Cited by 14RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA regulation and disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structures of aberrant spliceosome intermediates on their way to disassembly

Open access
Soni, Komal, Horvath, Attila, Dybkov, Olexandr, Schwan, Merlin, Trakansuebkul, Sasanan, Flemming, Dirk, Wild, Klemens, Urlaub, Henning, Fischer, Tamás, Sinning, Irmgard·2025·Nature Structural & Molecular Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Intron removal during pre-mRNA splicing is of extraordinary complexity and its disruption causes a vast number of genetic diseases in humans 1 . While key steps of the canonical spliceosome cycle have been revealed by combined structure-function analyses 2,3 , structural information on an aberrant spliceosome committed to premature disassembly is not available. Here, we report two cryo-EM structures of post-B act spliceosome intermediates from S. pombe primed for disassembly. We identify the DEAH-box helicase – G patch protein pair (Gih35-Gpl1, homologous to human DHX35-GPATCH1) and show how it maintains catalytic dormancy. In both structures, Gpl1 recognizes a remodeled active site introduced by an over-stabilization of the U5 loop I interaction with the 5’ exon leading to a single nucleotide insertion at the 5’splice site. Remodeling is communicated to the spliceosome surface and the Ntr1 complex that mediates disassembly is recruited. Our data pave the way for a targeted analysis of splicing quality control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41594-024-01480-7

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. Brody, E. & Abelson, J. The ‘spliceosome’: yeast pre-messenger RNA associates with a 40S complex in a splicing-dependent reaction. Science 228, 963–967 (1985). · DOI
  2. Frendewey, D. & Keller, W. Stepwise assembly of a pre-mRNA splicing complex requires U-snRNPs and specific intron sequences. Cell 42, 355–367 (1985). · DOI
  3. Grabowski, P. J., Seiler, S. R. & Sharp, P. A. A multicomponent complex is involved in the splicing of messenger RNA precursors. Cell 42, 345–353 (1985). · DOI
  4. Shi, Y. Mechanistic insights into precursor messenger RNA splicing by the spliceosome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 655–670 (2017). · DOI
  5. Wilkinson, M. E., Charenton, C. & Nagai, K. RNA splicing by the spliceosome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 89, 359–388 (2020). · DOI
  6. Cordin, O. & Beggs, J. D. RNA helicases in splicing. RNA Biol. 10, 83–95 (2013). · DOI
  7. Cordin, O., Hahn, D. & Beggs, J. D. Structure, function and regulation of spliceosomal RNA helicases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 431–438 (2012). · DOI
  8. Xu, Y. Z. & Query, C. C. Competition between the ATPase Prp5 and branch region–U2 snRNA pairing modulates the fidelity of spliceosome assembly. Mol. Cell 28, 838–849 (2007). · DOI
  9. Chen, H. C., Tseng, C. K., Tsai, R. T., Chung, C. S. & Cheng, S. C. Link of NTR-mediated spliceosome disassembly with DEAH-box ATPases Prp2, Prp16, and Prp22. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 514–525 (2013). · DOI
  10. Wlodaver, A. M. & Staley, J. P. The DExD/H-box ATPase Prp2p destabilizes and proofreads the catalytic RNA core of the spliceosome. RNA 20, 282–294 (2014). · DOI
  11. Burgess, S. M. & Guthrie, C. A mechanism to enhance mRNA splicing fidelity: the RNA-dependent ATPase Prp16 governs usage of a discard pathway for aberrant lariat intermediates. Cell 73, 1377–1391 (1993). · DOI
  12. Koodathingal, P., Novak, T., Piccirilli, J. A. & Staley, J. P. The DEAH box ATPases Prp16 and Prp43 cooperate to proofread 5′ splice site cleavage during pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 39, 385–395 (2010). · DOI
  13. Mayas, R. M., Maita, H. & Staley, J. P. Exon ligation is proofread by the DExD/H-box ATPase Prp22p. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 482–490 (2006). · DOI
  14. Egecioglu, D. E. & Chanfreau, G. Proofreading and spellchecking: a two-tier strategy for pre-mRNA splicing quality control. RNA 17, 383–389 (2011). · DOI
  15. Fourmann, J. B. et al. Dissection of the factor requirements for spliceosome disassembly and the elucidation of its dissociation products using a purified splicing system. Genes Dev. 27, 413–428 (2013). · DOI
