Cited by 100

A global view of aging and Alzheimer’s pathogenesis-associated cell population dynamics and molecular signatures in human and mouse brains

Sziraki, Andras, Lu, Ziyu, Lee, Jasper, Banyai, Gabor, Anderson, Sonya, Abdulraouf, Abdulraouf, Metzner, Eli, Liao, Andrew +9 more·2023·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Conventional methods fall short in unraveling the dynamics of rare cell types related to aging and diseases. Here we introduce EasySci, an advanced single-cell combinatorial indexing strategy for exploring age-dependent cellular dynamics in the mammalian brain. Profiling approximately 1.5 million single-cell transcriptomes and 400,000 chromatin accessibility profiles across diverse mouse brains, we identified over 300 cell subtypes, uncovering their molecular characteristics and spatial locations. This comprehensive view elucidates rare cell types expanded or depleted upon aging. We also investigated cell-type-specific responses to genetic alterations linked to Alzheimer’s disease, identifying associated rare cell types. Additionally, by profiling 118,240 human brain single-cell transcriptomes, we discerned cell- and region-specific transcriptomic changes tied to Alzheimer’s pathogenesis. In conclusion, this research offers a valuable resource for probing cell-type-specific dynamics in both normal and pathological aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-023-01572-y

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A comprehensive molecular characterization of region-specific differences in Alzheimer's disease is currently lacking.

    “Although some brain regions relevant to AD have been studied individually at scale or jointly in samples from a few individuals8–16, a comprehensive molecular characterization of region-specific differences in AD is currently lacking”

    From Single-cell multiregion dissection of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Main section says prior studies sampled brain cell populations relatively shallowly, supporting a general gap in comprehensive characterization. The Results section identifies region-specific AD gene signatures in two human brain regions, but the paper does not explicitly say that a comprehensive molecular characterization of region-specific differences in AD is currently lacking. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. [1]Erö C Gewaltig M-O Keller D Markram H A cell atlas for the mouse brain Front. Neuroinform. 2018 12 84 10.3389/fninf.2018.00084 30546301 PMC6280067 · DOI
  2. [3]Mathys H Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease Nature 2019 570 332 337 10.1038/s41586-019-1195-2 31042697 PMC6865822 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Ximerakis M Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the aging mouse brain Nat. Neurosci. 2019 22 1696 1708 10.1038/s41593-019-0491-3 31551601 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [6]Morabito S Single-nucleus chromatin accessibility and transcriptomic characterization of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Genet. 2021 53 1143 1155 10.1038/s41588-021-00894-z 34239132 PMC8766217 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [8]Wang R Construction of a cross-species cell landscape at single-cell level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 51 501 516 10.1093/nar/gkac633 PMC9881150 35929025 · DOI
  6. [9]Cao J Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism Science 2017 357 661 667 10.1126/science.aam8940 28818938 PMC5894354 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [10]Cao J A human cell atlas of fetal gene expression. Science 2020 370 eaba7721 10.1126/science.aba7721 33184181 PMC7780123 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [11]Cao J The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis Nature 2019 566 496 502 10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x 30787437 PMC6434952 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [13]Martin BK An optimized protocol for single cell transcriptional profiling by combinatorial indexing Nat. Protoc. 2023 18 188 207 10.1038/s41596-022-00752-0 36261634 PMC9839601 · DOI
