Cited by 169Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Profiling senescent cells in human brains reveals neurons with CDKN2D/p19 and tau neuropathology

Open access
Dehkordi, Shiva Kazempour, Walker, Jamie, Sah, Eric, Bennett, Emma, Atrian, Farzaneh, Frost, Bess, Woost, Benjamin, Bennett, Rachel E. +10 more·2021·Nature Aging

Abstract

Senescent cells contribute to pathology and dysfunction in animal models 1. Their sparse distribution and heterogenous phenotype have presented challenges for detecting them in human tissues. We developed a senescence eigengene approach to identify these rare cells within large, diverse populations of postmortem human brain cells. Eigengenes are useful when no single gene reliably captures a phenotype, like senescence; they also help to reduce noise, which is important in large transcriptomic datasets where subtle signals from low-expressing genes can be lost. Each of our eigengenes detected ~2% senescent cells from a population of ~140,000 single nuclei derived from 76 postmortem human brains with various levels of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. More than 97% of the senescent cells were excitatory neurons and overlapped with tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2D (CDKN2D/p19) was predicted as the most significant contributor to the primary senescence eigengene. RNAscope and immunofluorescence confirmed its elevated expression in AD brain tissue whereby p19-expressing neurons had 1.8-fold larger nuclei and significantly more cells with lipofuscin than p19-negative neurons. These hallmark senescence phenotypes were further elevated in the presence of NFTs. Collectively, CDKN2D/p19-expressing neurons with NFTs represent a unique cellular population in human AD with a senescence phenotype. The eigengenes developed may be useful in future senescence profiling studies as they accurately identified senescent cells in snRNASeq datasets and predicted biomarkers for histological investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s43587-021-00142-3

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only microglia showed full expression of the full canonical senescence pathway (CSP).

    “Microglia, oligodendrocytes and astrocytes transcriptomes all showed enrichment for genes upregulated in an early senescence (“senescence initiators”) pathway, but only microglia showed full expression of the full canonical senescence pathway (CSP) [16].”

    From Characterisation of premature cell senescence in Alzheimer's disease using single nuclear transcriptomics (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The paper’s results (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) say excitatory neurons were the predominant CSP-positive cells, accounting for 97% and 92% of CSP cells in the two adult brain cohorts. They also report CSP enrichment in endothelial cells in cohort 2. This contradicts the claim that only microglia showed the canonical senescence phenotype. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cellular senescence is involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease.

    “Cellular senescence contributes to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis.”

    From Senolytic therapy in mild Alzheimer's disease: a phase 1 feasibility trial (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports senescence-phenotype neurons overlapping with tau-containing tangles in human AD brains and says rodent-model data indicate that senescent brain cells contribute to neurodegeneration and cognitive dysfunction. The human findings show an association, not that cellular senescence contributes causally to AD pathogenesis as the citing sentence states. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Transcriptomic data from postmortem Alzheimer's disease brain tissue and mouse models show senescent cell signatures responsive to dasatinib plus quercetin, associated with neurofibrillary tangle-bearing neurons.

    “Transcriptomic data from postmortem human AD brain tissue and AD mouse models revealed senescent cell signatures predicted to be responsive to D + Q therapy (that is, SCAPs), which were specifically associated with neurofibrillary tangle (NFT)-bearing neurons6,7.”

    From Senolytic therapy in mild Alzheimer's disease: a phase 1 feasibility trial (2023) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports senescence signatures in transcriptomic data from postmortem human brains and their overlap with neurofibrillary tangle-bearing excitatory neurons. The Methods, “Eigengene analysis” (page unavailable), describes analysis of human RNA-sequencing data; the gene sets included findings from mouse models, but this paper does not report analyzing transcriptomic data from AD mouse models or predicting responsiveness to dasatinib plus quercetin. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Features of premature senescence associated with DSBs and p16 expression have been described in post-mitotic cells such as neurons.

    “However, features of premature senescence associated particularly with DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and p16 expression also have been described in post-mitotic cells such as neurons[16, 18, 29].”

    From Characterisation of premature cell senescence in Alzheimer's disease using single nuclear transcriptomics (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The paper’s Abstract reports a senescence phenotype in neurons, supporting the general point that post-mitotic cells can show senescence features. But it identifies CDKN2D/p19, not p16, as the prominent marker, cautions that p16 expression can occur independently of senescence, and does not describe DNA double-strand breaks as a feature of these neurons. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Dehkordi et al. previously concluded that excitatory neurons uniquely expressed a senescence signature based on relative enrichment of nuclear genes expressed with an eigengene reflecting a canonical senescence response.

    “Dehkordi et al. previously concluded that excitatory neurons uniquely expressed a senescence signature based on relative enrichment of nuclear genes expressed with an eigengene reflecting a canonical senescence response [16].”

    From Characterisation of premature cell senescence in Alzheimer's disease using single nuclear transcriptomics (2024) · cites this paper as [16]

    The paper’s copy (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) describes a canonical senescence phenotype eigengene derived from gene expression in single brain nuclei and identifies excitatory neurons as the predominant senescent cell type. It reports that excitatory neurons accounted for 97% and 92% of CSP-identified senescent cells in two adult cohorts, so “uniquely expressed” overstates the finding: expression was not exclusive to them. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dehkordi, S. K., Walker, J., Sah, E., Bennett, E., Atrian, F., Frost, B., Woost, B., Bennett, R. E., Orr, T. C., Zhou, Y., Andhey, P. S., Colonna, M., Sudmant, P. H., Xu, P., Wang, M., Zhang, B., Zare, H., & Orr, M. E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • W. G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zare, Habil
  • Orr, Miranda E.
Venue
Nature Aging
Published
2021-12-10
Volume
1
Issue
12
Pages
1107-1116
ISSN
2662-8465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200534156
Cited by
169
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (T32AG021890, R01AG057896, K99AG061259, P30AG062421, R21AG059176, RF1AG059082, RF1AG057440, U01AG046170, R01AG057907, R01AG068293)
  • Cure Alzheimer’s Fund
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (K2BX003804)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
cellular senescence, senescent cells, human brain, Alzheimer's disease, tau pathology, neurofibrillary tangles, excitatory neurons, single-nucleus RNA sequencing, lipofuscin, postmortem brain, senescence biomarkers
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Humans, Neurons, Cellular Senescence, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p19

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review