  16. Tsai, R. T. et al. Spliceosome disassembly catalyzed by Prp43 and its associated components Ntr1 and Ntr2. Genes Dev. 19, 2991–3003 (2005). · DOI
  17. Martin, A., Schneider, S. & Schwer, B. Prp43 is an essential RNA-dependent ATPase required for release of lariat-intron from the spliceosome. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17743–17750 (2002). · DOI
  18. Arenas, J. E. & Abelson, J. N. Prp43: an RNA helicase-like factor involved in spliceosome disassembly. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 11798–11802 (1997). · DOI
  19. Boon, K. L. et al. Yeast Ntr1/Spp382 mediates Prp43 function in postspliceosomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 6016–6023 (2006). · DOI
  20. Warkocki, Z. et al. The G-patch protein Spp2 couples the spliceosome-stimulated ATPase activity of the DEAH-box protein Prp2 to catalytic activation of the spliceosome. Genes Dev. 29, 94–107 (2015). · DOI
  21. Roy, J., Kim, K., Maddock, J. R., Anthony, J. G. & Woolford, J. L. Jr. The final stages of spliceosome maturation require Spp2p that can interact with the DEAH box protein Prp2p and promote step 1 of splicing. RNA 1, 375–390 (1995).
  22. Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. G-patch: a new conserved domain in eukaryotic RNA-processing proteins and type D retroviral polyproteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 342–344 (1999). · DOI
  23. Bohnsack, K. E., Ficner, R., Bohnsack, M. T. & Jonas, S. Regulation of DEAH-box RNA helicases by G-patch proteins. Biol. Chem. 402, 561–579 (2021). · DOI
  24. Lardelli, R. M., Thompson, J. X., Yates, J. R. 3rd & Stevens, S. W. Release of SF3 from the intron branchpoint activates the first step of pre-mRNA splicing. RNA 16, 516–528 (2010). · DOI
  25. Bao, P., Hobartner, C., Hartmuth, K. & Luhrmann, R. Yeast Prp2 liberates the 5′ splice site and the branch site adenosine for catalysis of pre-mRNA splicing. RNA 23, 1770–1779 (2017). · DOI
  26. Ohrt, T. et al. Prp2-mediated protein rearrangements at the catalytic core of the spliceosome as revealed by dcFCCS. RNA 18, 1244–1256 (2012). · DOI
  27. Fourmann, J. B. et al. The target of the DEAH-box NTP triphosphatase Prp43 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae spliceosomes is the U2 snRNP–intron interaction. eLife 5, e15564 (2016). · DOI
  28. Pandit, S., Lynn, B. & Rymond, B. C. Inhibition of a spliceosome turnover pathway suppresses splicing defects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13700–13705 (2006). · DOI
  29. Koodathingal, P. & Staley, J. P. Splicing fidelity: DEAD/H-box ATPases as molecular clocks. RNA Biol. 10, 1073–1079 (2013). · DOI
  30. Semlow, D. R. & Staley, J. P. Staying on message: ensuring fidelity in pre-mRNA splicing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37, 263–273 (2012). · DOI
  31. Mayas, R. M., Maita, H., Semlow, D. R. & Staley, J. P. Spliceosome discards intermediates via the DEAH box ATPase Prp43p. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10020–10025 (2010). · DOI
  32. Tsai, R. T. et al. Dynamic interactions of Ntr1–Ntr2 with Prp43 and with U5 govern the recruitment of Prp43 to mediate spliceosome disassembly. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 8027–8037 (2007). · DOI
  33. Fourmann, J. B., Tauchert, M. J., Ficner, R., Fabrizio, P. & Luhrmann, R. Regulation of Prp43-mediated disassembly of spliceosomes by its cofactors Ntr1 and Ntr2. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 4068–4080 (2017). · DOI
  34. Yan, C. et al. Structure of a yeast spliceosome at 3.6-angstrom resolution. Science 349, 1182–1191 (2015). · DOI
  35. Lee, N. N. et al. Mtr4-like protein coordinates nuclear RNA processing for heterochromatin assembly and for telomere maintenance. Cell 155, 1061–1074 (2013). · DOI
  36. Aronica, L. et al. The spliceosome-associated protein Nrl1 suppresses homologous recombination-dependent R-loop formation in fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 1703–1717 (2016). · DOI
  37. Zhou, Y. et al. The fission yeast MTREC complex targets CUTs and unspliced pre-mRNAs to the nuclear exosome. Nat. Commun. 6, 7050 (2015). · DOI
  38. Zhu, J. Identification and Characterization of the Fission Yeast Exosome Targeting Complexes: The MTREC and CNM Complexes. PhD thesis, Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg (2017).