  10. [14]Domcke S A human cell atlas of fetal chromatin accessibility Science 2020 370 eaba7721 10.1126/science.aba7612 33184180 PMC7785298 · DOI
  11. [17]Desimone A The influence of ApoE4 on the clinical outcomes and pathophysiology of degenerative cervical myelopathy. JCI Insight 2021 6 e149227 10.1172/jci.insight.149227 34369386 PMC8410082 · DOI
  12. [20]Blondel VD Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. 2008 2008 10008 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [21]Lin Y scJoint integrates atlas-scale single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data with transfer learning Nat. Biotechnol. 2022 40 703 710 10.1038/s41587-021-01161-6 35058621 PMC9186323 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [22]Yeh H Ikezu T Transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of microglia in health and disease Trends Mol. Med. 2019 25 96 111 10.1016/j.molmed.2018.11.004 30578089 PMC6377292 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [23]Watakabe A Comparative analysis of layer-specific genes in mammalian neocortex Cereb. Cortex 2007 17 1918 1933 10.1093/cercor/bhl102 17065549 · DOI
  16. [24]McEvilly RJ Requirement for Brn-3.0 in differentiation and survival of sensory and motor neurons Nature 1996 384 574 577 10.1038/384574a0 8955272 · DOI
  17. [25]Mays JC Single-cell RNA sequencing of the mammalian pineal gland identifies two pinealocyte subtypes and cell type-specific daily patterns of gene expression PLoS ONE 2018 13 e0205883 10.1371/journal.pone.0205883 30347410 PMC6197868 · DOI
  18. [26]Campbell JN A molecular census of arcuate hypothalamus and median eminence cell types Nat. Neurosci. 2017 20 484 496 10.1038/nn.4495 28166221 PMC5323293 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [27]Kleshchevnikov V Cell2location maps fine-grained cell types in spatial transcriptomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022 40 661 671 10.1038/s41587-021-01139-4 35027729 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [28]Ortiz C Molecular atlas of the adult mouse brain Sci. Adv. 2020 6 eabb3446 10.1126/sciadv.abb3446 32637622 PMC7319762 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [29]Kuleshov MV Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 44 W90 W97 10.1093/nar/gkw377 27141961 PMC4987924 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [30]Liu J Tbx19, a tissue-selective regulator of POMC gene expression Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2001 98 8674 8679 10.1073/pnas.141234898 11447259 PMC37494 · DOI
  23. [31]Tufo C Development of the mammalian main olfactory bulb. Development 2022 149 dev200210 10.1242/dev.200210 35147186 PMC8918810 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [32]Sokolowski JD Brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor-1 expression in astrocytes and neurons: implications for its dual function as an apoptotic engulfment receptor Brain Behav. Immun. 2011 25 915 921 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.09.021 20888903 PMC3033447 · DOI
  25. [33]Rosenberg AB Single-cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding Science 2018 360 176 182 10.1126/science.aam8999 29545511 PMC7643870 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [35]Barraud P Neural crest origin of olfactory ensheathing glia Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2010 107 21040 21045 10.1073/pnas.1012248107 21078992 PMC3000254 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [36]Monavarfeshani A Knill CN Sabbagh U Su J Fox MA Region- and cell-specific expression of transmembrane collagens in mouse brain Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2017 11 20 10.3389/fnint.2017.00020 28912695 PMC5583603 · DOI
  28. [37]Puverel S Nakatani H Parras C Soussi-Yanicostas N Prokineticin receptor 2 expression identifies migrating neuroblasts and their subventricular zone transient-amplifying progenitors in adult mice J. Comp. Neurol. 2009 512 232 242 10.1002/cne.21888 19003791 · DOI
