The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 48 of the 101 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal
Open accessAbstract
The capture and use of carbon dioxide to create valuable products might lower the net costs of reducing emissions or removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Here we review ten pathways for the utilization of carbon dioxide. Pathways that involve chemicals, fuels and microalgae might reduce emissions of carbon dioxide but have limited potential for its removal, whereas pathways that involve construction materials can both utilize and remove carbon dioxide. Land-based pathways can increase agricultural output and remove carbon dioxide. Our assessment suggests that each pathway could scale to over 0.5 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide utilization annually. However, barriers to implementation remain substantial and resource constraints prevent the simultaneous deployment of all pathways.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
51 Own interpretation · 40 Own result · 25 No basis given · 24 Partly supported · 19 No full text of the sources · 16 Supported · 9 Sources not found · 7 Not checked yet · 5 Own method · 3 Supported so far · 1 Mixed support · accuracy not yet measured
Some cited sources support this claim and some don’t — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Previous reviews 18,28,[52][53][54] have shown that these pathways offer substantial CO 2 removal potential:”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [18] Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016). This paper quantifies potential global impacts of various negative emissions technologies in the context of biophysical resource constraints. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Global resource implications of NETs deployment section estimates gigatonne-scale CO₂ removal for technologies including BECCS, supporting substantial removal potential. But the review assesses negative-emissions technologies, not the cited sentence’s specific category of “non-conventional utilization pathways”; our copy does not establish that those pathways have the stated potential. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Disputedcites [28] Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018). This paper estimates—through a large scoping review—that afforestation and reforestation, BECCS, biochar, enhanced weathering, DACCS and soil carbon sequestration all have multi-gigatonne sequestration potentials in 2050, and that costs vary widely. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.8 (page not provided) discusses CO₂ utilization pathways but raises doubts that they can contribute much to large-scale negative emissions. It also reports a concern that chemical conversion is highly unlikely to provide more than 1% of the mitigation needed for the Paris temperature goal, contrary to the claim of substantial removal potential. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
- Not matchedcites [52][53][54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In the short term, the creation of products from concentrated CO 2 , as in step L (albeit, CO 2 conversion is not a necessary requirement for utilization), could leverage the industrial capture of flue gases following the extraction and combustion of fossil fuels (KC) 27 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [27] Naims, H. Economics of carbon dioxide capture and utilization—a supply and demand perspective. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 23, 22226–22241 (2016). This paper analyses CO 2 supply and demand scenarios to conclude that the business case for CO 2 utilization is technology-specific. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Short-term scenarios section says near-term CO2 product demand could be met by capturing high-purity emissions, including those from natural gas production. The Conclusions and perspectives section also describes recovered industrial CO2 as a feedstock for consumer goods. But the paper associates capture from coal-fired power plants with longer-term, larger-scale scenarios, rather than the short-term pathway the claim suggests. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“For instance, perverse indirect effects-such as land-use change resulting from BECCS 14 -could increase net atmospheric CO 2 concentrations.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [14] Harper, A. B. et al. Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets. Nat. Commun. 9, 2938 (2018). source
The Abstract says carbon removed through BECCS could be offset by losses from land-use change. The Discussion adds that replacing high-carbon ecosystems with bioenergy crops could result in a negative carbon balance, supporting the claim that BECCS-related land-use change could increase net atmospheric CO₂. (LLM, conf=0.89)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Some are commercialized 29 , such as the production of urea 30 and polycarbonate polyols 31 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Chemicals.
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [29] Otto, A., Grube, T., Schiebahn, S. & Stolten, D. Closing the loop: captured CO2 as a feedstock in the chemical industry. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3283–3297 (2015). source
The Introduction states that a handful of commercial processes use CO2 as a feedstock, directly supporting the statement attributed to this source. The examples of urea and polycarbonate polyols have separate citations in the citing sentence and are not attributed to this paper here. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [30] Pérez-Fortes, M., Bocin-Dumitriu, A. & Tzimas, E. CO2 utilization pathways: Techno-economic assessment and market opportunities. Energy Procedia 63, 7968–7975 (2014). source
The paper supports the urea example: its Nomenclature section says CO2 is used as a feedstock for urea and lists several commercialized urea-production processes. In the citing sentence, polycarbonate polyols have a separate citation and are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Langanke, J. et al. Carbon dioxide (CO2) as sustainable feedstock for polyurethane production. Green Chem. 16, 1865–1870 (2014). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Such products have lifespans of decades or even centuries 36 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [36] Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. & Law, K. L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700782 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion section (page unavailable) models product lifetimes ranging from less than a year for packaging to decades for building and construction plastics. It does not establish that products remain in use for centuries; the paper’s discussion of plastics persisting after disposal is distinct from product lifespan. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Although the production of more complex hydrocarbons is energetically and therefore economically expensive 11”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [11] Bushuyev, O. S. et al. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule 2, 825–832 (2018). source
In “What should we make using CO2?” (p. 2), the paper says that reducing CO2 to higher-carbon products has a substantial energy cost and that more complex products generally require higher overpotentials. It links energy efficiency and product selectivity to economic viability (pp. 2–3), supporting the claim in the context of CO2 conversion. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Increasing urea production may therefore have a negative impact on climate 35 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [35] Luo, J., Ledgard, S. & Lindsey, S. Nitrous oxide emissions from application of urea on New Zealand pasture. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 50, 1–11 (2007). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction links nitrous oxide emissions to global warming, and the Abstract reports that applying urea to New Zealand pasture generally increased those emissions. This supports a potential climate impact from increased urea use, but the paper does not assess the impact of increasing urea production itself. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Some are technically possible but are not widely adopted, such as the production of CO 2 -derived methanol in the absence of carbon monoxide 32”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Chemicals.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [32] Shih, C. F., Zhang, T., Li, J. & Bai, C. Powering the future with liquid sunshine. Joule, 2, 1925–1949 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Roadmap from Fossilized Sunshine to Liquid Sunshine” section describes methanol production from captured CO₂ and says the first commercial deployment of this green-methanol technology could be expected in 2040, supporting that it was not widely deployed. The “5G Liquid Sunshine: Green Alcohol Production” section describes CO₂ hydrogenation approaches, but neither passage establishes production in the absence of carbon monoxide. