The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 137 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 98 of the 154 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi.
Open accessAbstract
Systemic fungal infections pose a serious clinical problem. Treatment options are limited, and antifungal drug resistance is increasing. In addition, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond to therapy despite being infected with fungi that are susceptible to the drug. The discordance between overall treatment outcome and low levels of clinical resistance may be attributable to antifungal drug tolerance. In this Review, we define and distinguish resistance and tolerance and discuss the current understanding of the molecular, genetic and physiological mechanisms that contribute to those phenomena. Distinguishing tolerance from resistance might provide important insights into the reasons for treatment failure in some settings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
39 Own interpretation · 38 Partly supported · 19 No full text of the sources · 17 Supported · 12 No basis given · 7 Couldn’t confirm · 5 Supported so far · 2 Own result · 1 Mixed support · 1 Sources not found · accuracy not yet measured
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In addition to affecting resistance, drug uptake and efflux appears to contribute, at least partially, to tolerance9, based on studies with fluorescent azole probes and strains with similar MIC levels but different tolerance levels (measured as FoG and SMG, see Box ##)89,90”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the Discussion, the paper says higher tolerance is associated with more cells having lower intracellular drug levels, but explicitly states that tolerance is not a function of either uptake or efflux rates. The section “Decreased intracellular drug levels underlie increased tolerance” likewise reports that measured efflux rates did not correlate with FoG. Thus, the fluorescent-probe findings do not support the attributed conclusion that uptake and efflux contribute to tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Partly supportedcites [89] Benhamou, R. I. et al. Real-time imaging of the azole class of antifungal drugs in live Candida cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 1769–1777 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes fluorescent azole probes for studying drug uptake, and Results and Discussion reports that increased efflux is associated with fluconazole resistance in one Candida strain. The paper does not report that uptake or efflux contributes to tolerance, or compare strains with similar MICs but different FoG or SMG tolerance levels. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] Benhamou, R. I., Bibi, M., Berman, J. & Fridman, M. Localizing antifungal drugs to the correct organelle can markedly enhance their efficacy. Angew. Chem. 57, 6230–6235 (2018). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“For example, the rate of fluconazole and echinocandin resistance in Candida. albicans, the most prevalent Candida species, is generally less than 1%7, yet existing therapies often fail to treat infections caused by susceptible Candida isolates.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report very low echinocandin resistance in C. albicans, and the Conclusions mention breakthrough infections. Neither passage says that infections caused by isolates testing susceptible frequently fail to respond to treatment. Searches for treatment failure despite in vitro susceptibility found no such statement in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For example, the rate of fluconazole and echinocandin resistance in Candida. albicans, the most prevalent Candida species, is generally less than 1%7, yet existing therapies often fail to treat infections caused by susceptible Candida isolates.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). source
The Results section reports fluconazole resistance of 0.3% among C. albicans isolates and echinocandin resistance of 0.0%–0.1%. Both are below 1%, supporting the cited clause. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A recent quantitative study9 identified four characteristics of fluconazole-tolerant cells across a set of seven diverse C. albicans isolates.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) describes quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans isolates and lists four cellular features, followed by a fifth point: tolerance is mechanistically distinct from resistance. The claim's restriction to seven diverse isolates is not supported: the paper also describes seven non-persistent clinical isolates and isolates from 12 patients with persistent candidemia (Candida albicans isolates, page not provided). (LLM, conf=0.85)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Copy number variations, including whole-chromosome aneuploidy and shorter-range amplifications, are genome changes that can increase resistance32,43–49.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [32] Prasad, R., Rawal, M. K. & Shah, A. H. Candida efflux ATPases and antiporters in clinical drug resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 892, 351–376 (2016). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [43] Kordalewska, M. et al. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 62, e00238–18 (2018). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [44] Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Aneuploidy and isochromosome formation in drug-resistant Candida albicans. Science 313, 367–370 (2006). source
- Supportedcites [45] Anderson, M. Z., Saha, A., Haseeb, A. & Bennett, R. J. A chromosome 4 trisomy contributes to increased fluconazole resistance in a clinical isolate of Candida albicans. Microbiology 163, 856–865 (2017). source
The Discussion reports that whole-chromosome Chr4 trisomy increases fluconazole resistance in clinical isolate P60002, though the effect depends on strain background. The Introduction also describes an amplification shorter than a whole chromosome: duplication of the left arm of Chr5 increases gene copy number and confers azole resistance. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] Yang, F. et al. Tolerance to caspofungin in Candida albicans is associated with at least three distinctive mechanisms that govern expression of FKS genes and cell wall remodeling. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e00071–17 (2017). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
- Supportedcites [48] Yang, F. et al. Aneuploidy enables cross-adaptation to unrelated drugs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 1768–1782 (2019). source
The Introduction (page unavailable) defines aneuploidy as a copy-number imbalance involving whole chromosomes or chromosomal segments and identifies it as a mechanism of fluconazole resistance. The Discussion (page unavailable) also reports that an extra copy of chromosome 2 conferred adaptation to two drugs. Together, these passages support the claim that whole-chromosome and shorter-range copy-number changes can increase resistance. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [49] Todd, R. T., Wikoff, T. D., Forche, A. & Selmecki, A. Genome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences. eLife. 8, e45954 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not provided) says that amplification of a chromosome arm confers fluconazole resistance, and the Results report increased resistance with another segmental amplification. The paper also associates aneuploidy broadly with resistant isolates, but the passages do not establish that whole-chromosome aneuploidy itself increases resistance. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Finally, in Candida auris, ERG11 polymorphisms as well as an increased number of ERG11 gene copies are thought to be responsible for its largely intrinsic azole resistance37–40”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [37] Xiang, M. J. et al. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 386–393 (2013). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Flowers, S. A., Colon, B., Whaley, S. G., Schuler, M. A. & Rogers, P. D. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 450–460 (2015). source
- Partly supportedcites [39] Healey, K. R. et al. Limited ERG11 mutations identified in isolates of Candida auris directly contribute to reduced azole susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 62, e01427–18 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Results (TEXT; page unavailable) show that two C. auris ERG11 substitutions, Y132F and K143R, raised azole MICs, while several other substitutions did not. It does not establish that C. auris has extra ERG11 gene copies or that these mechanisms explain largely intrinsic azole resistance; its gene-dosage discussion concerns the experimental constructs and a comparison with C. albicans. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [40] Chowdhary, A. et al. A multicentre study of antifungal susceptibility patterns among 350 Candida auris isolates (2009-17) in India: role of the ERG11 and FKS1 genes in azole and echinocandin resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73, 891–899 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) links ERG11 substitutions Y132F and K143R to fluconazole resistance in the C. auris isolates studied. It does not establish that C. auris has extra ERG11 gene copies or that its azole resistance is largely intrinsic. The reported increase after fluconazole exposure concerns ERG11 expression, not gene copy number. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Epidemiological cut-off values use MICs to identify isolates with acquired resistance, usually via mutations24.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Measuring and defining resistance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [24] Meletiadis, J., Curfs-Breuker, I., Meis, J. F. & Mouton, J. W. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates with the EUCAST methodology, a new method for ECOFF determination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e02372–16 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s introductory text (indexed as ABSTRACT; page unavailable) says ECOFFs use MIC distributions to detect non-wild-type isolates that may have reduced susceptibility. It does not establish that those isolates have acquired resistance or that resistance is usually caused by mutations; it notes that testing isolates with known resistance mechanisms would be useful. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Second, within a given isolate, tolerant cells (those that do grow slowly in the presence of the drug, while the remaining cells do not grow) represent a subpopulation (generally 5%-90% of the cells, depending on the isolate) (Fig. 1B).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Subpopulation growth dynamics section reports that the fraction of cells growing in drug varies by isolate and represents a subpopulation. It gives an observed range of 2%–98%, however, rather than establishing the claimed ‘generally 5%–90%’ range (page not available in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In this Review, we explore the molecular mechanisms that contribute to antifungal drug resistance, with a focus on Candida spp., the most common cause of fungal infections in humans7.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s discussion of invasive fungal infections (section labeled Abstract > Conclusions; page unavailable) calls candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis “the most important of the invasive mycoses.” That supports Candida’s prominence in invasive disease, but not the broader claim that it is the most common cause of all fungal infections in humans. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Fourth, the time required for cells to appear as visible colonies on a petri plate containing drug is shorter for isolates with high tolerance levels than for isolates with lower tolerance levels (Fig. 1C).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Subpopulation growth dynamics” (page unavailable), the paper reports that highly tolerant isolates had a shorter drug-induced delay in colony appearance than less tolerant isolates. Because colony appearance times also differed without drug, this does not establish that highly tolerant isolates’ colonies became visible sooner in absolute time on drug-containing plates. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Third, tolerance is largely independent of drug concentration (Box 1).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results section states that tolerance measured as FoG remained similar irrespective of drug concentration, while SMG remained constant across a broad range of supra-MIC concentrations. This supports the claim for the fluconazole concentrations tested above the MIC. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Tolerant bacterial and fungal isolates have MICs in the susceptible range, but tolerant bacteria are characterized by longer minimum duration to killing (MDK) than susceptible isolates10, based on responses to bactericidal drugs10–12.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Brauner, A., Fridman, O., Gefen, O. & Balaban, N. Q. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 320–330 (2016). source