  29. [38]Pastrana E Cheng L-C Doetsch F Simultaneous prospective purification of adult subventricular zone neural stem cells and their progeny Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009 106 6387 6392 10.1073/pnas.0810407106 19332781 PMC2669396 · DOI
  30. [39]Kumar A Transcriptomic analysis of the signature of neurogenesis in human hippocampus suggests restricted progenitor cell progression post-childhood IBRO Rep. 2020 9 224 232 10.1016/j.ibror.2020.08.003 32995658 PMC7502792 · DOI
  31. [40]Marques S Transcriptional convergence of oligodendrocyte lineage progenitors during development Dev. Cell 2018 46 504 517 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.07.005 30078729 PMC6104814 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [42]Lu Z Tracking cell-type-specific temporal dynamics in human and mouse brains Cell 2023 186 4345 4364.e24 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.042 37774676 PMC10545416 · DOI
  33. [43]Graham V Khudyakov J Ellis P Pevny L SOX2 functions to maintain neural progenitor identity Neuron 2003 39 749 765 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00497-5 12948443 · DOI
  34. [44]Li J Transcription factors Sp8 and Sp9 coordinately regulate olfactory bulb interneuron development Cereb. Cortex 2018 28 3278 3294 10.1093/cercor/bhx199 28981617 PMC6095218 · DOI
  35. [46]Zhou Y Human and mouse single-nucleus transcriptomics reveal TREM2-dependent and TREM2-independent cellular responses in Alzheimer’s disease Nat. Med. 2020 26 131 142 10.1038/s41591-019-0695-9 31932797 PMC6980793 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [47]Kenigsbuch M A shared disease-associated oligodendrocyte signature among multiple CNS pathologies Nat. Neurosci. 2022 25 876 886 10.1038/s41593-022-01104-7 35760863 PMC9724210 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [48]See AP The role of STAT3 activation in modulating the immune microenvironment of GBM J. Neurooncol. 2012 110 359 368 10.1007/s11060-012-0981-6 23096132 PMC3700337 · DOI
  38. [49]Paillasse MR de Medina P The NR4A nuclear receptors as potential targets for anti-aging interventions Med. Hypotheses 2015 84 135 140 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.12.003 25543265 · DOI
  39. [50]Di Giorgio E HDAC4 degradation during senescence unleashes an epigenetic program driven by AP-1/p300 at selected enhancers and super-enhancers Genome Biol. 2021 22 129 10.1186/s13059-021-02340-z 33966634 PMC8108360 · DOI
  40. [51]Zhang Y Wang P Age-related increase of insulin-degrading enzyme is inversely correlated with cognitive function in APPswe/PS1dE9 mice Med. Sci. Monit. 2018 24 2446 2455 10.12659/MSM.909596 29680859 PMC5935016 · DOI
  41. [52]Hashimoto Y A rescue factor abolishing neuronal cell death by a wide spectrum of familial Alzheimer’s disease genes and Abeta Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2001 98 6336 6341 10.1073/pnas.101133498 11371646 PMC33469 · DOI
  42. [53]Cavalcante GC Mitochondrial genetics reinforces multiple layers of interaction in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomedicines 2022 10 880 10.3390/biomedicines10040880 35453630 PMC9028063 · DOI
  43. [54]Mielke MM Lyketsos CG Alterations of the sphingolipid pathway in Alzheimer’s disease: new biomarkers and treatment targets? Neuromolecular Med. 2010 12 331 340 10.1007/s12017-010-8121-y 20571935 PMC3129545 · DOI
  44. [55]Tong Y Xu Y Scearce-Levie K Ptácek LJ Fu Y-H COL25A1 triggers and promotes Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in vivo Neurogenetics 2010 11 41 52 10.1007/s10048-009-0201-5 19548013 PMC2807601 · DOI
  45. [57]Butler T Volume of the human septal forebrain region is a predictor of source memory accuracy J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2012 18 157 161 10.1017/S1355617711001421 22152217 PMC3339258 · DOI
