expression correlation (blue). Enrichment and statistical significance were defined by gene set enrichment analysis. Multiple correction was performed using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Barplot of selected Reactome pathways enriched among genes with high CNA-mRNA expression correlation (orange) and/or with high mRNA-protein expression correlation (blue). Statistically significant normalized enrichment scores (NES, p < 0.05) are shown in darker shades (dark orange/blue) while non-significant NESs are shown in lighter shades (light orange/blue). d Scatterplot of the per-gene Spearman correlation coefficients (y-axis) between mRNA and protein expression against (x-axis) between CNA and mRNA. Genes in five of the recurrently altered regions as defined by GISTIC2 are colored according to the color key. Inset shows the genes with >0.5 correlation coefficients in both comparisons. Dysregulated genes (compared to normal livers) on both the mRNA and protein levels are underlined. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 The phosphoproteomic landscape of HCC. a Volcano plot of the −log10(adjusted p value) against the log fold-change (logFC) of the differentially regulated phosphorylation sites in HCC compared to normal livers. Dots are colored by logFC. Vertical dotted lines indicate |logFC| = 2 and horizontal dotted line indicates adjusted p value = 0.05. b Dot plot illustrating selected enriched Reactome pathways according to gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) from the differential expression analysis in (a). NES normalized enrichment score. c Top barplot showing the enrichment z-score of the kinases with significantly up- or downregulated kinase activity in a kinase-substrate enrichment analysis (KSEA) comparing HCC to normal livers. In the bubble plot below, the phosphorylation site substrates are shown in rows, where red and blue dots indicate that the phosphorylation site is up- and downregulated, respectively. The size of the dots is proportional to the log2fold-change of the phosphorylation site. Phosphorylation sites with at least a 5-fold difference between HCCs and normal livers are shown. For kinases with <3 substrates with at least a 5-fold difference, the top three substrates with the highest |logFC| are shown. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3 The phosphoproteomic landscape of HCC. a Volcano plot of the −log10(adjusted p value) against the log fold-change (logFC) of the differentially regulated phosphorylation sites in HCC compared to normal livers. Dots are colored by logFC. Vertical dotted lines indicate |logFC| = 2 and horizontal dotted line indicates adjusted p value = 0.05. b Dot plot illustrating selected enriched Reactome pathways according to gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) from the differential expression analysis in (a). NES normalized enrichment score. c Top barplot showing the enrichment z-score of the kinases with significantly up- or downregulated kinase activity in a kinase-substrate enrichment analysis (KSEA) comparing HCC to normal livers. In the bubble plot below, the phosphorylation site substrates are shown in rows, where red and blue dots indicate that the phosphorylation site is up- and downregulated, respectively. The size of the dots is proportional to the log2fold-change of the phosphorylation site. Phosphorylation sites with at least a 5-fold difference between HCCs and normal livers are shown. For kinases with <3 substrates with at least a 5-fold difference, the top three substrates with the highest |logFC| are shown. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Proteogenomic analysis of SMGs. a Heatmaps showing the expression (z-score-transformed) of (left) 23 proteins differentially expressed between CTNNB1-mutant and -WT HCCs (FDR < 0.05) and (right) the corresponding gene expression on the mRNA level. Genes with asterisks were also differentially expressed on the transcriptome level. b Binned scatterplot plotting the signed (according to the direction of the fold change) p values from differential expression analyses of protein expression (x-axis) and of phosphorylation site expression (y-axis) between CTNNB1-mutant and -WT HCCs. Phosphorylation sites >99th quantile of the unsigned p-values of the differential phosphoprotein expression analysis and within the inter-quartile range of the signed p-values of differential protein expression analysis are labeled. c Enrichment map showing the Gene Ontology biological processes enriched among proteins with phosphorylation sites at >90th quantile of the unsigned p-values of the differential phosphoprotein expression analysis and within the inter-quartile range of signed p-values of differential protein expression analysis. d Plot showing the kinase-substrate enrichment analyses z-scores ordered in increasing order, comparing (left) phosphorylation site abundance and (right) phosphorylation site abundance normalized by protein abundance between CTNNB1-mutant vs -WT HCCs. Significant kinases are labeled. e Small heatmap as (a) of (left) 399 proteins differentially expressed between TP53-mutant and -WT HCCs (FDR < 0.05) and (right) the corresponding gene expression. Large heatmap showing the subset of 14 proteins/genes for which the direction of the differential expression differed between the proteomic and transcriptomic signatures. f–h as (b–d) for stratification by TP53 mutation status. