The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 32 of the 43 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
APOE4 impairs myelination via cholesterol dysregulation in oligodendrocytes
Open accessAbstract
APOE4 is the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease 1-3. However, the effects of APOE4 on the human brain are not fully understood, limiting opportunities to develop targeted therapeutics for individuals carrying APOE4 and other risk factors for Alzheimer's disease 4-8. Here, to gain more comprehensive insights into the impact of APOE4 on the human brain, we performed single-cell transcriptomics profiling of post-mortem human brains from APOE4 carriers compared with non-carriers. This revealed that APOE4 is associated with widespread gene expression changes across all cell types of the human brain. Consistent with the biological function of APOE 2-6, APOE4 significantly altered signalling pathways associated with cholesterol homeostasis and transport. Confirming these findings with histological and lipidomic analysis of the post-mortem human brain, induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived cells and targeted-replacement mice, we show that cholesterol is aberrantly deposited in oligodendrocytes-myelinating cells that are responsible for insulating and promoting the electrical activity of neurons. We show that altered cholesterol localization in the APOE4 brain coincides with reduced myelination. Pharmacologically facilitating cholesterol transport increases axonal myelination and improves learning and memory in APOE4 mice. We provide a single-cell atlas describing the transcriptional effects of APOE4 on the aging human brain and establish a functional link between APOE4, cholesterol, myelination and memory, offering therapeutic opportunities for Alzheimer's disease.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
APOE4 is associated with widespread transcriptomic changes in the aged human brain, including cholesterol dysregulation in oligodendrocytes and reduced myelination. Facilitating cholesterol transport with cyclodextrin increases myelination and improves learning and memory in APOE4/4 targeted-replacement mice.
Key findings
- Single-nucleus RNA-sequencing of post-mortem prefrontal cortex from 32 subjects (12 APOE3/3, 12 APOE3/4, 8 APOE4/4) yielded 178,789 nuclei (164,741 after QC); APOE4 was associated with 486 candidate perturbed GO Biological Processes, including 404 cell-type-specific and 82 broadly dysregulated pathways.
- APOE4 oligodendrocytes showed dose-dependent increases in cholesterol-related gene expression (4/4 > 3/4 > 3/3, p = 0.01) and altered cholesterol localization: in APOE4-carriers, Bodipy-cholesterol along neurofilaments decreased from 58% to 19% (p = 0.0106), with higher mean Bodipy-cholesterol intensity (p = 0.0220).
- APOE4 was associated with reduced myelination: post-mortem APOE3/4 PFC had reduced Black Gold II area (p = 0.0031) and reduced MBP immunoreactivity (p = 0.0027 and p = 0.0294); APOE4/4 corpus callosum had higher g-ratios (p < 0.0001); APOE4/4-TR mice had fewer myelinated axons (p = 0.0265) and higher g-ratios (p < 0.0001).
- Cyclodextrin treatment increased MBP colocalization with neurofilament in APOE4/4 iPSC co-cultures by 43% ± 5% (p = 0.0274), reduced g-ratio in APOE4/4-TR mice (p < 0.0001), increased MBP immunoreactivity (p = 0.0008), increased novel object preference (p = 0.0466), and decreased Puzzle Box latency (p = 0.02).
Methods
- Post-mortem human prefrontal cortex from ROSMAP was profiled by 10x Genomics snRNA-seq; nuclei were clustered with ACTIONet, differential expression was modeled with NEBULA negative binomial mixed models, and pathway activity was analyzed with GSVA and Limma.
- Lipidomic profiling used mass spectrometry on post-mortem corpus callosum (APOE4/4 n = 3, all female; APOE3/3 n = 3, all female) and a separate prefrontal cortex dataset of 314 individuals; isogenic APOE3/3 and APOE4/4 iPSC-derived oligodendroglia and iNeuron co-cultures, plus APOE targeted-replacement mice, were used for functional and histological validation.
- Pharmacological experiments treated APOE4/4 iPSC-derived oligodendroglia with simvastatin, atorvastatin, or cyclodextrin, and treated APOE4/4-TR mice with subcutaneous cyclodextrin (2 g/kg twice weekly for eight weeks) or saline; myelination was assessed by imaging and TEM, and cognition by novel object recognition and Puzzle Box tasks.
Limitations
- The paper states that additional well-powered lipidomic analyses designed to quantify cholesteryl esters in post-mortem tissue are needed; the corpus callosum lipidomic comparison had n = 3 per genotype and showed only a trend toward higher cholesteryl esters (p ≥ 0.7).
- The paper states that genetic diversity may confound APOE4 effects observed in post-mortem human brain tissue, motivating the use of isogenic iPSC lines and APOE-TR mice; it also notes that covariates inherent to post-mortem human samples were controlled by quantifying myelin in inbred APOE-TR mice.
