Cited by 163Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureDNA and Biological ComputingComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum computing at the frontiers of biological sciences

Open access
Emani, Prashant S., Warrell, Jonathan, Anticevic, Alan, Bekiranov, Stefan, Gandal, Michael, McConnell, Michael J., Sapiro, Guillermo, Aspuru-Guzik, Alán, Baker, Justin T., Bastiani, Matteo, Murray, John D., Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N., Taylor, Jacob, Senthil, Geetha, Lehner, Thomas, Gerstein, Mark B., Harrow, Aram W.·2021·Nature Methods

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41592-020-01004-3

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Li, Z., Li, J., Dattani, N. S., Umrigar, C. J. & Chan, G. K. L. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 024302 (2019).
  2. Ambainis, A. & Kokainis, M. in Proc. 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing – STOC 2017 989–1002 (2017).
  3. Kadowaki, T. & Nishimori, H. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 58, 5355–5363 (1998).
  4. Srinivasan, S., Downey, C. & Boots, B. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (eds. Bengio, S. et al.) 10338–10347 (Curran Associates, 2018).
  5. Amin, M. H., Andriyash, E., Rolfe, J., Kulchytskyy, B. & Melko, R. Phys. Rev. X 8, 021050 (2018).
  6. Dezfouli, A., Morris, R., Ramos, F., Dayan, P. & Balleine, B. W. in Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (eds. Bengio, S. et al.) 4228–4237 (Curran Associates, 2018).
  7. Farhi, E. & Neven, H. Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06002 (2018). · arXiv
  8. Tegmark, M. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Topics 61, 4194–4206 (2000).
  9. Marr, D. C. & Poggio, T. Neurosci. Res. Program Bull. 15, 470–488 (1977).
  10. Van Meter, R., Itoh, K. M. & Ladd, T. D. in MS+S 2006 – Controllable Quantum States: Mesoscopic Superconductivity and Spintronics, Proceedings of the International Symposium 183–188 (World Scientific Publishing, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 163

Metadata

Authors
Emani, P. S., Warrell, J., Anticevic, A., Bekiranov, S., Gandal, M., McConnell, M. J., Sapiro, G., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Baker, J. T., Bastiani, M., Murray, J. D., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Taylor, J., Senthil, G., Lehner, T., Gerstein, M. B., & Harrow, A. W.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Lieber Institute for Brain Development (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
  • New York Genome Center (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lehner, Thomas
  • Gerstein, Mark B.
  • Harrow, Aram W.
Venue
Nature Methods
Published
2021-01-04
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
701-709
ISSN
  • 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-7105
OpenAlex
W2987160512
Cited by
163
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 17
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh120093-04, UL1TR001863)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L023067/1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH116492, R01MH121521, U01MH106882, R01‐MH120093, R01MH137578)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI143916, R01AI134895)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › DNA and Biological Computing
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
quantum computing, computational complexity, qubits, interdisciplinary research
MeSH terms
Big Data, Algorithms, Biological Science Disciplines, Computers, Computing Methodologies, Genetics, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Quantum Theory, Sequence Analysis, Genomics, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review