Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An immune-cell signature of bacterial sepsis

Open access
Reyes, Miguel, Filbin, Michael R., Bhattacharyya, Roby P., Billman, Kianna, Eisenhaure, Thomas, Hung, Deborah T., Levy, Bruce D., Baron, Rebecca M., Blainey, Paul C., Goldberg, Marcia B., Hacohen, Nir·2020·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Dysregulation of the immune response to bacterial infection can lead to sepsis, a condition with high mortality. Multiple whole-blood gene-expression studies have defined sepsis-associated molecular signatures, but have not resolved changes in transcriptional states of specific cell types. Here, we used single-cell RNA-sequencing to profile the blood of people with sepsis (n = 29) across three clinical cohorts with corresponding controls (n = 36). We profiled total peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs, 106,545 cells) and dendritic cells (19,806 cells) across all subjects and, on the basis of clustering of their gene-expression profiles, defined 16 immune-cell states. We identified a unique CD14+ monocyte state that is expanded in people with sepsis and validated its power in distinguishing these individuals from controls using public transcriptomic data from subjects with different disease etiologies and from multiple geographic locations (18 cohorts, n = 1,467 subjects). We identified a panel of surface markers for isolation and quantification of the monocyte state and characterized its epigenomic and functional phenotypes, and propose a model for its induction from human bone marrow. This study demonstrates the utility of single-cell genomics in discovering disease-associated cytologic signatures and provides insight into the cellular basis of immune dysregulation in bacterial sepsis. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis identifies a distinct gene signature associated with peripheral monocyte populations that distinguishes people with sepsis from those with sterile inflammation and uninfected controls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-020-0752-4

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
Reyes, M., Filbin, M. R., Bhattacharyya, R. P., Billman, K., Eisenhaure, T., Hung, D. T., Levy, B. D., Baron, R. M., Blainey, P. C., Goldberg, M. B., & Hacohen, N.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2020-02-17
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
333-340
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3006033724
Cited by
489
References
52
FWCI
35.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U24AI118668)
  • David P. Ryan, MD Endowed Chair in Cancer Research
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (1K08AI119157-04)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (1DSEP160030-01-00)
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  • Allergan Foundation
  • Broad Institute
  • Ellison Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An immune-cell signature of bacterial sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41591-020-0752-4
The paper
Reyes, M., Filbin, M. R., Bhattacharyya, R. P., Billman, K., Eisenhaure, T., Hung, D. T., Levy, B. D., Baron, R. M., Blainey, P. C., Goldberg, M. B., & Hacohen, N. (2020). An immune-cell signature of bacterial sepsis. Nature Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0752-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.