Cited by 447interferon and immune responsesImmune Response and InflammationCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions

A conserved PLPLRT/SD motif of STING mediates the recruitment and activation of TBK1

Open access
Zhao, Baoyu, Du, Fenglei, Xu, Pengbiao, Shu, Chang, Sankaran, Banumathi, Bell, Samantha L., Liu, Mengmeng, Lei, Yuanjiu +10 more·2019·Nature

Abstract

Nucleic acids from bacteria or viruses induce potent immune responses in infected cells 1-4. The detection of pathogen-derived nucleic acids is a central strategy by which the host senses infection and initiates protective immune responses 5,6. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) is a double-stranded DNA sensor 7,8. It catalyses the synthesis of cyclic GMP-AMP (cGAMP)9-12, which stimulates the induction of type I interferons through the STING-TBK1-IRF-3 signalling axis 13-15. STING oligomerizes after binding of cGAMP, leading to the recruitment and activation of the TBK1 kinase 8,16. The IRF-3 transcription factor is then recruited to the signalling complex and activated by TBK1 8,17-20. Phosphorylated IRF-3 translocates to the nucleus and initiates the expression of type I interferons 21. However, the precise mechanisms that govern activation of STING by cGAMP and subsequent activation of TBK1 by STING remain unclear. Here we show that a conserved PLPLRT/SD motif within the C-terminal tail of STING mediates the recruitment and activation of TBK1. Crystal structures of TBK1 bound to STING reveal that the PLPLRT/SD motif binds to the dimer interface of TBK1. Cell-based studies confirm that the direct interaction between TBK1 and STING is essential for induction of IFNβ after cGAMP stimulation. Moreover, we show that full-length STING oligomerizes after it binds cGAMP, and highlight this as an essential step in the activation of STING-mediated signalling. These findings provide a structural basis for the development of STING agonists and antagonists for the treatment of cancer and autoimmune disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1228-x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On reaching the Golgi, STING recruits TBK1, which activates IRF3 and NF-κB, leading to expression of ISGs, type I interferons and other inflammatory cytokines.

    “On reaching the Golgi compartment, STING then recruits TBK1, which then activates IRF3 and NF-κB, leading to the expression of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), type I interferons and other inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, IL-12).393–396”

    From Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration development (2023) · cites this paper as [394]

    The proposed model in Extended Data Fig. 7 says STING oligomerizes at ER or Golgi membranes, recruits TBK1, and enables TBK1-dependent IRF-3 activation and IFN-β transcription. It does not specify that recruitment occurs only after STING reaches the Golgi, or describe NF-κB activation, ISG expression, or production of other inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-12. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Levels of phosphorylated TBK1 (Ser172) are increased in aged mouse brains.