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In recent years, several wind and solar power auctions around the world have been won with prices below 41 $0.03 kWh -1 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [41] De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019). This paper reviews the potential for and costs of using renewable energy for electrochemical conversion of concentrated CO 2 into formic acid, carbon monoxide, ethylene and ethanol, and compares biocatalytic and Fischer–Tropsch routes to long-chain chemical production. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Pathways toward industrial implementation” (page not supplied), the paper reports recent onshore wind auctions in several countries with costs as low as $0.03/kWh. It does not report solar auctions at that price, and “as low as” $0.03/kWh does not establish prices below it. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The flux of carbon from fossil fuels and industry to the atmosphere (34 Gt CO 2 yr -1 ) 15 is dwarfed by the gross flux to land via photosynthesis in plants (440 Gt CO 2 yr -1 ) 16 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [15] Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 2141–2194 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation is attached to the 440 Gt CO2 yr−1 gross photosynthetic flux. The Figure 2 caption (section 2.8.3, p. 19) says that natural-cycle fluxes appear in the figure, but our copy contains only an image placeholder, not its values. Searches for photosynthesis, gross primary production, 120 GtC yr−1, and 440 Gt CO2 yr−1 found no passage stating the claimed flux. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Not checked yetcites [16] IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds. Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
- It may state two separate claims as one. 58
- Probably not a substantial claim. 30
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Geological storage, when executed correctly, is considered to be more permanent 22 than storage in the biosphere, which is shorter and subject to human and natural disturbances 23 such as wildfires and pests, as well as changes in climate 24 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [22] Alcalde, J. et al. Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation. Nat. Commun. 9, 2201 (2018). source
The Introduction reports that realistically well-regulated geological storage has a 50% probability of retaining more than 98% of injected CO2 over 10,000 years. This supports the long-term security of properly executed geological storage attributed to citation 22; the biosphere disturbances are attached to other citations. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] Allen, C. D. et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 259, 660–684 (2010). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The production of plastics and other products creates a demand for so-called 'socioeconomic carbon' 19 (around 2.4 Gt CO 2 yr -1 , of which around two-thirds is wood products) that could be met in part through CO 2 utilization.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [19] Lauk, C., Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., Gingrich, S. & Krausmann, F. Global socioeconomic carbon stocks in long-lived products 1900–2008. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034023 (2012). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report 650 MtC yr⁻¹ flowing into socioeconomic stocks in 2008, equivalent to about 2.4 Gt CO₂ yr⁻¹. They put wood products at 58% of those inflows, rather than around two-thirds. The paper does not assess whether CO₂ utilization could meet this demand. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“However, even 'closed' pathways do not offer completely permanent storage over geological timescales (more than 100,000 years 25 ), which gives rise to intergenerational ethical questions 26 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [25] Scott, V., Haszeldine, R. S., Tett, S. F. B. & Oschlies, A. Fossil fuels in a trillion tonne world. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 419 (2015). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Climate impact of storage timescales' section defines geological-timescale permanent storage as securing carbon for more than 100,000 years, supporting the cited timescale. It does not say that even 'closed' pathways fail to provide storage over that period; it instead describes such storage as permanent. The intergenerational-ethics point has a separate citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Gardiner, S. M. A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environ. Values 15, 397–413 (2006). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The total stock of carbon accumulated in products (such as wood products, bitumen, plastic and cereals) has been estimated at 42 Gt CO 2 in 2008, of which 25 Gt CO 2 is in wood products 19 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [19] Lauk, C., Haberl, H., Erb, K.-H., Gingrich, S. & Krausmann, F. Global socioeconomic carbon stocks in long-lived products 1900–2008. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034023 (2012). source
The Abstract reports 11.5 GtC in global socioeconomic stocks in 2008, with wood accounting for 60%. Converting carbon mass to CO₂ mass gives approximately 42 Gt CO₂ in total and 25 Gt CO₂ in wood. The Methods and data section includes wood products, bitumen, plastic and cereals in the assessment. (LLM, conf=0.93)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“If soil carbon uptake could be increased by 0.4% per year, this would contribute to achieving net zero emissions-as per the '4 per mille' initiative 17 -but this is challenging 18 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [17] Minasny, B. et al. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292, 59–86 (2017). source
The Introduction describes the 4 per mille initiative as aspiring to increase global soil organic matter stocks by 0.4% per year to compensate for anthropogenic greenhouse-gas emissions. The Conclusions call the goal ambitious and estimate that applying it across agricultural areas could offset about 30% of global greenhouse-gas emissions, supporting the claim that it could contribute to net zero but would be challenging. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites [18] Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016). This paper quantifies potential global impacts of various negative emissions technologies in the context of biophysical resource constraints. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) describes biophysical and economic barriers to deploying negative-emissions technologies, supporting the general point that carbon removal is challenging. But the paper says it does not evaluate soil-carbon storage, so it does not establish the specific difficulty of increasing soil carbon uptake by 0.4% per year. The ‘4 per mille’ proposition is attached to citation 17, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Up to 16 Gt CO 2 was sequestered in human infrastructure as mineralized carbonates in cement between 1930 and 2013, with current rates 20,21 estimated to be around 1 Gt CO 2 yr -1 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [20] Xi, F. et al. Substantial global carbon uptake by cement carbonation. Nat. Geosci. 9, 880–883 (2016). source
Section 4.3 estimates worldwide cement-material uptake from 1930 to 2013 at 4.50 GtC, equivalent to about 16.5 Gt CO₂. Section 4.2 reports 245.15 million tons of carbon uptake in 2013, equivalent to about 0.9 Gt CO₂ per year. Both figures support the citing sentence’s rounded estimates. (LLM, conf=0.89)
- Not matchedcites [21] Maries, A., Tyrer, M. & Provis, J. L. Sequestration of CO2 emissions from cement manufacture. In Proc. 37th Cement and Concrete Science Conference (eds Bai, Y. et al.) (Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining, 2017).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Currently, the largest-scale chemical utilization pathway is that of urea production.140 Mt CO 2 yr -1 is utilized to produce 200 Mt yr -1 of urea 33 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Chemicals.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [33] Jarvis, S. M. & Samsatli, S. Technologies and infrastructures underpinning future CO2 value chains: A comprehensive review and comparative analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 85, 46–68 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.1 (Urea production; page not provided) identifies urea production as a widely implemented CO₂-utilization pathway and reports more than 190 Mt of urea produced annually, broadly consistent with 200 Mt. But it reports 112–120 Mt of CO₂ used annually, not 140 Mt; it does not establish that urea is the largest-scale chemical utilization pathway. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Enhanced weathering offers a removal potential of 2 to 4 Gt CO 2 yr -1 at costs 28 of around $200 per tonne of CO 2 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [28] Fuss, S. et al. Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063002 (2018). This paper estimates—through a large scoping review—that afforestation and reforestation, BECCS, biochar, enhanced weathering, DACCS and soil carbon sequestration all have multi-gigatonne sequestration potentials in 2050, and that costs vary widely. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.4 gives a removal potential of 2–4 GtCO₂ per year, but specifies that it is from 2050 and excludes biological storage. It gives a cost range of US$50–200 per tonne, so the claimed ‘around $200’ presents the upper end as though it were the general cost. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The utilization of CO 2 in wood products will occur in addition to the direct removal of CO 2 by forests under certain highly specific circumstances; sustainable harvesting can maintain carbon stocks in forests while providing a source of renewable biomass 58,59 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Forestry techniques.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [58] Pingoud, K., Ekholm, T., Sievänen, R., Huuskonen, S. & Hynynen, J. Trade-offs between forest carbon stocks and harvests in a steady state – a multi-criteria analysis. J. Environ. Manage. 210, 96–103 (2018). source