- The paper states that power analysis to determine sample size was not performed and that experimenters were not blinded to drug injections or behavioral trials (TEM analysis was blinded); evident from the text, several human and mouse experiments used small samples, such as n = 3 per genotype for human TEM and Black Gold II staining and n = 4–5 mice per group for in vivo cyclodextrin histology/TEM.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
108 Own result · 54 Own interpretation · 26 Own method · 12 Partly supported · 5 Supported · 4 No full text of the sources · 2 Supported so far · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Consistent with APOE’s biological function2–6, APOE4 significantly altered signaling pathways associated with cholesterol homeostasis and transport.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] Corder, E. H. et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 261, 921–923 (1993). source
- Supportedcites [3] Strittmatter, W. J. et al. Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 1977–1981 (1993). source
The citation is attached to the background phrase about APOE’s biological function, not to the citing authors’ finding about altered signaling pathways. Our copy describes ApoE as involved in cholesterol transport (opening text, p. 1977) and says it transports lipids into cells (discussion; page not provided). (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [4] Liu, C.-C. et al. ApoE4 accelerates early seeding of amyloid pathology. Neuron 96, 1024–1032 (2017). source
The citation is attached to “APOE’s biological function,” rather than to the citing authors’ finding about altered signaling pathways. The Introduction identifies apoE as a major cholesterol carrier that delivers lipids to neurons, supporting the cited background point. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Could not verifycites [5] Shi, Y. et al. ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Nature 549, 523–527 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s results discuss ApoE4-associated changes in inflammatory and normal-cell-function gene expression in tauopathy mice, but do not identify cholesterol homeostasis or transport pathways. Searches for “cholesterol homeostasis and transport,” “cholesterol,” and related lipid-pathway terms found no passage supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
- Could not verifycites [6] Castellano, J. M. et al. Human apoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-β peptide clearance. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 89ra57 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The citation is attached to the background phrase about APOE’s biological function, not directly to the citing authors’ finding that APOE4 significantly altered signaling pathways. The source’s Results and Discussion discuss apoE lipidation and amyloid-β clearance, but the passages found for cholesterol homeostasis and transport do not address cholesterol-related signaling pathways. (LLM, conf=0.72)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The APOE4 polymorphism alters the accessibility of the lipid-binding region, which interferes with its cholesterol and lipid transport capacity7.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [7] Yamazaki, Y., Zhao, N., Caulfield, T. R., Liu, C.-C. & Bu, G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 501–518 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Biology of APOE section says APOE polymorphisms alter structure and lipid binding, and the Lipid transport section says APOE4 is less efficient at transporting lipids to neurons and reports impaired cholesterol efflux in APOE*ε4 homozygotes. But the paper does not say APOE4 alters access to the lipid-binding region or that this causes the transport impairment. Its Biology of APOE section instead describes lipid binding as increasing access to the receptor-binding region in a model of APOE3; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Our previous single-cell analysis uncovered AD-associated oligodendrocyte subpopulations highlighting a role of myelin-related processes in AD pathogenesis12, consistent with reports of hypomyelination and white matter changes in AD23,24.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] Mathys, H. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 570, 332–337 (2019). source
The Identification of AD-associated cellular subpopulations section identifies Oli0 as an oligodendrocyte subpopulation associated with AD pathology. The Discussion reports recurrent perturbation of myelination-related genes and suggests a role for maintaining myelin integrity. Together, these support the attributed claim; the separate reports of hypomyelination and white-matter changes are cited to other sources. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Post-mortem oligodendrocytes had low but detectable APOE expression, consistent with previous single-cell resolution reports25 (Extended Data Fig. 5k, l).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [25] Jäkel, S. et al. Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature 566, 543–547 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods (Human Donor tissue; page not given) identify the samples as post-mortem tissue, and the paper identifies APOE as an RNA marker of an oligodendroglial subcluster. It supports detectable APOE expression in that subcluster, but does not establish that expression was low across post-mortem oligodendrocytes generally. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Infant APOE4-carriers exhibit alterations in myelin volume and cognitive maturation trajectories relative to APOE3/3-carriers34,35.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [34] Dean, D. C. 3rd et al. Brain differences in infants at differential genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer disease: a cross-sectional imaging study. JAMA Neurol. 71, 11–22 (2014). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (2- to 25-Month-Old and 2- to 6-Month-Old MWF Comparisons) report regional myelin water fraction differences between infant ε4 carriers and noncarriers; the Results (Associations Between Brain Imaging Measurements and Age) also report different age-related myelin trajectories. The Discussion says cognitive differences remain unresolved and calls for studies of cognitive performance starting in infancy. This source therefore does not establish altered cognitive maturation trajectories. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites [35] Remer, J. et al. Longitudinal white matter and cognitive development in pediatric carriers of the apolipoprotein ε4 allele. Neuroimage 222, 117243 (2020). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background and Discussion report differences in white-matter myelin and cognitive-development trajectories in infants and young children with the APOE ε4 allele. But the study compares ε4 carriers with all non-carriers, not specifically ε3/3 children, and uses myelin water fraction as a surrogate for myelin content rather than measuring myelin volume. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DNA damage response was also altered in APOE4 microglia and OPCs, suggesting APOE4 may promote DNA damage in specific cell types.”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cholesterol biosynthesis was increased in APOE4 oligodendrocytes (e.g., DHCR24, LBR), lipid storage in OPCs (e.g., PPARA), and glycogen metabolism in microglia and astrocytes (e.g., UGP2, PGM1); while acetyl-CoA metabolism was decreased in astrocytes (e.g., ACAT1, ACSS1; Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table S4).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Remarkably, these alterations not only occurred in neurons (e.g., voltage-gated calcium channel activity), but also in oligodendrocytes (e.g., long-term neuronal synaptic plasticity).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By comparing pathway activity scores of APOE3/4 and APOE4/4 vs APOE3/3, we found APOE4 genotype impacts 22 of the 193 pathways (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Table S5).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cholesterol biosynthesis was increased in APOE4 oligodendrocytes (e.g., DHCR24, LBR), lipid storage in OPCs (e.g., PPARA), and glycogen metabolism in microglia and astrocytes (e.g., UGP2, PGM1); while acetyl-CoA metabolism was decreased in astrocytes (e.g., ACAT1, ACSS1; Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table S4).”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 40
- It may state two separate claims as one. 59
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“All these effects are consistent with reported roles of APOE4 in inflammation, synaptic impairment, MAPK1 signaling and downstream APP transcription, and early endosomes7,18.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [7] Yamazaki, Y., Zhao, N., Caulfield, T. R., Liu, C.-C. & Bu, G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 501–518 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Neuroinflammation and Synaptic function sections report APOE4-associated inflammatory activation and synaptic impairment. The Aβ production section reports greater APP transcription in human stem-cell-derived neurons exposed to APOE4, while noting conflicting mouse findings. The paper discusses intracellular endosomal compartments but does not identify early endosomes specifically, and the searched passages do not establish MAPK1 signaling as the pathway to APP transcription (pages unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [18] Huang, Y.-W. A., Zhou, B., Wernig, M. & Südhof, T. C. ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4 differentially stimulate APP transcription and Aβ secretion. Cell 168, 427–441 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that ApoE4 is more potent than other ApoE isoforms in activating an ERK1/2 MAP-kinase pathway that stimulates APP transcription. The passages do not establish the other attributed roles—inflammation, synaptic impairment, or early endosomes—and the paper describes ERK1/2 rather than naming MAPK1 specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Insight into APOE4-mediated pathogenesis is complicated by the fact that APOE is a soluble factor expressed by many cell types12,13.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [12] Mathys, H. