The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrinsically disordered regions as affinity tuners in protein–DNA interactions
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered regions, terminal tails, and flexible linkers are abundant in DNA-binding proteins and play a crucial role by increasing the affinity and specificity of DNA binding. Disordered tails often undergo a disorder-to-order transition during interactions with DNA and improve both the kinetics and thermodynamics of specific DNA binding. The DNA search by proteins that interact nonspecifically with DNA can be supported by disordered tails as well. The disordered tail may increase the overall protein–DNA interface and thus increase the affinity of the protein to the DNA and its sliding propensity while slowing linear diffusion. The exact effect of the disordered tails on the sliding rate depends on the degree of positive charge clustering, as has been shown for homeodomains and p53 transcription factors. The disordered tails, which may be viewed as DNA recognizing subdomains, can facilitate intersegment transfer events that occur via a “monkey bar” mechanism in which the domains bridge two different DNA fragments simultaneously. The “monkey bar” mechanism can be facilitated by internal disordered linkers in multidomain proteins that mediate the cross-talks between the constituent domains and especially their brachiation dynamics and thus their overall capability to search DNA efficiently. The residue sequence of the disordered tails has unique characteristics that were evolutionarily selected to achieve the optimized function that is unique to each protein. Perturbation of the electrostatic characteristics of the disordered tails by post-translational modifications, such as acetylation and phosphorylation, may affect protein affinity to DNA and therefore can serve to regulate DNA recognition. Modifying the disordered protein tails or the flexibility of the inter-domain linkers of multidomain proteins may affect the cross-talk between the constituent domains so as to facilitate the search kinetics of non-specific DNA sequences and increase affinity to the specific sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions
Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2005) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1589 · Cited by 3,871
Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Vousden, K. H., & Prives, C. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037 · Cited by 3,163
The first 30 years of p53: growing ever more complex.
Levine, A. J., & Oren, M. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2723 · Cited by 1,967
Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function
Dunker, A. K., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Iakoucheva, L. M., & Obradović, Z. (2002) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi012159+ · Cited by 1,731
Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins
Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2002) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00289-0 · Cited by 1,327
Post-translational modification of p53 in tumorigenesis
Bode, A. M., & Dong, Z. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1455 · Cited by 1,270
Intrinsic Disorder in Transcription Factors
Liu, J., Perumal, N. B., Oldfield, C. J., Su, E. W., Uversky, V. N., & Dunker, A. K. (2006) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi0602718 · Cited by 792
The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins
Tompa, P. (2005) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.03.072 · Cited by 717
Linear motifs: Evolutionary interaction switches
Neduva, V., & Russell, R. B. (2005) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.005 · Cited by 352
Variable Control of Ets-1 DNA Binding by Multiple Phosphates in an Unstructured Region
Pufall, M. A., Lee, G. M., Nelson, M. L., Kang, H.-S., Velyvis, A., Kay, L. E., McIntosh, L. P., & Graves, B. J. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111915 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Insights into RNA Biology from an Atlas of Mammalian mRNA-Binding Proteins
Castello, A., Fischer, B., Eichelbaum, K., Horos, R., Beckmann, B. M., Strein, C., Davey, N. E., Humphreys, D. T., Preiss, T., Steinmetz, L. M., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031 · Cited by 2,132
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Intrinsically Disordered Protein Regions
Oldfield, C. J., & Dunker, A. K. (2014) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-164947 · Cited by 1,057
Buljan, M., Chalancon, G., Eustermann, S., Wagner, G. P., Fuxreiter, M., Bateman, A., & Babu, M. M. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.039 · Cited by 396
Intrinsically disordered proteins play diverse roles in cell signaling
Bondos, S. E., Dunker, A. K., & Uversky, V. N. (2022) · Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1186/s12964-022-00821-7 · Cited by 222
Intrinsically disordered proteins and multicellular organisms
Dunker, A. K., Bondos, S. E., Huang, F., & Oldfield, C. J. (2015) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.09.025 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Vuzman, D., & Levy, Y.
- Venue
- Molecular BioSystems
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-09-15
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-57
- ISSN
- 1742-2051 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-206X
- OpenAlex
- W2143970215
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrinsically disordered regions as affinity tuners in protein–DNA interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c1mb05273j
- The paper
- Vuzman, D., & Levy, Y. (2011). Intrinsically disordered regions as affinity tuners in protein–DNA interactions. Molecular BioSystems. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1mb05273j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.