Joint analysis of heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq dataset collections
Open accessAbstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing is often applied in study designs that include multiple individuals, conditions or tissues. To identify recurrent cell subpopulations in such heterogeneous collections, we developed Conos, an approach that relies on multiple plausible inter-sample mappings to construct a global graph connecting all measured cells. The graph enables identification of recurrent cell clusters and propagation of information between datasets in multi-sample or atlas-scale collections.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integration using three independent methodologies (Harmony, Conos, and LIGER) yielded highly reliable cell type results based on visual inspection of UMAP distributions and low LISI values for cell type coherence when compared to Seurat integration.
“In each case, highly reliable cell type results were observed, based on visual inspection of UMAP distributions and low Local Inverse Simpson Index (LISI) values for cell type coherence when compared to Seurat integration.”
From A harmonized atlas of mouse spinal cord cell types and their spatial organization (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
The main integration was compared to three independent methods: Harmony, Conos, and LIGER.
“This integration was compared to three independent methods (Harmony25, Conos26, and LIGER27).”
From A harmonized atlas of mouse spinal cord cell types and their spatial organization (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
Cell-cell similarity graphs in single cell omics, gene regulatory networks, and protein-protein interaction networks are fundamental tools to rationalize the complexity of biological systems such as the human body.
“Cell-cell similarity graphs in single cell omics [ 47 ], gene regulatory networks [ 48 ] and protein-protein interaction networks [ 49 ] are fundamental tools to rationalize the complexity of biological systems such as the human body.”
From igraph 1.0 enables fast and robust network analysis across programming languages (2026) · cites this paper as [47]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies
Ritchie, M. E., Phipson, B., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Law, C. W., Shi, W., & Smyth, G. K. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv007 · Cited by 40,458 · see citing works
Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species
Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E., & Satija, R. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4096 · Cited by 13,174 · see citing works
Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris
The Tabula Muris Consortium, coordination, O., coordination, L., processing, O. C. A., sequencing, L. P. A., analysis, C. D., annotation, C. T., Writing group, Supplemental text writing group, & Principal investigators (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0590-4 · Cited by 3,326 · see citing works
Puram, S. V., Tirosh, I., Parikh, A. S., Patel, A. P., Yizhak, K., Gillespie, S., Rodman, C., Luo, C. L., Mroz, E. A., Emerick, K. S., et al. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.044 · Cited by 2,557 · see citing works
Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors
Haghverdi, L., Lun, A. T. L., Morgan, M. D., & Marioni, J. C. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4091 · Cited by 2,416 · see citing works
Regev, A., Teichmann, S. A., Lander, E. S., Amit, I., Benoist, C., Birney, E., Bodenmiller, B., Campbell, P., Carninci, P., Clatworthy, M., et al. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.27041 · Cited by 2,232 · see citing works
Single-Cell Map of Diverse Immune Phenotypes in the Breast Tumor Microenvironment
Azizi, E., Carr, A. J., Plitas, G., Cornish, A. E., Konopacki, C., Prabhakaran, S., Nainys, J., Wu, K., Kiseliovas, V., Setty, M., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.060 · Cited by 1,976 · see citing works
McCarthy, D. J., Campbell, K. R., Lun, A. T. L., & Wills, Q. F. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777 · Cited by 1,852 · see citing works
Global characterization of T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer by single-cell sequencing
Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, L., Zheng, C., Song, J., Zhang, Q., Kang, B., Liu, Z., Jin, L., Xing, R., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0045-3 · Cited by 1,651 · see citing works
Phenotype molding of stromal cells in the lung tumor microenvironment
Lambrechts, D., Wauters, E., Boeckx, B., Aibar, S., Nittner, D., Burton, O., Bassez, A., Decaluwé, H., Pircher, A., Van den Eynde, K., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0096-5 · Cited by 1,648 · see citing works
Mapping the Mouse Cell Atlas by Microwell-Seq
Han, X., Wang, R., Zhou, Y., Fei, L., Sun, H., Lai, S., Saadatpour, A., Zhou, Z., Chen, H., Ye, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.001 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling of Human Pancreatic Islets in Health and Type 2 Diabetes
Segerstolpe, Å., Palasantza, A., Eliasson, P., Andersson, E.-M., Andréasson, A.-C., Sun, X., Picelli, S., Sabirsh, A., Clausen, M., Bjursell, M. K., et al. (2016) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.020 · Cited by 1,550 · see citing works
Baron, M., Veres, A., Wolock, S. L., Faust, A. L., Gaujoux, R., Vetere, A., Ryu, J. H., Wagner, B. K., Shen-Orr, S. S., Klein, A. M., et al. (2016) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.08.011 · Cited by 1,508 · see citing works
Regev, A., Teichmann, S. A., Lander, E. S., Amit, I., Benoist, C. O., Birney, E., Bodenmiller, B., & al, E. (2017) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-162597 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Joint profiling of chromatin accessibility and gene expression in thousands of single cells
Cao, J., Cusanovich, D. A., Ramani, V., Aghamirzaie, D., Pliner, H. A., Hill, A. J., Daza, R. M., McFaline-Figueroa, J. L., Packer, J. S., Christiansen, L., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0730 · Cited by 938 · see citing works
A Single-Cell Atlas of In Vivo Mammalian Chromatin Accessibility
Cusanovich, D. A., Hill, A. J., Aghamirzaie, D., Daza, R. M., Pliner, H. A., Berletch, J. B., Filippova, G. N., Huang, X., Christiansen, L., DeWitt, W. S., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.052 · Cited by 759 · see citing works
Missing data and technical variability in single-cell RNA-sequencing experiments
Hicks, S. C., Townes, F. W., Teng, M., & Irizarry, R. A. (2018) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxx053 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Xin, Y., Dominguez Gutierrez, G., Okamoto, H., Kim, J., Lee, A.-H., Adler, C., Ni, M., Yancopoulos, G. D., Murphy, A. J., & Gromada, J. (2018) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db18-0365 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Overcoming confounding plate effects in differential expression analyses of single-cell RNA-seq data
Lun, A. T. L., & Marioni, J. C. (2017) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxw055 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Ponnapalli, S. P., Saunders, M. A., Loan, C. F. V., & Alter, O. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028072 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Common Principal Components for Dependent Random Vectors
Neuenschwander, B. E., & Flury, B. D. (2000) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1006/jmva.2000.1908 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence.
Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2 · Cited by 1,823 · see citing works
Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science
Lähnemann, D., Köster, J., Szczurek, E., McCarthy, D. J., Hicks, S. C., Robinson, M. D., Vallejos, C. A., Campbell, K. R., Beerenwinkel, N., Mahfouz, A., et al. (2020) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-020-1926-6 · Cited by 1,327 · see citing works
Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics
Luecken, M. D., Büttner, M., Chaichoompu, K., Danese, A., Interlandi, M., Mueller, M. F., Strobl, D. C., Zappia, L., Dugas, M., Colomé-Tatché, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01336-8 · Cited by 1,438 · see citing works
Szabo, P. A., Levitin, H. M., Miron, M., Snyder, M. E., Senda, T., Yuan, J., Cheng, Y. L., Bush, E. C., Dogra, P., Thapa, P., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12464-3 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research
Messeri, L., & Crockett, M. J. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Mapping single-cell data to reference atlases by transfer learning
Lotfollahi, M., Naghipourfar, M., Luecken, M. D., Khajavi, M., Büttner, M., Wagenstetter, M., Avsec, Ž., Gayoso, A., Yosef, N., Interlandi, M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-01001-7 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Computational principles and challenges in single-cell data integration
Argelaguet, R., Cuomo, A. S. E., Stegle, O., & Marioni, J. C. (2021) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-021-00895-7 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
The triumphs and limitations of computational methods for scRNA-seq
Kharchenko, P. V. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01171-x · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Self-citationA harmonized atlas of mouse spinal cord cell types and their spatial organization
Russ, D. E., Cross, R. B. P., Li, L., Koch, S. C., Matson, K. J. E., Yadav, A., Alkaslasi, M. R., Lee, D. I., Le Pichon, C. E., Menon, V., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25125-1 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Cellular plasticity balances the metabolic and proliferation dynamics of a regenerating liver
Chembazhi, U. V., Bangru, S., Hernaez, M., & Kalsotra, A. (2021) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.267013.120 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Computational methods for the integrative analysis of single-cell data
Forcato, M., Romano, O., & Bicciato, S. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa042 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
cellHarmony: cell-level matching and holistic comparison of single-cell transcriptomes
DePasquale, E. A. K., Schnell, D., Dexheimer, P., Ferchen, K., Hay, S., Chetal, K., Valiente-Alandí, Í., Blaxall, B. C., Grimes, H. L., & Salomonis, N. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkz789 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
igraph 1.0 enables fast and robust network analysis across programming languages
Antonov, M., Csárdi, G., Horvát, S., Müller, K., Nepusz, T., Noom, D., Salmon, M., Traag, V., Welles, B. F., & Zanini, F. (2026) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0355108 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Cell-cell similarity graphs in single cell omics [47], gene regulatory networks [48] and protein-protein interaction networks [49] are fundamental tools to rationalize the complexity of biological systems such as the human body.”
- Authors
- Barkas, N., Petukhov, V., Nikolaeva, D., Lozinsky, Y., Demharter, S., Khodosevich, K., & Kharchenko, P. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kharchenko, Peter V.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Published
- 2019-07-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 695-698
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- 1548-7105
- PMC
- PMC6684315
- OpenAlex
- W2962073995
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 13.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Lundbeckfonden (R273-2017-2241)
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF16OC0019920)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL131768)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- single-cell RNA sequencing, cell graphs, multi-sample analysis, cell clustering
- MeSH terms
- Bone Marrow, Humans, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review