Cited by 334Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 59 of the 84 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Senolytic therapy in mild Alzheimer's disease: a phase 1 feasibility trial

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cellular senescence contributes to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. An open-label, proof-of-concept, phase I clinical trial of orally delivered senolytic therapy, dasatinib (D) and quercetin (Q), was conducted in early-stage symptomatic patients with AD to assess central nervous system (CNS) penetrance, safety, feasibility and efficacy. Five participants (mean age = 76 + 5 years; 40% female) completed the 12-week pilot study. D and Q levels in blood increased in all participants (12.7-73.5 ng ml-1 for D and 3.29-26.3 ng ml-1 for Q). In cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), D levels were detected in four participants (80%) ranging from 0.281 to 0.536 ml-1 with a CSF to plasma ratio of 0.422-0.919%; Q was not detected. The treatment was well-tolerated, with no early discontinuation. Secondary cognitive and neuroimaging endpoints did not significantly differ from baseline to post-treatment further supporting a favorable safety profile. CSF levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) increased (t(4) = 3.913, P = 0.008 and t(4) = 3.354, P = 0.028, respectively) with trending decreases in senescence-related cytokines and chemokines, and a trend toward higher Aβ42 levels (t(4) = -2.338, P = 0.079). In summary, CNS penetrance of D was observed with outcomes supporting safety, tolerability and feasibility in patients with AD. Biomarker data provided mechanistic insights of senolytic effects that need to be confirmed in fully powered, placebo-controlled studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04063124 .

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41591-023-02543-w

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

8 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Verification

Claims the paper makes

55 Own result · 17 Partly supported · 17 Own method · 13 Own interpretation · 11 Supported · 10 No full text of the sources · 3 Sources not found · 2 Supported so far · 2 Couldn’t confirm · 1 Not checked yet · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 58 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 59
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
74 of 74
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of a drug indicate its central nervous system penetrance or exposure.

    “Our primary objective was to measure CNS penetrance of D and Q.”
    “Our results confirmed the presence of D in 4/5 participants’ CSF following treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Changes in cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers over the open-label period reflect senolytic treatment effects rather than natural variation or disease progression.

    “Biomarker data provided mechanistic insights of senolytic effects that need to be confirmed in fully powered, placebo-controlled studies.”
    “our preliminary data suggest the potential of baseline to post-treatment changes in markers of cellular senescence and ADRD”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Intermittent dosing lowers the risk of toxicity compared with continuous dosing.

    “Intermittent dosing further reduces potential toxicity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The measured senescence-associated secretory phenotype cytokines and chemokines are valid markers of senolytic target engagement in Alzheimer’s disease.

    “to evaluate target engagement of D + Q by examining changes markers associated with cellular senescence and the SASP.”
    “Biomarker data provided mechanistic insights of senolytic effects that need to be confirmed in fully powered, placebo-controlled studies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In humans with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia, dasatinib, unlike other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, has shown usefulness in managing intracranial leukemic disease.

    “Human cancer patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia are at risk of CNS relapse; D, but not other tyrosine-kinase inhibitors used to treat Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia (for example, imatinib), has shown useful in managing intracranial leukemic disease.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This study is the first in-human clinical trial and first report of senolytic treatment in humans with AD.

    “As the first in-human clinical trial of senolytic therapy for AD, our study also provides important preliminary data on safety, tolerability and feasibility.”
    “While our study provides the first report of senolytic treatment in humans with AD, there are several important limitations that must be considered.”
    “In summary, we report findings from the first proof-of-concept, Phase I, open-label clinical trial of senolytic therapy for AD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Sheep CSF pharmacokinetic data for quercetin can be extrapolated to humans in this study.

    “If we extrapolate these results to our study, we assayed Q at a timepoint where it should have been detected in CSF, but the level would fall tenfold below the detection limits of our assay.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Senescent cells secrete the observed cytokines and chemokines as SASP factors.

