Cited by 715Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsSignaling Pathways in Disease

The E2F transcriptional network: old acquaintances with new faces

Dimova, Desssislava K, Dyson, Nicholas J·2005·Oncogene

Abstract

The E2 factor (E2F) family of transcription factors are downstream targets of the retinoblastoma protein. E2F factors have been known for several years to be important regulators of S-phase entry. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of action used by this transcriptional network. In addition, they have given us an appreciation of the fact that E2F has functions that reach beyond G1/S control and impact cell proliferation in several different ways. The discovery of new family members with unusual properties, the unexpected phenotypes of mutant animals, a diverse collection of biological activities, a large number of new putative target genes and the new modes of transcriptional regulation have all contributed to an increasingly complex view of E2F function. In this review, we will discuss these recent developments and describe how they are beginning to shape a new and revised picture of the E2F transcriptional program.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.onc.1208612

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The E2F network as well as the Cdk1 and Cdk2 related pathways are associated with anemia, the most prominent and consistent clinical sign of trypanosome infection.

    “The E2F network as well as the Cdk1 and Cdk2 related pathways are also associated with anemia which is the most prominent and consistent clinical sign of trypanosome infection (Kaminski et al., 2001; Dimova and Dyson, 2005; Noyes et al., 2011, Hu and Sun, 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimova, D. K., & Dyson, N. J.
Affiliations
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Dyson, Nicholas J
Venue
Oncogene
Published
2005-04-18
Volume
24
Issue
17
Pages
2810-2826
ISSN
  • 0950-9232 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5594
OpenAlex
W2065343028
Cited by
715
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 34
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oncogene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA64402, R01CA064402)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-53203, R01GM053203)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
Keywords
E2F transcription factors, retinoblastoma protein, S phase entry, cell proliferation, E2F target genes, transcriptional regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Transcription Factors, Transcription, Genetic, Cell Cycle Proteins, E2F Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review