Cited by 205

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Pleistocene enamel proteome from Dmanisi resolves Stephanorhinus phylogeny

Cappellini, Enrico, Welker, Frido, Pandolfi, Luca, Ramos-Madrigal, Jazmín, Samodova, Diana, Rüther, Patrick L., Fotakis, Anna K., Lyon, David, Moreno-Mayar, J. Víctor, Bukhsianidze, Maia, Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen, Rosa, Mackie, Meaghan, Ginolhac, Aurélien, Ferring, Reid, Tappen, Martha, Palkopoulou, Eleftheria, Dickinson, Marc R., Stafford, Thomas W., Chan, Yvonne L., Götherström, Anders, Nathan, Senthilvel K. S. S., Heintzman, Peter D., Kapp, Joshua D., Kirillova, Irina, Moodley, Yoshan, Agusti, Jordi, Kahlke, Ralf-Dietrich, Kiladze, Gocha, Martínez-Navarro, Bienvenido, Liu, Shanlin, Sandoval Velasco, Marcela, Sinding, Mikkel-Holger S., Kelstrup, Christian D., Allentoft, Morten E., Orlando, Ludovic, Penkman, Kirsty, Shapiro, Beth, Rook, Lorenzo, Dalén, Love, Gilbert, M. Thomas P., Olsen, Jesper V., Lordkipanidze, David, Willerslev, Eske·2019·Nature

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1555-y

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enamel has been explored as a well-preserved source of ancient proteins that can be analyzed to enable phylogenetic analysis of extinct animals and humans, as well as identification of sex based on sequence differences in amelogenin.

    “Recently, enamel has been explored as a well-preserved source of ancient proteins that can be analyzed to enable the phylogenetic analysis of extinct animals and humans (71, 72), as well as the identification of sex based on sequence differences in the enamel protein amelogenin (73–75).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [72]

    The paper’s Abstract reports that ancient enamel proteins preserve phylogenetic information and describes phylogenetic analysis of Dmanisi animal remains. It mentions hominin fossils at the site but does not report a phylogenetic analysis of humans. The sex-identification clause is attached to separate citations (73–75), although this paper also reports identifying male specimens using Y-specific amelogenin peptides. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The paleoproteomic phylogenetic approach has also been applied to extinct faunal taxa, including Stephanorhinus, Macrauchenia and Toxodon, Castoroides ohioensis, and Plesiorycteropus.