- Supportedcites [59] Lippke, B. et al. Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns. Carbon Manage. 2, 303–333 (2011). source
The paper’s Forest management section says that when wood removals do not exceed net growth, forest carbon remains stable across the managed landscape. Its Life cycle forest, product & integrated processing energy carbon pools section says harvested wood extends forest carbon storage into products. This supports the claim under sustainable-management conditions; individual stands can temporarily lose carbon at harvest. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Up to 3 tonnes of CO 2 emissions may be avoided for every 1 tonne of CO 2 used in polycarbonate polyols 2 , even though no CO 2 is removed from atmosphere.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [2] von der Assen, N. & Bardow, A. Life cycle assessment of polyols for polyurethane production using CO2 as feedstock: insights from an industrial case study. Green Chem. 16, 3272–3280 (2014). source
The Conclusions report that up to three kg CO₂-equivalent emissions are avoided per kg CO₂ incorporated into polyols, while the polyols are not a net greenhouse-gas sink. Section 2.2 identifies the CO₂ source as captured power-plant flue gas, not atmospheric removal. The three-to-one figure applies to polyols with 30 wt% CO₂. (LLM, conf=0.91)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Similarly, a robust finding in the literature on integrated-assessment modelling is that the electricity sector should be decarbonized first, which then facilitates decarbonization in other, more difficult sectors 77 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [77] Luderer, G. et al. Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 626–633 (2018). source
The Energy supply section reports that electricity offers large, low-cost emissions reductions and becomes virtually carbon-free by 2050 in the stringent modelled pathways. The Demand-side transformation section explains that rapid power-supply decarbonization makes electrification of end uses an increasingly powerful mitigation option, while noting that electrification is harder in sectors such as transport. Together, these passages support the claimed sequencing and its role in decarbonizing other sectors. (LLM, conf=0.86)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Given the rapid rate at which human societies are urbanizing 82 , there is an urgent one-time opportunity to deploy new building materialsincluding wood, as discussed below-that utilize and store CO 2 and displace emissions-intensive Portland cement.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [82] Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B. & Hutyra, L. R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16083–16088 (2012). source
The citation is attached to the rapid rate of urbanization, not the subsequent proposal to use wood or replace cement. The Abstract forecasts that urban land cover could nearly triple by 2030, and the Discussion says 65% of urban land in 2030 would have become urban during the preceding three decades. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Catalytic processes can be optimized to increase CO 2 emission reductions or to reduce energy consumption 81 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [81] Xiao, T. et al. The Catalyst Selectivity Index (CSI): a framework and metric to assess the impact of catalyst efficiency enhancements upon energy and CO2 footprints. Top. Catal. 58, 682–695 (2015). source
The Introduction says advances in catalyst efficiency can yield gains in energy consumption and CO2 emissions for particular fuel-production and conversion processes. Section 4.2 identifies processes where improving catalyst efficiency can reduce total energy use or CO2 emissions, supporting the claim's qualified 'can.' (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Production of 'green' hydrogen-by the electrolysis of water-has real potential, and the ultimate choice of technology for the generation of hydrogen will depend on the rates of cost reduction 69 , among other factors.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Energy requirements
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [69] Kuckshinrichs, W., Ketelaer, T. & Koj, J. C. Economic analysis of improved alkaline water electrolysis. Front. Energy Res. 5, 1 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “AWE Cost Literature Overview” (page unavailable) describes potential future cost decreases from technological development and learning, supporting the relevance of cost reduction to water electrolysis. The paper analyzes alkaline water electrolysis, however, and does not say that the ultimate choice among hydrogen-generation technologies will depend on their rates of cost reduction. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A better understanding of soil carbon dynamics and improved phenotypic and genotypic plant selection will also help 85 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [85] Scharlemann, J. P. W., Tanner, E. V. J., Hiederer, R. & Kapos, V. Global soil carbon: understanding and managing the largest terrestrial carbon pool. Carbon Manage. 5, 81–91 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusion (page unavailable) calls for better estimates and understanding of soil organic carbon dynamics. The cited paper does not address improved phenotypic or genotypic plant selection, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Specification, quality and safety measures for these products are approaching comparability to many concrete structures 88 , and current manufacturing scale-up suggests that this may be a market with strong growth prospects.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [88] Ramage, M. H. et al. The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68, 333–359 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation follows the claim about specifications, quality and safety, not the later market-growth inference. Section 5.3 (page unavailable) describes grading, product standards and improved properties of engineered timber; Section 7 says common European standards enable larger timber buildings. But Section 8.1 identifies distinct fire-safety challenges, and the paper does not establish that these measures are approaching comparability with those for concrete structures. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some carbon capture and utilization (CCU) processes achieve carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere, and some involve CCS.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CO 2 can be transformed efficiently into a range of chemicals, but only a few of the technologies are economically viable and scalable.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Chemicals.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“However, only 2%-3% of this photosynthetic carbon remains on land (12 Gt CO 2 yr -1 ), and only for decades; the remainder is re-emitted by plant and soil respiration.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [16] IPCC Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds. Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within days of being applied as fertilizer, the carbon in urea is released to the atmosphere.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Chemicals.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The US Department of Energy's target for the cost of hydrogen production-$2 per kg of H 2 -is roughly equivalent to $2 per gasoline-gallon equivalent, and would require carbon-free electricity to cost less than $0.03 kWh -1 (accounting for kinetics and other losses to the enthalpy of electrolysis-based hydrogen production, around 40 kWh per kg H 2 ) 40 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [40] Secretary of Energy Advisory Board. Letter Report: Task Force on RD&D Strategy for CO 2 Utilization and/or Negative Emissions at the Gigatonne Scale. (US Department of Energy, 2016).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A CO 2 -to-methanol plant operates in Iceland, and various power-togas plants operate worldwide.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The estimated utilization potential for CO 2 in chemicals is around 0.3 to 0.6 Gt CO 2 yr -1 in 2050, and the interquartile range of breakeven costs obtained from the scoping review is -$80 to $320 per tonne of CO 2 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Chemicals.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CO 2 utilization pathways in concrete building materials are estimated to remove, utilize and store between 0.1 and 1.4 Gt CO 2 yr -1 over the long term-with the CO 2 sequestered well beyond the lifespan of the infrastructure itself”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The breakeven costs per tonne of CO 2 utilized that we estimate here are low and are frequently negative.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The microalgae pathway has complex production economics and the estimated CO 2 utilization potential for microalgae in 2050 ranges from 0.2 to 0.9 Gt CO 2 yr -1 , with a breakeven cost interquartile range from the scoping review of $230 to $920 per tonne of CO 2 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Biochar is currently at a low TRL and has associated uncertainties.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| Microalgae | 2,680 | 1,000 | +170% | Likely to be more expensive | Insufficient consensus |”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Dealing with Carbon Dioxide at Scale