- Supportedcites [11] Balaban, N. Q. et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 441–448 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Persistence and tolerance” section defines bacterial tolerance as slower killing without an increased MIC and identifies minimum duration for killing (MDK99) as a measure of that slower killing. The paper also frames persistence in terms of exposure to bactericidal drugs, consistent with the cited claim. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Supportedcites [12] Brauner, A., Shoresh, N., Fridman, O. & Balaban, N. Q. An experimental framework for quantifying bacterial tolerance. Biophys. J. 112, 2664–2671 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction defines a higher MDK as meaning that bacterial killing takes longer and associates it with greater tolerance. Its Figure 1 description reports that, under ampicillin treatment, a tolerant strain with the same MIC as its ancestral strain was killed more slowly, as reflected in its MDK99. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Candida spp. biofilms induce a transient, physiological alteration in drug responses22 (Box 3); that is, fungal biofilms exhibit reduced antifungal drug susceptibility via mechanisms that are dependent on cells growing within a biofilm, in which cells adhere to a substrate and form a thick mat of cells and secreted extracellular matrix that holds them together and reduces drug efficacy.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [22] Taff, H. T., Mitchell, K. F., Edward, J. A. & Andes, D. R. Mechanisms of Candida biofilm drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 8, 1325–1337 (2013). source
The Abstract describes antifungal resistance as a phenotypic change accompanying biofilm growth and says that biofilm cells become susceptible again when recultured under planktonic conditions. The Conclusion also identifies resistance mechanisms specific to the biofilm mode of growth. Together, these support a transient, physiological change in drug response. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Candida spp. biofilms induce a transient, physiological alteration in drug responses22 (Box 3); that is, fungal biofilms exhibit reduced antifungal drug susceptibility via mechanisms that are dependent on cells growing within a biofilm, in which cells adhere to a substrate and form a thick mat of cells and secreted extracellular matrix that holds them together and reduces drug efficacy.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [22] Taff, H. T., Mitchell, K. F., Edward, J. A. & Andes, D. R. Mechanisms of Candida biofilm drug resistance. Future Microbiol. 8, 1325–1337 (2013). source
The Abstract describes Candida biofilms as adherent cells encased in extracellular matrix and reports substantially reduced antifungal susceptibility compared with nonbiofilm cells. The extracellular-matrix section explains that the matrix promotes adherence and can sequester antifungals, reducing their ability to reach their targets. The Conclusion also describes a transient resistance mechanism during adherence and biofilm formation. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Further effects could be due to tolerance or trailing, rather than resistance9,25–28 because the MIC was not altered at 24 h. Instead, increased growth in the presence of the drug (relative to a reference strain) was usually detected at 48 h.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Measuring and defining resistance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results report that most isolates showed supra-MIC growth at 48 hours while MIC levels remained unchanged between 24 and 48 hours. The same section states that this growth in disk and broth assays was not due to the emergence of drug resistance, supporting the tolerance-or-trailing interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] Lockhart, S. R., Ghannoum, M. A. & Alexander, B. D. Establishment and use of epidemiological cutoff values for molds and yeasts by use of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M57 standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 1262–1268 (2017). This review provides an important and accessible over-review of the concept of epidemiological cut-off values as well as the methodology that underlies their establishment. source
- Partly supportedcites [26] Onyewu, C., Wormley, F. L. Jr., Perfect, J. R. & Heitman, J. The calcineurin target, Crz1, functions in azole tolerance but is not required for virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 72, 7330–7333 (2004). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The fluconazole Etest passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) describes growth within an inhibition halo as a trailing effect, and the assay passage says plates were read after 48 hours. The paper does not report an unchanged 24-hour MIC or increased drug-phase growth relative to the reference strain; it observed trailing in the reference strain too. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J. & Bille, J. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 959–976 (2003). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [28] Luna-Tapia, A., Tournu, H., Peters, T. L. & Palmer, G. E. Endosomal trafficking defects can induce calcium-dependent azole tolerance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 60, 7170–7177 (2016). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“These LOH events included homozygosis of a region of the left arm of chromosome 5 that includes a point mutation in ERG1155.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [55] Ford, C. B. et al. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. eLife 4, e00662 (2015). source
The Results section ('LOH events are commonly associated with increased resistance') reports a homozygous nonsynonymous change in ERG11 associated with persistent LOH on the left arm of chromosome 5 in Patient 1. The Discussion also reports LOH of ERG11 mutations in three patients. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Importantly, exposure to azoles promotes mitotic defects that yield tetraploid and aneuploid cells58.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports aneuploid progeny arising from chromosome loss in tetraploid C. albicans strains grown on pre-spo or sorbose medium. It does not show that azole exposure promotes mitotic defects or produces those cells; searches for azole and fluconazole found references but no passage establishing that causal claim. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In addition to genetic determinants of tolerance level, growth conditions influence the degree of tolerance exhibited by a strain.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [76] Walker, L. A., Gow, N. A. & Munro, C. A. Elevated chitin content reduces the susceptibility of Candida species to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 146–154 (2013). This study finds that the ability of Candida species to grow in the presence of sub-MIC levels of caspofungin is associated with increased chitin levels in the cell wall. Pretreatment of cells with CaCl 2 and calcofluor white induces a similar increase in chitin and ability to grow in sub-MIC caspofungin levels. Whether this effect is an alteration in tolerance or resistance levels remains to be determined; higher cell source
- Supportedcites [77] Lee, K. K. et al. Elevated cell wall chitin in Candida albicans confers echinocandin resistance in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 208–217 (2012). source
The Materials and Methods describe growing the same C. albicans strain with calcium chloride and calcofluor white to increase cell-wall chitin. The Results report that these high-chitin cells were less susceptible to caspofungin than normal-chitin cells, supporting the claim that growth conditions can affect a strain’s drug tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Biofilms section reports that biofilm growth makes normally susceptible planktonic cells highly resistant, supporting the broader point that growth state affects drug response. The Adaptive Cellular Factors section discusses drug tolerance, but our copy does not directly establish that growth conditions change the degree of tolerance exhibited by a given strain. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Partly supportedcites [78] Singh-Babak, S. D. et al. Global analysis of the evolution and mechanism of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002718 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that Hsp90 is required for basal echinocandin tolerance in C. glabrata and describes methionine-mediated repression of HSP90 in a conditional strain. That supports a condition-dependent change in this engineered setting, but the paper does not establish that ordinary changes in growth conditions alter the tolerance of a strain generally. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Of note, long periods of echinocandin therapy are associated with the emergence of echinocandin-resistant strains65.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [65] Perlin, D. S. Echinocandin resistance in Candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 61, S612–S617 (2015). source
The Risk Factors for Resistance Emergence section states that echinocandin resistance in Candida generally requires prolonged or repeated drug exposure, while noting that it can also emerge rapidly. This supports the claimed association between extended treatment and resistant strains. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Finally, some drugs enhance genome instability and thus promote aneuploidy and whole-chromosome LOH57,58.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [57] Cowen, L. E. et al. Population genomics of drug resistance in Candida albicans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9284–9289 (2002). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) suggests that mutations, broadly including chromosomal rearrangements, may underlie changes in gene expression during adaptation to fluconazole. It does not say that the drug increases genome instability or promotes aneuploidy or whole-chromosome LOH; searches for those terms found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Partly supportedcites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (Analysis of the Pattern of Concerted Chromosome Loss during the Parasexual Cycle; page unavailable) reports more trisomies and a different distribution of whole-chromosome LOH in progeny grown on sorbose medium than on pre-spo medium. It attributes the difference tentatively to selective pressure from the growth medium, not to drugs; the claimed drug-induced genome instability is therefore unsupported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For heterozygous diploids such as C. albicans, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is another frequent mechanism of resistance (reviewed in Refs. 52 and 53).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [52] Mount, H. O. et al. Global analysis of genetic circuitry and adaptive mechanisms enabling resistance to the azole antifungal drugs. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007319 (2018). This article screens a library of C. albicans deletion strains and identifies two genes that affect azole responses, have roles in stress response pathways and functions that are are suppressed by the acquisition of aneuploid chromosomes. Whether the mutations are affecting resistance or tolerance is not clear, but activities of the identified genes (vacuolar retrograde trafficking and a cell wall and polarity GTPase activating pro sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes aneuploidy as frequent in fluconazole-resistant isolates, while the Results section on chromosome 3 and 7 reports structural changes in four evolved resistant isolates. Neither passage says that loss of heterozygosity is a frequent resistance mechanism in C. albicans. A search for “loss of heterozygosity” found the term in a reference title, not in a finding that establishes the claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Partly supportedcites [53] Todd, R. T., Forche, A. & Selmecki, A. Ploidy variation in fungi: polyploidy, aneuploidy, and genome evolution. Microbiol. Spectr. 5, https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0051-2016 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes C. albicans as generally diploid, and section 4 reports loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in C. albicans cells (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not say LOH is a frequent resistance mechanism; its discussion of fluconazole resistance in section 6 instead concerns aneuploidy and gene amplification. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“For example, conditions that increase cell wall chitin promote cell survival in the presence of echinocandin76,77, whereas calcineurin inhibitors reduce echinocandin tolerance (measured using MIC assays analyzed after 72 h)68,78.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [76] Walker, L. A., Gow, N. A. & Munro, C. A. Elevated chitin content reduces the susceptibility of Candida species to caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 146–154 (2013). This study finds that the ability of Candida species to grow in the presence of sub-MIC levels of caspofungin is associated with increased chitin levels in the cell wall. Pretreatment of cells with CaCl 2 and calcofluor white induces a similar increase in chitin and ability to grow in sub-MIC caspofungin levels. Whether this effect is an alteration in tolerance or resistance levels remains to be determined; higher cell source
- Supportedcites [77] Lee, K. K. et al. Elevated cell wall chitin in Candida albicans confers echinocandin resistance in vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 208–217 (2012). source
The Introduction reports that conditions increasing chitin content reduce C. albicans susceptibility to caspofungin. The Results show that high-chitin cells recovered from infected mice continued to grow at caspofungin concentrations that inhibited normal-chitin cells. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“In addition, a substantial number of infections with echinocandin-susceptible C. glabrata or C. albicans isolates are not readily cleared68, and the degree to which echinocandin tolerance may play a role in this remains to be determined.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Adaptive Cellular Factors section discusses echinocandin tolerance but says these stress responses are not typically associated with clinical failures. The Drug Resistance Mechanisms section describes growth of susceptible fungi at high drug concentrations, not whether infections with susceptible C. glabrata or C. albicans isolates clear. A search for clinical outcomes and clearance found no passage establishing the claimed substantial number of difficult-to-clear infections. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“however, more recent work did not find a correlation between MSH2 mutations and antifungal resistance in vitro or in vivo69,70.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [69] Bordallo-Cardona, M. A. et al. MSH2 gene point mutations are not antifungal resistance markers in Candida glabrata. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e01876–18 (2019). source
