Cited by 133SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesImmune responses and vaccinations

Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b1 mRNA vaccine in younger and older Chinese adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 1 study

Open access
Li, Jingxin, Hui, Aimin, Zhang, Xiang, Yang, Yumei, Tang, Rong, Ye, Huayue, Ji, Ruiru, Lin, Mei +14 more·2021·Nature Medicine

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

An effective vaccine is needed to end the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Here, we assess the preliminary safety, tolerability and immunogenicity data from an ongoing single-center (in Jiangsu province, China), parallel-group, double-blind phase 1 trial of the vaccine candidate BNT162b1 in 144 healthy SARS-CoV-2-naive Chinese participants. These participants are randomized 1:1:1 to receive prime and boost vaccinations of 10 µg or 30 µg BNT162b1 or placebo, given 21 d apart, with equal allocation of younger (aged 18-55 years) and older adults (aged 65-85 years) to each treatment group (ChiCTR2000034825). BNT162b1 encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein receptor-binding domain (RBD) and is one of several messenger RNA-based vaccine candidates under clinical investigation. Local reactions and systemic events were generally dose dependent, transient and mild to moderate. Fever was the only grade 3 adverse event. BNT162b1 induced robust interferon-γ T cell responses to a peptide pool including the RBD in both younger and older Chinese adults, and geometric mean neutralizing titers reached 2.1-fold (for younger participants) and 1.3-fold (for the older participants) that of a panel of COVID-19 convalescent human sera obtained at least 14 d after positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction test. In summary, BNT162b1 has an acceptable safety profile and produces high levels of humoral and T cell responses in an Asian population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-021-01330-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The incidence of grade 3 fever of ARCoV was similar to the trial results of another RBD-based mRNA vaccine, BNT162b1.

    “Thus, the incidence of grade 3 fever of ARCoV was similar to the trial results of another RBD-based mRNA vaccine, BNT162b1.16”

    From Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Preliminary safety and tolerability data section (article pp. 1062–1070) reports grade 3 fever in BNT162b1 recipients, including 17% of younger and 8% of older participants at the 30 µg dose. The discussion identifies BNT162b1 as an RBD-encoding vaccine. This paper does not report ARCoV's grade 3 fever incidence, so it cannot establish that the two incidences were similar. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In phase 1 trials, mRNA-based vaccines (ARCoV, BNT162b1) and adenovirus-vector vaccines (ChAdOx1, Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine) induced a strong T-helper-1-cell response in most participants.

    “In phase 1 trials, mRNA-based vaccines (ARCoV, BNT162b1)16 and adenovirus-vector vaccines (ChAdOx1,25 Ad5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine)26 induced a strong T-helper-1-cell response in most participants.”

    From Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    The 'Vaccine-induced T cell responses' section reports significantly stronger BNT162b1-induced T-cell responses than placebo after the boost in both age groups (page not specified). But the study measured IFN-γ responses in bulk peripheral blood mononuclear cells; it does not establish that these were specifically T-helper-1-cell responses or that most individual participants had a strong response. This citation is attached to BNT162b1, not to the other vaccines listed. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The incidence of grade 3 fever of BNT162b1 varied significantly in the same 30 μg group in adults aged 18-55 years, with none (0%) of 12 in the USA, one (8%) of 12 in Germany, and four (17%) of 24 in China, suggesting varying tolerability in different populations.

    “The incidence of grade 3 fever of BNT162b1 varied significantly in the same 30 μg group in adults aged 18–55 years, with none (0%) of 12 in the USA,17 one (8%) of 12 in Germany,18 and four (17%) of 24 in China,16 suggesting varying tolerability in different populations.”
  • In a randomized phase I study on BNT162b1 in younger (18-55 years) and older adults (65-85 years), virus neutralization was lower in the older age group 22 days after the first dose.

    “In a randomized phase I study on BNT162b1 in younger (18-55 years) and older adults (65-85 years), virus neutralization was lower in the older age group 22 days after the first dose 20 .”
  • All five BioNTech/Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine candidates have entered clinical trials.

    “Till now, all of these candidates have entered clinical trials (Table 5).130,376,377”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [377]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, J., Hui, A., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Tang, R., Ye, H., Ji, R., Lin, M., Zhu, Z., Türeci, Ö., Lagkadinou, E., Jia, S., Pan, H., Peng, F., Ma, Z., Wu, Z., Guo, X., Shi, Y., Muik, A., Şahin, U., Zhu, L., & Zhu, F.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
  • Fosun Pharma (China) (CN)
  • Army Medical University (CN)
  • The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN)
  • BioNTech (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Zhu, Li
  • Zhu, Fengcai
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1062-1070
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W3154648093
Cited by
133
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 33
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccines, vaccine safety, immunogenicity, older adults, young adults, spike protein receptor-binding domain, neutralizing antibodies, dose comparison, adverse events, Chinese adults
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, China, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, RNA, Messenger, Vaccines, Synthetic, Young Adult, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Pandemics, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review