    “Given that senescent cells secrete these molecules as SASP factors, the observed reduction supports a decrease in senescent cell burden post-treatment.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upt(4) = 3.913reported p = .008 · recomputed p = .017

    “t(4) = 3.913, p = .008”

  • Not confirmedt(4) = -2.338reported p = .079 · recomputed p = .080

    “t(4) = −2.338, p = .079”

  • Consistentt(4) = 3.354reported p = .028 · recomputed p = .028

    “t(4) = 3.354, p = .028”

  • Consistentt(4) = 2.34reported p = .0795 · recomputed p = .079

    “t(4) = 2.34, p = .0795”

  • Consistentt(4) = -1.12reported p = .32 · recomputed p = .325

    “t(4) = −1.12, p = .32”

  • Consistentt(4) = 0.56reported p = .61 · recomputed p = .605

    “t(4) = 0.56, p = .61”

  • Consistentt(4) = 0.96reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .391

    “t(4) = 0.96, p = .39”

  • Consistentt(4) = 2.904reported p = .044 · recomputed p = .044

    “t(4) = 2.904, p = .044”

8 of 8

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Iwashina, T. Flavonoid properties of five families newly incorporated into the order Caryophyllales. Bull. Natl Mus. Nat. Sci. B 39, 25–51 (2013).
  2. Psychological Corporation. WMS-IV: Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition: Administration and Scoring Manual (Harcourt, Brace, & Company, 2009).
  3. Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H. & Weintraub, S. Boston Naming Test (2nd (BNT-2), Second Edition (Pro-Ed, 2001).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–284 of 284

Metadata

Authors
Gonzales, M. M., Garbarino, V. R., Kautz, T. F., Palavicini, J. P., Lopez-Cruzan, M., Dehkordi, S. K., Mathews, J. J., Zare, H., Xu, P., Zhang, B., Franklin, C., Habes, M., Craft, S., Petersen, R. C., Tchkonia, T., Kirkland, J. L., Salardini, A., Seshadri, S., Musi, N., & Orr, M. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • W. G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gonzales, Mitzi M.
  • Orr, Miranda E.
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2023-09-07
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
2481-2488
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W4386499275
Cited by
334
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 21
FWCI
32.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (GC-201908-2019443)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U24AG059624, R01AG068293, P30AG044271, R01AG077472, P30AG066546, T32AG021890, PG30AG044271, P30AG013319, U01AG22307, R01AG057896, 1RF1AG063507, 1R01AG0665241A, 1R01AG065301, P30 AG066546, U01AG046170, R01AG068030, R01AG080821, P30AG072947, P30 AG062677, U01 AG006786, U24 AG057437, U19 AG024904, R33AG061456, R37AG13925, P01AG062413, R01AG066524, R01AG054076, R01AG033193, RF1AG059421, U54AG07594, R01AG069690, R01AG075684)
  • American Federation for Aging Research
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX005717)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS125171, RF1NS112391, U19NS115388, UF1 NS125417, R01NS017950)
  • Hevolution Foundation
  • Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science and the Center for Biomedical Neurosciences at UT Health Science Center in San Antonio
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (TR002647)
  • Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science at UT Health Science Center in San Antonio. Center for Biomedical Neurosciences at UT Health Science Center in San Antonio.
  • Cure Alzheimer’s Fund
  • GHR Foundation
  • Alzheimer’s Association (PTC REG-20-651687)
  • Connor Fund Robert J. and Theresa W. Ryan Noaber Foundation
  • National Heart and Lung Institute (R01HL105756)
  • JMR Barker Foundation; Bill and Rebecca Reed Endowments for Precision Medicine and Palliative Care; Kleberg/McGill Foundation; UT STARS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
senolytic therapy, Alzheimer's disease, cellular senescence, dasatinib, quercetin, cerebrospinal fluid drug concentration, CNS penetration, amyloid-beta, tau protein, interleukin-6, glial fibrillary acidic protein, astrocytes, cytokines and chemokines, safety and tolerability, early Alzheimer's disease, oral drug delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review