Cited by 20Gut microbiota and healthAntibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Third generation cephalosporins and piperacillin/tazobactam have distinct impacts on the microbiota of critically ill patients

Open access
Gamage, Hasinika K. A. H., Venturini, Carola, Tetu, Sasha G., Kabir, Masrura, Nayyar, Vineet, Ginn, Andrew N., Roychoudhry, Belinda, Thomas, Lee +6 more·2021·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Effective implementation of antibiotic stewardship, especially in critical care, is limited by a lack of direct comparative investigations on how different antibiotics impact the microbiota and antibiotic resistance rates. We investigated the impact of two commonly used antibiotics, third-generation cephalosporins (3GC) and piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) on the endotracheal, perineal and faecal microbiota of intensive care patients in Australia. Patients exposed to either 3GC, TZP, or no β-lactams (control group) were sampled over time and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing was performed to examine microbiota diversity and composition. While neither treatment significantly affected diversity, numerous changes to microbiota composition were associated with each treatment. The shifts in microbiota composition associated with 3GC exposure differed from those observed with TZP, consistent with previous reports in animal models. This included a significant increase in Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae abundance in endotracheal and perineal microbiota for those administered 3GC compared to the control group. Culture-based analyses did not identify any significant changes in the prevalence of specific pathogenic or antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Exposure to clinical antibiotics has previously been linked to reduced microbiota diversity and increased antimicrobial resistance, but our results indicate that these effects may not be immediately apparent after short-term real-world exposures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-021-85946-4

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Center-specific differences in broad-spectrum antibiotic use, with cefepime only administered in US patients, could confound microbiome signatures given its narrower antimicrobial spectrum.

    “Of note in our study, we observed center-specific differences in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Specifically, cefepime was only administered in US patients, which could confound microbiome signatures given its narrower anti-microbial activity spectrum as compared to other high-risk antibiotics43.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gamage, H. K. A. H., Venturini, C., Tetu, S. G., Kabir, M., Nayyar, V., Ginn, A. N., Roychoudhry, B., Thomas, L., Brown, M., Holmes, A., Partridge, S. R., Seppelt, I., Paulsen, I. T., & Iredell, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • NSW Health Pathology (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Paulsen, Ian T.
  • Iredell, Jonathan R.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2021-03-31
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
7252-7252
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3148546398
Cited by
20
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (1046889)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
third-generation cephalosporins, piperacillin-tazobactam, gut microbiota, critically ill patients, intensive care, antibiotic stewardship, fecal microbiota, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcaceae, microbiome diversity, antibiotic resistance, beta-lactam antibiotics
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination, Adult, Animals, Cephalosporins, Enterobacteriaceae, Female, Humans, Male, RNA, Bacterial, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Critical Illness, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review