The Discussion states that the authors found no correlation between MSH2 gene mutations and acquisition of antifungal resistance either in vitro or in clinical settings. The finding concerns the C. glabrata isolates studied, and directly supports the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] Singh, A. et al. Absence of azole or echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata isolates in India despite background prevalence of strains with defects in the DNA mismatch repair pathway. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e00195–18 (2018). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, segmental trisomy of chromosome 3 conferred an increased fitness in the presence of fluconazole that was attributable, at least partially, to extra copies of NPR2, which encodes a urea transporter51.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (Figure 6; page unavailable) reports that clones carrying a supernumerary chromosome with a Chr3R segment were slightly more fit in fluconazole than clones without it. The Discussion (‘Other aneuploidies in FluR strains’; page unavailable) also identifies segmental Chr3 trisomy, but discusses CDR1 and MRR1, not NPR2. Our copy does not support attributing the fitness benefit to extra NPR2 copies or identifying NPR2 as a urea transporter. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“this approach identified sphingolipid biosynthesis as an important mechanism by which cells survive azole-induced ergosterol depletion73.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [73] Hickman, M. A. et al. The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature 494, 55–59 (2013). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Detection of haploid C. albicans cells’ section mentions a haploid isolate found among colonies growing near fluconazole, but does not discuss how cells survive azole treatment. Searches for sphingolipid biosynthesis and ergosterol depletion found no passage addressing the claimed mechanism; the ‘Haploid strains as genetic tools’ section concerns gene-knockout phenotyping instead. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Aneuploidy can alter fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans drug38,51.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Flowers, S. A., Colon, B., Whaley, S. G., Schuler, M. A. & Rogers, P. D. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 450–460 (2015). source
- Supportedcites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). source
The Abstract reports that an aneuploid isochromosome, i(5L), was associated with increased fitness in fluconazole, and that accumulation of aneuploid chromosomes coincided with the highest fluconazole resistance. This supports the claim that aneuploidy can alter how C. albicans tolerates fluconazole. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“For example, in a series of clinical C. albicans isolates from the same patient with HIV treated with fluconazole54,55, LOH events that were retained in all subsequent isolates arose concomitant with the acquisition of bona fide resistance.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [54] Bennett, R. J., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Rapid mechanisms for generating genome diversity: whole ploidy shifts, aneuploidy, and loss of heterozygosity. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a019604 (2014). source
- Supportedcites [55] Ford, C. B. et al. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. eLife 4, e00662 (2015). source
The Results section reports that three LOH events in Patient 1 persisted in subsequent isolates and coincided with increases in fluconazole MIC (Figure 3 caption). Table 1 documents the serial isolates’ rise from an MIC of 0.25 to 96 µg/mL; the study identifies the patients as HIV-infected and the isolates as collected during fluconazole treatment. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In agreement with this, increased copies of the right arm of chromosome 3, together with unidentified genes on trisomic chromosome 7 were associated with increased efflux51.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion section, “Other aneuploidies in FluR strains” (page unavailable), reports extra copies of chromosome 3’s right-arm segment containing CDR1 and MRR1, genes linked to drug efflux. The Results section, “Multiple aneuploidies are evident in drug-evolved populations” (page unavailable), reports chromosome 7 trisomy but suggests it may enhance fitness, not efflux. The claim’s attribution of increased efflux to unidentified genes on trisomic chromosome 7 is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Aneuploidy and/or loss of heteroresistance are rapidly acquired genome changes that can result in increased tolerance. and are likely to affect one or several genes that alter tolerance level.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Flowers, S. A., Colon, B., Whaley, S. G., Schuler, M. A. & Rogers, P. D. Contribution of clinically derived mutations in ERG11 to azole resistance in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 450–460 (2015). source
- Partly supportedcites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Results report that aneuploidies appeared during early fluconazole exposure and were associated with improved growth and drug resistance. The paper does not establish that loss of heteroresistance produces increased tolerance; its Discussion instead says MTL heterozygosity was maintained throughout the three evolution experiments. Its demonstrated outcome is fluconazole resistance and fitness, rather than tolerance generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, exposure to fluconazole promotes whole-chromosome LOH via unusual mitotic divisions (chromosome duplications and losses)58–60.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on concerted chromosome loss reports whole-chromosome LOH and chromosome re-duplication in parasexual progeny grown on sorbose medium. It does not show that fluconazole exposure promotes those events or establish the claimed mechanism under fluconazole exposure; a fluconazole-related study appears only in the References. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [59] Harrison, B. D. et al. A tetraploid intermediate precedes aneuploid formation in yeasts exposed to fluconazole. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001815 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page not provided) reports that fluconazole exposure increases loss of heterozygosity (LOH), which can arise through chromosome missegregation or recombination. The Results show unusual mitotic divisions and unequal chromosome segregation, but the paper does not establish that those divisions cause whole-chromosome LOH specifically. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [60] Forche, A. et al. Stress alters rates and types of loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. mBio 2, e00129–11 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that fluconazole increased the proportion of whole-chromosome LOH about fivefold. The Introduction explains how chromosome nondisjunction and subsequent reduplication can produce whole-chromosome LOH, but the Discussion says the mechanism under fluconazole is unclear. The claim presents that proposed mechanism as established. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Echinocandin resistance is almost exclusively due to mutations in FKS genes (Table 1), which encode the target enzyme of the drug, 1,3-β-glucan synthase65.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [65] Perlin, D. S. Echinocandin resistance in Candida. Clin. Infect. Dis. 61, S612–S617 (2015). source
The FKS MECHANISM OF RESISTANCE section describes echinocandin resistance causing clinical failure as a highly restricted mechanism involving substitutions in Fks subunits of glucan synthase. It also states that FKS mutations reduce the enzyme’s sensitivity to the drug, supporting the paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“whereas calcineurin inhibitors reduce echinocandin tolerance (measured using MIC assays analyzed after 72 h)68,78.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Adaptive Cellular Factors section says calcineurin signaling helps fungi survive echinocandin-induced stress, and Drug Resistance Mechanisms reports that calcineurin inhibitors eliminate paradoxical growth at high echinocandin concentrations. This supports reduced tolerance, but our copy does not establish the specified measurement by MIC assays analyzed after 72 hours. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Partly supportedcites [78] Singh-Babak, S. D. et al. Global analysis of the evolution and mechanism of echinocandin resistance in Candida glabrata. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002718 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports that the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporin A and FK506 reduced caspofungin resistance in a C. glabrata clinical isolate. The Methods describe MIC assays using these inhibitors, but our copy does not establish a 72-hour readout for those assays; it specifies a 24-hour endpoint for clinical caspofungin MICs. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Point mutations in one of two specific hot-spot regions of FKS genes increase the half maximal inhibition concentration (IC50) of an echinocandin in vitro by up to 3 orders of magnitude67.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [67] Garcia-Effron, G., Lee, S., Park, S., Cleary, J. D. & Perlin, D. S. Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 mutations on echinocandin sensitivity and kinetics of 1,3-β-D-glucan synthase: implication for the existing susceptibility breakpoint. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53, 3690–3699 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports that mutations in FKS1 and FKS2 hot-spot regions reduced echinocandin sensitivity of the enzyme by 2 to 3 orders of magnitude relative to wild type. The Results report increased in vitro IC50 values for mutant enzyme complexes, supporting the cited magnitude. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The emergence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) C. glabrata isolates is increasing at an alarming rate.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [71] Shor, E., Schuyler, J. & Perlin, D. S. A novel, drug resistance-independent, fluorescence-based approach to measure mutation rates in microbial pathogens. mBio 10, e00120–19 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction says that C. glabrata infections have become more prevalent and that studies have documented the emergence of multidrug-resistant infections. It does not say that the number of multidrug-resistant isolates is increasing, or establish an alarming rate of increase; those claims go beyond the passage. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Inhibitors of heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90)82, calcineurin21,25,26, target of rapamycin (TOR)83 and mutants that affect Rim10184 (a transcription factor involved in the pH response pathway) effectively eliminate tolerance and greatly increase the fungicidal activity [G] of fluconazole across a diverse set of isolates with different tolerance levels (Fig. 1E; Box 5).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] Cowen, L. E. & Lindquist, S. Hsp90 potentiates the rapid evolution of new traits: drug resistance in diverse fungi. Science 309, 2185–2189 (2005). source
- Partly supportedcites [21] Marchetti, O., Moreillon, P., Glauser, M. P., Bille, J. & Sanglard, D. Potent synergism of the combination of fluconazole and cyclosporine in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44, 2373–2381 (2000). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) reports that cyclosporine or FK506 combined with fluconazole eliminated trailing growth, and identifies calcineurin as a possible cyclosporine target. It does not establish that calcineurin inhibition caused the effect. The fluconazole–cyclosporine combination was fungicidal in two of three fluconazole-susceptible isolates but only fungistatic in the third; the paper does not establish the claimed effect across isolates with different tolerance levels. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] Lockhart, S. R., Ghannoum, M. A. & Alexander, B. D. Establishment and use of epidemiological cutoff values for molds and yeasts by use of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M57 standard. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55, 1262–1268 (2017). This review provides an important and accessible over-review of the concept of epidemiological cut-off values as well as the methodology that underlies their establishment. source
