Cited by 14Reproductive tract infections researchUrinary Tract Infections ManagementEscherichia coli research studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Urogenital colonization and pathogenicity of E. Coli in the vaginal microbiota during pregnancy

Open access
Boutouchent, Nassim, Vu, Thi Ngoc Anh, Landraud, Luce, Kennedy, Sean P.·2024·Scientific Reports

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract This study explores the role of the vaginal microbiota (VM) in the pathophysiology of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), which requires systematic screening and antibiotic treatment during pregnancy. We hypothesize that disruptions in the VM composition may promote the ascending colonization of bacteria from the gut to the urinary tract, reinforcing the existence of a gut-urogenital axis. A healthy VM is typically characterized by low diversity and is dominated by lactic acid-producing species, notably those from the Lactobacillus genus. Diversity analyses of whole genomes metagenomic sequencing data from 1,553 pregnant women revealed a metagenomic signature characterized by an increase in phylogenetic diversity within the VM during ASB. This shift includes both a decrease in lactobacilli and an increase in the abundance of taxa associated with the gut microbiota, particularly Enterobacterales, with a substantial rise in Escherichia coli abundance. Worldwide, E. coli remains the most common etiological agent of bacteriuria during pregnancy and also a major causative agent of newborn infections. Given its importance and the limited data on its characterization within the VM during pregnancy, we performed genomic assembly and analysis of this species from pregnant women of this cohort. Molecular typing and antimicrobial resistance characterization of 72 assembled E. coli genomes revealed a genomic signature of Extra-Intestinal pathogenic E. coli (“ExPEC”) strains, which are involved in various extraintestinal infections such as urinary tract infections, newborn infections and bacteremia. Moreover, the presence of this species in the vaginal environment was associated with a substantial variation of the microbial diversity, primarily marked by a decrease in abundance of Lactobacillus species. Overall, our study shows how disruption in key bacterial group within the VM can disrupt its stability, potentially leading to the colonization by opportunistic pathogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41598-024-76438-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Flores-Mireles, A. L., Walker, J. N., Caparon, M. & Hultgren, S. J. Urinary tract infections: Epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 269–284 (2015). · DOI
  2. Ansaldi, Y., Martinez, T. & Weber, B. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. S1198743X22004311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.015 (2022). · DOI
  3. Nicolle, L. E. et al. Clinical practice Guideline for the management of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: 2019 update by the infectious diseases Society of Americaa. Clin. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy1121 (2019). · DOI
  4. Kalinderi, K., Delkos, D., Kalinderis, M., Athanasiadis, A. & Kalogiannidis, I. Urinary tract infection during pregnancy: Current concepts on a common multifaceted problem. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 38, 448–453 (2018). · DOI
  5. Wingert, A. et al. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: Systematic reviews of screening and treatment effectiveness and patient preferences. BMJ Open. 9, e021347 (2019). · DOI
  6. Corrales, M., Corrales-Acosta, E. & Corrales-Riveros, J. G. Which antibiotic for urinary tract infections in pregnancy? A literature review of International guidelines. JCM. 11, 7226 (2022). · DOI
  7. Farfour, E. et al. Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterobacterales recovered from urinary tract infections in France. Pathogens. 11, 356 (2022). · DOI
  8. Dunne, M. W., Aronin, S. I., Yu, K. C., Watts, J. A. & Gupta, V. A multicenter analysis of trends in resistance in urinary Enterobacterales isolates from ambulatory patients in the United States: 2011–2020. BMC Infect. Dis. 22, 194 (2022). · DOI
  9. Belete, M. A. & Saravanan, M. A. Systematic review on drug resistant urinary tract infection among pregnant women in developing countries in Africa and Asia; 2005–2016. IDR. 13, 1465–1477 (2020). · DOI
  10. Kaper, J. B., Nataro, J. P. & Mobley, H. L. T. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 123–140 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Denamur, E., Clermont, O., Bonacorsi, S. & Gordon, D. The population genetics of pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 37–54 (2021). · DOI
  12. Clermont, O., Christenson, J. K., Denamur, E. & Gordon, D. M. The C lermont E scherichia coli phylo-typing method revisited: Improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo‐groups. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5, 58–65 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Beghain, J., Bridier-Nahmias, A., Le Nagard, H., Denamur, E. & Clermont, O. ClermonTyping: An easy-to-use and accurate in silico method for Escherichia Genus strain phylotyping. Microb. Genomics 4, (2018). · DOI
  14. Sannes, M. R., Kuskowski, M. A., Owens, K., Gajewski, A. & Johnson, J. R. Virulence factor profiles and phylogenetic background of Escherichia coli isolates from veterans with bacteremia and uninfected control subjects. J. INFECT. DIS. 190, 2121–2128 (2004). · DOI
