Cited by 292Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Joint analysis of heterogeneous single-cell RNA-seq dataset collections

Open access
Barkas, Nikolas, Petukhov, Viktor, Nikolaeva, Daria, Lozinsky, Yaroslav, Demharter, Samuel, Khodosevich, Konstantin, Kharchenko, Peter V.·2019·Nature Methods

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing is often applied in study designs that include multiple individuals, conditions or tissues. To identify recurrent cell subpopulations in such heterogeneous collections, we developed Conos, an approach that relies on multiple plausible inter-sample mappings to construct a global graph connecting all measured cells. The graph enables identification of recurrent cell clusters and propagation of information between datasets in multi-sample or atlas-scale collections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-019-0466-z

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integration using three independent methodologies (Harmony, Conos, and LIGER) yielded highly reliable cell type results based on visual inspection of UMAP distributions and low LISI values for cell type coherence when compared to Seurat integration.

    “In each case, highly reliable cell type results were observed, based on visual inspection of UMAP distributions and low Local Inverse Simpson Index (LISI) values for cell type coherence when compared to Seurat integration.”
  • The main integration was compared to three independent methods: Harmony, Conos, and LIGER.

    “This integration was compared to three independent methods (Harmony25, Conos26, and LIGER27).”
  • Cell-cell similarity graphs in single cell omics, gene regulatory networks, and protein-protein interaction networks are fundamental tools to rationalize the complexity of biological systems such as the human body.

    “Cell-cell similarity graphs in single cell omics [ 47 ], gene regulatory networks [ 48 ] and protein-protein interaction networks [ 49 ] are fundamental tools to rationalize the complexity of biological systems such as the human body.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barkas, N., Petukhov, V., Nikolaeva, D., Lozinsky, Y., Demharter, S., Khodosevich, K., & Kharchenko, P. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kharchenko, Peter V.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2019-07-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
695-698
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2962073995
Cited by
292
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
13.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (R273-2017-2241)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF16OC0019920)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL131768)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, cell graphs, multi-sample analysis, cell clustering
MeSH terms
Bone Marrow, Humans, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review