Cited by 18Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

Ultrasound powered implants: design, performance considerations and simulation results

Open access
Rosa, Bruno Miguel Gil, Yang, Guang-Zhong·2020·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Ultrasounds (US) has been used in the past decades as a non-invasive imaging modality. Although employed extensively in clinical applications for soft tissue imaging, the acoustic beams can also be used for sensing and actuation for biological implants. In this paper we present a unified three dimensional (3D) computational framework to simulate the performance and response of deeply implanted devices to US stimulation and composed by a double piezoelectric layer with different material composition and configurations. The model combines the temporally-invariant distribution of the scattered pressure field arising from the presence of scatterers and attenuators in the domain of simulation, with the time-delay propagation of waves caused by refraction, to solve the Forward Problem in US within the breast and lower abdominal regions. It was found that a lens-shaped implant produces higher peak echoes in the breast for frequencies ≤ 6 MHz whereas, in the liver, similar strengths are obtained for the lens and disk-shaped implants in the higher spectrum. Regarding material composition, a combination of LiNbO 3 with PZT-5A yielded higher amplitude signals, when the double layer thickness is comparable to the wavelength of excitation. Experimental validation of the proposed model was carried out in the presence of a synthetic anatomical phantom of the breast and water tank to investigate the acoustic signals generated by disk-shaped implants when stimulated by external US sources in the harmonic and impulsive regimes of wave propagation. The implantation of a double piezoelectric layer inside the human body can, in the future, provide a high resolution system for the detection of surgical site infection as well as tumour growth and other systemic inflammatory responses originating deeply in soft tissues.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-020-63097-2

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ultrasound is generally considered safe due to its non-ionizing nature.

    “Ultrasound, widely utilized in various medical applications, is generally considered safe due to its non-ionizing nature (Seo et al., 2015; Rosa and Yang, 2020).”

    From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Rosa and Yang, 2020

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes ultrasound as widely used in diagnostic and therapeutic applications and discusses operating within safe biological limits. It does not say that ultrasound is generally considered safe because it is non-ionizing, so the stated reason for safety is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosa, B. M. G., & Yang, G.-Z.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Rosa, Bruno Miguel Gil
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2020-04-16
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
6537-6537
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016310507
Cited by
18
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
RCUK | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L014149/1, EP/R026092/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
piezoelectric layers, lithium niobate, PZT-5A, acoustic scattering, breast tissue, liver tissue, acoustic attenuation, soft tissue imaging
MeSH terms
Acoustics, Breast, Computer Simulation, Electricity, Female, Humans, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Prosthesis Design, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Transducers, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Phantoms, Imaging, Prostheses and Implants, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review