- Partly supportedcites [26] Onyewu, C., Wormley, F. L. Jr., Perfect, J. R. & Heitman, J. The calcineurin target, Crz1, functions in azole tolerance but is not required for virulence of Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 72, 7330–7333 (2004). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The passage describing fluconazole Etest assays (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) reports that FK506, a calcineurin inhibitor, abolished the trailing effect in the strains tested. The paper also reports enhanced inhibition with FK506 and fluconazole, but it does not establish increased fungicidal activity across diverse isolates with different tolerance levels. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [83] Khandelwal, N. K. et al. Azole resistance in a Candida albicans mutant lacking the ABC transporter CDR6/ROA1 depends on TOR signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 412–432 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (p. 2) reports that Tor1 inhibition leads to azole hypersensitivity, and the discussion (p. 15) links hyperactive Tor1 to azole resistance in the NKKY101 mutant. The paper does not show that TOR inhibitors eliminate fluconazole tolerance or greatly increase its fungicidal activity across diverse isolates; its experiments focus on the mutant and related strains. The other targets in the citing sentence have separate citations and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, mutations in Tac1, a positive transcriptional regulator of efflux pump genes, increases efflux activity49.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [49] Todd, R. T., Wikoff, T. D., Forche, A. & Selmecki, A. Genome plasticity in Candida albicans is driven by long repeat sequences. eLife. 8, e45954 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction identifies Tac1 as a transcriptional activator of drug efflux pumps. It attributes fluconazole resistance to amplification of TAC1 and ERG11, but does not say that mutations in Tac1 increase efflux activity. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Organelles such as the vacuole make important contributions to tolerance and/or trailing growth.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J. & Bille, J. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 959–976 (2003). source
- Could not verifycites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on i(5L) and fitness discusses the advantage conferred by aneuploidy during fluconazole exposure, not a contribution from organelles. Searches for “vacuole” and “trailing” found no passage in our copy addressing the claim; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.75)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [94] Roemer, T. & Krysan, D. J. Antifungal drug development: challenges, unmet clinical needs, and new approaches. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a019703 (2014). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [95] Cornet, M. et al. Deletions of endocytic components VPS28 and VPS32 affect growth at alkaline pH and virulence through both RIM101-dependent and RIM101-independent pathways in Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 73, 7977–7987 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The inter-isolate heterogeneity is likely due to genetic differences that contribute to several other clinically relevant phenotypes, including biofilm formation, filamentous growth responses and sensitivity to temperature52,60,79,80.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [52] Mount, H. O. et al. Global analysis of genetic circuitry and adaptive mechanisms enabling resistance to the azole antifungal drugs. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007319 (2018). This article screens a library of C. albicans deletion strains and identifies two genes that affect azole responses, have roles in stress response pathways and functions that are are suppressed by the acquisition of aneuploid chromosomes. Whether the mutations are affecting resistance or tolerance is not clear, but activities of the identified genes (vacuolar retrograde trafficking and a cell wall and polarity GTPase activating pro sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on basal fluconazole tolerance identifies genes affecting tolerance, and the clinical-isolate Results section reports differing effects of gene deletions on azole resistance. Neither connects inter-isolate tolerance heterogeneity to genetic differences affecting biofilm formation, filamentous growth, or temperature sensitivity. Searches for those phenotypes found no passage making that connection; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Partly supportedcites [60] Forche, A. et al. Stress alters rates and types of loss of heterozygosity in Candida albicans. mBio 2, e00129–11 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says genetic variation occurs among C. albicans clinical isolates and that different alleles can confer different benefits under stress. That supports a general genetic basis for differences in stress response, but the paper does not connect inter-isolate tolerance to biofilm formation, filamentous growth, or temperature sensitivity. Its temperature experiments measure loss of heterozygosity under heat stress, not differences in temperature sensitivity among isolates. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [79] Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Genomic plasticity of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 9, 991–1008 (2010). source
- Partly supportedcites [80] Sitterle, E. et al. Within-host genomic diversity of Candida albicans in healthy carriers. Sci. Rep. 9, 2563 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports genetic heterogeneity among isolates from healthy carriers and says genomic variation can facilitate adaptation to environmental changes and affect virulence factors. It does not establish that genetic differences explain inter-isolate tolerance heterogeneity or specifically link those differences to biofilm formation, filamentous growth responses, and temperature sensitivity. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For example, isolates that are more tolerant have lower average intracellular drug than less tolerant isolates9 (Fig 1D).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results section, “Decreased intracellular drug levels underlie increased tolerance,” reports that steady-state intracellular FLC-Cy5 levels at 24 hours correlated inversely with tolerance (FoG) across isolates. This supports the comparison, specifically for the measured fluorescent fluconazole probe. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Importantly, many of these same core stress response pathways in C. albicans (Hsp90, Ca2+-calmodulin-calcineurin, lysine deacetylases, protein kinase C and HOG (high osmolarity glycerol responses) pathways) t also affect echinocandin responses68,86,87.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Hsp90, Chitin Synthesis, and Cell Integrity Circuit sections link Hsp90, calcineurin, PKC, and HOG signaling to echinocandin responses in C. albicans. The Hsp90 and Related Factors section discusses lysine deacetylases in relation to C. albicans azole resistance, but does not establish their effect on its echinocandin responses. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [86] Shapiro, R. S., Zaas, A. K., Betancourt-Quiroz, M., Perfect, J. R. & Cowen, L. E. The Hsp90 co-chaperone Sgt1 governs Candida albicans morphogenesis and drug resistance. PLoS One 7, e44734 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page unavailable) says that Hsp90 affects C. albicans echinocandin resistance and links Hsp90-mediated drug resistance to calcineurin and the PKC pathway. It does not establish the claimed roles of lysine deacetylases or the HOG pathway in echinocandin responses; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [87] Cowen, L. E. et al. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2818–2823 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion links Hsp90 and calcineurin to echinocandin responses in Aspergillus, but links those pathways to azole responses in C. albicans. It does not establish that the listed pathways affect echinocandin responses in C. albicans, and it does not address lysine deacetylases, protein kinase C, or HOG in that context. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Indeed, the involvement of lysine deacetylases and calcineurin implies a connection between tolerance and the metabolic anti-stress machinery (for example Ref. 88).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [88] Olin-Sandoval, V. et al. Lysine harvesting is an antioxidant strategy and triggers underground polyamine metabolism. Nature 572, 249–253 (2019). source
The cited paper is offered as an example of a connection between tolerance and metabolic anti-stress machinery, not as evidence that lysine deacetylases or calcineurin are involved. Its Abstract (page unavailable) reports that lysine harvesting reconfigures redox metabolism, lowers reactive oxygen species, and increases oxidant tolerance. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Similarly, pH, temperature and nutrient availability affect the level of fluconazole tolerance9.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results section, under “Environmental modulation of drug responses” (page not provided), reports changes in FoG, the paper’s measure of fluconazole tolerance, with pH, temperature, and growth medium. Its comparison of rich YPD and casitone media supports the nutrient-availability part of the paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“By contrast, an isolate that is resistant because of increased efflux has a proportion of cells with very low levels of intracellular drug (10X less than those with moderate drug levels compared to tolerant isolates)9 (Fig. 1D).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Fig. 3 caption compares intracellular drug levels in resistant strain T101 with those in isolates of differing tolerance and defines low and mid drug-level categories whose lower bounds differ by about tenfold. The Discussion notes the role of efflux in drug resistance, but our copy does not establish that T101 is resistant because of increased efflux or explicitly quantify a tenfold difference between its cells and tolerant isolates. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.79)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Specifically, studies of these pathways using either inhibitors or mutant strains showed they reduce fungal growth in combination with caspofungin or anidulafungin.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [68] Cowen, L. E., Sanglard, D., Howard, S. J., Rogers, P. D. & Perlin, D. S. Mechanisms of antifungal drug resistance. CSH Perspect. Med. 5, a019752 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Cell Integrity Circuit section reports that deleting pathway genes increases susceptibility to echinocandins and that kinase inhibitors act synergistically with echinocandins against fungi. The Hsp90 section likewise reports reduced echinocandin tolerance after genetic or pharmacological compromise. These passages support the general finding, but do not establish the claimed growth reduction specifically in combination with caspofungin or anidulafungin; they describe inhibiting the pathways, not the pathways themselves reducing growth. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Partly supportedcites [86] Shapiro, R. S., Zaas, A. K., Betancourt-Quiroz, M., Perfect, J. R. & Cowen, L. E. The Hsp90 co-chaperone Sgt1 governs Candida albicans morphogenesis and drug resistance. PLoS One 7, e44734 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on Sgt1 depletion reports that genetically reducing Sgt1 increased Candida albicans susceptibility to the echinocandin micafungin and created a fungicidal combination. It does not report the claimed combinations with caspofungin or anidulafungin, or show an inhibitor-based combination in those experiments. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [87] Cowen, L. E. et al. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2818–2823 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports that inhibiting Hsp90 enhanced caspofungin’s efficacy against A. fumigatus. Our copy does not report a corresponding result with anidulafungin or show that mutant strains reduced fungal growth in combination with either drug; it describes genetic depletion of Hsp90 in combination with fluconazole instead. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, colonies from higher tolerance isolates appear faster than those from low tolerance isolates (Fig. 1C).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We posit that antifungal tolerance is a property of pathogenic fungi that can be distinguished from resistance using the same in vitro assay that can quantify both susceptibility [G] (measured as MIC at 24 h) and growth properties at 48 h (the fraction of growth [G] or supra-MIC growth [G]) (Box 1).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This has been attributed to non-mycologic causes such as host factors, immune status, and/or pharmacologic issues8.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Lepak, A. J. & Andes, D. R. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a019653 (2014). source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, the discordance between overall treatment outcome and low levels of clinical resistance may be attributable to antifungal drug tolerance.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, the loss of one antifungal drug through resistance has a major impact on patient care.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Drug-resistant fungal infections are emerging as an important clinical problem1,2.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] Arendrup, M. C. & Patterson, T. F. Multidrug-resistant Candida: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 216, S445–S451 (2017). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] Perlin, D. S., Rautemaa-Richardson, R. & Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, e383–e392 (2017). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Currently, only three primary classes of agents are used to treat invasive fungal infections5: polyenes (for example, amphotericin B); azoles (for example, fluconazole) and echinocandins (for example, caspofungin) (Table 1).