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 570, 332–337 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section on cell-type-specific alterations reports APOE expression changes in both microglia and astrocytes, supporting expression in multiple cell types. Our copy does not say that APOE is a soluble factor, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [13] Xu, Q. et al. Profile and regulation of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) expression in the CNS in mice with targeting of green fluorescent protein gene to the ApoE locus. J. Neurosci. 26, 4985–4994 (2006). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Annotations were supported by expression patterns of curated marker genes16,17 (Extended Data Fig. 1e; Supplementary Table S2).”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [16] Wang, D. et al. Comprehensive functional genomic resource and integrative model for the human brain. Science 362, eaat8464 (2018). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Transcriptome analysis: Bulk and single cell” (page not provided), the paper describes brain cell-type profiles and expression signatures comprising marker genes, and reports that biomarker-gene expression for the same cell type correlated across two data formats. Our copy does not say the marker genes were curated or that their expression patterns were used to support the cell-type annotations. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Supportedcites [17] Franzén, O., Gan, L.-M. & Björkegren, J. L. M. PanglaoDB: a web server for exploration of mouse and human single-cell RNA sequencing data. Database 2019, baz046 (2019). source
In “Clustering and cell-type inference” (page not provided), the paper describes a manually curated cell-type marker database and a cell-type activity score based on normalized marker-gene expression. This supports using expression patterns of curated marker genes to inform cell-type annotations. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“APOE4 is the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1–3.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Lambert, J. C. et al. Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 45, 1452–1458 (2013). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper states that the APOE gene is a major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (Abstract; page not available), and its references identify the APOE type 4 allele as associated with risk (References; page not available). Our copy does not establish that APOE4, specifically, is the strongest genetic risk factor. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] Corder, E. H. et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 261, 921–923 (1993). source
- Partly supportedcites [3] Strittmatter, W. J. et al. Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 1977–1981 (1993). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper reports a significant association between APOE-e4 and late-onset familial Alzheimer’s disease: its allele frequency was 0.50 in affected patients versus 0.16 in controls. It does not compare APOE4 with other genetic risk factors to establish that it is the strongest, or establish the claim for Alzheimer’s disease generally. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“and increases cholesterol sequestration in astrocytes leading to changes in the brain matrisome11.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [11] Tcw, J. et al. Cholesterol and matrisome pathways dysregulated in astrocytes and microglia. Cell 185, 2213–2233 (2022). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section, “Matrisome exacerbates lipid dysregulation in APOE4 astrocytes” (page unavailable), states that APOE4 drives lysosomal cholesterol sequestration in astrocytes and that matrisome dysregulation occurs. It does not say sequestration leads to matrisome changes; instead, it links those changes partly to astrocyte–neuron communication and says they worsen lipid dysregulation. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Recent in vitro studies discovered that APOE4 promotes the accumulation of unsaturated triglycerides and lipid droplets in iPSC-derived astrocytes10”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [10] Sienski, G. et al. APOE4 disrupts intracellular lipid homeostasis in human iPSC-derived glia. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eaaz4564 (2021). source
The Results section, “Human iPSC-derived APOE4-expressing astrocytes display intracellular lipid dysregulation,” reports higher triacylglyceride levels and greater fatty-acid unsaturation in APOE4 astrocytes than in APOE3 astrocytes. It also reports more lipid droplets in the APOE4 cells. Triacylglycerides are triglycerides, so this supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“APOE4 is associated with increased amyloid-β deposition, hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of tau, and accelerated cognitive decline4–7.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [4] Liu, C.-C. et al. ApoE4 accelerates early seeding of amyloid pathology. Neuron 96, 1024–1032 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction states that Aβ plaques are more abundant in APOE4 carriers, and the Discussion describes apoE4’s role in early amyloid plaque formation (page numbers unavailable). The passages do not link APOE4 to tau hyperphosphorylation or aggregation, or to accelerated cognitive decline; the Discussion mentions cognitive decline only as a later clinical event relative to Aβ deposition. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Supportedcites [5] Shi, Y. et al. ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy. Nature 549, 523–527 (2017). source
The paper’s introductory passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) describes greater Aβ deposition with ApoE4 and greater tau hyperphosphorylation with E4 than E3. Its mouse results report more accumulated, less-soluble tau in ApoE4 mice, while Extended Data Figure 8 reports faster progression on a dementia-rating scale in APOE4 carriers with symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [6] Castellano, J. M. et al. Human apoE isoforms differentially regulate brain amyloid-β peptide clearance. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 89ra57 (2011). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results section on Aβ and amyloid deposition reports greater deposition in apoE4 mice than in apoE3 or apoE2 mice; the human biomarker Results section also links APOE ε4 to greater amyloid burden. The paper does not establish the attributed association with tau hyperphosphorylation or aggregation, or accelerated cognitive decline. Its Introduction describes an earlier age of Alzheimer’s onset, which is not the same as a faster rate of cognitive decline. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [7] Yamazaki, Y., Zhao, N., Caulfield, T. R., Liu, C.-C. & Bu, G. Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 501–518 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘APOE4 and Aβ pathology’ section (page unavailable) reports greater Aβ deposition in APOE4 carriers. The ‘Tau, α-synuclein and TDP43 proteinopathies’ section (page unavailable) reports increased tau phosphorylation in experimental models and more tau aggregates in people with two APOE4 alleles when Aβ pathology is present. The copy links APOE4 to earlier symptom onset, but the passages found do not establish accelerated cognitive decline; the claim also omits the condition on the human tau-aggregation finding. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The APOE genotype has a widespread impact on cell-autonomous and non-autonomous biological processes14.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [14] Lin, Y.-T. et al. APOE4 causes widespread molecular and cellular alterations associated with Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes in human iPSC-derived brain cell types. Neuron 98, 1141–1154 (2018). source
The Results section on the APOE3-to-APOE4 switch reports widespread genotype-dependent gene-expression changes across iPSC-derived neurons and glia, supporting cell-autonomous effects. The Results section on microglia-like cells also reports that changing the APOE genotype of cells co-cultured with organoids changed extracellular Aβ accumulation, supporting effects beyond the genotype-bearing cells. These findings are in human iPSC-derived brain-cell models. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Altered amyloid-β processing and DNA damage have been associated with APOE4 and AD19–21.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [19] Zalocusky, K. A. et al. Neuronal ApoE upregulates MHC-I expression to drive selective neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 786–798 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract and Results report correlations between neuronal apoE expression and DNA-damage-and-repair pathways in an Alzheimer’s disease context, but do not establish that association specifically for APOE4. The passages do not support the other part of the claim, altered amyloid-β processing; the paper’s reported findings instead focus on MHC-I and Tau pathology. (LLM, conf=0.82)
- Could not verifycites [20] Thadathil, N. et al. DNA double-strand break accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from experimental models and postmortem human brains. Mol. Neurobiol. 58, 118–131 (2021). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied passages and the retrieved passages are labeled as a Parkinson’s disease paper, not the cited Alzheimer’s disease paper. Searches for APOE4 and altered amyloid-β processing did not yield passages from our copy of the cited paper, so the attributed association cannot be assessed. (LLM, conf=0.72)
- Partly supportedcites [21] Ye, S. et al. Apolipoprotein (apo) E4 enhances amyloid beta peptide production in cultured neuronal cells: apoE structure as a potential therapeutic target. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18700–18705 (2005). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (p. 18703) reports that apoE4 enhances amyloid-β production more than apoE3 and relates this finding to amyloid deposition in Alzheimer’s disease. The paper does not address DNA damage, so it supports only the amyloid-β part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“two lipid classes known to promote brain inflammation and demyelination (Extended Data Fig. 6; Supplementary Table S11)26.”