    “The levels of phosphorylated TBK1 (Ser172; pTBK1)—the major kinase responsible for signal transduction downstream of STING19,20—were increased in aged mouse brains (Fig. 2d).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [1]Chen Q, Sun L & Chen ZJ Regulation and function of the cGAS-STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing. Nat Immunol 17, 1142– 1149, doi: 10.1038/ni.3558 (2016). 27648547 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Barber GN Innate immune DNA sensing pathways: STING, AIMII and the regulation of interferon production and inflammatory responses. Curr Opin Immunol 23, 10– 20, doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.12.015 (2011). 21239155 PMC3881186 · DOI
  3. [4]Kato H, Takahasi K & Fujita T RIG-I-like receptors: cytoplasmic sensors for non-self RNA. Immunol Rev 243, 91– 98, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01052.x (2011). 21884169 · DOI
  4. [5]Paludan SR & Bowie AG Immune sensing of DNA. Immunity 38, 870– 880, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.004 (2013). 23706668 PMC3683625 · DOI
  5. [6]Burdette DL & Vance RE STING and the innate immune response to nucleic acids in the cytosol. Nat Immunol 14, 19– 26, doi: 10.1038/ni.2491 (2013). 23238760 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Sun L, Wu J, Du F, Chen X & Chen ZJ Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science 339, 786– 791, doi: 10.1126/science.1232458 (2013). 23258413 PMC3863629 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]Wu J & Chen ZJ Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. Annu Rev Immunol 32, 461– 488, doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120156 (2014). 24655297 · DOI
  8. [9]Zhang X Cyclic GMP-AMP containing mixed phosphodiester linkages is an endogenous high-affinity ligand for STING. Mol Cell 51, 226– 235, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.022 (2013). 23747010 PMC3808999 · DOI
  9. [10]Ablasser A cGAS produces a 2’−5’-linked cyclic dinucleotide second messenger that activates STING. Nature 498, 380– 384, doi: 10.1038/nature12306 (2013). 23722158 PMC4143541 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [11]Diner EJ The Innate Immune DNA Sensor cGAS Produces a Noncanonical Cyclic Dinucleotide that Activates Human STING. Cell Rep 3, 1355– 1361, doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.009 (2013). 23707065 PMC3706192 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [13]Wu J Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science 339, 826– 830, doi: 10.1126/science.1229963 (2013). 23258412 PMC3855410 · DOI
  12. [14]Ishikawa H & Barber GN STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling. Nature 455, 674– 678, doi: 10.1038/nature07317 (2008). 18724357 PMC2804933 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [16]Tanaka Y & Chen ZJ STING specifies IRF3 phosphorylation by TBK1 in the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway. Sci Signal 5, ra20, doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002521 (2012). 22394562 PMC3549669 · DOI
  14. [17]Sharma S Triggering the interferon antiviral response through an IKK-related pathway. Science 300, 1148– 1151, doi: 10.1126/science.1081315 (2003). 12702806 · DOI
  15. [18]Fitzgerald KA IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway. Nat Immunol 4, 491– 496, doi: 10.1038/ni921 (2003). 12692549 · DOI
  16. [19]Liu S Phosphorylation of innate immune adaptor proteins MAVS, STING, and TRIF induces IRF3 activation. Science 347, aaa2630, doi: 10.1126/science.aaa2630 (2015). 25636800 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [20]Zhao B Structural basis for concerted recruitment and activation of IRF-3 by innate immune adaptor proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, E3403– 3412, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603269113 (2016). 27302953 PMC4914169 · DOI
  18. [22]Burdette DL STING is a direct innate immune sensor of cyclic di-GMP. Nature 478, 515– 518, doi: 10.1038/nature10429 (2011). 21947006 PMC3203314 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [23]Shang G, Zhang C, Chen ZJ, Bai XC & Zhang X Cryo-EM structures of STING reveal its mechanism of activation by cyclic GMP-AMP. Nature 567, 389– 393, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0998-5 (2019). 30842659 PMC6859894 · DOI
  20. [24]Shu C, Yi G, Watts T, Kao CC & Li P Structure of STING bound to cyclic di-GMP reveals the mechanism of cyclic dinucleotide recognition by the immune system. Nat Struct Mol Biol 19, 722– 724, doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2331 (2012). 22728658 PMC3392545 · DOI
  21. [25]Shu C Structural insights into the functions of TBK1 in innate antimicrobial immunity. Structure 21, 1137– 1148, doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.04.025 (2013). 23746807 PMC3702631 · DOI
  22. [26]Powell HR, Battye TGG, Kontogiannis L, Johnson O & Leslie AGW Integrating macromolecular X-ray diffraction data with the graphical user interface iMosflm. Nat Protoc 12, 1310– 1325, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.037 (2017). 28569763 PMC5562275 · DOI
  23. [27]Adams PD PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 213– 221, doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925 (2010). 20124702 PMC2815670 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [28]Sheldrick GM Experimental phasing with SHELXC/D/E: combining chain tracing with density modification. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 479– 485, doi: 10.1107/S0907444909038360 (2010). 20383001 PMC2852312 · DOI
  25. [29]Emsley P & Cowtan K Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 2126– 2132, doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158 (2004). 15572765 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, B., Du, F., Xu, P., Shu, C., Sankaran, B., Bell, S. L., Liu, M., Lei, Y., Gao, X., Fu, X., Zhu, F., Liu, Y., Laganowsky, A., Zheng, X., Ji, J.-Y., West, A. P., Watson, R. O., & Li, P.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
  • Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Pingwei
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-05
Volume
569
Issue
7758
Pages
718-722
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2945775408
Cited by
447
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 74 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 9
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP150454)
  • Florida State University (S10 RR025080, S10 OD018142)
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health (DE-AC02–05CH11231, 1s10od018142-01, AI145287)
  • Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI125512, R01AI145287)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE026101)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S10RR025080)
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02, DE-AC02-05CH11231., AC02–05CH11231)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Keywords
STING, TBK1, cGAMP, cGAS, IRF3, type I interferon signaling, innate immune recognition, STING agonist
MeSH terms
STING Protein, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Nucleotides, Cyclic, Protein Binding, Signal Transduction, Interferon-beta, Conserved Sequence, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases, Crystallography, X-Ray, Amino Acid Motifs, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review