Cited by 29Infant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Carbohydrate Syntrophy enhances the establishment of Bifidobacterium breve UCC2003 in the neonatal gut

Open access
O’Connell Motherway, Mary, O’Brien, Frances, O’Driscoll, Tara, Casey, Patrick G., Shanahan, Fergus, van Sinderen, Douwe·2018·Scientific Reports

Abstract

The non-digestible oligosaccharide fraction of maternal milk represents an important of carbohydrate and energy source for saccharolytic bifidobacteria in the gastrointestinal tract during early life. However, not all neonatal bifidobacteria isolates can directly metabolise the complex sialylated, fucosylated, sulphated and/or N-acetylglucosamine-containing oligosaccharide structures present in mothers milk. For some bifidobacterial strains, efficient carbohydrate syntrophy or crossfeeding is key to their establishment in the gut. In this study, we have adopted advanced functional genomic approaches to create single and double in-frame deletions of the N-acetyl glucosamine 6-phosphate deacetylase encoding genes, nagA1 and nagA2 , of B . breve UCC2003. In vitro phenotypic analysis followed by in vivo studies on co-colonisation, mother to infant transmission, and evaluation of the relative co-establishment of B . bifidum and B . breve UCC2003 or UCC2003ΔnagA1ΔnagA2 in dam-reared neonatal mice demonstrates the importance of crossfeeding on sialic acid, fucose and N-acetylglucosamine-containing oligosaccharides for the establishment of B . breve UCC2003 in the neonatal gut. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis of in vivo gene expression shows upregulation of genes associated with the utilisation of lactose, sialic acid, GlcNAc-6-S and fucose in B . breve UCC2003, while for UCC2003ΔnagA1ΔnagA2 only genes for lactose metabolism were upregulated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-018-29034-0

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The probiotic B. bifidum likely facilitated the establishment of these beneficial Bifidobacterium species through cross-feeding on HMOs, promoting a microbiome composition more similar to that of term infants.

    “The probiotic B. bifidum likely facilitated the establishment of these beneficial species through cross-feeding on HMOs54,55, promoting a microbiome composition more similar to that of term infants.”

    From Impact of early life antibiotic and probiotic treatment on gut microbiome and resistome of very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that carbohydrate cross-feeding helped B. breve UCC2003 establish in dam-reared neonatal mice co-colonised with B. bifidum PAM5. The study does not show that a B. bifidum probiotic promoted the establishment of multiple beneficial species in human infants or made their microbiomes more similar to those of term infants. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Connell Motherway, M., O’Brien, F., O’Driscoll, T., Casey, P. G., Shanahan, F., & van Sinderen, D.
Affiliations
National University of Ireland (IE)
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2018-07-13
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
10627-10627
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2841881125
Cited by
29
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Science Foundation Ireland (SFI/12/RC/, 12/RC/2273, 12/RC/, SFI/12/RC/2273.)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
sialic acid metabolism, fucose metabolism, N-acetylglucosamine metabolism, Bifidobacterium bifidum, mother-to-child transmission, lactose metabolism
MeSH terms
Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Bacterial Proteins, Female, Lactose, Milk, Oligosaccharides, Symbiosis, Up-Regulation, N-Acetylneuraminic Acid, Gene Expression Profiling, Gastrointestinal Tract, alpha-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review