  39. Cipakova, I. et al. Identification of proteins associated with splicing factors Ntr1, Ntr2, Brr2 and Gpl1 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cell Cycle 18, 1532–1536 (2019). · DOI
  40. Ren, L. et al. Systematic two-hybrid and comparative proteomic analyses reveal novel yeast pre-mRNA splicing factors connected to Prp19. PLoS ONE 6, e16719 (2011). · DOI
  41. Yan, C., Wan, R. & Shi, Y. Molecular mechanisms of pre-mRNA splicing through structural biology of the spliceosome. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, 291–323 (2019). · DOI
  42. De, I. et al. The RNA helicase Aquarius exhibits structural adaptations mediating its recruitment to spliceosomes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 138–144 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Dybkov, O. et al. Regulation of 3′ splice site selection after step 1 of splicing by spliceosomal C* proteins. Sci. Adv. 9, eadf1785 (2023). · DOI
  44. Zhan, X., Yan, C., Zhang, X., Lei, J. & Shi, Y. Structure of a human catalytic step I spliceosome. Science 359, 537–545 (2018). · DOI
  45. Wan, R., Yan, C., Bai, R., Lei, J. & Shi, Y. Structure of an intron lariat spliceosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 171, 120–132 (2017). · DOI
  46. Selicky, T. et al. Defining the functional interactome of spliceosome-associated G-patch protein Gpl1 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 12800 (2022). · DOI
  47. Larson, A., Fair, B. J. & Pleiss, J. A. Interconnections between RNA-processing pathways revealed by a sequencing-based genetic screen for pre-mRNA splicing mutants in fission yeast. G3 (Bethesda) 6, 1513–1523 (2016). · DOI
  48. Plaschka, C., Newman, A. J. & Nagai, K. Structural basis of nuclear pre-mRNA splicing: lessons from yeast. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 11, a032391 (2019). · DOI
  49. Rauhut, R. et al. Molecular architecture of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae activated spliceosome. Science 353, 1399–1405 (2016). · DOI
  50. Bai, R. et al. Mechanism of spliceosome remodeling by the ATPase/helicase Prp2 and its coactivator Spp2. Science 371, eabe8863 (2021). · DOI
  51. Galej, W. P. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the spliceosome immediately after branching. Nature 537, 197–201 (2016). · DOI
  52. Yan, C., Wan, R., Bai, R., Huang, G. & Shi, Y. Structure of a yeast step II catalytically activated spliceosome. Science 355, 149–155 (2017). · DOI
  53. Bai, R., Yan, C., Wan, R., Lei, J. & Shi, Y. Structure of the post-catalytic spliceosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 171, 1589–1598 (2017). · DOI
  54. Fica, S. M. et al. Structure of a spliceosome remodelled for exon ligation. Nature 542, 377–380 (2017). · DOI
  55. Liu, S. et al. Structure of the yeast spliceosomal postcatalytic P complex. Science 358, 1278–1283 (2017). · DOI
  56. Wilkinson, M. E. et al. Postcatalytic spliceosome structure reveals mechanism of 3′-splice site selection. Science 358, 1283–1288 (2017). · DOI
  57. Fica, S. M., Oubridge, C., Wilkinson, M. E., Newman, A. J. & Nagai, K. A human postcatalytic spliceosome structure reveals essential roles of metazoan factors for exon ligation. Science 363, 710–714 (2019). · DOI
  58. Zhang, X. et al. Structures of the human spliceosomes before and after release of the ligated exon. Cell Res. 29, 274–285 (2019). · DOI
  59. Studer, M. K., Ivanovic, L., Weber, M. E., Marti, S. & Jonas, S. Structural basis for DEAH-helicase activation by G-patch proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7159–7170 (2020). · DOI
  60. Hamann, F. et al. Structural analysis of the intrinsically disordered splicing factor Spp2 and its binding to the DEAH-box ATPase Prp2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2948–2956 (2020). · DOI
