PreprintCited by 44SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Bounding the levels of transmissibility & immune evasion of the Omicron variant in South Africa

Open access
Pearson, Carl A. B., Silal, Sheetal P., Li, Michael W.Z., Dushoff, Jonathan, Bolker, Benjamin M., Abbott, Sam, van Schalkwyk, Cari, Davies, Nicholas G. +13 more·2021·medRxiv

Abstract

A new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, Omicron (B.1.1.529), has been identified based on genomic sequencing and epidemiological data in South Africa. Presumptive Omicron cases in South Africa have grown extremely rapidly, despite high prior exposure and moderate vaccination coverage. The available evidence suggests that Omicron spread is at least in part due to evasion of this immune protection, though Omicron may also exhibit higher intrinsic transmissibility. Using detailed laboratory and epidemiological data from South Africa, we estimate the constraints on these two characteristics of the new variant and their relationship. Our estimates and associated uncertainties provide essential information to inform projection and scenario modeling analyses, which are crucial planning tools for governments around the world. One Sentence Summary: We report a region of plausibility for the relative transmissibility and immune escape characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant estimated by integrating laboratory and epidemiological data from South Africa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.12.19.21268038

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. H. Wickham, ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag New York, 2016; https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org).
  2. K. Prem, A. R. Cook, M. Jit, Projecting social contact matrices in 152 countries using contact surveys and demographic data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005697 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, C. A. B., Silal, S. P., Li, M. W. Z., Dushoff, J., Bolker, B. M., Abbott, S., van Schalkwyk, C., Davies, N. G., Barnard, R. C., Edmunds, W. J., Bingham, J., Meyer-Rath, G., Jamieson, L., Glass, A., Wolter, N., Govender, N., Stevens, W. S., Scott, L., Mlisana, K., Moultrie, H., & Pulliam, J. R. C.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • National Health Laboratory Service (ZA)
Corresponding author
Pearson, Carl A. B.
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-12-21
OpenAlex
W4200413446
Cited by
44
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1184344, OPP1171455)
  • Wellcome Trust (221003/Z/20/Z, 214236)
  • Department of Science and Innovation, South Africa
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 101003688, 221003)
  • National Research Foundation
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
Omicron variant, SARS-CoV-2, transmissibility, immune evasion, parameter estimation, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review