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [26] Law, S.-H. et al. An updated review of lysophosphatidylcholine metabolism in human diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1149 (2019). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 1.3 reports that LPC induces demyelination in the central nervous system and inflammation in the brain microvasculature. Section 5.2 discusses LPA in inflammatory disorders and the central nervous system, but does not say that LPA promotes brain inflammation or demyelination. The claim is therefore supported for LPC, not for both lipid classes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Accumulation of lipid droplets is a common hallmark of ER stress27,28.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] Ye, J. et al. ER stress induces cleavage of membrane-bound ATF6 by the same proteases that process SREBPs. Mol. Cell 6, 1355–1364 (2000). source
- Supportedcites [28] Hapala, I., Marza, E. & Ferreira, T. Is fat so bad? Modulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress by lipid droplet formation. Biol. Cell 103, 271–285 (2011). source
The “LDs and ER stress” section states that lipid-droplet accumulation is often observed in mammals when ER stress is induced. This supports the claim’s description of it as a common hallmark. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Cyclodextrin is a molecule known to reduce intracellular cholesterol accumulation in Niemann-Pick disease type C30.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [30] Ottinger, E. A. et al. Collaborative development of 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin for the treatment of Niemann-Pick type C1 disease. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 14, 330–339 (2014). source
The HISTORY OF 2-HYROXYPROPYL-β-CYCLODEXTRIN AND NPC1 DISEASE section states that HP-β-CD reverses intracellular accumulation of unesterified cholesterol in vitro and reduces stored cholesterol in primary neurons and astrocytes. This supports the claim, although the passage describes cell-based evidence rather than a demonstrated effect in patients. (LLM, conf=0.92)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Reduced myelin volume and integrity often occur prior to the onset of dementia and are predictive of future cognitive impairment23,24,33,36.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] Brun, A. & Englund, E. A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a pathoanatomical study. Ann. Neurol. 19, 253–262 (1986). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] Bartzokis, G. Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 25, 5–18 (2004). source
- Partly supportedcites [33] Dean, D. C. 3rd et al. Association of amyloid pathology with myelin alteration in preclinical Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 74, 41–49 (2017). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusions (page not provided) suggest that myelin alterations may be among the earliest features of Alzheimer disease, and the study examined asymptomatic adults. But the Discussion’s Limitations describe the analyses as cross-sectional and call for longitudinal studies; this paper does not show that reduced myelin predicts future cognitive impairment. It also does not establish how often the alterations occur before dementia. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [36] Gold, B. T., Powell, D. K., Andersen, A. H. & Smith, C. D. Alterations in multiple measures of white matter integrity in normal women at high risk for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 52, 1487–1494 (2010). sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports reduced white-matter integrity in cognitively normal women at high risk for Alzheimer’s disease and says the imaging pattern is consistent with early myelin loss. It does not establish reduced myelin volume or show that these changes predict future cognitive impairment; the authors say longitudinal follow-up is needed to test prediction. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Per-gene expression levels per cell type were modeled as a negative binomial model with random effects that model both within-individual and between-individual effects, as implemented in the R package NEBULA (version 1.2.1)40”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] He, L. et al. NEBULA is a fast negative binomial mixed model for differential or co-expression analysis of large-scale multi-subject single-cell data. Commun. Biol. 4, 629 (2021). source
The Methods section (‘The model specification in NEBULA’; page unavailable) describes a per-gene negative binomial mixed model with fixed-effect predictors, cell-level dispersion, and subject-level random effects. This supports the citation-bearing sentence’s identification of NEBULA as the modeling method. The APOE4 and adjustment variables in the supplied paraphrase are not part of that sentence’s attribution to the source. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The quote only partly states this claim.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pharmacologically facilitating cholesterol transport increases axonal myelination and improves learning and memory in APOE4 mice.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We establish that pharmacologically facilitating cholesterol transport improves myelination and learning and memory in aged APOE4/4 mice, thus providing new insight into the mechanistic connection between APOE4, myelination, and AD pathogenesis.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As expected, associated pathways included amyloid-β and protein processing, lipid metabolism, and synaptic-related processes.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also identified decreased glycosyltransferase activity (e.g., ALG6, ALG3) in APOE4 neurons and widespread alterations to amyloid-β metabolism genes in excitatory neurons, oligodendrocytes, and OPCs (amyloid-β formation, e.g., BIN1, ROCK1; Fig. 1a).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cell type expression profiles were strongly correlated between individual donors (average Pearson r=0.94 and r=0.65 for high and low-abundant cell types, respectively; Extended Data Fig. 1h, i; Supplementary Table S3).”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chaperone-mediated protein folding was increased in most cell types (e.g., DNAJB14, HSPA1A), and ATF-mediated unfolded protein response was increased in neurons and oligodendrocytes.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In APOE4 excitatory neurons, we identified upregulation of ERK1/2 signaling (e.g., MAPK1, MAP2K1, and MAP2K2) and endosomal-related transport genes (e.g., RAB21 and SNX12) (Supplementary Table S4).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and (2) is associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress and reduced myelination.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Punctate, perinuclear PLIN1 stained lipid droplets appeared in both APOE3/3 and APOE3/4 tissue; staining was more prominent around distinct nuclei in APOE4-carriers (Extended Data Fig. 4a).”
plaincorrelationaln = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We find that APOE4-carriers have decreased localization of cholesterol along neurofilaments and increased intracellular accumulation or storage of cholesterol as compared to brains from age-matched APOE3/3 individuals.”
plaincorrelationaln = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“APOE mRNA and protein were expressed at low to moderate levels in iPSC-derived oligodendroglia, with no significant (p = 0.2635) difference between isogenic APOE3/3 and APOE4/4 iPSC-derived oligodendroglia (Extended Data Fig. 5i, j).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“PLIN1 immunoreactivity around OLIG2-positive nuclei in APOE3/4 human PFC from AD individuals also exhibited a minimal but non-significant increase compared to APOE3/3 (p = 0.1521, n = 3 per genotype) (Extended Data Fig. 4d, e).”
