Cited by 1,277Fuel Cells and Related MaterialsElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesHybrid Renewable Energy Systems

New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation

Open access
Cullen, David A., Neyerlin, K. C., Ahluwalia, Rajesh K., Mukundan, Rangachary, More, Karren L., Borup, Rodney L., Weber, Adam Z., Myers, Deborah J. +1 more·2021·Nature Energy

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41560-021-00775-z

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The anode Pt loading for the Mirai fuel cell is 0.05 mg Pt cm−2 while the cathode is up to 0.315 mg Pt cm−2.

    “For example, the anode Pt loading for the Mirai fuel cell is only 0.05 mg Pt cm -2 while that for the cathode is up to 0.315 mg Pt cm -2 [19,20].”

    From Recent Advances on PEM Fuel Cells: From Key Materials to Membrane Electrode Assembly (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The “Current status of commercial MEAs” section (page unavailable) identifies Pt on the Toyota Mirai anode and Pt-Co on its cathode, with a combined Pt loading of approximately 0.4 mg/cm². Figure 7’s caption says it shows loadings by component, but our text copy does not give the claimed 0.05 and 0.315 mg/cm² values, so neither electrode-specific number can be verified. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Satyapal, S. Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Program Overview (Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings, 2019); https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review19/plenary_overview_satyapal_2019.pdf
  2. Guandalini, G. in 2018 International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive (2018).
  3. Papadias, D., Ahluwalia, R.K., Connelly, E. & Devlin, P. Total Cost of Ownership Analysis for Hydrogen Fuel Cells in Maritime Applications: Preliminary Results (H2@Ports Workshop, 2019); https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/h2ports-workshop 24
  4. Ahluwalia, R.K., Wang, X. & Peng, J.-K. Fuel Cell System Modeling and Analysis (Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings, 2020); https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review20/fc017_ahluwalia_2020_o.pdf
  5. Kusoglu, A. in Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology (ed Robert A. Meyers) Ch. Chapter 1021-2, 1-23 (Springer New York, 2018).
  6. James, B. Fuel Cell Systems Analysis (Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings, 2020); https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review20/fc163_james_2020_o.pdf 100 How hydrogen empowers the energy transition (Hydrogen Council, 2017); https://hydrogencouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Hydrogen-Council-Vision- Document.pdf 101 US Department of Energy. Fuel Cell Truck Powertrain R&D Activities and Target Review Workshop (2018); https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/fuel-cell-truck-powertrain-rd- activities-and-target-review-workshop-h2-scale-end-use 102
  7. Borup, R.L. & Weber, A.Z. FC-PAD: Fuel Cell Performance and Durability Consortium (Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings, 2020); https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review20/fc135_borup_weber_2020_o.pdf 103
  8. Borup, R.L. & Weber, A.Z. FC-PAD: Fuel Cell Performance and Durability Consortium (Hydrogen & Fuel Cells Program Annual Merit Review Proceedings, 2019); https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review19/fc135_borup_2019_o.pdf 107

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cullen, D. A., Neyerlin, K. C., Ahluwalia, R. K., Mukundan, R., More, K. L., Borup, R. L., Weber, A. Z., Myers, D. J., & Kusoglu, A.
Affiliations
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kusoglu, Ahmet
Venue
Nature Energy
Published
2021-03-25
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
462-474
ISSN
2058-7546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137258066
Cited by
1,277
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 246 · 2025: 348 · 2024: 255 · 2023: 256 · 2022: 135 · 2021: 37
FWCI
50.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Energy (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
DOE | Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy | Fuel Cell Technologies Office (DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC36-08GO28308, DE-AC02-06CH11357, 89233218CNA000001, DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Keywords
proton exchange membrane fuel cells, heavy vehicles, hydrogen economy, fuel cell durability, fuel cell materials, fuel cell powertrain, long-haul trucks, buses, locomotives, marine fuel cells, fuel cell system design, hydrogen infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review