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [5] Krysan, D. J. The unmet clinical need of novel antifungal drugs. Virulence 8, 135–137 (2017). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, specific interactions between the drug and the fungus, aside from the MIC, may affect therapeutic responses as well.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This is mainly due to an increase in patients at-risk for invasive fungal infections from complex surgical procedures, immune-suppression or reduced immune function3.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] Alangaden, G. J. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, infection control, and prevention. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 25, 201–225 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By comparison, six distinct classes of antibiotics are currently available to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), an important and widespread drug-resistant bacterium6.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] Bassetti, M., Carnelutti, A., Castaldo, N. & Peghin, M. Important new therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 20, 2317–2334 (2019). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, drug tolerance is a manifestation of phenotypic heterogeneity intrinsic to a given fungal isolate.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Studies are beginning to provide evidence that tolerance is associated with multiple genetic components that differ between isolates.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although resistance is emerging in non-Candida species such as Aspergillus spp.,29 the general molecular mechanisms of resistance are conserved; therefore, we will focus primarily on Candida spp., the most prevalent species and the most common cause of both life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal diseases, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush and esophagitis.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, non-standard assays are frequently used to measure antifungal activity but do not generate an MIC value.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Measuring and defining resistance
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The genetic make up of an individual isolate may also affect the degree of variability between the responses of different isogenic cells in the population.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, antifungal tolerance is most evident with fungistatic drugs [G], and thus measuring cell death is less relevant.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although resistance is emerging in non-Candida species such as Aspergillus spp.,29 the general molecular mechanisms of resistance are conserved; therefore, we will focus primarily on Candida spp., the most prevalent species and the most common cause of both life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal diseases, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush and esophagitis.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Luna-Tapia, A., Butts, A. & Palmer, G. E. Loss of C-5 sterol desaturase activity in Candida albicans: azole resistance or merely trailing growth? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e00129–11 (2019). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“For example, isochromosome (5L), a specific aneuploidy in C. albicans, results in the formation of two extra copies of the left arm of chromosome 543, and, consequently, extra copies of TAC1 and ERG11, genes that confer resistance to azoles in these strains50.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [43] Kordalewska, M. et al. Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 62, e00238–18 (2018). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [50] Coste, A. et al. A mutation in Tac1p, a transcription factor regulating CDR1 and CDR2, is coupled with loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 5 to mediate antifungal resistance in Candida albicans. Genetics 172, 2139–2156 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In C. albicans, gain-of-function mutations in Upc2, a key transcriptional regulator of ergosterol biosynthetic genes34, lead to increased ERG11 expression and reduced azole susceptibility.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Holmes, A. R. et al. Heterozygosity and functional allelic variation in the Candida albicans efflux pump genes CDR1 and CDR2. Mol. Microbiol. 62, 170–186 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Tolerant bacterial and fungal isolates have MICs in the susceptible range, but tolerant bacteria are characterized by longer minimum duration to killing (MDK) than susceptible isolates10, based on responses to bactericidal drugs10–12.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [10] Brauner, A., Fridman, O., Gefen, O. & Balaban, N. Q. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 320–330 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The highest rates of both azole and echinocandin resistance are observed in Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis30 (Table 1).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] van der Linden, J. W. et al. Aspergillosis due to voriconazole highly resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and recovery of genetically related resistant isolates from domiciles. Clin. Infect. Dis. 57, 513–520 (2013). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, serial dilution agar plating assays frequently compare the susceptibility of one isolate or a mutant to its appropriate reference strain; isolates and mutants that grow better than the reference strain in these assays are often referred to as resistant.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Measuring and defining resistance
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similarly, extra copies of the right arm of chromosome 3 may increase drug efflux because CDR1 and MRR1, which encode a major ABC transporter and a transcriptional activator of MDR1 (the MFS transporter), respectively, are found on this chromosome (Candida Genome Database [http://www.candidagenome.org/]).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Candida Genome Database
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alterations in antifungal drug targets, due to increased target expression or mutations within the target protein sequence, also mediate antifungal drug resistance (Table 1).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Of note, many of these transcription factors also regulate other genes that also contribute to resistance, virulence or general yeast cell fitness32.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [32] Prasad, R., Rawal, M. K. & Shah, A. H. Candida efflux ATPases and antiporters in clinical drug resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 892, 351–376 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The most prevalent mechanism of azole resistance involves increased drug efflux pump activity, primarily due to gain-of-function mutations in transcription factors that regulate ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (TAC1 in C. albicans and PDR1 in C. glabrata) and major facilitator super family (MFS) pumps (MRR1 in C. albicans)31,32.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] McCarty, T. P. & Pappas, P. G. Invasive candidiasis. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 30, 103–124 (2016). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [32] Prasad, R., Rawal, M. K. & Shah, A. H. Candida efflux ATPases and antiporters in clinical drug resistance. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 892, 351–376 (2016). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Growth of subpopulations of susceptible fungal isolates in the presence of drugs at concentrations above the MIC can be due to tolerance, heteroresistance [G] or persistence (see Box 2), depending on the drug, organism and the size of the subpopulation.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These genetic components, that differ between isolates, affect the ability of isogenic cells within a single isolate to respond physiologically or metabolically (to environmental or nutritional signals).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notably, a single aneuploid chromosome can confer more than one unrelated phenotype.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, trisomy of chromosome 2 also promotes cell survival in the presence of hydroxyurea, a cancer chemotherapy drug.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Trisomy of chromosome 2 promotes the growth of C. albicans cells in the presence of the antifungal drug caspofungin47 without altering the MIC.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This implies that tolerance depends on a shared set of critical pathways across diverse isolates.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This highlights the idea that tolerance is due to the slow growth of some cells in the population and raises questions about how such cells differ from those that do not grow (or grow much more slowly).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Measuring and characterizing tolerance in fungi
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this sense, the differences in tolerance levels measured as FoG or SMG (Box 1) between isolates have a genetic component.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Measuring and characterizing tolerance in fungi
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, tolerance seems to depend on intracellular processes that facilitate adaptation in response to drug stresses.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In resistant isolates, mutations (for example, gain-of-function alleles in drug efflux pumps or their positive regulators) affecting efflux would enable most (or all) cells to reduce intracellular drug concentration to very low levels.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The large number of central cellular pathways that affect tolerance also implies that many types of mutations could lead to changes in tolerance.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mutations in some pathways seem to affect resistance as well as tolerance.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Combination therapies with adjuvant drugs that interfere with the compensatory stress responses required for tolerance have the potential to increase the lethality of an inhibitory antifungal drug.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Summary and future directions
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, variations on the function of the critical pathways listed above are candidate drivers of differences in tolerance levels between isolates.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This implies that tolerance in all strains is dependent on all of these major hubs of cell homeostasis, irrespective of both the subpopulation size and its ability to in the presence of the drug.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests a mechanistic distinction between resistance and tolerance.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mechanisms that drive cell-to-cell differences in drug responses within a single isolate remain to be determined; but, at least for azoles, they seem to be connected to differences in intracellular drug concentration between different cells.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Summary and future directions
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Consistent with this, either pharmacological or genetic disruption of Hsp90, calcineurin, TOR, lysine deacetylases or Rim101 function enhance the effect of fluconazole (reviewed in Ref. 85).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [85] Robbins, N., Caplan, T. & Cowen, L. E. Molecular evolution of antifungal drug resistance. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 71, 753–775 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, drug pressure will lead to the positive selection of mutants that exhibit improved fitness.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Role of tolerance in the acquisition of resistance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In tolerant isolates, physiological differences (for example, normal distribution in the amount of efflux gene expression) would enable some cells to reduce intracellular drug concentrations modestly relative to others, thereby facilitating slow growth in those cells with higher efflux gene expression.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
- It may state two separate claims as one. 40
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“For example, the 90-day mortality rate for recipients of solid organ transplants who develop candidemia [G] is between 22%-44%, depending on the Candida species4.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [4] Andes, D. R. et al. The epidemiology and outcomes of invasive Candida infections among organ transplant recipients in the United States: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET). Transpl. Infect. Dis. 18, 921–931 (2016). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.2 reports 90-day mortality of 22.6%–44% by Candida species among organ transplant recipients with invasive candidiasis. The cohort includes infection sites other than the bloodstream, so these figures are not established specifically for recipients with candidemia. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Although relatively low levels of resistance for most Candida species have been described, the outcomes for candidemia remain poor, as high levels of mortality (15%-50%) have been associated with candida infections7.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introductory passage following the Abstract’s Conclusions says antifungal-resistant Candida isolates remain uncommon and invasive fungal infections are associated with high mortality. It does not give a 15%–50% mortality range or state a mortality rate specifically for candidemia; searches for that range and for candidemia mortality found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Subpopulations of tolerant cells grow slowly in drug concentrations above the MIC, which is usually visually evident after time periods longer than the standard 24 h for MIC measurements.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results section defines the standard MIC measurement at 24 h and says tolerance is commonly monitored at 48 h, when the authors measured growth above the MIC. The Subpopulation growth dynamics section confirms that only a proportion of cells grow at supra-MIC concentrations and that their growth slows in the presence of fluconazole. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“C. auris appears to rapidly acquire resistance or tolerance to echinocandins as well polyenes1,42, leaving few, if any, treatment options.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [1] Arendrup, M. C. & Patterson, T. F. Multidrug-resistant Candida: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and treatment. J. Infect. Dis. 216, S445–S451 (2017). source