plainn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genes associated with cholesterol biosynthesis and droplet formation (DHCR24, LPIN2, IRS2, NR1H2, LBR, LPIN1, and MBTPS1) were upregulated, while cholesterol transport genes were downregulated (PCYT1B, SEC23A, PRKN, SCP2, and LPCAT3; Fig. 2c).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“APOE3/3 subjects with and without pathology exhibited the lowest cholesterol biosynthesis gene expression, and those with both APOE4 and AD pathology the largest (Extended Data Fig. 2k).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Approximately ~2% of Bodipy-cholesterol particles localized to the endosome, ~18% to the lysosome, and ~80% to the ER”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, PFC from APOE3/4 had a significant (p = 0.0031) reduction in the area positive for Black Gold II staining, and axonal fasciculation was largely absent”
plaincorrelationaln = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mass-spectrometry-based lipidomic profiling of APOE3/3 and APOE4/4 isogenic iPSC-derived oligodendroglia detected 88 lipid species increased (adjusted p-value < 0.05) in APOE4/4 oligodendroglia compared to APOE3/3 controls, and only one species decreased (Fig. 3a; Extended Data Fig. 6; Supplementary table S11).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, PFC white matter regions from APOE4-carriers exhibited significantly (p = 0.0027, p = 0.0294) decreased MBP immunoreactivity as compared to APOE3/3 non-carriers, with fewer MBP regions surrounding neurofilament-positive axons (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 8b).”
plaincorrelationaln = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, the area within a 2 μm radius of OLIG2-positive nuclei exhibited significantly (p < 0.0001) more Bodipy-cholesterol staining, with 77% of OLIG2-positive nuclei surrounded by intense Bodipy-cholesterol signal, suggesting that cholesterol may aberrantly accumulate in APOE4 oligodendrocytes (Extended Data Fig. 4c).”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cholesterol biosynthesis gene expression increased in individuals without AD pathology (Extended Data Fig. 2e, f; lipid storage pathways also increased) and a non-significant increase in individuals with AD (Extended Data Fig. 2g), indicating an APOE4 effect independent of AD pathology.”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The levels of MBP surrounding neurofilament in APOE4/4 oligodendroglia co-cultured with APOE3 iNeurons were similar (p > 0.9999) to all-APOE4/4 co-cultures, with only ~20% of neurofilament-positive axons surrounded by MBP staining (Fig. 5b).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Total distance traveled and time spent in the center of the home cage (p = 0.1275 and p = 0.4478, respectively) was similar in control (n = 12) and cyclodextrin-treated (n = 14) APOE4/4-TR mice”
plainn = 14- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“APOE4/4-TR mice had fewer myelinated axons (p = 0.0265, 140 myelinated axons in average per field of view, n=3 mice), and higher g-ratios compared to APOE3/3-TR mice (p < 0.0001; Fig. 4e).”
plaincorrelationaln = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“MBP immunoreactivity and axonal localization in the APOE−/− co-cultures were significantly (p = 0.0005) lower than APOE3/3 co-cultures and were similar to APOE4/4 co-cultures (Extended Data Fig. 9j).”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“High-magnification imaging confirmed that the cells surrounding neurofilaments were positive for MBP (Extended Data Fig. 9e, Supplemental Video 1), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed axonal segments surrounded by electron-dense membrane rings at a low frequency”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lipid-related genesets with evidence of having an APOE4 effect (p-value < 0.05) are shown in Extended Fig. 2d.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cyclodextrin-treated APOE4/4-TR mice exhibited a decrease in latency to enter the goal box (p-value = 0.02), while saline-treated APOE4/4-TR mice (control) did not improve between the trial days (p-value > 0.6; Fig. 6f).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In cyclodextrin-treated APOE4/4 oligodendroglia, we observed a significant (p = 0.0092) reduction in the number of intracellular droplets of Bodipy-cholesterol, as well as a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction of neutral lipid droplets stained with Bodipy.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This procedure resulted in prioritized candidate pathways for all major cell types.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After two weeks in these 3D co-cultures, MBP-positive oligodendroglia spread and engaged neurofilament-positive axons (Extended Data Fig. 9b).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We compared APOE3/4 and APOE4/4 vs APOE3/3 scores using a multivariate linear model controlling for sex, postmortem interval (PMI), amyloid, neurofibrillary tangles, and age at death.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 11 cell types supported by gene marker expression and significant enrichment (FDR < 0.01, permutation test) of marker sets (Extended Data Fig. 1g) were annotated.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“High-abundant cell types were well-represented across all donors, independent of AD diagnosis or genotypic background, with reproducible proportions in most cases (Extended Data Fig. 1l, m).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“One copy of the APOE4 allele, which differs from the major allele (APOE3) by a single amino acid change from Cys112 to Arg112, increases the risk of developing AD 3 to 4 fold, while two copies increase it by 8 to 12 fold2.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] Corder, E. H. et al. Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 261, 921–923 (1993). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The APOE3/3 and APOE3/4 subgroups were balanced by AD pathological diagnosis (n=6 each for positive and negative diagnoses of AD) and gender (3 male and 3 female each; Extended Data Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table S1).”
plainn = 6- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All AD subjects presented high levels of both amyloid and neurofibrillary tangle (Tau) pathology, and there were no differences in age or post-mortem intervals between APOE3/3 and APOE3/4 groups and AD status (Extended Data Fig. 1b).”
plainn = 32- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DNA damage response was also altered in APOE4 microglia and OPCs, suggesting APOE4 may promote DNA damage in specific cell types.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“consistent with reports of hypomyelination and white matter changes in AD23,24.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] Brun, A. & Englund, E. A white matter disorder in dementia of the Alzheimer type: a pathoanatomical study. Ann. Neurol. 19, 253–262 (1986). source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] Bartzokis, G. Age-related myelin breakdown: a developmental model of cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 25, 5–18 (2004). source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“these further support an association between APOE4 and brain cholesterol potentially indicating increased cholesterol storage in lipid droplets (Supplementary Tables S7 and S8).”
hedgedcorrelationaln = 314- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This demonstrates that iPSC-derived oligodendroglia are transcriptionally similar to ex vivo human oligodendrocytes and OPCs, providing a reliable proxy for investigating the effect of APOE4 on human oligodendrocytes.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these results demonstrate that APOE4 is associated with reduced localization of cholesterol in the plasma membrane of oligodendrocytes, increased cholesteryl esters and lipid droplets, and upregulation of ATF6-mediated ER stress response.”