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Figures 1 and 3 suggest that land-based biological processes offer a large opportunity to utilize, remove and store more CO 2 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pathways that involve chemicals, fuels and microalgae might reduce emissions of carbon dioxide but have limited potential for its removal, whereas pathways that involve construction materials can both utilize and remove carbon dioxide.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“rapid cost-reductions could potentially occur if renewable energy-which represents a large proportion of total cost-continues to become cheaper, and if policy stimulates other cost reductions.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The low end-which is itself considerable-represents very modest penetration into the methane and fuels markets, but it could also be an overestimate if CO 2 -derived products do not become costcompetitive with alternative clean energy vectors such as hydrogen or ammonia, or with direct sequestration.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“All nitrogen-based fertilizers produce N 2 O, a greenhouse gas that is around 300 times more potent than CO 2 over a 100-year time horizon 34 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [34] Myhre, G. et al. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 659–740 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The long-term use of carbonbased energy carriers in a net zero emissions economy relies upon their production with renewable energy, and upon low-cost, scalable, clean hydrogen production-for example via the electrolysis of water or by novel alternative methods.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CO 2 utilization does not necessarily reduce emissions and does not necessarily deliver a net climate benefit, once indirect and other effects have been accounted for.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the longer term, the CO 2 loop will need to be closed in order to achieve net zero emissions, implying that CO 2 will need to be sourced from the atmosphere, potentially via direct air capture (A) or through land-based uptake by photosynthesis or mineralization (B).”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CCS itself can contribute either to the mitigation of CO 2 (for example, by reducing net emissions from a gas-fired power plant) or to atmospheric removals (for example, by direct air carbon capture and storage, or DACCS); CCS does not necessarily imply CDR.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Fuels derived from CO 2 are argued to be an attractive option in the decarbonization process 37,38 because they can be deployed within existing transport infrastructure.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [37] Jiang, Z., Xiao, T., Kuznetsov, V. L. & Edwards, P. P. Turning carbon dioxide into fuel. Philos. Trans. A 368, 3343–3364 (2010). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Olah, G. A. Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 2636–2639 (2005). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The other five conventional industrial CO 2 utilization pathways could also perturb the net flows of CO 2 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > CO 2 utilization and the carbon cycle
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Land-based pathways can increase agricultural output and remove carbon dioxide.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The high end represents a future in which synfuels have sizeable market shares, due to cost reductions and policy drivers.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If CO 2 -EOR is to offer net removals, the CO 2 must be captured from the atmosphere, and more carbon must be injected into the well than is extracted.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Emissions have been reduced, and CO 2 ρ = CO 2 u = CO 2 s > 0, even though CO 2 r = 0.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Microalgae are a subject of long-standing research interest because of their high CO 2 -fixation efficiencies (up to 10%, compared with 1%-4% for other biomass 45 ), as well as their potential to produce a range of products such as biofuels, high-value carbohydrates and proteins, and plastics 43 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [45] Williams, P. J. B. & Laurens, L. M. Microalgae as biodiesel & biomass feedstocks: review & analysis of the biochemistry, energetics & economics. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 554–590 (2010). source
- Not matchedcites [43] Laurens, L. M. L. State of Technology Review – Algae Bioenergy (IEA Bioenergy, 2017).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total emissions in this 'utilization' scenario comprise the 1.5 t CO 2 from the consumption of the CO 2 -EOR oil.Emissions reduced is equal to 2.5 -1.5 = 1.0 t CO 2 ρ, which is identical to the CO 2 u, but net CO 2 r = 0 because the CO 2 came from a fossil power plant, rather than from the atmosphere.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is particularly relevant for the algal pathways thatrequire photobioreactors 43 and for the fuel synthesis pathways that require electrolysers 44 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [43] Laurens, L. M. L. State of Technology Review – Algae Bioenergy (IEA Bioenergy, 2017).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [44] Brynolf, S., Taljegard, M., Grahn, M. & Hansson, J. Electrofuels for the transport sector: A review of production costs. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 81, 1887–1907 (2018). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“At oil prices of approximately $100 bbl -1 , EOR is economically viable if CO 2 can be sourced for between $45 and $60 per tonne of CO 2 49,51 , implying a breakeven cost of CO 2 of -$60 to -$45 per tonne of CO 2 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [49] Heidug, W. et al. Storing CO 2 through enhanced oil recovery: combining EOR with CO 2 storage (EOR+) for profit. (International Energy Agency, 2015).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [51] Godec, M. L. Global Technology Roadmap for CCS in Industry: Sectoral Assessment CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery. (United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2011).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Assuming that the CO 2 does not return to atmosphere, the CO 2 utilized is equal to the CO 2 emissions stored, that is, CO 2 u = CO 2 s, but whether CO 2 r ≥ 0 depends upon the source of the CO 2 ; if it is from a fossil power station, there is no net removal of CO 2 from the atmosphere.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: In the CO2-EOR example, the CO2 utilized does not return to the atmosphere.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It might reduce emissions (CO 2 ρ), or remove CO 2 (CO 2 r) from the atmosphere, and/or store it (CO 2 s).”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Enhanced oil recovery using CO 2 currently accounts for around 5% of the total US crude oil production 48 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] Dai, Z. et al. CO2 accounting and risk analysis for CO2 sequestration at enhanced oil recovery sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 7546–7554 (2016). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, under our broad definition, there may still be an as-yet-unquantified CO 2 utilization potential associated with the increase in net primary productivity.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 93
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Although there is substantial uncertainty regarding the total quantity of available biomass 55 -particularly in light of concerns over competition for land use with food crops-100 to 300 EJ yr -1 of primary energy equivalent of biomass could be deployed by 2050.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > BECCS.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [55] Slade, R., Bauen, A. & Gross, R. Global bioenergy resources. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 99 (2014). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These cost estimates (realistically or unrealistically) assume $100 bbl -1 oil prices and are specific to the United States, where the business model is mature.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Nature | Vol 575 | 7 November 2019 | 91
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The business model for CO2-EOR is mature in the United States.