- Could not verifycites [42] Satoh, K. et al. Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 53, 41–44 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) describe antifungal susceptibility for a single C. auris isolate, but do not report resistance developing over time. Table 1 (page unavailable) lists susceptibility results for other drug classes, not echinocandins or polyenes. Searches for rapid acquisition of resistance, echinocandins, polyenes, and treatment options found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Many ERG11 mutations seem to interfere with drug binding and to decrease susceptibility in an additive manner36.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [36] Flowers, S. A. et al. Gain-of-function mutations in UPC2 are a frequent cause of ERG11 upregulation in azole-resistant clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 11, 1289–1299 (2012). This study establishes that gain-of-function mutations in UPC2, the key regulator of ergosterol biosynthesis gene expression, are a source of clinically important fluconazole resistance. Previously, only transcriptional regulators of efflux pump expression were known to do so. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introduction states that ERG11 point mutations reduce azole binding to their target, supporting the drug-binding part of the claim. The Discussion describes lower azole susceptibility with two mutant UPC2 alleles than with one, but does not say that ERG11 mutations reduce susceptibility additively. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Antifungal drug resistance rates in Candida species are dynamic and variable between medical institutions and countries7.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section reports changes in fluconazole resistance over time for several Candida species and different resistance rates across geographic regions (Tables 3 and 4; page not provided). It does not report resistance rates by individual medical institution or country, so those specific comparisons are not established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Mutations in ERG11 have also been observed in Candida spp. and over 100 different ERG11 alleles have been described35.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [35] Munoz, J. F. et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat. Commun. 9, 5346 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section (“Conservation of known drug resistance and virulence related genes”; page unavailable) reports ERG11 mutations in Candida auris isolates and identifies a mutation also found in C. pseudohaemulonii. It does not report more than 100 distinct ERG11 alleles; searches for that number and for ERG11 allele counts found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Like tolerance, trailing growth is sensitive to growth conditions17–19; the degree of sensitivity to these conditions differs for different clinical isolates9,(reviewed in 20), and leads to considerable laboratory-to-laboratory variation in the estimation of trailing growth.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Coenye, T., De Vos, M., Vandenbosch, D. & Nelis, H. Factors influencing the trailing endpoint observed in Candida albicans susceptibility testing using the CLSI procedure. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 14, 495–497 (2008). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [18] Agrawal, D., Patterson, T. F., Rinaldi, M. G. & Revankar, S. G. Trailing end-point phenotype of Candida spp. in antifungal susceptibility testing to fluconazole is eliminated by altering incubation temperature. J. Med. Microbiol. 56, 1003–1004 (2007). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Marr, K. A., Rustad, T. R., Rex, J. H. & White, T. C. The trailing end point phenotype in antifungal susceptibility testing is pH dependent. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43, 1383–1386 (1999). source
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results (page unavailable) report that pH, temperature, and growth medium affect measures of trailing growth, and that strains differ in their sensitivity to medium changes. The paper says consistent assay conditions are needed for reproducible results. The citing sentence's laboratory-to-laboratory variation is an inference from those findings, rather than a variation measured directly in the source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [20] Delarze, E. & Sanglard, D. Defining the frontiers between antifungal resistance, tolerance and the concept of persistence. Drug Resist. Updat. 23, 12–19 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 6 reports trailing growth at neutral pH but not low pH, supporting sensitivity to growth conditions, while cautioning that the media also differed. Section 4 describes different degrees of trailing growth among C. albicans isolates. Neither passage establishes that isolates differ in their sensitivity to growth conditions or that this causes laboratory-to-laboratory variation in trailing-growth measurements; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Furthermore, higher tolerance in bacterial isolates is associated with longer lag phase length, whereas fungal isolates with higher tolerance levels have shorter lag phase length (measured as time required for colonies to become visible13) relative to those with lower tolerance levels9.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [13] Levin-Reisman, I., Fridman, O. & Balaban, N. Q. ScanLag: high-throughput quantification of colony growth and lag time. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/51456 (2014). source
Citation 13 is attached to the parenthetical definition of the measurement, not the bacterial–fungal tolerance comparison, which is cited to source 9. In Representative Results (Figure 5; page unavailable), ScanLag defines a colony’s “appearance time” as the time when it is detected, supporting the cited definition of time until colonies become visible. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Partly supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion says antibacterial tolerance generally involves a longer lag phase. In Subpopulation growth dynamics, highly tolerant fungal isolates had shorter lag times in liquid assays with drug and a shorter drug-induced delay in colony appearance. The claim omits the drug condition and implies that colony appearance time itself was shorter; the paper says lag-phase duration did not correlate with tolerance in growth measurements without drug. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Whereas tolerance is generally due to substantial subpopulations of cells (5-90%) that grow in drug, antifungal heteroresistance or persistence involve rare cells (generally <<1%) that transiently survive high concentrations of antifungal drugs14.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [14] Wuyts, J., Van Dijck, P. & Holtappels, M. Fungal persister cells: the basis for recalcitrant infections? PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007301 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction describes persisters as a small, nongrowing subpopulation that survives high antifungal doses, supporting that part of the claim. It defines tolerance as survival after transient exposure, not growth in drug, and attributes growth in drug to resistant isolates. The cited passages give neither the 5–90% nor the generally <<1% range, and do not address heteroresistance; the section on in vivo persistence reports persister frequencies of up to 9% in some strains. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“First, tolerance of an isolate is relatively reproducible, with differences in tolerance levels between isolates presumed to be affected by intrinsic genetic differences between those isolates. (Fig. 1A).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The Results passage says tolerance measurements were reproducible and stable for a given isolate. The Discussion says the size of the tolerant subpopulation is a heritable feature of a strain and predicts that tolerance differs between genetic backgrounds and growth conditions. The supplied passages do not give page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.90)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The degree of tolerance correlates with the size of the subpopulation of cells that grow above the MIC, and the rate at which such cells form visible colonies at supra-MIC concentrations9.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Measuring and characterizing tolerance in fungi
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
In “Subpopulation growth dynamics” (Fig. 2a), the proportion of cells forming colonies above the MIC correlates with tolerance measured as FoG. The same section (Fig. 2f–g) reports that high-FoG isolates have a shorter delay before colonies appear on fluconazole and that this delay correlates with FoG levels. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Upon exposure to fluconazole, all cells undergo 1-3 rounds of division before growth arrest9,58; tolerant cells in the population resume growth several hours later, whereas non-tolerant cells arrest for considerably longer and only resume division in the absence of the drug.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Could not verifycites [58] Forche, A. et al. The parasexual cycle in Candida albicans provides an alternative pathway to meiosis for the formation of recombinant strains. PLoS Biol. 6, e110 (2008). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Adjuvant [G] drugs and mutations that affect several stress-responsive pathways often reduce tolerance9 (Box 5); and adjuvants reduce tolerance to similar baseline levels irrespective of the tolerance level of the isolate9.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
In the Results section on adjuvant fluconazole combinations (page not available), the paper reports that most adjuvants significantly reduced tolerance and that the combinations cleared tolerance across the clinical isolates tested. The same section reports that genes in several stress-response pathways primarily affected tolerance; together with the across-isolate result, this supports the paraphrase. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Homozygosis of this ERG11 allele was persistent (retained in the infecting population for more than 8 months55), consistent with the notion that mutations in ERG11 promote pathogen survival under drug selection56.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [55] Ford, C. B. et al. The evolution of drug resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. eLife 4, e00662 (2015). source
The citation to this paper is attached to the idea that ERG11 mutations may aid survival under drug selection, not to the preceding eight-month duration. The Results section (‘LOH events are commonly associated with increased resistance’; page unavailable) describes a persistent homozygous ERG11 change and identifies ERG11 as a fluconazole drug target. The Discussion (page unavailable) reports ERG11 mutation LOH in three patients, while leaving its independent effect on resistance unresolved; this supports the citing sentence’s cautious wording. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [56] White, T. C. Increased mRNA levels of ERG16, CDR, and MDR1 correlate with increases in azole resistance in Candida albicans isolates from a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41, 1482–1487 (1997). This article presents the first detailed study of the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of fluconazole resistance over time in patients. It is a landmark study because of its patient-based approach and because it yielded strains that are still under study today. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s opening passage says alterations in the azole target enzyme can contribute to resistance, which supports the general link between target-enzyme changes and drug resistance. Our copy does not report that this ERG11 allele became homozygous or persisted for more than eight months, nor does it establish that the mutation promoted survival under drug selection. (LLM, conf=0.75)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Phenotypic differences between clinical isolates involves many thousands, to tens of thousands of SNPs, and is also evident with phenotypes such as biofilm formation and its dependence upon specific transcription factors72.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Measuring and characterizing tolerance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [72] Ropars, J. et al. Gene flow contributes to diversification of the major fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Nat. Commun. 