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following completion of the differentiation protocol, 65–81% of cells were immunoreactive for MBP and 69–82% were immunoreactive for PLP1 across cultures (Extended Data Fig. 5c).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the increased bodipy-cholesterol in APOE4 oligodendroglia was not entirely localized to lysosome, suggesting cholesterol may be accumulating in other organelles.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Oligodendrocytes myelinate the central nervous system and the bioavailability of cholesterol is rate-limiting for the formation and maintenance of myelin29.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Saher, G., Quintes, S. & Nave, K.-A. Cholesterol: a novel regulatory role in myelin formation. Neuroscientist 17, 79–93 (2011). source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting ER stress and impaired cholesterol transport could have a central role in the observed intracellular cholesterol accumulation.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting that repeated cyclodextrin treatment did not affect general locomotion or induce anxiety-like behavior (Extended Data Fig. 10c).”
hedgedn = 14- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For each pathway-cell type combination, pathway activity scores were modeled using a multivariate linear model as follows: pathway activity ~ β0 * APOE4 + β1 * amyloid + β2 * nft + β3 * age_death + β4 * msex + β5 * pmi.”
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“After applying QC filtering steps, the dataset included 17,915 genes profiled in 164,741 nuclei.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These effects are not observed when targeting biosynthesis, suggesting that APOE4 plays a role in cholesterol trafficking and that increased biosynthesis might be a compensatory mechanism.”
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To avoid biased cell mixing due to independent sequencing batches or potential technical artifacts, a batch correction step considering sequencing batch as indicator vector was performed as part of the initial dimensionality reduction in all analyses.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cholesterol gene expression and localization are dysregulated in oligodendrocytes, leading to impaired myelination.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that cyclodextrin reduced both intracellular cholesterol and accumulation of neutral lipids such as triacylglycerides (Fig. 6b and Extended Data Fig. 10a).”
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Experimenters were not blinded to drug injections and when executing behavioral trials.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sample size was determined from previous publications from our lab.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individual-level normalized gene expression averages were fitted with the following linear model: gene expression ~ β0*APOE4 + β1*amyloid + β2*nft + β3*age_death + β4*msex + β5*pmi.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Data analysis of the TEM images was done manually under blinded conditions.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“APOE4 expression in oligodendrocytes promotes both cholesterol accumulation and impaired myelination.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting that APOE4/4 neurons do not impair the ability of APOE3/3 oligodendroglia to produce MBP or engage neuronal axons (Fig. 5b).”
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At least four images for each animal were analyzed.”
plainn = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“4 out of 17 peaks passed this quality control cutoff (Supplementary Table S8).”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Therefore, myelination defects are observed in APOE4/4 and APOE−/− oligodendrocytes and can be rescued with the addition of APOE3 protein.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting that APOE4/4 oligodendrocytes were producing less MBP and engaging less with neuronal processes than isogenic APOE3/3 co-cultures (Fig. 5a).”
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Activity scores computed this way accurately recovered cell type signatures not recovered by equally-sized randomly sampled genesets (data not shown)”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We demonstrate facilitating cholesterol transport increases myelination and improves cognitive function in APOE4.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For APOE3/3 and APOE3/4-carriers, subjects were balanced between sexes (12 each) and matched for age (median=84.6 for APOE3/3 and 85.2 for APOE3/4).”
plainn = 32- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Power analysis to determine sample size was not performed.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The following parameters were used to evaluate the GSVA function: mx.diff=TRUE, kcdf=c(“Gaussian”), min.sz=5, max.sz=150.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Treatment and genotype groups were matched on age as much as possible.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We observed that pharmacologically promoting cholesterol efflux increases myelination in vitro and in vivo, and improves cognition in APOE4/4-TR mice.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting that corpus callosum from aged APOE4/4 individuals contains fewer myelinated axons and thinner overall myelin sheaths compared to APOE3/3 individuals (Fig. 4d).”
hedgedcorrelationaln = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both males and females were included in the experiments and sex was balanced across treatment and genotype conditions.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These results establish a causal link between cholesterol dysregulation and myelination in APOE4-carriers, which may influence the onset and severity of cognitive decline in AD.”
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Outlier cells with less than 500 or more than 10,000 genes detected were excluded, and only genes detected in at least 10 cells were considered.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“indicating an increased number of myelinated axons and thicker myelin sheaths (Fig 6d).”
hedgeddirectn = 150- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Analysis was performed blinded.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each experiment consisted of at least 3 mice per a treatment group.”
plainn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The mechanisms by which APOE4 mediates its effects on amyloid-β deposition, tau pathology, and cognitive decline are not fully understood.
“However, the mechanisms by which APOE4 mediates these effects are not fully understood.”
The paper relies on this without support.
How cholesterol and lipid abnormalities impair learning and memory in the APOE4 brain, and whether such effects can be mitigated, remains unclear.
“Despite these longstanding associations, how cholesterol and lipid abnormalities impair learning and memory in the APOE4 brain, and whether such effects can be mitigated, remains unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
APOE is a lipid and cholesterol transporter.
“APOE is a lipid and cholesterol transporter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Genetic diversity may confound the effects of APOE4 observed on human post-mortem brain tissue.
“Genetic diversity may confound the effects of APOE4 observed on human post-mortem brain tissue.”
The paper relies on this without support.
APOE-TR mice recapitulate human APOE4 effects on myelination sufficiently for conclusions about human APOE4.
“To control for covariates inherent to post-mortem human samples, we also quantified myelin levels in inbred APOE-TR mice (9 months old, male and female mice; n = 4 per genotype).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Isogenic iPSC-derived oligodendroglia and iNeuron co-cultures model human oligodendrocyte myelination sufficiently for conclusions about human APOE4.
“To investigate this, we employed an in vitro myelination assay using isogenic iPSC-derived oligodendroglia co-cultured with NGN2-induced neurons derived from the same iPSCs (iNeurons) in a three-dimensional extracellular matrix that allows cells to interact with each other and self-assemble into tissue-like structures (Extended Data Fig. 9a).”
The paper relies on this without support.
MBP immunoreactivity and g-ratio are valid measures of myelin levels.
“To quantify relative myelin levels per axon, we calculated the g-ratio (the inner axonal diameter divided by the outer diameter with myelin sheath) for 150 neurons per condition.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bodipy-cholesterol and filipin staining reflect intracellular cholesterol localization and storage.