In the paper
“New membrane materials that can separate miscible liquidsfor example, methanol and water-will also be important 80 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [80] Mahmood, A., Bano, S., Kim, S.-G. & Lee, K.-H. Water–methanol separation characteristics of annealed SA/PVA complex membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 415–416, 360–367 (2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CO 2 -EOR utilizes and, with correct policy, stores CO 2 at scale, but may not yield any net climate benefit and may even be detrimental.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The cost of DACCS has recently been assessed to be between $600 and $1,000 per tonne of CO 2 for the first-of-a-kind plant, with nth-of-a-kind costs potentially of the order of $200 per tonne of CO 2 79 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Conventional utilization pathways
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [79] Keith, D. W., Holmes, G., St., Angelo, D. & Heidel, K. A process for capturing CO2 from the atmosphere. Joule 2, 1573–1594 (2018). source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These curves are constructed using currently available (and often sparse) data in the peer-reviewed literature, or-where data are not available-using approximations, and should be considered as a speculative first pass at envisioning future scenarios.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, the putative success of CO 2 -fuels may reduce the demand for oil, thus also reducing the potential of CO 2 -EOR.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Building materials face a challenging route to market penetration owing to regulatory barriers, which may take decades to surmount.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The chemicals pathways may reduce net emissions by displacing fossil fuel use, but will not contribute to net removal unless they are paired with direct air capture in a net zero world.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although market penetration can be facilitated by cost-competitiveness, there is no certainty that the cheapest CO 2 utilization pathways will scale up.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Techno-economic barriers to scaling
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At present, 'brown' hydrogen is primarilyand most cheaply-generated by reforming methane 68 , which has associated CO 2 emissions.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Energy requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Izquierdo, U. et al. Hydrogen production from methane and natural gas steam reforming in conventional and microreactor reaction systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 7026–7033 (2012). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The curves should not be interpreted as comprehensive assessments of costs, they do not represent nth-ofa-kind costs, and they are incompatible with other sequestration or abatement cost curves.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many technologies are in the very early stages of development, and cost optimization via research and development could substantially change these estimates.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a decarbonized world, those supply-chain emissions will be close to zero and so the climate benefit from BECCS will be amplified.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because they are based on a backward-looking scoping review, our cost estimates for conventional pathways do not capture current unpublished innovations and advances in the industrial arena.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Cost and performance differentials
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Land management, biochar and forestry offer only shorterterm storage, face saturation, and risk large-scale flows of CO 2 back to the atmosphere 23 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] Baccini, A. et al. Tropical forests are a net carbon source based on aboveground measurements of gain and loss. Science 358, 230–234 (2017). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although photosynthesis is an inefficient process (the average efficiency is around 0.2% globally 67 )”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Energy requirements
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [67] Barber, J. Photosynthetic energy conversion: natural and artificial. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 185–196 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Open pathways, although both theoretically profitable and implementable, often incur additional operating costs-such as implementation, transaction, institutional, and monitoring costs-which can be high 71 .”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [71] Viana, V. M., Grieg-Gran, M., Della Mea, R. & Ribenboim, G. The Costs of REDD: Lessons From Amazonas (International Institute for Environment and Development, 2009).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The uncertainty in future outcomes is relatively large, and very few industries globally involve over 1 Gt yr -1 of material flows.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > The outlook for CO 2 utilization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CO 2 utilization is not an end in itself, and these pathways solely or even collectively will not provide a key solution to climate change.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Cross-cutting efforts
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Financing and managing the emergence of a globally important new set of CO 2 utilization industries will probably require clear direction and industrial support from government.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Cross-cutting efforts
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, if these can be overcome, its position low on the cost curve in both low and high scenarios suggests that this pathway may have considerable potential.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Non-conventional utilization pathways
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An enabling 'net zero' legislative regime-such as that in place in Sweden and the UK and proposed in New Zealand-can provide clarity about the necessary scale of industries that reduce and remove CO 2 , including the pathways examined here.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Cross-cutting efforts
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, incentives for CO 2 removals and reductions (or penalties for emissions) are justified, and these will support CO 2 utilization in cases in which it is beneficial for the climate.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Cross-cutting efforts
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“creating carbon prices of around $40 to $80 per tonne of CO 2 -increasing over time-to penalize CO 2 emissions 89 and to incentivize verifiable CO 2 emissions reductions and removals from the atmosphere.”
§ The technological and economic prospects for CO 2 utilization and removal > Cross-cutting efforts
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [89] High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices Report of the High-Level Commission on Carbon Prices (World Bank, 2017).
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the CO2-EOR example, the CO2 utilized does not return to the atmosphere.
“Assuming that the CO 2 does not return to atmosphere, the CO 2 utilized is equal to the CO 2 emissions stored”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cement requires the use of lime (CaO), which is produced by the calcination of limestone in an emissions-intensive process.
“Cement requires the use of lime (CaO), which is produced by the calcination of limestone in an emissions-intensive process.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The business model for CO2-EOR is mature in the United States.
“and are specific to the United States, where the business model is mature.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The low scenario does not account for potential overlaps in utilization volumes between pathways.
“The specific assumptions of the low scenario, which do not account for potential overlaps in utilization volumes between pathways,”
The paper relies on this without support.
BECCS and building materials are scalable closed pathways.
“closed pathways with scalability-such as BECCS and building materials”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, in contrast to most other CDR methods such as afforestation, soil management or biochemical production, mineral carbonation is not intrinsically limited by land surface availability or CO 2 release by (hydro)carbon oxidation [3].”
From Isotope chemistry to trace carbon mineralization in construction materials (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Another pathway postcarbon capture is the utilization of the CO 2 captured in the production of chemicals, fuels, microalgae and concrete building materials, as well as utilization in enhanced oil recovery (Hepburn et al. 2019;Aresta et al. 2005;Su et al. 2016;Qin et al. 2020).”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Hepburn et al. 2019
Citations
Cites
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700782 · Cited by 18,606
Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 7,763
Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109 · Cited by 5,086
Jansen, E. H., Overpeck, J. T., Briffa, K., Duplessy, J., Joos, F., Masson-Delmotte, Olago, D., Otto‐Bliesner, B. L., Peltier, W. R., Rahmstorf, S., et al. (2007) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 4,577
Griscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamäki, J. V., Smith, P., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1710465114 · Cited by 3,481
Self-citationAresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., & Angelini, A. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4002758 · Cited by 3,210
What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes?
De Luna, P., Hahn, C., Higgins, D., Jaffer, S. A., Jaramillo, T. F., & Sargent, E. H. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav3506 · Cited by 3,052
Beyond fossil fuel–driven nitrogen transformations
Chen, J. G., Crooks, R. M., Seefeldt, L. C., Bren, K. L., Bullock, R. M., Darensbourg, M. Y., Holland, P. L., Hoffman, B. M., Janik, M. J., Jones, A. K., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar6611 · Cited by 2,476
Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy
Olah, G. A. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200462121 · Cited by 2,431
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- IPCC Special Report: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (eds Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., De Coninck, H., Loos, M. & Meyer, L. A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005). This IPCC report provides an overview of the technology and expected costs of carbon capture and sequestration, and provides a key definition of CO 2 utilization.
- Maries, A., Tyrer, M. & Provis, J. L. Sequestration of CO2 emissions from cement manufacture. In Proc. 37th Cement and Concrete Science Conference (eds Bai, Y. et al.) (Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining, 2017).
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Commercial Aircraft Propulsion and Energy Systems Research: Reducing Global Carbon Emissions (National Academies Press, 2016).