    “This approach has also been applied to the study of extinct faunal taxa, including Stephanorhinus (an extinct genus of rhinoceros) (72), Macrauchenia and Toxodon (South American ungulates) (147, 148), Castoroides ohioensis (giant beaver) (149), and Plesiorycteropus (Malagasy aardvark) (150)”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [72]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Dabney, J., Meyer, M. & Pääbo, S. Ancient DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012567 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Wadsworth, C. & Buckley, M. Proteome degradation in fossils: investigating the longevity of protein survival in ancient bone. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 28, 605–615 (2014). · DOI
  3. Schweitzer, M. H. et al. Analyses of soft tissue from Tyrannosaurus rex suggest the presence of protein. Science 316, 277–280 (2007). · DOI
  4. Schroeter, E. R. et al. Expansion for the Brachylophosaurus canadensis collagen I sequence and additional evidence of the preservation of Cretaceous protein. J. Proteome Res. 16, 920–932 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Willerslev, E. et al. Analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct and extant rhinoceroses reveals lack of phylogenetic resolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 9, 95 (2009). · DOI
  6. Welker, F. et al. Middle Pleistocene protein sequences from the rhinoceros genus Stephanorhinus and the phylogeny of extant and extinct Middle/Late Pleistocene Rhinocerotidae. PeerJ 5, e3033 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Kirillova, I. et al. Discovery of the skull of Stephanorhinus kirchbergensis (Jäger, 1839) above the Arctic Circle. Quat. Res. 88, 537–550 (2017). · DOI
  8. Lordkipanidze, D. et al. A complete skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the evolutionary biology of early Homo. Science 342, 326–331 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eastoe, J. E. Organic matrix of tooth enamel. Nature 187, 411–412 (1960). · DOI
  10. Demarchi, B. et al. Protein sequences bound to mineral surfaces persist into deep time. eLife 5, e17092 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Welker, F. et al. Ancient proteins resolve the evolutionary history of Darwin’s South American ungulates. Nature 522, 81–84 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chen, F. et al. A late Middle Pleistocene Denisovan mandible from the Tibetan Plateau. Nature 569, 409–412 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Vol. 75, 39–63 (Columbia Univ. Press, 1987). · DOI
  14. Buckley, M., Warwood, S., van Dongen, B., Kitchener, A. C. & Manning, P. L. A fossil protein chimera; difficulties in discriminating dinosaur peptide sequences from modern cross-contamination. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 284, 20170544 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Gabunia, L. et al. Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia: taxonomy, geological setting, and age. Science 288, 1019–1025 (2000).
  16. Ferring, R. et al. Earliest human occupations at Dmanisi (Georgian Caucasus) dated to 1.85–1.78 Ma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10432–10436 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  17. Castiblanco, G. A. et al. Identification of proteins from human permanent erupted enamel. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 123, 390–395 (2015). · DOI
  18. Stewart, N. A. et al. The identification of peptides by nanoLC-MS/MS from human surface tooth enamel following a simple acid etch extraction. RSC Advances 6, 61673–61679 (2016). · DOI
  19. van Doorn, N. L., Wilson, J., Hollund, H., Soressi, M. & Collins, M. J. Site-specific deamidation of glutamine: a new marker of bone collagen deterioration. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 26, 2319–2327 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Catak, S., Monard, G., Aviyente, V. & Ruiz-López, M. F. Computational study on nonenzymatic peptide bond cleavage at asparagine and aspartic acid. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 8752–8761 (2008). · DOI
  21. Hunter, T. Why nature chose phosphate to modify proteins. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 367, 2513–2516 (2012). · DOI
  22. Hu, J. C. C., Yamakoshi, Y., Yamakoshi, F., Krebsbach, P. H. & Simmer, J. P. Proteomics and genetics of dental enamel. Cells Tissues Organs 181, 219–231 (2005). · DOI
  23. Tagliabracci, V. S. et al. Secreted kinase phosphorylates extracellular proteins that regulate biomineralization. Science 336, 1150–1153 (2012). · DOI
  24. Cleland, T. P. Solid digestion of demineralized bone as a method to access potentially insoluble proteins and post-translational modifications. J. Proteome Res. 17, 536–542 (2018). · DOI
  25. Antoine, P.-O. et al. A revision of Aceratherium blanfordi Lydekker, 1884 (Mammalia: Rhinocerotidae) from the Early Miocene of Pakistan: postcranials as a key. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 160, 139–194 (2010). · DOI
  26. Steiner, C. C. & Ryder, O. A. Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the Perissodactyla. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 163, 1289–1303 (2011). · DOI