  46. [58]Oeckinghaus A Ghosh S The NF-kappaB family of transcription factors and its regulation Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009 1 a000034 10.1101/cshperspect.a000034 20066092 PMC2773619 · DOI
  47. [59]Liu X-F Nrf2 as a target for prevention of age-related and diabetic cataracts by against oxidative stress Aging Cell 2017 16 934 942 10.1111/acel.12645 28722304 PMC5595676 · DOI
  48. [60]Bommer GT MacDougald OA Regulation of lipid homeostasis by the bifunctional SREBF2-miR33a locus Cell Metab. 2011 13 241 247 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.02.004 21356514 PMC3062104 · DOI
  49. [61]Finucane HK Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics Nat. Genet. 2015 47 1228 1235 10.1038/ng.3404 26414678 PMC4626285 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [62]Seripa D The RELN locus in Alzheimer’s disease J. Alzheimers Dis. 2008 14 335 344 10.3233/JAD-2008-14308 18599960 · DOI
  51. [63]Herring A Reelin depletion is an early phenomenon of Alzheimer’s pathology J. Alzheimers Dis. 2012 30 963 979 10.3233/JAD-2012-112069 22495348 · DOI · Paper page
  52. [64]Attwood MM Schiöth HB Characterization of five transmembrane proteins: with focus on the Tweety, Sideroflexin, and YIP1 domain families Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2021 9 708754 10.3389/fcell.2021.708754 34350187 PMC8327215 · DOI
  53. [65]Buckley MT Cell-type-specific aging clocks to quantify aging and rejuvenation in neurogenic regions of the brain Nat. Aging 2023 3 121 137 10.1038/s43587-022-00335-4 37118510 PMC10154228 · DOI
  54. [66]de Faria O Jr TMEM10 promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation and is expressed by oligodendrocytes in human remyelinating multiple sclerosis plaques Sci. Rep. 2019 9 3606 10.1038/s41598-019-40342-x 30837646 PMC6400977 · DOI
  55. [67]Volkert MR Crowley DJ Preventing neurodegeneration by controlling oxidative stress: the role of OXR1 Front. Neurosci. 2020 14 611904 10.3389/fnins.2020.611904 33384581 PMC7770112 · DOI
  56. [68]Schmidt LS Linehan WM FLCN: the causative gene for Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome Gene 2018 640 28 42 10.1016/j.gene.2017.09.044 28970150 PMC5682220 · DOI
  57. [69]Cooper WN RASSF2 associates with and stabilizes the proapoptotic kinase MST2 Oncogene 2009 28 2988 2998 10.1038/onc.2009.152 19525978 PMC2829092 · DOI
  58. [70]Luo, J. et al. PTPRG activates m6A methyltransferase VIRMA to block mitochondrial autophagy mediated neuronal death in Alzheimer’s disease. Preprint at medRxiv10.1101/2022.03.11.22272061 (2022).
  59. [71]Silva I Silva J Ferreira R Trigo D Glymphatic system, AQP4, and their implications in Alzheimer’s disease Neurol. Res Pr. 2021 3 5 10.1186/s42466-021-00102-7 PMC7816372 33499944 · DOI
  60. [72]Kulijewicz-Nawrot M Syková E Chvátal A Verkhratsky A Rodríguez JJ Astrocytes and glutamate homoeostasis in Alzheimer’s disease: a decrease in glutamine synthetase, but not in glutamate transporter-1, in the prefrontal cortex ASN Neuro. 2013 5 273 282 10.1042/AN20130017 24059854 PMC3791522 · DOI
  61. [75]Baranger K MT5-MMP is a new pro-amyloidogenic proteinase that promotes amyloid pathology and cognitive decline in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016 73 217 236 10.1007/s00018-015-1992-1 26202697 PMC4700096 · DOI
  62. [76]Arawaka S Machiya Y Kato T Heat shock proteins as suppressors of accumulation of toxic prefibrillar intermediates and misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2010 11 158 166 10.2174/138920110790909713 20170473 · DOI
  63. [77]Cornejo VH Hetz C The unfolded protein response in Alzheimer’s disease Semin. Immunopathol. 2013 35 277 292 10.1007/s00281-013-0373-9 23609500 · DOI
  64. [79]Niccolini F Altered PDE10A expression detectable early before symptomatic onset in Huntington’s disease Brain 2015 138 3016 3029 10.1093/brain/awv214 26198591 · DOI
  65. [80]Niccolini F Loss of phosphodiesterase 10A expression is associated with progression and severity in Parkinson’s disease Brain 2015 138 3003 3015 10.1093/brain/awv219 26210536 · DOI