- Laurens, L. M. L. State of Technology Review – Algae Bioenergy (IEA Bioenergy, 2017).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 2,462
Carus, M., Dammer, L., Raschka, A., & Skoczinski, P. (2020) · Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/ghg.1992 · Cited by 66
Food Systems for Human and Planetary Health: Economic Perspectives and Challenges
Fan, S., Headey, D., Rue, C., & Thomas, T. S. (2021) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-101520-081337 · Cited by 74
Strategies for achieving carbon neutrality within the chemical industry
Malehmirchegini, L., & Chapman, A. J. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.115762 · Cited by 71
CO2 capture by various nanoparticles: Recent development and prospective
Li, H. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137679 · Cited by 66
Zhang, W., Yu, A., Mao, H., Feng, G., Li, C., Wang, G., Chang, J., Halat, D. M., Li, Z., Yu, W., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c02786 · Cited by 66
Xin, Y., Ning, H., Wang, D., Li, X., Fan, W., Ju, X., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Yao, D., et al. (2023) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-023-5516-2 · Cited by 64
Konsolakis, M., & Lykaki, M. (2021) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal11040452 · Cited by 64
CO2 as a building block: from capture to utilization
Theofanidis, S. A., Antzaras, A. N., & Lemonidou, A. A. (2023) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2023.100902 · Cited by 64
Recent Advances of Carbon Capture in Metal–Organic Frameworks: A Comprehensive Review
Li, W., Shuai, Q., & Yu, J. (2024) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202402783 · Cited by 71
Ni-Co catalyst-assisted carbon cycling for CH4-CO2 reforming
Yuan, J., Lu, C., Gu, Z., et al. (2023) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123318 · Cited by 63
Photochemical H 2 dissociation for nearly quantitative CO 2 reduction to ethylene
Jin, P., Guo, P., Luo, N., Zhang, H., Ni, C., Chen, R., Liu, W., Li, R., Xiao, J., Wang, G., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adq3445 · Cited by 73
Christensen, O. P., Bagger, A., & Rossmeisl, J. (2024) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.3c04851 · Cited by 65
The circular bioeconomy: a driver for system integration
Schipfer, F., Burli, P., Fritsche, U., Hennig, C., Stricker, F., Wirth, M., Proskurina, S., & Serna-Loaiza, S. (2024) · Energy, Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-024-00461-4 · Cited by 52
Kothandaraman, J., Lopez, J. S., Jiang, Y., Walter, É., Burton, S., Dagle, R. A., & Heldebrant, D. J. (2021) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.202101590 · Cited by 62
Lu, T., Shi, G., Liu, Y., Luo, X., Shen, Y., Chang, M., Wu, Y., Gao, X., Wu, J., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5c05984 · Cited by 70
Ge, H., Kuwahara, Y., Kusu, K., & Yamashita, H. (2021) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d1ta02277f · Cited by 62
Xiong, W. H., Peng, Y., Ma, W., Xu, X., Zhao, Y., Wu, J., & Tang, R. (2023) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwad200 · Cited by 63
Cheng, H., Fan, Y.-L., Tarlet, D., Luo, L.-N., & Fan, Z. (2023) · Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113357 · Cited by 56
Ma, S., Wang, W., Hu, Z., et al. (2026) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c06431 · Cited by 61
Zhang, X. Y., Li, W. J., Chen, J., Wu, X. F., Liu, Y. W., Mao, F., Yuan, H., Zhu, M., Dai, S., Wang, H. F., et al. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202202298 · Cited by 61
Effect of sulfate on CO2 binding efficiency of recycled alkaline materials
Zając, M., Skibsted, J., Lothenbach, B., Bullerjahn, F., Skoček, J., & Haha, M. B. (2022) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2022.106804 · Cited by 63
Yang, M., Baral, N. R., Anastasopoulou, A., Breunig, H. M., & Scown, C. D. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02816 · Cited by 61
Bao, X., Lu, D., Wang, Z., Yin, H., Zhu, B., Chen, B., Shi, M., Zhang, Y., Xu, Q., Qin, Y., et al. (2023) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2023.01.096 · Cited by 62
Helal, A., Cordova, K. E., Arafat, M. E., Usman, M., & Yamani, Z. H. (2020) · Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers · doi:10.1039/d0qi00496k · Cited by 61
Qian, C., Rui, Z., Liu, Y., et al. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.159135 · Cited by 61
Carbon Pricing Mechanism for the Energy Industry: A Bibliometric Study of Optimal Pricing Policies
(2022) · Acta Montanistica Slovaca · doi:10.46544/ams.v27i1.05 · Cited by 60
Li, B., Geng, Y., Xia, X., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18147603 · Cited by 61
Copper–Zinc Alloy-Free Synthesis of Methanol from Carbon Dioxide over Cu/ZnO/Faujasite
Zabilskiy, M., Sushkevich, V. L., Newton, M. A., et al. (2020) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c03661 · Cited by 61
Shaw, W. J., Kidder, M. K., Bare, S. R., Delferro, M., Morris, J. R., Toma, F. M., Senanayake, S. D., Autrey, T. S., Biddinger, E. J., Boettcher, S. W., et al. (2024) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-024-00587-1 · Cited by 72
“These efforts will move us towards ‘closing the carbon cycle’, achieving net-zero CO 2 emissions in segments of our economy 38,54 that cannot be easily electrified.”
Kim, C.-S., Lee, Y., Kim, K., & Lee, U. (2022) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal12101113 · Cited by 67
“However, since CO 2 itself is a very stable chemical, most pathways require an excessive amount of energy input to accelerate the conversion process [2].”
Yang, S., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Cheng, K., Liu, J., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Mou, H., & Sun, H. (2024) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104278 · Cited by 61
Materials from waste plastics for CO 2 capture and utilisation
Teo, J. Y. Q., Ong, A., Tan, T. T. Y., Li, X., Loh, X. J., & Lim, J. Y. C. (2022) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2gc02306g · Cited by 64
Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities of Poly(γ-butyrolactone)-Based Recyclable Polymers
Liu, Y., Wu, J., Hu, X., Zhu, N., & Guo, K. (2021) · ACS Macro Letters · doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00813 · Cited by 62
Pronoitis, C., Hakkarainen, M., & Odelius, K. (2022) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c08530 · Cited by 61
Recent progress in anti-coking Ni catalysts for thermo-catalytic conversion of greenhouse gases
Gao, X., Li, J., Zheng, M., et al. (2021) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2021.10.051 · Cited by 60
Kong, W., Kong, J., Lyu, H., Ma, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Feng, S., & Shen, B. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132028 · Cited by 57
Kong, Y., Hu, H., Liu, M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2022.02.014 · Cited by 60
Photocatalytic dry reforming: what is it good for?
Tavasoli, A., Preston, M., & Ozin, G. A. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02809f · Cited by 59
The BECCS Implementation Gap–A Swedish Case Study
Fuss, S., & Johnsson, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.553400 · Cited by 73
“The latter would earn US$50 per metric tonne of CO2 stored permanently or $35 per metric tonne if the CO2 is put to use, which could mean that the balance does not remain negative (Hepburn et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLal, A., & You, F. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adg6740 · Cited by 62
Vitillo, J. G., Eisaman, M. D., Aradóttir, E. S., Passarini, F., Wang, T., & Sheehan, S. W. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104237 · Cited by 68
Wang, Y., Zhuang, G., Zhang, J., Luo, F., Cheng, X., Sun, F.-L., Fu, S., Lu, T., & Zhang, Z. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202216592 · Cited by 59
Tunable selectivity on copper–bismuth bimetallic aerogels for electrochemical CO2 reduction
Wang, Y., Cheng, L., Zhu, Y., Liu, J., Xiao, C., Chen, R., Zhang, L., Li, Y., & Li, C. (2022) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121650 · Cited by 59
Review on in-situ CO2 mineralization sequestration: mechanistic understanding and research frontiers
Ye, H., Liu, Q., Bao, Q., Wang, Z., Xie, Y., Michelle, T., Zhao, W., & Xian, C. (2025) · International Journal of Coal Science & Technology · doi:10.1007/s40789-025-00755-8 · Cited by 66
“It is a significant challenge, hence seeking effective CO 2 utilization and removal technologies is of great importance for mitigating climate change (Hepburn et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2020).”
