Cited by 1,046Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

Cell Hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics

Open access
Stoeckius, Marlon, Zheng, Shiwei, Houck-Loomis, Brian, Hao, Stephanie, Yeung, Bertrand Z., Mauck, William M., Smibert, Peter, Satija, Rahul·2018·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite rapid developments in single cell sequencing technology, sample-specific batch effects, detection of cell doublets, and the cost of generating massive datasets remain outstanding challenges. Here, we introduce cell “hashing”, where oligo-tagged antibodies against ubiquitously expressed surface proteins are used to uniquely label cells from distinct samples, which can be subsequently pooled. By sequencing these tags alongside the cellular transcriptome, we can assign each cell to its sample of origin, and robustly identify doublets originating from multiple samples. We demonstrate our approach by pooling eight human PBMC samples on a single run of the 10x Chromium system, substantially reducing our per-cell costs for library generation. Cell “hashing” is inspired by, and complementary to, elegant multiplexing strategies based on genetic variation, which we also leverage to validate our results. We therefore envision that our approach will help to generalize the benefits of single cell multiplexing to diverse samples and experimental designs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-018-1603-1

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SNPs can be obtained from gDNA using SNP arrays at a similar cost.

    “In the absence of this RNA-Seq data, at a similar cost, SNPs can be obtained from gDNA using SNP arrays [17].”

    From Benchmarking of computational demultiplexing methods for single-nucleus RNA sequencing data (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Methods (PBMC genotyping; page unavailable) state that the authors purified genomic DNA and genotyped it with an Infinium CoreExome 24 array, supporting the SNP-array method. The Discussion (page unavailable) discusses sequencing and library-preparation costs, but does not compare SNP-array genotyping costs with obtaining SNPs from RNA-seq data. The “similar cost” qualification is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]Stubbington MJT Rozenblatt-Rosen O Regev A Teichmann SA Single-cell transcriptomics to explore the immune system in health and disease Science 2017 358 58 63 10.1126/science.aan6828 28983043 PMC5654495 · DOI
  2. [2]Tanay A Regev A Scaling single-cell genomics from phenomenology to mechanism Nature 2017 541 331 338 10.1038/nature21350 28102262 PMC5438464 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Velten L Human haematopoietic stem cell lineage commitment is a continuous process Nat Cell Biol 2017 19 271 281 10.1038/ncb3493 28319093 PMC5496982 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Cao J Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism Science 2017 357 661 667 10.1126/science.aam8940 28818938 PMC5894354 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Karaiskos N The Drosophila embryo at single-cell transcriptome resolution Science 2017 8 eaan3235 eaan3214 28860209
  6. [7]Macosko EZ Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets Cell 2015 161 1202 1214 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002 26000488 PMC4481139 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]Klein AM Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells Cell 2015 161 1187 1201 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 26000487 PMC4441768 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [12]Hicks SC, Townes FW, Teng M, Irizarry RA. Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments. Biostatistics. 2017. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx053. PMC6215955 29121214 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [15]Mei HE Leipold MD Schulz AR Chester C Maecker HT Barcoding of live human peripheral blood mononuclear cells for multiplexed mass cytometry J Immunol 2015 194 2022 2031 10.4049/jimmunol.1402661 25609839 PMC4323739 · DOI
  10. [16]Lai L Ong R Li J Albani S A CD45-based barcoding approach to multiplex mass-cytometry (CyTOF) Cytometry 2015 87 369 374 10.1002/cyto.a.22640 25645694 PMC4670699 · DOI
  11. [17]Krutzik PO Nolan GP Fluorescent cell barcoding in flow cytometry allows high-throughput drug screening and signaling profiling Nat Meth 2006 3 361 368 10.1038/nmeth872 16628206 · DOI
  12. [18]Stoeckius M Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells Nat Meth 2017 9 2579 2510 PMC5669064 28759029
  13. [19]van Buggenum JAGL, et al. A covalent and cleavable antibody- DNA conjugation strategy for sensitive protein detection via immuno-PCR. Nat Publ Group. 2016:1–12. 10.1038/srep22675. PMC4780193 26947912 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [20]Hulspas R Titration of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for labeling cell surface markers on live cells Curr Protoc Cytom 2010 Chapter 6 Unit 6 29 20938920
  15. [21]Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Lindskog C. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015. 10.1126/science.1260419. 25613900 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [22]Hartmann FJ, Simonds EF, Bendall SC. A universal live cell barcoding-platform for multiplexed human single cell analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(10770). PMC6050312 30018331
  17. [25]Delley CL, liu L, Sarhan MF, Abate AR. Combined aptamer and transcriptome sequencing of single cells. bioRxiv. 2017:1–10. 10.1101/228338. PMC5811598 29440771 · DOI
  18. [26]Shin D Lee W Lee JH bioRxiv DB Multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq via transient barcoding for drug screening 2018 PMC6520024 31106268
  19. [27]Gehring J, Park JH, Chen S, Thomson M, Pachter L. Highly multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq for defining cell population and transcriptional spaces. bioRxiv. 2018:1–19. 10.1101/315333. · DOI
  20. [28]McGinnis, C. S. et al. MULTI-seq: scalable sample multiplexing for single-cell RNA sequencing using lipid-tagged indices 1–34 (2018). doi:10.1101/387241. PMC6837808 31209384 · DOI
  21. [29]Stuart et al. Comprehensive integration of single cell data. biorxiv. 2018. 10.1101/460147. · DOI
  22. [30]Guo C, Biddy BA, Kamimoto K, Kong W, Morris SA. CellTag indexing: a genetic barcode-based multiplexing tool for single-cell technologies. 2018:1–20. 10.1101/335547. PMC6509836 31072405 · DOI
  23. [33]Blondel VD Guillaume J-L Lambiotte R Lefebvre E Fast unfolding of communities in large networks J Stat Mech 2008 2008 P10008 10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [34]Levine JH Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis Cell 2015 162 184 197 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047 26095251 PMC4508757 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [36]Wright MN, Ziegler A. Ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C and R. J Stat Softw. 2017;77:1–17.
  26. [37]Stoeckius M, Zheng S, Houck-Loomis B, Hao S, Yeung B, Smibert P, and Satija R. Cell hashing with barcoded antibodies enables multiplexing and doublet detection for single cell genomics. Gene Expression Omnibus. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE108313 (2018). PMC6300015 30567574

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoeckius, M., Zheng, S., Houck-Loomis, B., Hao, S., Yeung, B. Z., Mauck, W. M., Smibert, P., & Satija, R.
Affiliations
  • New York Genome Center (US)
  • BioLegend (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Smibert, Peter
  • Satija, Rahul
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2018-12
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
224-224
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2785085486
Cited by
1,046
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 110 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 192 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 161 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 18 · 2013: 1
FWCI
26.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (DP2-HG-009623, NIHR21-HG-009748)
  • Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (HCA-A1704-01895, HCA2-A-1708-02755)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Keywords
cell hashing, doublet detection, single-cell genomics, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Immunologic Techniques, Oligonucleotides, Staining and Labeling, 3T3 Cells, Genomics, Mice, HEK293 Cells, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review