The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting
Open accessAbstract
As the biocompatible materials, hydrogels have been widely used in three- dimensional (3D) bioprinting/organ printing to load cell for tissue engineering. It is important to precisely control hydrogels deposition during printing the mimic organ structures. However, the printability of hydrogels about printing parameters is seldom addressed. In this paper, we systemically investigated the printability of hydrogels from printing lines (one dimensional, 1D structures) to printing lattices/films (two dimensional, 2D structures) and printing 3D structures with a special attention to the accurate printing. After a series of experiments, we discovered the relationships between the important factors such as air pressure, feedrate, or even printing distance and the printing quality of the expected structures. Dumbbell shape was observed in the lattice structures printing due to the hydrogel diffuses at the intersection. Collapses and fusion of adjacent layer would result in the error accumulation at Z direction which was an important fact that could cause printing failure. Finally, we successfully demonstrated a 3D printing hydrogel scaffold through harmonize with all the parameters. The cell viability after printing was compared with the casting and the results showed that our bioprinting method almost had no extra damage to the cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication
Malda, J., Visser, J., Melchels, F. P., Jüngst, T., Hennink, W. E., Dhert, W. J. A., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201302042 · Cited by 1,901
Direct-write bioprinting of cell-laden methacrylated gelatin hydrogels
Bertassoni, L. E., Cardoso, J. C., Manoharan, V., Cristino, A. L., Bhise, N. S., Araujo, W. A., Zorlutuna, P., Vrana, N. E., Ghaemmaghami, A. M., Dokmeci, M. R., et al. (2014) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5082/6/2/024105 · Cited by 642
Creating perfused functional vascular channels using 3D bio-printing technology
Lee, V. K., Kim, D. Y., Ngo, H., Lee, Y., Seo, L., Yoo, S.-S., Vincent, P. A., & Dai, G. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.05.083 · Cited by 494
Fabrication and Characterization of a Nitric Oxide-Releasing Nanofibrous Gelatin Matrix
Vogt, C., Xing, Q., He, W., Li, B., Frost, M. C., & Zhao, F. (2013) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm301984w · Cited by 45
Cited by
Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability
Gillispie, G., Prim, P., Copus, J., Fisher, J., Mikos, A. G., Yoo, J. J., Atala, A., & Lee, S. J. (2020) · Biofabrication · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d · Cited by 426
Bom, S., Ribeiro, R., Ribeiro, H. M., Santos, C., & Marto, J. (2022) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121506 · Cited by 230
3D bioprinting of structural proteins
Włodarczyk-Biegun, M. K., & del Campo, A. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.019 · Cited by 185
Polysaccharide matrices used in 3D in vitro cell culture systems
Diekjürgen, D., & Grainger, D. W. (2017) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.06.020 · Cited by 125
Stepanovska, J., Supova, M., Hanzalek, K., Broz, A., & Matejka, R. (2021) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines9091137 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- He, Y., Yang, F., Zhao, H., Gao, Q., Xia, B., & Fu, J.
- Venue
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2016-07-20
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29977-29977
- ISSN
- 2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2488863215
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.