9, 2253 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion report an average of 65,629 heterozygous SNPs per isolate and describe phenotypic differences among isolates. That count is within isolates, not a measure of SNP differences between isolates. The paper links transcription factors to fitness and morphogenesis, but the passages found do not establish differences in biofilm formation or its dependence on particular transcription factors (Results and Discussion; page unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Furthermore, both LOH and aneuploidy occur at much higher frequency (2-4-fold) than point mutations59, and are readily detected following a single passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity of a mouse61–63.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [59] Harrison, B. D. et al. A tetraploid intermediate precedes aneuploid formation in yeasts exposed to fluconazole. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001815 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation to this paper is attached to detection after a single mouse passage, not to the 2–4-fold comparison, which cites reference 59. The Results section, “Trimeras Form During Exposure to FLC Within the Host” (page unavailable), reports trimera-like cells in fluconazole-treated mouse ear tissue after 48 hours; it does not report detecting LOH or aneuploidy after passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity. Searches for those routes and for mouse-passage detection found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Partly supportedcites [61] Ene, I. V. et al. Global analysis of mutations driving microevolution of a heterozygous diploid fungal pathogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8688–E8697 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Genome Architecture and Environmental Pressures section says LOH was more frequent during bloodstream passage and oral-cavity infection than in vitro. The paper also reports aneuploidy after mouse gastrointestinal passage, but does not establish that both changes were readily detected after a single passage through the bloodstream or oral cavity. The 2–4-fold comparison is attached to a different citation (59). (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Supportedcites [62] Forche, A. et al. Rapid phenotypic and genotypic diversification after exposure to the oral host niche in Candida albicans. Genetics 209, 725–741 (2018). source
The citation to this source concerns detection after mouse passage, not the 2–4-fold comparison, which the sentence cites separately. The Abstract (page not available) reports LOH and aneuploidy after passage through the mouse oral cavity and describes earlier findings of both after passage in a mouse bloodstream-infection model. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites [63] Forche, A., May, G. & Magee, P. T. Demonstration of loss of heterozygosity by single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis and alterations in strain morphology in Candida albicans strains during infection. Eukaryot. Cell 4, 156–165 (2005). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Materials and Methods describes isolates obtained after passage through mice in a model of bloodstream-disseminated infection, and Results and Discussion reports LOH and chromosome-size changes in those isolates. The paper does not establish aneuploidy or examine passage through the oral cavity. The 2–4-fold comparison is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence, so it is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“it leaves the polyene amphotericin B, which is toxic8, as the only treatment option for these infections.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Lepak, A. J. & Andes, D. R. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 5, a019653 (2014). source
- Could not verifycites [71] Shor, E., Schuyler, J. & Perlin, D. S. A novel, drug resistance-independent, fluorescence-based approach to measure mutation rates in microbial pathogens. mBio 10, e00120–19 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Citation 8 is attached specifically to the assertion that amphotericin B is toxic. The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses multidrug-resistant C. glabrata infections but does not address amphotericin B or its toxicity; searches for amphotericin B and toxicity found no supporting passage. The Introduction instead says there are no treatment options for these infections, rather than identifying amphotericin B as the only option. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Echinocandin resistance is less prevalent than azole resistance (less than 1% of C. albicans infections7, but up to 10% of C. glabrata infections)66.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [7] Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M. & Jones, R. N. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, S79–S94 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In the Results section on echinocandin resistance (page unavailable), the paper reports 1.7%–3.5% resistance among C. glabrata isolates overall and cites earlier findings of 8%–9% specifically among fluconazole-resistant bloodstream isolates. Thus, “up to 10%” is plausible for that restricted subgroup, but the citing sentence omits the qualifier and presents it as a rate for C. glabrata infections generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Supportedcites [66] Farmakiotis, D., Tarrand, J. J. & Kontoyiannis, D. P. Drug-resistant Candida glabrata infection in cancer patients. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 1833–1840 (2014). source
The Echinocandin Resistance section reports caspofungin resistance in 10.3% of C. glabrata isolates from cancer patients; the Azole Resistance section reports fluconazole resistance in 20.5%. That supports the approximate 10% figure and the comparison. The C. albicans figure is attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“tolerant cell growth is slower and more time-dependent than resistant cell growth, and is less dependent on drug concentration9.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Measuring and characterizing tolerance in fungi
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results describe tolerant growth at supra-MIC fluconazole concentrations becoming evident at 48 hours while MIC remains unchanged, supporting a time-dependent distinction from resistance. Subpopulation growth dynamics reports delayed colony appearance with drug except in a resistant strain, but does not establish a general slower growth rate for tolerant versus resistant cells. The passages do not establish that tolerant growth is less dependent on drug concentration than resistant growth. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Furthermore, intracellular drug concentrations vary among cells within a given isolate, with the more tolerant isolates (those that grow slowly) having a larger population of cells with moderate amounts of drug per cell.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The “Decreased intracellular drug levels underlie increased tolerance” section reports variation in drug levels among cells and a positive correlation between tolerance (FoG) and the proportion of cells with mid-level intracellular FLC-Cy5 (Fig. 3d–e). The “No adjuvant” section describes tolerant cells as growing slowly in the presence of FLC. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“In Saccharomyces cerevisiae several genes involved in retrograde trafficking modulate tolerance and/or trailing growth, including VPS2127,51, VPS15 and VPS5194; Rim101 may influence tolerance via its ability to regulate the transcription of key components of the vacuolar trafficking pathway95.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] Sanglard, D., Ischer, F., Marchetti, O., Entenza, J. & Bille, J. Calcineurin A of Candida albicans: involvement in antifungal tolerance, cell morphogenesis and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48, 959–976 (2003). source
- Could not verifycites [51] Selmecki, A. M., Dulmage, K., Cowen, L. E., Anderson, J. B. & Berman, J. Acquisition of aneuploidy provides increased fitness during the evolution of antifungal drug resistance. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000705 (2009). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [94] Roemer, T. & Krysan, D. J. Antifungal drug development: challenges, unmet clinical needs, and new approaches. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 4, a019703 (2014). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [95] Cornet, M. et al. Deletions of endocytic components VPS28 and VPS32 affect growth at alkaline pH and virulence through both RIM101-dependent and RIM101-independent pathways in Candida albicans. Infect. Immun. 73, 7977–7987 (2005). source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In part, this argument is based on the observation that inhibition of Hsp90 in the presence of fluconazole not only eliminates tolerance9 but also renders fluconazole fungicidal87.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Role of tolerance in the acquisition of resistance
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [9] Rosenberg, A. et al. Antifungal tolerance is a subpopulation effect distinct from resistance and is associated with persistent candidemia. Nat. Commun. 9, 2470 (2018). This article provides a quantitative characterization of fluconazole tolerance in C. albicans, distinguishing it from resistance and highlighting its phenotypic heterogeneity and association with subpopulation growth, and sensitivity to adjuvant drugs. source
The ‘Adjuvant FLC combinations clear tolerance’ section reports that geldanamycin and radicicol inhibit Hsp90 and that fluconazole–adjuvant combinations cleared tolerance in the tested isolates. Figure 4 and its accompanying text also report that the tested combinations rendered fluconazole cidal, although the citing sentence attaches a separate citation to that point. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [87] Cowen, L. E. et al. Harnessing Hsp90 function as a powerful, broadly effective therapeutic strategy for fungal infectious disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 2818–2823 (2009). source
The Results section, “Inhibition of Hsp90 Function Converts the Fungistatic Activity of FL into a Fungicidal Combination,” reports that fluconazole (FL) combined with Hsp90 inhibition dramatically reduced viability in a C. albicans clinical isolate. Citation 87 is attached to the fungicidal claim; the separate tolerance claim is attributed to citation 9. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a more nuanced understanding of the fungal response to drugs may help explain the poor outcomes for infections caused by apparently susceptible isolates (that is, isolates that have a susceptible MIC at 24h, the standard endpoint for MIC measurements for Candida species).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Resistant strains have MICs above the breakpoint and are more likely to cause a therapeutic failure than susceptible strains with MICs below the breakpoint.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the same isogenic population, a second subpopulation of cells does not grow in the drug or its extremely slow growth is not detectable following 48 h in the drug.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, one antifungal drug class becoming ineffective in treating a fungal infection owing to resistance reduces the therapeutic options by at least 33%, and frequently by 50% because azoles and echinocandins are not active against all fungi.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Noteworthy, tolerant or trailing cells, when re-tested, have a similar MIC and a similar slow/partial growth in the presence of drugs at concentrations above the MIC (Fig. 1A).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although resistance is emerging in non-Candida species such as Aspergillus spp.,29 the general molecular mechanisms of resistance are conserved; therefore, we will focus primarily on Candida spp., the most prevalent species and the most common cause of both life-threatening invasive disease and clinically important mucosal diseases, such as vulvovaginal candidiasis, thrush and esophagitis.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Furthermore, because of the overlapping functions of different efflux pumps, mutations such as loss-of-function of a single gene encoding an efflux pump, or gain-of-function of less efficient efflux pumps, have only modest effects on bona fide resistance and the most dramatic effects are from overexpression combined with homozygosis (loss of heterozygosity) of hyperactive transcription factor alle”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Sasse, C. et al. The stepwise acquisition of fluconazole resistance mutations causes a gradual loss of fitness in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 86, 539–556 (2012). This article shows that when a strain accumulates multiple resistance mutations that affect different transcription factors, the effects are independent and additive. In addition, these effects, generated by engineered deletion mutations, are associated with reduced fitness in the absence of drug stress. As many resistant isolates do not have obvious fitness defects, it is assumed that they must have acquired compensatory mechan source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [37] Xiang, M. J. et al. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 386–393 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Trailing growth is often estimated as the percent of growth at different drug concentrations relative to growth in the absence of drug16, a measure similar to the ‘supra-MIC growth’ (SMG) parameter used to measure tolerance (Fig. 1B).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [16] Marcos-Zambrano, L. J., Escribano, P., Sanchez-Carrillo, C., Bouza, E. & Guinea, J. Scope and frequency of fluconazole trailing assessed using EUCAST in invasive Candida spp. isolates. Med. Mycol. 54, 733–739 (2016). source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clinical breakpoints provide guidance regarding the likelihood that a given isolate will respond to therapy.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Measuring and defining resistance