  27. Hobolth, A., Dutheil, J. Y., Hawks, J., Schierup, M. H. & Mailund, T. Incomplete lineage sorting patterns among human, chimpanzee, and orangutan suggest recent orangutan speciation and widespread selection. Genome Res. 21, 349–356 (2011). · DOI
  28. Rieseberg, L. H. Evolution: replacing genes and traits through hybridization. Curr. Biol. 19, R119–R122 (2009). · DOI
  29. Deng, T. et al. Out of Tibet: Pliocene woolly rhino suggests high-plateau origin of Ice Age megaherbivores. Science 333, 1285–1288 (2011). · DOI
  30. Orlando, L. et al. Ancient DNA analysis reveals woolly rhino evolutionary relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 485–499 (2003). · DOI
  31. Yuan, J. et al. Ancient DNA sequences from Coelodonta antiquitatis in China reveal its divergence and phylogeny. Sci. China Earth Sci. 57, 388–396 (2014). · DOI
  32. Penkman, K. E. H., Kaufman, D. S., Maddy, D. & Collins, M. J. Closed-system behaviour of the intra-crystalline fraction of amino acids in mollusc shells. Quat. Geochronol. 3, 2–25 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  33. Cappellini, E. et al. Resolution of the type material of the Asian elephant, Elephas maximus Linnaeus, 1758 (Proboscidea, Elephantidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 170, 222–232 (2014).
  34. Mackie, M. et al. Palaeoproteomic profiling of conservation layers on a 14th century Italian wall painting. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 57, 7369–7374 (2018). · DOI
  35. Cappellini, E. et al. Proteomic analysis of a Pleistocene mammoth femur reveals more than one hundred ancient bone proteins. J. Proteome Res. 11, 917–926 (2012). · DOI
  36. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367–1372 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zhang, J. et al. PEAKS DB: de novo sequencing assisted database search for sensitive and accurate peptide identification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.010587 (2012). · DOI
  38. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D158–D169 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Welker, F. et al. Palaeoproteomic evidence identifies archaic hominins associated with the Châtelperronian at the Grotte du Renne. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11162–11167 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
  40. Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012). · DOI
  41. Gabriels, R., Martens, L. & Degroeve, S. Updated MS2PIP web server delivers fast and accurate MS2 peak intensity prediction for multiple fragmentation methods, instruments and labeling techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W295–W299 (2019). · DOI
  42. Tyanova, S., Temu, T. & Cox, J. The MaxQuant computational platform for mass spectrometry-based shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protocols 11, 2301–2319 (2016). · DOI
  43. Colaert, N., Helsens, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhove, J. & Gevaert, K. Improved visualization of protein consensus sequences by iceLogo. Nat. Methods 6, 786–787 (2009). · DOI
  44. Briggs, A. W. et al. Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e87 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Sea Urchin Genome Sequencing Consortium. The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Science 314, 941–952 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  47. Katoh, K. & Frith, M. C. Adding unaligned sequences into an existing alignment using MAFFT and LAST. Bioinformatics 28, 3144–3146 (2012). · DOI
  48. Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011). · DOI
  49. Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012). · DOI
  50. Rohland, N. & Hofreiter, M. Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction. Biotechniques 42, 343–352 (2007). · DOI
  51. Meyer, M. & Kircher, M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010, pdb.prot5448 (2010). · DOI
  52. Schubert, M. et al. Characterization of ancient and modern genomes by SNP detection and phylogenomic and metagenomic analysis using PALEOMIX. Nat. Protocols 9, 1056–1082 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Dickinson, M. R., Lister, A. M. & Penkman, K. E. H. A new method for enamel amino acid racemization dating: a closed system approach. Quat. Geochronol. 50, 29–46 (2019). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cappellini, E., Welker, F., Pandolfi, L., Ramos-Madrigal, J., Samodova, D., Rüther, P. L., Fotakis, A. K., Lyon, D., Moreno-Mayar, J. V., Bukhsianidze, M., Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen, R., Mackie, M., Ginolhac, A., Ferring, R., Tappen, M., Palkopoulou, E., Dickinson, M. R., Stafford, T. W., Chan, Y. L., Götherström, A., Nathan, S. K. S. S., Heintzman, P. D., Kapp, J. D., Kirillova, I., Moodley, Y., Agusti, J., Kahlke, R.-D., Kiladze, G., Martínez-Navarro, B., Liu, S., Sandoval Velasco, M., Sinding, M.-H. S., Kelstrup, C. D., Allentoft, M. E., Orlando, L., Penkman, K., Shapiro, B., Rook, L., Dalén, L., Gilbert, M. T. P., Olsen, J. V., Lordkipanidze, D., & Willerslev, E.
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-09-11
Volume
574
Issue
7776
Pages
103-107
ISSN
  • 0028-0836
  • 1476-4687
Cited by
205
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review