Cited by 101Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Methylphenidate Increases Cortical Excitability via Activation of Alpha-2 Noradrenergic Receptors

Open access
Andrews, Glenn D, Lavin, Antonieta·2006·Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Although methylphenidate (MPH), a catecholaminergic reuptake blocker, is prescribed for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, there is a dearth of information regarding the cellular basis of its actions. To address this issue, we used whole-cell patch-clamp recordings to investigate the roles of various catecholamine receptors in MPH-induced changes in cortical neuron excitability. We bath-applied dopamine or noradrenaline receptor antagonists in combination with MPH to pyramidal cells located in deep layers of the infralimbic and prelimbic prefrontal cortices. Application of MPH (10 microM) by itself increased cortical cell excitability in slices obtained from juvenile rats. This MPH-mediated increase in excitability was lost when catecholamines were depleted with reserpine prior to recording, demonstrating the requirement for a presynaptic monoamine component. Antagonist studies further revealed that stimulation of alpha-2 noradrenergic receptors mediates the MPH-induced increase in intrinsic excitability. Dopamine D1 receptors played no observable role in the actions of MPH. We therefore propose that MPH is acting to increase catecholaminergic tone in the PFC, and thereby increases cortical excitability by mediating the disinhibition of pyramidal cells through mechanisms that may include activation of alpha-2 adrenoreceptors located in interneurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.npp.1300818

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, G. D., & Lavin, A.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2005-07-06
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
594-601
ISSN
  • 0893-133X (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-634X
OpenAlex
W2018418849
Cited by
101
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (14698)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA014698, R56DA014698, DA 14698)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
methylphenidate, alpha2-adrenoceptors, cortical excitability, prefrontal cortex, pyramidal neurons, catecholamine depletion, reserpine, dopamine D1 receptor, norepinephrine, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, disinhibition, interneurons
MeSH terms
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists, Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Catecholamines, Cerebral Cortex, Dopamine, Electrophysiology, Male, Methylphenidate, Nerve Net, Norepinephrine, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2, Dopamine Agonists, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review