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increased ERG11 expression is also seen in intrinsically resistant non-C. albicans species; however, the underlying mechanism is unknown.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, many published reports refer to resistance as an increase in the MIC relative to a reference strain, particularly in the setting of work focused on elucidating the mechanisms of resistance.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Measuring and defining resistance
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The response to hydroxyurea was shown to be dependent on two of the 1087 different genes located on chromosome 2: RNR1 and RNR21; the genes responsible for survival in the presence of caspofungin are distinct from these RNR genes and have not yet been identified47.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Yang, F., Kravets, A., Bethlendy, G., Welle, S. & Rustchenko, E. Chromosome 5 monosomy of Candida albicans controls susceptibility to various toxic agents, including major antifungals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5026–5036 (2013). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The degree of tolerance varies across different isolates, presumably owing to the intrinsic allele diversity of each isolate.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Measuring and characterizing tolerance in fungi
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Recent guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America recommend that an echinocandin, rather than azoles, be used as initial therapy for most invasive Candida spp. infections64.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug resistance > Mechanisms of drug resistance in fungi
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] Forche, A., Magee, P. T., Selmecki, A., Berman, J. & May, G. Evolution in Candida albicans populations during a single passage through a mouse host. Genetics 182, 799–811 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is tolerance, rather than resistance, because the MIC remained susceptible and the increased growth was detected after incubation for more than the 24 h in standard MIC assays.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, for a single isolate, the phenotypic heterogeneity that drives some cells to grow slowly, and others to arrest growth, must be due to physiological or metabolic shifts that differ between isogenic cells in the population.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Measuring and characterizing tolerance in fungi
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, tolerance is likely to be due to physiological responses that emerge heterogeneously among the cell population, where the proportion of cells exhibiting such responses is a function of the genetic potential of the specific isolate.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By contrast, tolerance is a feature of susceptible (non-resistant) isolates that relies upon several central stress response pathways; it is a consequence of phenotypic heterogeneity, in which some cells in the population grow, albeit slowly, in drug.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Summary and future directions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Differences in tolerance levels between isolates have a genetic basis and affect the proportion of cells able to grow in the presence of drug.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, because a highly tolerant strain will divide more frequently in the presence of fluconazole than a strain with low tolerance levels, it will also have a higher population size and a higher likelihood of acquiring new mutations.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Role of tolerance in the acquisition of resistance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We posit that inter-isolate heterogeneity in tolerance is a composite phenotype that emerges from variations at multiple loci; that is, different stress response pathways probably contribute to tolerance to a different degree in different isolates.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Transcription factors can regulate multiple targets, and therefore the downstream effects of mutations in those transcription factors on resistance and tolerance could be independent of one another.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Resistance is due to genetic changes that directly affect either the drug target and/or intracellular drug concentrations and cause a heritable effect on the entire population of cells in a given isolate.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Summary and future directions
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cell-to-cell phenotypic heterogeneity occurs at a frequency that is far too high (10-90% of cells) to be due to the genetic acquisition of mutations, implying that it is due to non-genetic differences between the cells.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, tolerance has a genetic component that varies between isolates, and a non-genetic component that is influenced by growth conditions and cell physiology.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It appears that most, or all, of these fluconazole-associated stress response pathways affect tolerance, because inhibiting these pathways does not affect MIC levels (Box 5).”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, no colonies grow when fluconazole and an Hsp90 inhibitor are combined, because dead cells cannot evolve.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Role of tolerance in the acquisition of resistance
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, although resistance and tolerance are different (as described above), they may share the same processes (albeit to different degrees) to promote growth in the presence of antifungal drugs.”
§ Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi > Antifungal drug tolerance > Mechanisms of antifungal tolerance
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Tolerance and trailing growth in fluconazole probably represent the same phenomenon.
“Thus, we use the term ‘trailing’ for describing studies that used that term, with the assumption that tolerance and trailing growth in fluconazole probably reflect the same phenomenon19–21 in this Review.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Differences in tolerance levels between isolates have a genetic basis and affect the proportion of cells able to grow in the presence of drug.
“Differences in tolerance levels between isolates is assumed to have a genetic basis, and to affect the proportion of cells able to grow in drug.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, some 5–90% of the tolerant cells can slowly proliferate [105].”
From Insight into the Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance of Antifungal Heteroresistance (2025) · cites this paper as [105]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Nevertheless, the fungistatic nature of FLC renders pathogenic fungi capable of developing tolerance, characterized by FLC-susceptible fungal strains surviving at FLC concentrations higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [9].”
From Pitavastatin Calcium Confers Fungicidal Properties to Fluconazole by Inhibiting Ubiquinone Biosynthesis and Generating Reactive Oxygen Species (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, the emerging issue of azole resistance and tolerance poses a substantial obstacle7 and underscores the necessity for alternative approaches to impede the function of Erg11.”
From Impairing the interaction between Erg11 and cytochrome P450 reductase Ncp1 enhances azoles’ antifungal activities (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Fungal drug tolerance is linked to azole treatment failure and the inability to clear an infection, despite these isolates being considered drug-sensitive by the typical MIC50 assays (Sanglard et al. 2003; Delarze and Sanglard 2015; Rosenberg et al. 2018; Berman and Krysan 2020).”
From Antifungal Drug Concentration Impacts the Spectrum of Adaptive Mutations in Candida albicans (2023) · cites this paper as Berman and Krysan 2020
In the citing paper
“The C. neoformans homologue of mTOR kinase, Tor1, is essential for Cryptococcus stress response signalling, virulence84,85 and fluconazole tolerance (that is, the ability of a drug-susceptible organism to grow in the presence of an antifungal drug at concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration)86.”
From Treatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook (2021) · cites this paper as [86]
Citations
Cites
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D. R., Clancy, C. J., Marr, K. A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Reboli, A. C., Schuster, M. G., Vazquez, J. A., Walsh, T. J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ933 · Cited by 4,200
Lockhart, S. R., Etienne, K. A., Vallabhaneni, S., Farooqi, J., Chowdhary, A., Govender, N. P., Colombo, A. L., Calvo, B., Cuomo, C. A., Desjardins, C. A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciw691 · Cited by 1,662
Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment
Brauner, A., Fridman, O., Gefen, O., & Balaban, N. Q. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34 · Cited by 1,612
Satoh, K., Makimura, K., Hasumi, Y., Nishiyama, Y., Uchida, K., & Yamaguchi, H. (2009) · Microbiology and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x · Cited by 1,381
Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence
Balaban, N. Q., Helaine, S., Lewis, K., Ackermann, M., Aldridge, B., Andersson, D. I., Brynildsen, M. P., Bumann, D., Camilli, A., Collins, J. J., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3 · Cited by 1,313
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D. R., Clancy, C. J., Marr, K. A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., Reboli, A. C., Schuster, M. G., Vazquez, J. A., Walsh, T. J., et al. (2016) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/civ1194 · Cited by 1,298
The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management
Perlin, D. S., Rautemaa-Richardson, R., & Alastruey-Izquierdo, A. (2017) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30316-x · Cited by 1,055
Pfaller, M. A., Diekema, D. J., Turnidge, J. D., Castanheira, M., & Jones, R. N. (2019) · Open Forum Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofy358 · Cited by 825
Standardized Method for In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida albicans Biofilms
Ramage, G., Vande Walle, K., Wickes, B. L., & López-Ribot, J. L. (2001) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.45.9.2475-2479.2001 · Cited by 753
Aneuploidy and Isochromosome Formation in Drug-Resistant Candida albicans
Selmecki, A., Forche, A., & Berman, J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128242 · Cited by 733
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health
Fisher, M. C., Alastruey-Izquierdo, A., Berman, J., Bicanic, T., Bignell, E. M., Bowyer, P., Bromley, M., Brüggemann, R., Garber, G., Cornely, O. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-022-00720-1 · Cited by 1,179
Self-citationAntifungal Drug Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms in Candida albicans and Beyond
Lee, Y., Puumala, E., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00199 · Cited by 801
The Antifungal Pipeline: Fosmanogepix, Ibrexafungerp, Olorofim, Opelconazole, and Rezafungin
Hoenigl, M., Sprute, R., Egger, M., Arastehfar, A., Cornely, O. A., Krause, R., Lass-Flörl, C., Prattes, J., Spec, A., Thompson, G. R., et al. (2021) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-021-01611-0 · Cited by 467
“Candida dubliensis, C. fabianii, C. glabrata, C. inconspicua, C. kefyr, C. krusei, C. lipolytica, C. pulcherrima, C. sojae, and C. tropicalis were also inhibited by MIC values ≤ 0.125 µg/mL and were susceptible to other echinocandins using epidemiological cut-off value (ECV) interpretive criteria [194, 195].”
BackgroundInfluentialTreatment strategies for cryptococcal infection: challenges, advances and future outlook
Iyer, K. R., Revie, N. M., Fu, C., Robbins, N., & Cowen, L. E. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00511-0 · Cited by 363
Diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: challenges and recent developments
Fang, W., Wu, J., Cheng, M., Zhu, X., Du, M., Chen, C., Liao, W., Zhi, K., & Pan, W. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.1186/s12929-023-00926-2 · Cited by 413
“Echinocandins work by blocking the catalytic subunit of the β-1,3 glucan synthase and thus interfere with β-1,3-d-glucan production, a major cell wall component [23].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Berman, J., & Krysan, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berman, Judith
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Microbiology
- Published
- 2020-02-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 319-331
- ISSN
- 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
- 1740-1534
- PMC
- PMC7231573
- OpenAlex
- W3006511740
- Cited by
- 642
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 101 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 34
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-06-29)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R21AI125094)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Keywords
- antifungal resistance, antifungal drug tolerance, systemic fungal infection, treatment failure, molecular mechanisms of resistance, fungal pathogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Antifungal Agents, Candida, Drug Tolerance, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Drug Resistance, Fungal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review