“To further characterize APOE4-mediated differences in cholesterol storage, we stained isogenic APOE3/3 and APOE4/4 oligodendroglia with the cholesterol dye filipin, Bodipy-cholesterol, and lipid-droplet associated PLIN1.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cyclodextrin’s beneficial effects on myelination and cognition in APOE4 mice are mediated by facilitating cholesterol transport.
“Collectively, these data demonstrate that pharmacological enhancement of cholesterol transport can improve APOE4 myelination in vitro and in vivo.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“APOE4 is known to disrupt oligodendrocyte differentiation and contribute to myelin breakdown in mouse models without any AD pathology. 26 , 27 , 28”
From Apolipoprotein ε4 exacerbates white matter impairment in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis by decreasing actively myelinating oligodendrocytes (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Previous studies using humanized APOE3 and APOE4 mouse models without amyloid pathology revealed inconsistent findings regarding myelination. One study found no significant difference in myelination, while others observed reduced myelination from electron microscopy images. 27 , 28”
From Apolipoprotein ε4 exacerbates white matter impairment in a mouse model of Aβ amyloidosis by decreasing actively myelinating oligodendrocytes (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“and the APOE4-associated glial LD accumulation modulates neuron function and brain memory17–19.”
From PICALM Alzheimer’s risk allele causes aberrant lipid droplets in microglia (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Elevated CE levels have been reported in AD brains as well as AD models12,14,15.”
From Decreased lipidated ApoE‐receptor interactions confer protection against pathogenicity of ApoE and its lipid cargoes in lysosomes (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“based on its upregulation in AD patient brain and various AD models, along with the fact that its downregulation is protective in various AD models10,12,15,64.”
From Decreased lipidated ApoE‐receptor interactions confer protection against pathogenicity of ApoE and its lipid cargoes in lysosomes (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A recent study demonstrated a link between ApoE4 and impaired neuronal myelination, underlying dysfunctional electrical activity in neurons and the subsequent impact on learning and memory processes [36].”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the authors identified an upregulation of inflammatory and immune-related pathways, a downregulation of processes related to synaptic plasticity, channel activity and excitatory post-synaptic potential, and significant changes in APP- and Aβ-related metabolic pathways [36].”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Cyclodextrin, an inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis, was able to reduce cholesterol accumulation in oligodendrocytes, rescuing their function and promoting myelination in vitro and in vivo.”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“ApoE isoforms may differentially regulate brain lipid metabolism in AD and primary tauopathies.1”
From Amelioration of Tau and ApoE4-linked glial lipid accumulation and neurodegeneration with an LXR agonist (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In disease models, ApoE4 perturbs cholesterol regulation, including expression of cholesterol metabolism-related genes, cholesterol transport and esterification10–13.”
From Decreased lipidated ApoE‐receptor interactions confer protection against pathogenicity of ApoE and its lipid cargoes in lysosomes (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Significant increases in expression of the cholesterol biosynthesis gene family, a proposed key process in AD etiology77, occur later in CPS (DHCR24, LBR, FDFT, HSD17B1, SC5D, CYP51A1, SQLE, and DHCR7) (Fig. 7e, middle, and Fig. 7g).”
From Integrated multimodal cell atlas of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [77]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“studies performed in post-mortem brain tissue and in vivo using APOE knock-in mouse models have all associated APOE4 with impaired myelination of oligodendrocytes resulting from altered cholesterol transport163,164.”
From Multifaceted roles of APOE in Alzheimer disease (2024) · cites this paper as [163]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These studies indicate that cholesterol transport is impaired both within oligodendrocytes163 and from astrocytes to oligodendrocytes164.”
From Multifaceted roles of APOE in Alzheimer disease (2024) · cites this paper as [163]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“a recent study showed the upregulation of molecular pathways related to cellular and ER stress, namely in chaperone-mediated protein folding and unfolded protein response, in distinct cell types of human post-mortem brain tissue [36].”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“these authors demonstrated that ApoE4 is associated to altered cholesterol and other lipids metabolic pathways in distinct cell types, through modified transcriptomics [36].”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Pharmacological treatment of ApoE4-TR mice with this molecule was also able to improve learning and memory function [36].”
From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [36]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Expression of ApoE4 in oligodendrocytes has been reported to lead to cholesterol dysregulation, namely accumulation of cholesterol esters and reduced axonal myelination by oligodendrocytes [111].”
From ApoE lipoproteins in the central nervous system under homeostasis and role in Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [111]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Methods
“For all mouse model experiments, APOE targeted replacement mice, where the endogenous murine locus is replaced by human APOE3/3 or human APOE4/4 on a C57BL/6NTac background, were used. Ages ranged from 6 to 9 months old.”
§ Introduction
“To investigate whether reduced myelination in APOE4/4-TR mice is an age-related phenotype, we performed TEM analysis on young two-month-old mice.”
Citations
Cites
GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-Seq data
Hänzelmann, S., Castelo, R., & Guinney, J. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-7 · Cited by 15,440 · cited 1×
“Individual-cell-type-level normalized gene expression profile averages were first computed (normalized values were first computed using ACTIONet), followed by calculation of pathway activity scores, as previously implemented in the R package GSVA (v.1.42.0) 41 .”
InfluentialFast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony
Korsunsky, I., Millard, N., Fan, J., Slowikowski, K., Zhang, F., Wei, K., Baglaenko, Y., Brenner, M., Loh, P.-R., & Raychaudhuri, S. (2019) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 · Cited by 10,488 · cited 1×
“Harmony, which internally uses the data integration procedure 39 implemented in the software package Harmony (https://github.com/immunogenomics/harmony).”