Hidden parameters for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction in zero-gap electrolyzers
Hoof, L., Thissen, N., Pellumbi, K., Puring, K. J., Siegmund, D., Mechler, A. K., & Apfel, U. (2022) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100825 · Cited by 65
Photocatalytic CO2 reduction to C1–C5 hydrocarbons using K2Fe2O4/g-C3N4 as coupling photocatalyst
Chen, H.-L., Lin, Y.-Y., Lin, Y.-Y., Zuo, Z., Wu, W.-T., Qi, Q., Peng, Z., Zou, D., & Chen, C. (2023) · Materials Today Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100430 · Cited by 59
Ruan, H., Wu, S., Chen, X., et al. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.138095 · Cited by 58
Zhang, Z., Li, M., Gao, R., Yang, S., Ma, Q., Feng, R., Dou, H., Dang, J., Wen, G., Bai, Z., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c01061 · Cited by 58
Molecular insight into replacement dynamics of CO2 enhanced oil recovery in nanopores
Wang, R., Bi, S., Guo, Z., et al. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.135796 · Cited by 58
Guo, L., Sun, S., Li, J., Gao, W., Zhao, H., Zhang, B., He, Y., Zhang, P., Yang, G., & Tsubaki, N. (2021) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121684 · Cited by 55
Investigating the Synergistic Impact of CCUS-EOR
Rui, Z., Liu, T., Wen, X., et al. (2025) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2025.04.005 · Cited by 57
Computational screening methodology identifies effective solvents for CO2 capture
Orlov, A. A., Valtz, A., Coquelet, C., Rozanska, X., Wimmer, E., Marcou, G., Horvath, D., Poulain, B., Varnek, A. A., & de Meyer, F. J.-M. (2022) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-022-00654-y · Cited by 64
“(2)) in every aqueous amine and ΔG5 calculated from the amine pKa.”
BackgroundVarvoutis, G., Lykaki, M., Papista, E., et al. (2020) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2020.101408 · Cited by 57
Supported Metal Oxide Catalysts for CO2 Fischer–Tropsch Conversion to Liquid Fuels─A Review
Suppiah, D. D., Daud, W. M. A. W., & Johan, M. R. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02406 · Cited by 62
Wang, R., Wang, X., & Zhu, T. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jes.2024.04.018 · Cited by 64
CO2 enrichment in greenhouse production: Towards a sustainable approach
Wang, A., Lv, J., Wang, J., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1029901 · Cited by 57
“Compared with the huge cost and risk of leakage of carbon storage, converting CO2 into substances that people need, that is, carbon capture and utilization (CCU), is more attractive (Hepburn et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA molecular view of single-atom catalysis toward carbon dioxide conversion
Shang, X. C., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, T., & Su, X. (2024) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d3sc06863c · Cited by 57
Choi, G. H., Song, H. J., Lee, S. K., Kim, J., Moon, M., & Yoo, P. J. (2023) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108512 · Cited by 59
Grant, N., Gambhir, A., Mittal, S., Greig, C. R., & Köberle, A. C. (2022) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103766 · Cited by 56
An air CO 2 capture system based on the passive carbonation of large Ca(OH) 2 structures
Abánades, J. C., Criado, Y. A., & Fernández, J. R. (2020) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/d0se00094a · Cited by 61
Quantifying global carbon dioxide removal deployment
Powis, C. M., Smith, S. M., Minx, J. C., & Gasser, T. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acb450 · Cited by 56
“We build on Hepburn et al [29] and Smith et al [30], defining the principle carbon reservoirs as the atmosphere, land, ocean, lithosphere, and products.”
MethodSelf-citationSun, Y., Wang, F., Liu, F., Zhang, S., Zhao, S., Chen, J., Huang, Y. H., Liu, X., Wu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2022) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.1c19847 · Cited by 54
Faber, G., Ruttinger, A., Strunge, T., Langhorst, T., Zimmermann, A., van der Hulst, M., Bensebaa, F., Moni, S., & Tao, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.820261 · Cited by 55
“Despite CCU’s significant potential, one of themost significant barriers to its large-scale deployment is the current low technology readiness level (TRL) of most CCU technologies (Hepburn et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSustainable scale-up of negative emissions technologies and practices: where to focus
Cobo, S., Negri, V., Valente, A., Reiner, D. M., Hamelin, L., Dowell, N. M., & Guillén‐Gosálbez, G. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acacb3 · Cited by 57
Self-citationMoreno-González, M., Berger, A., Borsboom-Hanson, T., & Mérida, W. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114452 · Cited by 58
Li, Y., Wang, H., Yang, X., O'Carroll, T., & Wu, G. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202317884 · Cited by 57
Petruch, M., & Walcher, D. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126324 · Cited by 55
Zimmermann, A., Langhorst, T., Moni, S. M., Schaidle, J. A., Bensebaa, F., & Bardow, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2022.841907 · Cited by 60
“The mitigation of climate change requires the development of a variety of innovative, cost-efficient, and environmentally benign technologies—among them a great variety of emerging technologies that employ carbon dioxide capture and utilization (CCU) (Hepburn et al., 2019).”
