The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A practical guide to microfluidic perfusion culture of adherent mammalian cells
Abstract
Culturing cells at microscales allows control over microenvironmental cues, such as cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions; the potential to scale experiments; the use of small culture volumes; and the ability to integrate with microsystem technologies for on-chip experimentation. Microfluidic perfusion culture in particular allows controlled delivery and removal of soluble biochemical molecules in the extracellular microenvironment, and controlled application of mechanical forces exerted via fluid flow. There are many challenges to designing and operating a robust microfluidic perfusion culture system for routine culture of adherent mammalian cells. The current literature on microfluidic perfusion culture treats microfluidic design, device fabrication, cell culture, and micro-assays independently. Here we systematically present and discuss important design considerations in the context of the entire microfluidic perfusion culture system. These design considerations include the choice of materials, culture configurations, microfluidic network fabrication and micro-assays. We also present technical issues such as sterilization; seeding cells in both 2D and 3D configurations; and operating the system under optimized mass transport and shear stress conditions, free of air-bubbles. The integrative and systematic treatment of the microfluidic system design and fabrication, cell culture, and micro-assays provides novices with an effective starting point to build and operate a robust microfludic perfusion culture system for various applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review
Wilson, C. J., Clegg, R. E., Leavesley, D. I., & Pearcy, M. J. (2005) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/ten.2005.11.1 · Cited by 1,696
Bhatia, S. N., Balis, U. J., Yarmush, M. L., & Toner, M. (1999) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fasebj.13.14.1883 · Cited by 890
A novel 3D mammalian cell perfusion-culture system in microfluidic channels
Toh, Y.-C., Zhang, C., Zhang, J., Khong, Y. M., Chang, S., Samper, V. D., van Noort, D., Hutmacher, D. W., & Yu, H. (2007) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/b614872g · Cited by 414
Self-citationFunctional behavior of primary rat liver cells in a three-dimensional perfused microarray bioreactor
Powers, M. J., Janigian, D. M., Wack, K. E., Baker, C. S., Stolz, D. B., & Griffith, L. G. (2002) · Tissue Engineering · doi:10.1089/107632702760184745 · Cited by 234
Permeation-driven flow in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic devices.
Randall, G. C., & Doyle, P. S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503287102 · Cited by 220
Cited by
A guide to the organ-on-a-chip
Leung, C. M., de Haan, P., Ronaldson-Bouchard, K., Kim, G.-A., Ko, J., Rho, H. S., Chen, Z., Habibovic, P., Jeon, N. L., Takayama, S., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00118-6 · Cited by 1,116
Self-citationAdvantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices
Halldorsson, S., Lucumi, E., Gómez-Sjöberg, R., & Fleming, R. M. T. (2015) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.029 · Cited by 1,027
Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments
Young, E. W. K., & Beebe, D. J. (2010) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b909900j · Cited by 615
Perfused multiwell plate for 3D liver tissue engineering
Domansky, K., Inman, W., Serdy, J., Dash, A., Lim, M. H. M., & Griffith, L. G. (2010) · Lab Chip · doi:10.1039/b913221j · Cited by 444
Marx, U. (2016) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.1603161 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, L., Toh, Y.-C., Voldman, J., & Yu, H.
- Venue
- Lab on a Chip
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 681
- ISSN
- 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0197
- OpenAlex
- W2016915024
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.