  15. Malaure, C. et al. Early-onset infection caused by Escherichia coli sequence type 1193 in late Preterm and full-term neonates. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 30, 20–28 (2024). · DOI
  16. Brzuszkiewicz, E. et al. How to become a uropathogen: Comparative genomic analysis of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 103, 12879–12884 (2006). · DOI
  17. Schreiber, H. L. et al. Bacterial virulence phenotypes of Escherichia coli and host susceptibility determine risk for urinary tract infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 9, eaaf1283 (2017). · DOI
  18. Tamadonfar, K. O., Omattage, N. S., Spaulding, C. N. & Hultgren, S. J. Reaching the end of the line: Urinary tract infections. Microbiol. Spectr. 7, 7.3.17. (2019). · DOI
  19. Meštrović, T. et al. The role of gut, Vaginal, and urinary microbiome in urinary tract infections: From bench to Bedside. Diagnostics. 11, 7 (2020). · DOI
  20. Magruder, M. et al. Gut uropathogen abundance is a risk factor for development of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection. Nat. Commun. 10, 5521 (2019). · DOI
  21. Brannon, J. R. et al. Invasion of vaginal epithelial cells by uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 11, 2803 (2020). · DOI
  22. Zhu, B., Tao, Z., Edupuganti, L., Serrano, M. G. & Buck, G. A. Roles of the microbiota of the female reproductive tract in gynecological and reproductive health. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 86, e00181–e00121 (2022). · DOI
  23. France, M., Alizadeh, M., Brown, S., Ma, B. & Ravel, J. Towards a deeper understanding of the vaginal microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 367–378 (2022). · DOI
  24. Ma, B., Forney, L. J. & Ravel, J. Vaginal microbiome: Rethinking health and disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 66, 371–389 (2012). · DOI
  25. Ng, S. et al. Large-scale characterisation of the pregnancy vaginal microbiome and sialidase activity in a low-risk Chinese population. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 7, 89 (2021). · DOI
  26. Ravel, J. et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 108, 4680–4687 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  27. France, M. T. et al. VALENCIA: A nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome. 8, 166 (2020). · DOI
  28. Spear, G. T. et al. Human α-amylase Present in Lower-Genital-Tract Mucosal fluid processes glycogen to support vaginal colonization by Lactobacillus. J. Infect. Dis. 210, 1019–1028 (2014). · DOI
  29. Chee, W. J. Y., Chew, S. Y. & Than, L. T. L. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb. Cell. Fact. 19, 203 (2020). · DOI
  30. Zheng, N., Guo, R., Wang, J., Zhou, W. & Ling, Z. Contribution of Lactobacillus iners to Vaginal Health and diseases: A systematic review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 792787 (2021). · DOI
  31. Petrova, M. I., Reid, G., Vaneechoutte, M. & Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus iners: Friend or foe? Trends Microbiol. 25, 182–191 (2017). · DOI
  32. Chen, X., Lu, Y., Chen, T. & Li, R. The female vaginal microbiome in Health and bacterial vaginosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 631972 (2021). · DOI
  33. Romero, R. et al. The vaginal microbiota of pregnant women varies with gestational age, maternal age, and parity. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, e03429–e03422 (2023). · DOI
  34. Stapleton, A. E. The vaginal microbiota and urinary tract infection. Microbiol. Spectr. 4, 4.6.37. (2016). · DOI
  35. Lewis, A. L. & Gilbert, N. M. Roles of the vagina and the vaginal microbiota in urinary tract infection: Evidence from clinical correlations and experimental models. GMS Infect. Dis., 8:Doc02 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3205/ID000046 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Dominoni, M. et al. Microbiota ecosystem in recurrent cystitis and the immunological microenvironment of urothelium. Healthcare. 11, 525 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hillebrand, L., Harmanli, O. H., Whiteman, V. & Khandelwal, M. Urinary tract infections in pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 186, 916–917 (2002). · DOI
  38. Gupta, K. et al. Inverse Association of H2O2-Producing Lactobacilli and Vaginal Escherichia coli colonization in women with recurrent urinary tract infections. J. Infect. Dis. 178, 446–450 (1998). · DOI
  39. Stamey, T. A. & Sexton, C. C. The role of Vaginal colonization with Enterobacteriaceae in recurrent urinary infections. J. Urol. 113, 214–217 (1975). · DOI
  40. Baud, A. et al. Microbial diversity in the vaginal microbiota and its link to pregnancy outcomes. Sci. Rep. 13, 9061 (2023). · DOI
  41. Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019). · DOI
  42. Baud, A. & Kennedy, S. P. Targeted metagenomic databases provide improved analysis of Microbiota samples. Microorganisms. 12, 135 (2024). · DOI
  43. Lu, J., Breitwieser, F. P., Thielen, P. & Salzberg, S. L. Bracken: Estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e104 (2017). · DOI
  44. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of Fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  45. Friedman, J. & Alm, E. J. Inferring correlation networks from genomic Survey Data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002687 (2012). · DOI