BackgroundLiang, J., Guo, L., Gao, W., Wang, C., Guo, X., He, Y., Yang, G., & Tsubaki, N. (2022) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.1c05061 · Cited by 57
Wu, Y. Q., Zhang, M., Yang, M.-X., & Yan, J. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192114109 · Cited by 55
Microstructure evolution of bituminite and anthracite modified by different fracturing fluids
Zheng, Y., Zhai, C., Chen, A., et al. (2022) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125732 · Cited by 54
Liu, H., Wang, H., Song, Q., Küster, K., Starke, U., van Aken, P. A., & Klemm, E. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202117058 · Cited by 56
Recent advances in enantioselective ring-opening polymerization and copolymerization
Xie, X., Huo, Z., Jang, E., & Tong, R. (2023) · Communications Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s42004-023-01007-z · Cited by 65
“In contrast to many reactions requiring expensive stoichiometric reagents and having scale-up problems 123 , the ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP) of CO 2 and other monomers, e.g., epoxides, is well suited for large-scale deployment because it enables signi fi cant CO 2 sequestration, and…”
BackgroundCatalytic reactivity descriptors of metal‐nitrogen‐doped carbon catalysts for electrocatalysis
Liu, H., Li, J., Arbiol, J., Yang, B., & Tang, P. (2023) · EcoEnergy · doi:10.1002/ece2.12 · Cited by 57
Ma, Y., Guo, L., Chang, L., Guo, W., Zhou, T., Hao, F., Su, W., Zhou, J., Wang, G., Shao, M., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63013-0 · Cited by 73
Role of Ligand-Bound CO2 in the Hydrogenation of CO2 to Formate with a (PNP)Mn Catalyst
Schlenker, K., Christensen, E. G., Zhanserkeev, A. A., et al. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.1c01709 · Cited by 54
An ecosystem of carbon dioxide removal reviews – part 1: direct air CO 2 capture and storage
van der Spek, M. W., Bardow, A., Baum, C. M., Bolongaro, V., Dufour‐Décieux, V., Esch, C., Fritz, L., Garcia, S., Hamann, C., Hondeborg, D., et al. (2025) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d5ee01732g · Cited by 71
Self-citationRecent Advances on CO2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H2
Varvoutis, G., Lampropoulos, A., Mandela, E., Konsolakis, M., & Marnellos, G. E. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15134790 · Cited by 57
Technology options and policy design to facilitate decarbonization of chemical manufacturing
Woodall, C. M., Fan, Z., Lou, Y., Bhardwaj, A. A., Khatri, A., Agrawal, M., McCormick, C. F., & Friedmann, S. J. (2022) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.10.006 · Cited by 60
Chen, L., Zhu, X., Zheng, Y., Wang, L., Poon, C. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2023) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134142 · Cited by 52
Recent advances in paired electrolysis coupling CO2 reduction with alternative oxidation reactions
Li, D., Yang, J., Lian, J., Yan, J., & Liu, S. (2022) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2022.10.031 · Cited by 57
Soil organic matter enhances aboveground biomass in alpine grassland under drought
Zhao, Y., Wang, X., Fei, C., Li, J., Wu, J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Deng, T., Jiang, S., Zhou, X., et al. (2023) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116430 · Cited by 52
Wet carbonation of C3A and pre-hydrated C3A
Villmow, S., Mielkau, A., Goetz‐Neunhoeffer, F., & Neubauer, J. (2023) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107259 · Cited by 54
Mass transfer of chemical absorption of CO2 in a serpentine minichannel
Pang, Z., Jiang, S., Zhu, C., Ma, Y., & Fu, T. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.128791 · Cited by 52
Photoelectrochemical CO2 electrolyzers: From photoelectrode fabrication to reactor configuration
Abarca, J. A., Díaz‐Sainz, G., Merino‐Garcia, I., Irabien, Á., & Albo, J. (2023) · Journal of Energy Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jechem.2023.06.032 · Cited by 55
In Situ/Operando Characterization Techniques of Electrochemical CO2 Reduction
Hasa, B., Zhao, Y., & Jiao, F. (2023) · Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-101121-071735 · Cited by 58
Jiang, G., Han, D., Han, Z., Gao, J., Wang, X., Weng, Z., & Yang, Q. (2022) · Transactions of Tianjin University · doi:10.1007/s12209-022-00330-1 · Cited by 52
“Electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) powered by renewable electricity provides a sustainable solution for converting waste CO2 emissions into useful feedstocks and thereby realizing a net negative carbon footprint and long-term storage of the intermittent renewable electricity in chemical bonds [4, 5].”
BackgroundCCUS Perspectives: Assessing Historical Contexts, Current Realities, and Future Prospects
Ampomah, W., Morgan, A., Koranteng, D. O., & Nyamekye, W. I. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17174248 · Cited by 60
Buss, W., Hasemer, H., Sokol, N. W., Rohling, E. J., & Borevitz, J. (2024) · Communications Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43247-024-01771-3 · Cited by 59
Peng, R., Ren, Y., Si, Y., et al. (2024) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.4c06218 · Cited by 52
One‐Pot Precision Synthesis of AB, ABA and ABC Block Copolymers via Switchable Catalysis
Yang, Z., Hu, C., Cui, F., Pang, X., Huang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Chen, X. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202117533 · Cited by 53
Recent progress of photothermal effect on photocatalytic reduction of CO2
Guo, R., Xia, C., Bi, Z., Zhang, Z.-R., & Pan, W. (2022) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107617 · Cited by 53
Enhancing d/p‐2π* Orbitals Hybridization via Strain Engineering for Efficient CO 2 Photoreduction
Zhou, G., Liu, X., Xu, Y., Feng, S., Lu, Z., & Liu, Z. (2024) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202411794 · Cited by 61
Zhao, P., Yin, Y., Xu, X., Yang, D., Wang, J., Yang, F., & Zhang, G. (2022) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.124162 · Cited by 54
Membrane Technologies for Decarbonization
Alent’ev, A. Y., Волков, А. В., Vorotyntsev, I. V., Maximov, A. L., & Yaroslavtsev, A. B. (2021) · Membranes and Membrane Technologies · doi:10.1134/s2517751621050024 · Cited by 52
Recent progress in CO2-based polyurethanes and polyureas
Ou, X., Niu, Y., Liu, Q., Li, L., Wei, F., Cui, Y., Zhou, Y., & Yan, F. (2023) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2023.101780 · Cited by 53
Engineering thermochemistry to cope with challenges in carbon neutrality
Han, Z., Jia, X., Song, X., et al. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137943 · Cited by 51
Assessing Carbon Capture: Public Policy, Science, and Societal Need
Sekera, J. A., & Lichtenberger, A. (2020) · Biophysical Economics and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s41247-020-00080-5 · Cited by 61
“2018b; Pielke 2018; Adlen and Hepburn 2019).”
BackgroundHanssen, S. V., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Daioglou, V., Čengić, M., van Vuuren, D. P., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12911 · Cited by 55
“The reasons BECCS can be considered attractive (for instance in integrated assessment models) are that it forms a combination of existing technologies, is scalable, yields useful energy and may have lower costs than other negative emission technologies (Fuss et al., 2016, 2018; Hepburn et al., 2019; Muratori et al., 2…”
Mahato, M., Nam, S., Tabassian, R., Oh, S., Nguyen, V. H., & Oh, I. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202107442 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Hepburn, C., Adlen, E., Beddington, J., Carter, E. A., Fuss, S., Mac Dowell, N., Minx, J. C., Smith, P., & Williams, C. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Adlen, Ella
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2019-11-06
- Volume
- 575
- Issue
- 7781
- Pages
- 87-97
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- OpenAlex
- W2988278250
- Cited by
- 2,523
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 434 · 2025: 477 · 2024: 498 · 2023: 384 · 2022: 347 · 2021: 261 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nature Conservancy
- Belmont Forum
- UK Energy Research Centre (NE/P019455/1)
- National Academy of Sciences
- U.S. Air Force (FA9550)
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S018603/1)
- Natural Environment Research Council (P019900, NE/P019455/1, NE/P019900/1, NE/M021327/1)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-14-1-0254)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- CO2 utilization, carbon capture and storage, carbon dioxide removal, carbon capture and utilization, microalgae, biofuels, agricultural carbon sequestration, emission reduction, economic feasibility
- MeSH terms
- Carbon Dioxide, Charcoal, Photosynthesis, Soil, Technology, Carbon Sequestration, Microalgae, Forests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review