Cited by 549Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural Networks and Applications

Task representations in neural networks trained to perform many cognitive tasks

Open access
Yang, Guangyu Robert, Joglekar, Madhura R., Song, H. Francis, Newsome, William T., Wang, Xiao-Jing·2019·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The brain has the ability to flexibly perform many tasks, but the underlying mechanism cannot be elucidated in traditional experimental and modeling studies designed for one task at a time. Here, we trained single network models to perform 20 cognitive tasks that depend on working memory, decision making, categorization, and inhibitory control. We found that after training, recurrent units can develop into clusters that are functionally specialized for different cognitive processes, and we introduce a simple yet effective measure to quantify relationships between single-unit neural representations of tasks. Learning often gives rise to compositionality of task representations, a critical feature for cognitive flexibility, whereby one task can be performed by recombining instructions for other tasks. Finally, networks developed mixed task selectivity similar to recorded prefrontal neurons after learning multiple tasks sequentially with a continual-learning technique. This work provides a computational platform to investigate neural representations of many cognitive tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41593-018-0310-2

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The RNNs are initialized with normally distributed weights to facilitate comparisons with the computational neuroscience literature.

    “In contrast to the orthogonal initialization typically employed in the mainstream machine learning literature 95 , we initialize our RNNs with normally distributed weights to facilitate comparisons with the computational neuroscience literature 75,96,97 .”

    From Emergent behaviour and neural dynamics in artificial agents tracking odour plumes (2023) · cites this paper as [75]

    The Methods (Training procedure; page unavailable) say the input and output weights are initialized as independent Gaussian random variables. But the recurrent weights are initialized as a scaled identity matrix, and the paper does not say that Gaussian initialization facilitates comparison with computational neuroscience literature. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RNNs trained in many computational tasks develop modular neural populations and dynamical motifs that are re-used across tasks.

    “RNNs trained in many computational tasks develop modular neural populations and dynamical motifs that are re-used across tasks (Driscoll et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2019)”

    From Remapping in a recurrent neural network model of navigation and context inference (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2019

    The Results section, “Functional clusters encode subsets of tasks” (page unavailable), reports clusters of recurrent units dedicated to processes shared across tasks, supporting the modular-population and reuse portions of the claim. The Discussion describes these clusters as potential building blocks, but our copy does not establish that dynamical motifs are reused across tasks; it also notes that sequential training produces more mixed representations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RNNs trained in many computational tasks develop modular neural populations and dynamical motifs that are re-used across tasks.

    “For example, RNNs trained in many computational tasks develop modular neural populations and dynamical motifs that are re-used across tasks (Driscoll et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2019).”

    From Remapping in a recurrent neural network model of navigation and context inference (2023) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2019

    The Results section, “Functional clusters encode subsets of tasks in reference networks” (page not available), reports clusters of recurrent units dedicated to processes shared across tasks. The paper supports modular populations and their reuse, but the passages examined do not establish that dynamical motifs are reused across tasks. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Modular structure has been shown to spontaneously emerge in some end-to-end neural network systems in domains other than language.

    “Modular structure has been shown to spontaneously emerge in some end-to-end neural network systems in domains other than language [e.g., 203, 204]”

    From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [203]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Wang X-J in Principles of Frontal Lobe Function (Stuss DT & Knight RT eds.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2013).
  2. [40]Lake BM & Baroni M. Generalization without systematicity: On the compositional skills of sequence-to-sequence recurrent networks. ICML 80, 2873– 2882 (2017).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, G. R., Joglekar, M. R., Song, H. F., Newsome, W. T., & Wang, X.-J.
Affiliations
  • Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute (US)
  • Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US)
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiao-Jing
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2019-01-14
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
297-306
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2908124316
Cited by
549
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
29.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062349)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
task representation, cognitive flexibility, working memory, decision-making, categorization, inhibitory control, recurrent neural networks, functional specialization, compositional representations, prefrontal cortex, continual learning
MeSH terms
Brain, Cognition, Computer Simulation, Decision Making, Humans, Learning, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review