  66. [81]Karch CM Goate AM Alzheimer’s disease risk genes and mechanisms of disease pathogenesis Biol. Psychiatry 2015 77 43 51 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.006 24951455 PMC4234692 · DOI · Paper page
  67. [82]Kotredes KP Uncovering disease mechanisms in a novel mouse model expressing humanized APOEε4 and Trem2*R47H Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021 13 735524 10.3389/fnagi.2021.735524 34707490 PMC8544520 · DOI · Paper page
  68. [83]Ding J Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods Nat. Biotechnol. 2020 38 737 746 10.1038/s41587-020-0465-8 32341560 PMC7289686 · DOI · Paper page
  69. [84]Stoeckius M Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics Genome Biol. 2018 19 224 10.1186/s13059-018-1603-1 30567574 PMC6300015 · DOI · Paper page
  70. [86]Dobin A STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner Bioinformatics 2013 29 15 21 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 23104886 PMC3530905 · DOI · Paper page
  71. [89]Yao Z A transcriptomic and epigenomic cell atlas of the mouse primary motor cortex Nature 2021 598 103 110 10.1038/s41586-021-03500-8 34616066 PMC8494649 · DOI · Paper page
  72. [90]Kozareva V A transcriptomic atlas of mouse cerebellar cortex comprehensively defines cell types Nature 2021 598 214 219 10.1038/s41586-021-03220-z 34616064 PMC8494635 · DOI
  73. [91]Stuart T Comprehensive integration of single-cell data Cell 2019 177 1888 1902 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 31178118 PMC6687398 · DOI · Paper page
  74. [92]Qiu X Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories Nat. Methods 2017 14 979 982 10.1038/nmeth.4402 28825705 PMC5764547 · DOI · Paper page
  75. [93]Rodriguez A Laio A Machine learning. Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks Science 2014 344 1492 1496 10.1126/science.1242072 24970081 · DOI
  76. [95]Anders S Pyl PT Huber W HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data Bioinformatics 2015 31 166 169 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 25260700 PMC4287950 · DOI · Paper page
  77. [96]Fang R Comprehensive analysis of single cell ATAC-seq data with SnapATAC Nat. Commun. 2021 12 1337 10.1038/s41467-021-21583-9 33637727 PMC7910485 · DOI · Paper page
  78. [97]Zhang, K., Zemke, N. R., Armand, E. J. & Ren, B. SnapATAC2: a fast, scalable and versatile tool for analysis of single-cell omics data. Preprint at bioRxiv10.1101/2023.09.11.557221 (2023). PMC10864184 38191932
  79. [98]Zhang Y Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) Genome Biol. 2008 9 R137 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 18798982 PMC2592715 · DOI · Paper page
  80. [99]Corces MR The chromatin accessibility landscape of primary human cancers. Science 2018 362 eaav1898 10.1126/science.aav1898 30361341 PMC6408149 · DOI · Paper page
  81. [100]Stuart T Srivastava A Madad S Lareau CA Satija R Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac Nat. Methods 2021 18 1333 1341 10.1038/s41592-021-01282-5 34725479 PMC9255697 · DOI · Paper page
  82. [102]Weirauch MT Determination and inference of eukaryotic transcription factor sequence specificity Cell 2014 158 1431 1443 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.009 25215497 PMC4163041 · DOI
  83. [105]Hinrichs AS The UCSC Genome Browser Database: update 2006 Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 34 D590 D598 10.1093/nar/gkj144 16381938 PMC1347506 · DOI · Paper page
  84. [108]Qiu X Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census Nat. Methods 2017 14 309 315 10.1038/nmeth.4150 28114287 PMC5330805 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sziraki, A., Lu, Z., Lee, J., Banyai, G., Anderson, S., Abdulraouf, A., Metzner, E., Liao, A., Banfelder, J., Epstein, A., Schaefer, C., Xu, Z., Zhang, Z., Gan, L., Nelson, P. T., Zhou, W., & Cao, J.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2023-11-30
Volume
55
Issue
12
Pages
2104-2116
ISSN
  • 1061-4036
  • 1546-1718
Cited by
100
References
23
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review