Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibition of E6 induced degradation of p53 is not sufficient for stabilization of p53 protein in cervical tumour derived cell lines

Mantovani, Fiamma, Banks, Lawrence·1999·Oncogene

Abstract

The E6 proteins derived from tumour associated papillomavirus types target the cellular tumour suppressor protein p53 for ubiquitin mediated degradation. In cell lines derived from cervical tumours the p53 protein is present in very low amounts, but it can be activated by appropriate DNA damaging agents, indicating that functional p53 is present within these lines. Recent studies have also shown that different polymorphic forms of the p53 protein are differentially susceptible to E6 mediated degradation. Therefore we have been interested in analysing the effects of different HPV E6 proteins upon p53 levels in a variety of cervical tumour derived cell lines. We show that inhibition of E6 mediated degradation of p53 frequently results in increased levels of p53 expression. However, there are notable exceptions to this where increased p53 levels are only obtained following DNA damage and proteasome inhibition. We also show in E6 expressing cells, that as well as p53 being targeted for degradation, the localization of p53 to the nucleus is also inhibited, consistent with previous observations which indicate that degradation of p53 is not essential for E6 mediated inhibition of p53 function. These results have important implications for any potential therapies which might aim to block E6 mediated degradation of p53.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1202688

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Androphy EJ, Hubbert NL, Schiller JT and Lowy DR. . 1987 EMBO J. 6: 989–992. · DOI
  2. Bandara LR, Adamczewski JP, Hunt T and La Thangue NB. . 1991 Nature 352: 249–251. · DOI
  3. Banks L, Matlashewski G and Crawford L. . 1986 Eur. J. Biochem. 159: 529–534. · DOI
  4. Banks L, Spence P, Androphy E, Hubbert N, Matlashewski G, Murray A and Crawford L. . 1987 J. Gen. Virol. 68: 1351–1359. · DOI
  5. Crook T, Morgenstern JP, Crawford L and Banks L. . 1989 EMBO J. 8: 513–519. · DOI
  6. Crook T, Tidy JA and Vousden KH. . 1991 Cell 67: 547–556. · DOI
  7. Crook T, Parker GA, Rozycka M, Crossland S and Allday M. . 1998 Oncogene 16: 1429–1441. · DOI
  8. Davies R, Hicks R, Crook T, Morris J and Vousden KH. . 1993 J. Virol. 67: 2521–2528. · DOI
  9. Demers GW, Foster SA, Halbert CL and Galloway DA. . 1994 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 4382–4386. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dyson N, Howley PM, Munger K and Harlow E. . 1989 Science 243: 934–936. · DOI · Paper page
  11. El-Deiry WS, Tokino T, Velculescu VE, Levy DB, Parsons R, Trent JM, Lin D, Mercer WE, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B. . 1993 Cell 75: 817–825. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Haupt Y, Maya R, Kazaz A and Oren M. . 1997 Nature 387: 296–299. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M and Howley PM. . 1993 Mol. Cell. Biol. 13: 4918–4927. · DOI
  14. Kubbutat MH, Jones SN and Vousden KH. . 1997 Nature 387: 299–303. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lechner MS, Mack DH, Finicle AB, Crook T, Vousden KH and Laimins LA. . 1992 EMBO J. 11: 3045–3052. · DOI
  16. Lechner MS and Laimins LA. . 1994 J. Virol. 68: 4262–4273. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Miyashita T and Reed JC. . 1995 Cell 80: 293–299. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Phelps WC, Bagchi S, Barnes JA, Raychaudhuri P, Kraus V, Munger K, Howley PM and Nevins JR. . 1991 J. Virol. 65: 6922–6930. · DOI
  19. Pietenpol JA, Tokino T, Thiagalingam S, El-Deiry WS, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B. . 1994 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 1998–2002. · DOI
  20. Rock K, Gramm C, Rothstein L, Clark K, Stein R, Dick L, Hwang D and Goldberg A. . 1994 Cell 78: 761–771. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Sakamuro D, Sabbatini P, White E and Prendergast GC. . 1997 Oncogene 15: 887–898. · DOI
  22. Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine AJ and Howley PM. . 1990 Cell 63: 1129–1136. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Scheffner M, Munger K, Byrne JC and Howley PM. . 1991 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 5523–5527. · DOI
  24. Smotkin D and Wettstein FO. . 1986 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA 83: 4680–4684. · DOI
  25. Stanley M, Browne H, Appelby M and Minson A. . 1989 Int. J. Cancer 43: 672–676. · DOI
  26. Storey A, Thomas M, Kalita A, Harwood C, Gardiol D, Mantovani F, Breuer J, Leigh IM, Matlashewski G and Banks L. . 1998 Nature 393: 229–234. · DOI
  27. Walker KK and Levine AJ. . 1996 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 15335–15340. · DOI
  28. Werness BA, Levine AJ and Howley PM. . 1990 Science 248: 76–79. · DOI · Paper page
  29. zur Hausen H and Schneider A. . 1987 In: Salzman NP, Howley PM (eds). The papillomaviruses. Plenum Publishing Corp.: New York. pp.245–263.

Cited by

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Mantovani, F., & Banks, L.
Venue
Oncogene
Published
1999-06-03
Volume
18
Issue
22
Pages
3309-3315
ISSN
  • 0950-9232
  • 1476-5594
Cited by
46
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review