Cited by 1,517COVID-19 Digital Contact TracingData-Driven Disease SurveillanceSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19

Open access
Menni, Cristina, Valdes, Ana M., Freidin, Maxim B., Sudre, Carole H., Nguyen, Long H., Drew, David A., Ganesh, Sajaysurya, Varsavsky, Thomas +12 more·2020·Nature Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A total of 2,618,862 participants reported their potential symptoms of COVID-19 on a smartphone-based app. Among the 18,401 who had undergone a SARS-CoV-2 test, the proportion of participants who reported loss of smell and taste was higher in those with a positive test result (4,668 of 7,178 individuals; 65.03%) than in those with a negative test result (2,436 of 11,223 participants; 21.71%) (odds ratio = 6.74; 95% confidence interval = 6.31-7.21). A model combining symptoms to predict probable infection was applied to the data from all app users who reported symptoms (805,753) and predicted that 140,312 (17.42%) participants are likely to have COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-020-0916-2

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID19 symptom-tracker app has been downloaded by 3.9 million people in the UK and USA and is feeding into national surveillance.

    “The COVID19 symptom-tracker app has been downloaded by 3.9 million people in the UK and USA 38 and is feeding into national surveillance.”

    From Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Methods (Study setting and participants; page unavailable) confirm that the symptom-tracker app launched in the UK and US, but report 2,618,862 users after three weeks—not 3.9 million downloads. The citation is attached to the download claim; the subsequent statement about national surveillance is not assessed as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinical reports indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with high rates of disturbances in smell and taste perception, including anosmia.

    “Clinical reports suggest that infection with CoV-2 is associated with high rates of disturbances in smell and taste perception, including anosmia (8-13).”
  • COVID-19-associated anosmia has high penetrance of smell disorders relative to endemic viruses.

    “Any reasonable pathophysiological mechanism for COVID-19-associated anosmia must account for the high penetrance of smell disorders relative to endemic viruses (12, 91, 92), the apparent suddenness of smell loss that can precede the development of other symptoms (11, 13), and the transient nature of dysfunction in many patients (11, 17, 18); definitive identification of the disease mechanisms”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]Hopkiins C & Kumar N Loss of Sense of Smell as Marker of COVID-19 Infection (ENT UK, 2020). PMC7436734 32741085

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menni, C., Valdes, A. M., Freidin, M. B., Sudre, C. H., Nguyen, L. H., Drew, D. A., Ganesh, S., Varsavsky, T., Cardoso, M. J., El-Sayed Moustafa, J. S., Visconti, A., Hysi, P., Bowyer, R. C. E., Mangino, M., Falchi, M., Wolf, J., Ourselin, S., Chan, A. T., Steves, C. J., & Spector, T. D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • ZOE (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Menni, Cristina
  • Spector, Tim D.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2020-05-11
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1037-1040
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3023519397
Cited by
1,517
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 185 · 2022: 303 · 2021: 532 · 2020: 336 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
319.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chronic Disease Research Foundation
  • RCUK | Medical Research Council (AIMHY; MR/M016560/1)
  • DH | NIHR | Health Services Research Programme
  • Alzheimer’s Society (AS-JF-17-011)
  • Evergrande COVID-19 Response Fund Reward
  • Wellcome Trust (WT203148/Z/16/Z)
  • Steele Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, self-reported symptoms, mobile application, loss of taste and smell, anosmia, olfactory dysfunction, infection prediction, contact tracing
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Aged, Olfaction Disorders, Computer Systems, Cough, Dyspnea, Fatigue, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Pneumonia, Viral, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Taste Disorders, United States, Coronavirus Infections, Disease Notification, Self Report, Pandemics, Prodromal Symptoms, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review