  46. Watts, S. C., Ritchie, S. C., Inouye, M. & Holt, K. E. FastSpar: Rapid and scalable correlation estimation for compositional data. Bioinformatics. 35, 1064–1066 (2019). · DOI
  47. Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Letunic, I. & Bork Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v6: Recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. gkae268https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkae268 (2024). · DOI
  49. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012). · DOI
  51. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 30, 2068–2069 (2014). · DOI
  52. Tonkin-Hill, G. et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 21, 180 (2020). · DOI
  53. Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Larsen, M. V. et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced Bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 1355–1361 (2012). · DOI
  56. Florensa, A. F., Kaas, R. S., Clausen, P. T. L. C., Aytan-Aktug, D. & Aarestrup, F. M. ResFinder – an open online resource for identification of antimicrobial resistance genes in next-generation sequencing data and prediction of phenotypes from genotypes. Microb. Genomics 8, (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  57. Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992). · DOI
  58. Lozupone, C., Lladser, M. E., Knights, D., Stombaugh, J. & Knight, R. UniFrac: An effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 5, 169–172 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  59. Bray, J. R. & Curtis, J. T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol. Monogr. 27, 325–349 (1957). · DOI
  60. Lithgow, K. V. et al. Protease activities of vaginal Porphyromonas species disrupt coagulation and extracellular matrix in the cervicovaginal niche. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes. 8, 8 (2022). · DOI
  61. Blattner, F. R. et al. The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12. Science. 277, 1453–1462 (1997). · DOI
  62. Manges, A. R. et al. Global extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) lineages. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 32, e00135–e00118 (2019). · DOI
  63. Pigeon, R. P. & Silver, R. P. Topological and mutational analysis of KpsM, the hydrophobic component of the ABC-transporter involved in the export of polysialic acid in Escherichia coli K1. Mol. Microbiol. 14, 871–881 (1994). · DOI
  64. Salverda, M. L. M., De Visser, J. A. G. M. & Barlow, M. Natural evolution of TEM-1 β-lactamase: Experimental reconstruction and clinical relevance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34, 1015–1036 (2010). · DOI
  65. Kervinen, K. et al. Parity and gestational age are associated with vaginal microbiota composition in term and late term pregnancies. eBioMedicine. 81, 104107 (2022). · DOI
  66. Lebeer, S. et al. A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 2183–2195 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  67. Power, M. E. et al. Challenges in the Quest for keystones. BioScience. 46, 609–620 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
  68. Amit, G. & Bashan, A. Top-down identification of keystone taxa in the microbiome. Nat. Commun. 14, 3951 (2023). · DOI
  69. Navas-Nacher, E. L. et al. Relatedness of Escherichia coli Colonizing women longitudinally. Mol. Urol. 5, 31–36 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  70. Pitout, J. D. D., Peirano, G., Chen, L., DeVinney, R. & Matsumura, Y. Escherichia coli ST1193: Following in the footsteps of E. Coli ST131. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 66, e00511–e00522 (2022). · DOI
  71. Wyrsch, E. R., Bushell, R. N., Marenda, M. S., Browning, G. F. & Djordjevic, S. P. Global phylogeny and F virulence plasmid carriage in Pandemic Escherichia coli ST1193. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, e02554–e02522 (2022). · DOI
  72. Spaulding, C. N. et al. Selective depletion of uropathogenic E. Coli from the gut by a FimH antagonist. Nature. 546, 528–532 (2017). · DOI
  73. Lapidus, A. L. & Korobeynikov, A. I. Metagenomic data assembly – The way of decoding unknown microorganisms. Front. Microbiol. 12, 613791 (2021). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Boutouchent, N., Vu, T. N. A., Landraud, L., & Kennedy, S. P.
Affiliations
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
  • Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VN)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Sean P.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-10-26
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
25523-25523
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403784999
Cited by
14
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University Hospital of Rouen Normandy (Bourse Année Recherche (BAR) 2023-24)
  • Programme d’Investissements d’avenir and BPIfrance (DOS0053477 SUB & DOS0053473 AR)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Escherichia coli research studies
Keywords
Escherichia coli, vaginal microbiota, asymptomatic bacteriuria, pregnancy, Lactobacillus, vaginal dysbiosis, extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli, antimicrobial resistance, metagenome-assembled genomes, neonatal infection, Enterobacterales
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacteriuria, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Infections, Female, Humans, Lactobacillus, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Vagina, Genome, Bacterial, Reproductive Tract Infections, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review