Cited by 2,523Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 48 of the 101 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal

Open access

Abstract

The capture and use of carbon dioxide to create valuable products might lower the net costs of reducing emissions or removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Here we review ten pathways for the utilization of carbon dioxide. Pathways that involve chemicals, fuels and microalgae might reduce emissions of carbon dioxide but have limited potential for its removal, whereas pathways that involve construction materials can both utilize and remove carbon dioxide. Land-based pathways can increase agricultural output and remove carbon dioxide. Our assessment suggests that each pathway could scale to over 0.5 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide utilization annually. However, barriers to implementation remain substantial and resource constraints prevent the simultaneous deployment of all pathways.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

51 Own interpretation · 40 Own result · 25 No basis given · 24 Partly supported · 19 No full text of the sources · 16 Supported · 9 Sources not found · 7 Not checked yet · 5 Own method · 3 Supported so far · 1 Mixed support · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 2 references — free account

Show all 124 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 58
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 30
76 of 76
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In the CO2-EOR example, the CO2 utilized does not return to the atmosphere.

    “Assuming that the CO 2 does not return to atmosphere, the CO 2 utilized is equal to the CO 2 emissions stored”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cement requires the use of lime (CaO), which is produced by the calcination of limestone in an emissions-intensive process.

    “Cement requires the use of lime (CaO), which is produced by the calcination of limestone in an emissions-intensive process.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The business model for CO2-EOR is mature in the United States.

    “and are specific to the United States, where the business model is mature.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The low scenario does not account for potential overlaps in utilization volumes between pathways.

    “The specific assumptions of the low scenario, which do not account for potential overlaps in utilization volumes between pathways,”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    BECCS and building materials are scalable closed pathways.

    “closed pathways with scalability-such as BECCS and building materials”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. IPCC Special Report: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (eds Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., De Coninck, H., Loos, M. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005). This IPCC report provides an overview of the technology and expected costs of carbon capture and sequestration, and provides a key definition of CO 2 utilization.
  2. Maries, A., Tyrer, M. & Provis, J. L. Sequestration of CO2 emissions from cement manufacture. In Proc. 37th Cement and Concrete Science Conference (eds Bai, Y. et al.) (Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining, 2017).
  3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Commercial Aircraft Propulsion and Energy Systems Research: Reducing Global Carbon Emissions (National Academies Press, 2016).
  4. Laurens, L. M. L. State of Technology Review – Algae Bioenergy (IEA Bioenergy, 2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 2,462

Metadata

Authors
Hepburn, C., Adlen, E., Beddington, J., Carter, E. A., Fuss, S., Mac Dowell, N., Minx, J. C., Smith, P., & Williams, C. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Adlen, Ella
Venue
Nature
Published
2019-11-06
Volume
575
Issue
7781
Pages
87-97
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2988278250
Cited by
2,523
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 434 · 2025: 477 · 2024: 498 · 2023: 384 · 2022: 347 · 2021: 261 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 1
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nature Conservancy
  • Belmont Forum
  • UK Energy Research Centre (NE/P019455/1)
  • National Academy of Sciences
  • U.S. Air Force (FA9550)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S018603/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (P019900, NE/P019455/1, NE/P019900/1, NE/M021327/1)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-14-1-0254)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
CO2 utilization, carbon capture and storage, carbon dioxide removal, carbon capture and utilization, microalgae, biofuels, agricultural carbon sequestration, emission reduction, economic feasibility
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Charcoal, Photosynthesis, Soil, Technology, Carbon Sequestration, Microalgae, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review