  61. Wilkinson, M. E., Fica, S. M., Galej, W. P. & Nagai, K. Structural basis for conformational equilibrium of the catalytic spliceosome. Mol. Cell 81, 1439–1452 (2021). · DOI
  62. Wan, R., Bai, R., Yan, C., Lei, J. & Shi, Y. Structures of the catalytically activated yeast spliceosome reveal the mechanism of branching. Cell 177, 339–351 (2019). · DOI
  63. Newman, A. J. & Norman, C. U5 snRNA interacts with exon sequences at 5′ and 3′ splice sites. Cell 68, 743–754 (1992). · DOI
  64. Sontheimer, E. J. & Steitz, J. A. The U5 and U6 small nuclear RNAs as active site components of the spliceosome. Science 262, 1989–1996 (1993). · DOI
  65. Kandels-Lewis, S. & Seraphin, B. Involvement of U6 snRNA in 5′ splice site selection. Science 262, 2035–2039 (1993). · DOI
  66. Lesser, C. F. & Guthrie, C. Mutations in U6 snRNA that alter splice site specificity: implications for the active site. Science 262, 1982–1988 (1993). · DOI
  67. Schmitzová, J., Cretu, C., Dienemann, C., Urlaub, H. & Pena, V. Structural basis of catalytic activation in human splicing. Nature 617, 842–850 (2023). · DOI
  68. Wu, N. Y. & Cheng, S. C. Functional analysis of Cwc24 ZF-domain in 5′ splice site selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 10327–10339 (2019). · DOI
  69. Wu, N. Y., Chung, C. S. & Cheng, S. C. Role of Cwc24 in the first catalytic step of splicing and fidelity of 5′ splice site selection. Mol. Cell. Biol. 37, e00580-16 (2017). · DOI
  70. Chung, C. S., Wai, H. L., Kao, C. Y. & Cheng, S. C. An ATP-independent role for Prp16 in promoting aberrant splicing. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 10815–10828 (2023). · DOI
  71. Ilagan, J. O., Chalkley, R. J., Burlingame, A. L. & Jurica, M. S. Rearrangements within human spliceosomes captured after exon ligation. RNA 19, 400–412 (2013). · DOI
  72. Sales-Lee, J. et al. Coupling of spliceosome complexity to intron diversity. Curr. Biol. 31, 4898–4910 (2021). · DOI
  73. Micic, J. et al. Ribosomal protein eL39 is important for maturation of the nascent polypeptide exit tunnel and proper protein folding during translation. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 6453–6473 (2022). · DOI
  74. Ishigami, Y., Ohira, T., Isokawa, Y., Suzuki, Y. & Suzuki, T. A single m6A modification in U6 snRNA diversifies exon sequence at the 5′ splice site. Nat. Commun. 12, 3244 (2021). · DOI
  75. Parker, M. T. et al. m6A modification of U6 snRNA modulates usage of two major classes of pre-mRNA 5′ splice site. eLife 11, e78808 (2022). · DOI
  76. Roost, C. et al. Structure and thermodynamics of N6-methyladenosine in RNA: a spring-loaded base modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2107–2115 (2015). · DOI
  77. Coltri, P. P., Dos Santos, M. G. P. & da Silva, G. H. G. Splicing and cancer: challenges and opportunities. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 10, e1527 (2019). · DOI
  78. Petibon, C., Malik Ghulam, M., Catala, M. & Abou Elela, S. Regulation of ribosomal protein genes: an ordered anarchy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 12, e1632 (2021). · DOI
  79. Watson, A. T., Garcia, V., Bone, N., Carr, A. M. & Armstrong, J. Gene tagging and gene replacement using recombinase-mediated cassette exchange in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene 407, 63–74 (2008). · DOI
  80. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018). · DOI
  81. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). · DOI
  82. Zhang, K. Gctf: real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016). · DOI
  83. Tegunov, D. & Cramer, P. Real-time cryo-electron microscopy data preprocessing with Warp. Nat. Methods 16, 1146–1152 (2019). · DOI
  84. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  85. Punjani, A., Brubaker, M. A. & Fleet, D. J. Building proteins in a day: efficient 3D molecular structure estimation with electron cryomicroscopy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39, 706–718 (2017). · DOI
