Cited by 162Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Influence of skin type and wavelength on light wave reflectance

Fallow, Bennett A., Tarumi, Takashi, Tanaka, Hirofumi·2013·Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Abstract

Purpose A new application of photoplethysmography (PPG) has emerged recently to provide the possibility of heart rate monitoring without a telemetric chest strap. The aim of this study was to determine if a new device could detect pulsation over a broad range of skin types, and what light wavelength would be most suitable for detecting the signals. A light emitting diode-based PPG system was used to detect changes in pulsatile blood flow on 23 apparently healthy individuals (11 male and 12 female, 20-59 years old) of varying skin types classified according to a questionnaire in combination with digital photographs with a skin type chart. Four different light wavelengths (470, 520, 630, and 880 nm) were tested. Normalized modulation level is calculated as the AC/DC component ratio and represents the change in flow over the underlying constant state of flow or perfusion.Results In the resting condition, green light wavelength (520 nm) displayed greater modulation (p < 0.001) than all the other wavelengths analyzed regardless of skin types. Type V (dark brown) skin type was significantly lower in modulation than all other skin types. In the exercise condition, both blue (470 nm) and green (520 nm) light wavelengths displayed greater signal-to-noise ratios than red (630 nm) or infrared (880 nm) light wavelengths (p < 0.001).Conclusions We concluded that a PPG-based device can detect pulsation across all skin types and that a greater resolution was obtained using a green light wavelength at rest and a green or blue light wavelength during exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10877-013-9436-7

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fallow, B. A., Tarumi, T., & Tanaka, H.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Tanaka, Hirofumi
Venue
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
Published
2013-02-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
313-317
ISSN
  • 1387-1307 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2614
OpenAlex
W2066932506
Cited by
162
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Omron Healthcare
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
photoplethysmography, skin type, light wavelength, heart rate monitoring, pulsatile blood flow, signal-to-noise ratio, physical activity, green light, blue light, infrared radiation, skin pigmentation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Light, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Skin, Skin Pigmentation, Exercise, Photoplethysmography, Optical Phenomena, Young Adult, Signal-To-Noise Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review