Corder, E. H., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D. E., Gaskell, P. C., Small, G. W., Roses, A. D., Haines, J. L., & Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8346443 · Cited by 9,429 · cited 2×
“The following quality measures were quantified for each cell: (1) the number of genes for which at least one read was mapped (indicative of library complexity); (2) the total number of counts; and (3) the percentage of reads mapped to mitochondrial genes (used to approximate the relative amount of endogenous RNA and c…”
Meta-Analysis of 74,046 Individuals Identifies 11 New Susceptibility Loci for Alzheimer’s Disease
(EADI), E. A. D. I., Lambert, J.-C., (GERAD), G. A. E. R. I. A. D., Alzheimer's Disease Genetic Consortium (ADGC), (CHARGE), C. F. H. A. A. R. I. G. E., Ibrahim-Verbaas, C. A., Harold, D., Naj, A. C., Sims, R., Bellenguez, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2802 · Cited by 4,336 · cited 2×
“The following quality measures were quantified for each cell: (1) the number of genes for which at least one read was mapped (indicative of library complexity); (2) the total number of counts; and (3) the percentage of reads mapped to mitochondrial genes (used to approximate the relative amount of endogenous RNA and c…”
Self-citationStrittmatter, W. J., Saunders, A. M., Schmechel, D., Pericak-Vance, M., Enghild, J., Salvesen, G. S., & Roses, A. D. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977 · Cited by 4,268 · cited 1×
“The following quality measures were quantified for each cell: (1) the number of genes for which at least one read was mapped (indicative of library complexity); (2) the total number of counts; and (3) the percentage of reads mapped to mitochondrial genes (used to approximate the relative amount of endogenous RNA and c…”
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease
Mathys, H., Davila-Velderrain, J., Peng, Z., Gao, F., Mohammadi, S., Young, J. Z., Menon, M., He, L., Abdurrob, F., Jiang, X., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1195-2 · Cited by 2,568 · cited 5×
“The protocol for the isolation of nuclei of the 8 samples prepared using the Chromium Single Cell 3′ Reagent Kits v2 is described in a previous study 12 .”
InfluentialSelf-citationER Stress Induces Cleavage of Membrane-Bound ATF6 by the Same Proteases that Process SREBPs
Ye, J., Rawson, R. B., Komuro, R., Chen, X., Davé, U. P., Prywes, R., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00133-7 · Cited by 1,871 · cited 1×
“Accumulation of lipid droplets is a common hallmark of ER stress 27,28 .”
BackgroundPanglaoDB: a web server for exploration of mouse and human single-cell RNA sequencing data
Franzén, O., Gan, L.-M., & Björkegren, J. L. M. (2019) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baz046 · Cited by 1,551 · cited 1×
“Annotations were supported by expression patterns of curated marker genes 16,17 (Extended Data Fig.”
Apolipoprotein E and Alzheimer disease: pathobiology and targeting strategies
Yamazaki, Y., Zhao, N., Caulfield, T. R., Liu, C.-C., & Bu, G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-019-0228-7 · Cited by 1,425
Object recognition test in mice
Leger, M., Quiedeville, A., Bouet, V., Haelewyn, B., Boulouard, M., Schumann-Bard, P., & Freret, T. (2013) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.155 · Cited by 1,357
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microbiota–gut–brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases
Loh, J. S., Mak, W. Q., Tan, L. K. S., Ng, C. X., Chan, H. H., Yeow, S. H., Foo, J. B., Ong, Y. S., How, C. W., & Khaw, K. Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01743-1 · Cited by 1,193
APOE4/4 is linked to damaging lipid droplets in Alzheimer’s disease microglia
Haney, M. S., Pálovics, R., Munson, C. N., Long, C., Johansson, P. K., Yip, O., Dong, W., Rawat, E., West, E., Schlachetzki, J. C. M., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07185-7 · Cited by 536
“Whereas recent studies have focused on the role of APOE in astrocytes 31 , endothelial cells 32 , neurons 33 and oligodendrocytes 34 , the LDAM expression signature, such as ACSL1 and NAMPT upregulation, seems to be unique to microglia.”
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs): molecular mechanisms of induction and applications
Cerneckis, J., Cai, H., & Shi, Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01809-0 · Cited by 452
Integrated multimodal cell atlas of Alzheimer’s disease
Gabitto, M. I., Travaglini, K. J., Rachleff, V. M., Kaplan, E. S., Long, B., Ariza, J., Ding, Y., Mahoney, J. T., Dee, N., Goldy, J., et al. (2024) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-024-01774-5 · Cited by 397
“Significant increases in expression of the cholesterol biosynthesis gene family, a proposed key process in AD etiology 77 , occur later in CPS ( DHCR24 , LBR , FDFT , HSD17B1 , SC5D , CYP51A1 , SQLE , and DHCR7 ) (Fig.”
The complex genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease: novel insights and future directions
Andrews, S. J., Renton, A. E., Fulton-Howard, B., Podlesny-Drabiniok, A., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M. (2023) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104511 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Blanchard, J. W., Akay, L. A., Davila-Velderrain, J., von Maydell, D., Mathys, H., Davidson, S. M., Effenberger, A., Chen, C.-Y., Maner-Smith, K., Hajjar, I., Ortlund, E. A., Bula, M., Agbas, E., Ng, A., Jiang, X., Kahn, M., Blanco-Duque, C., Lavoie, N., Liu, L., Reyes, R., Lin, Y.-T., Ko, T., R’Bibo, L., Ralvenius, W. T., Bennett, D. A., Cam, H. P., Kellis, M., & Tsai, L.-H.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Princeton University (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Rush University Medical Center (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kellis, Manolis
- Tsai, Li-Huei
- ORCID
- Blanchard, Joel W.
- Akay, Leyla Anne
- Davila-Velderrain, Jose
- von Maydell, Djuna
- Mathys, Hansruedi
- Davidson, Shawn M.
- Effenberger, Audrey
- Chen, Chih-Yu
- Maner-Smith, Kristal
- Hajjar, Ihab
- Ortlund, Eric A.
- Bula, Michael
- Jiang, Xueqiao
- Kahn, Martin
- R’Bibo, Lea
- Ralvenius, William T.
- Bennett, David A.
- Cam, Hugh P.
- Kellis, Manolis
- Tsai, Li-Huei
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2022-11-16
- Volume
- 611
- Issue
- 7937
- Pages
- 769-779
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC9870060
- OpenAlex
- W4309507742
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 105 · 2025: 161 · 2024: 118 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 33.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-12-04)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, K24AG062786, R01AG058002, RF1AG057470, RF1AG054012, U01AG046152, R01AG015819, P30AG010161, RF1AG062377, U01AG061356, RF1AG051633, P30AG072975)
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG008097)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS110453, UH3NS115064, UG3NS115064, R01NS114239)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- APOE ε4, Alzheimer's disease, myelination, oligodendrocytes, cholesterol homeostasis, cholesterol transport, single-cell transcriptomics, postmortem brain, brain aging, learning and memory, axonal myelination, lipidomics, induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cells, targeted replacement mice
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Autopsy, Biological Transport, Brain, Cholesterol, Heterozygote, Homeostasis, Humans, Memory, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neurons, Oligodendroglia, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Apolipoprotein E4, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review