Cited by 63Climate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate variability and modelsClimate Change and Geoengineering

Constraints on global temperature target overshoot

Open access
Ricke, K. L., Millar, R. J., MacMartin, D. G.·2017·Scientific Reports

Abstract

In the aftermath of the Paris Agreement, the climate science and policy communities are beginning to assess the feasibility and potential benefits of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C above preindustrial. Understanding the dependence of the magnitude and duration of possible temporary exceedance (i.e., “overshoot”) of temperature targets on sustainable energy decarbonization futures and carbon dioxide (CO 2) removal rates will be an important contribution to this policy discussion. Drawing upon results from the mitigation literature and the IPCC Working Group 3 (WG3) scenario database, we examine the global mean temperature implications of differing, independent pathways for the decarbonization of global energy supply and the implementation of negative emissions technologies. We find that within the scope of scenarios broadly-consistent with the WG3 database, the magnitude of temperature overshoot is more sensitive to the rate of decarbonization. However, limiting the duration of overshoot to less than two centuries requires ambitious deployment of both decarbonization and negative emissions technology. The dependencies of temperature target overshoot’s properties upon currently untested negative emissions technologies suggests that it will be important to consider how climate impacts depend on both the magnitude and duration of overshoot, not just long term residual warming.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-017-14503-9

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional mitigation technologies are well established and carry an acceptable level of managed risk.

    “Most of these technologies are well established and carry an acceptable level of managed risk (Ricke et al. 2017;Victor et al. 2018;Bataille et al. 2018;Mathy et al. 2018;Shinnar and Citro 2008;Bustreo et al. 2019).”

    From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Ricke et al. 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Board, O. S. & others. Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. (National Academies Press, 2015).
  2. [26]Board, O. S., Council, N. R. & others. Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. (National Academies Press, 2015).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ricke, K. L., Millar, R. J., & MacMartin, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Ricke, K. L.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2017-11-07
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
14743-14743
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767011636
Cited by
63
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future , Cornell University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
Keywords
temperature overshoot, 1.5°C target, 2°C target, energy decarbonization, negative emissions technologies, carbon dioxide removal, global mean temperature, climate change mitigation scenarios, Paris Agreement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review