Cited by 62Ethics and Social Impacts of AIEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsCybernetics and Technology in Society

What kind of trust does AI deserve, if any?

Alvarado, Ramón·2023·AI and Ethics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s43681-022-00224-x

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trust is an overarching theme that arises in all previously discussed topics and the development and deployment of AI generally.

    “Trust is an overarching theme that arises in all previously discussed topics and the development and deployment of AI generally [5, 138, 139, 145, 146].”
  • The opacity of AI systems is ethically problematic because we cannot trust them if even the best experts do not completely understand how they work.

    “The opacity of AI systems is ethically problematic because one might argue that we should not use these devices if we cannot trust them, and we cannot trust them if even the best experts do not completely understand how they work [6, 7, 39, 47, 63, 186].”
  • Making AI explainable does not completely solve the black box problem but it can play a key role in promoting transparency, accountability, and trust.

    “making AI explainable does not completely solve the black box problem but it can play a key role in promoting transparency, accountability, and trust [7, 9].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alvarado, R.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Alvarado, Ramón
Venue
AI and Ethics
Published
2022-11-07
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
1169-1183
ISSN
  • 2730-5953 (ISSN-L)
  • 2730-5961
OpenAlex
W4309334973
Cited by
60
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AI and Ethics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
trust in AI, epistemic trust, interpersonal trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review