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4 Proteogenomic analysis of SMGs. a Heatmaps showing the expression (z-score-transformed) of (left) 23 proteins differentially expressed between CTNNB1-mutant and -WT HCCs (FDR < 0.05) and (right) the corresponding gene expression on the mRNA level. Genes with asterisks were also differentially expressed on the transcriptome level. b Binned scatterplot plotting the signed (according to the direction of the fold change) p values from differential expression analyses of protein expression (x-axis) and of phosphorylation site expression (y-axis) between CTNNB1-mutant and -WT HCCs. Phosphorylation sites >99th quantile of the unsigned p-values of the differential phosphoprotein expression analysis and within the inter-quartile range of the signed p-values of differential protein expression analysis are labeled. c Enrichment map showing the Gene Ontology biological processes enriched among proteins with phosphorylation sites at >90th quantile of the unsigned p-values of the differential phosphoprotein expression analysis and within the inter-quartile range of signed p-values of differential protein expression analysis. d Plot showing the kinase-substrate enrichment analyses z-scores ordered in increasing order, comparing (left) phosphorylation site abundance and (right) phosphorylation site abundance normalized by protein abundance between CTNNB1-mutant vs -WT HCCs. Significant kinases are labeled. e Small heatmap as (a) of (left) 399 proteins differentially expressed between TP53-mutant and -WT HCCs (FDR < 0.05) and (right) the corresponding gene expression. Large heatmap showing the subset of 14 proteins/genes for which the direction of the differential expression differed between the proteomic and transcriptomic signatures. f–h as (b–d) for stratification by TP53 mutation status. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Integrated phosphoproteomic classification of HCC. Unsupervised clustering of the (a) proteome and (b) phosphoproteome data using consensus non-negative matrix factorization. c Integrative clustering of the mutation, copy number alteration, transcriptome, proteome and phosphoproteome using the iCluster method. Copy number alterations not shown in the figure as no genomic region differed between clusters. a–c Barplots below show the distribution of Edmondson grade and BCLC between the clusters. Statistical comparison for each cluster was computed using the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5 Integrated phosphoproteomic classification of HCC. Unsupervised clustering of the (a) proteome and (b) phosphoproteome data using consensus non-negative matrix factorization. c Integrative clustering of the mutation, copy number alteration, transcriptome, proteome and phosphoproteome using the iCluster method. Copy number alterations not shown in the figure as no genomic region differed between clusters. a–c Barplots below show the distribution of Edmondson grade and BCLC between the clusters. Statistical comparison for each cluster was computed using the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 168

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ng, C. K. Y., Dazert, E., Boldanova, T., Coto-Llerena, M., Nuciforo, S., Ercan, C., Suslov, A., Meier, M.-A., Bock, T., Schmidt, A., Ketterer, S., Wang, X., Wieland, S., Matter, M. S., Colombi, M., Piscuoglio, S., Terracciano, L. M., Hall, M. N., & Heim, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Humanitas University (IT)
Corresponding author
Heim, Markus H.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-05-04
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
2436-2436
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-022-29960-8
PMC
PMC9068765
OpenAlex
W4225410183
Cited by
165
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 10
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Universität Basel
  • Universitätsspital Basel
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (IG 2019—ID, IG-2019)
  • Swiss Cancer Research Foundation (KFS-4543-08-2018, KFS-4988-02-2020-R)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (609883)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
hepatocellular carcinoma, proteogenomics, phosphoproteomics, cancer etiology, tumor stage, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, Akt/mTOR signaling, Notch signaling, cell cycle regulation, DNA damage response, metabolic reprogramming, AURKA, cyclin-dependent kinases, CTNNB1 mutation, TP53 mutation, protein phosphorylation, tumor heterogeneity, driver genes
MeSH terms
Proteogenomics, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Mutation, Proteomics, beta Catenin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review