  86. Grant, T., Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing. eLife 7, e35383 (2018). · DOI
  87. Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in PHENIX. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  88. Waterhouse, A. et al. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018). · DOI
  89. Bertram, K. et al. Cryo-EM structure of a human spliceosome activated for step 2 of splicing. Nature 542, 318–323 (2017). · DOI
  90. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004). · DOI
  91. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  92. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011). · DOI
  93. Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  94. Buchan, D. W. A. & Jones, D. T. The PSIPRED protein analysis workbench: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W402–W407 (2019). · DOI
  95. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 12–21 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  96. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021). · DOI
  97. Chen, Z. L. et al. A high-speed search engine pLink 2 with systematic evaluation for proteome-scale identification of cross-linked peptides. Nat. Commun. 10, 3404 (2019). · DOI
  98. Kim, D., Paggi, J. M., Park, C., Bennett, C. & Salzberg, S. L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 907–915 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  99. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  100. Ramirez, F., Dundar, F., Diehl, S., Gruning, B. A. & Manke, T. deepTools: a flexible platform for exploring deep-sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W187–W191 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  101. Burke, J. E. et al. Spliceosome profiling visualizes operations of a dynamic RNP at nucleotide resolution. Cell 173, 1014–1030 (2018). · DOI
  102. Charif, D. & Lobry, J. R. SeqinR 1.0-2: a contributed package to the R project for statistical computing devoted to biological sequences retrieval and analysis. In Structural Approaches to Sequence Evolution: Molecules, Networks, Populations (eds Bastolla, U., Porto, M., Eduardo Roman, H. & Vendruscolo, M.) (2007). · DOI
  103. Haider, S. et al. A bedr way of genomic interval processing. Source Code Biol. Med. 11, 1–7 (2016). · DOI
  104. Studier, F. W. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234 (2005). · DOI
  105. Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Soni, K., Horvath, A., Dybkov, O., Schwan, M., Trakansuebkul, S., Flemming, D., Wild, K., Urlaub, H., Fischer, T., & Sinning, I.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences (DE)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Soni, Komal
  • Fischer, Tamás
  • Sinning, Irmgard
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Published
2025-01-20
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
914-925
ISSN
  • 1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9993
OpenAlex
W4406633361
Cited by
14
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (35/1597‐1, INST 35/1597-1, INST 35/1314-1 FUGG., INST35/1503‐1FUGG, TRR319, INST35/1597‐1FUGG, INST 35/1314‐1, SI 586/6-1, 35/1597-1 FUGG, 35/1503-1, 35/1503-1 FUGG, 439669440, 35/1314-1 FUGG, TP-B03, INST 35/1503‐1, 35/1314-1)
  • Australian Research Council (DP190100423, DP240102611)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
spliceosome, pre-mRNA splicing, spliceosome disassembly, DEAH-box helicase, 5' splice site, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, cryo-EM structure
MeSH terms
Humans, Introns, Models, Molecular, RNA Precursors, RNA Splicing, Schizosaccharomyces, Spliceosomes, Catalytic Domain, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, DEAD-box RNA Helicases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review