Cited by 293Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsNanomaterials and Printing TechnologiesSensor Technology and Measurement Systems

A highly sensitive and flexible pressure sensor with electrodes and elastomeric interlayer containing silver nanowires

Wang, Jun, Jiu, Jinting, Nogi, Masaya, Sugahara, Tohru, Nagao, Shijo, Koga, Hirotaka, He, Peng, Suganuma, Katsuaki·2015·Nanoscale

Abstract

The next-generation application of pressure sensors is gradually being extended to include electronic artificial skin (e-skin), wearable devices, humanoid robotics and smart prosthetics. In these advanced applications, high sensing capability is an essential feature for high performance. Although surface patterning treatments and some special elastomeric interlayers have been applied to improve sensitivity, the process is complex and this inevitably raises the cost and is an obstacle to large-scale production. In the present study a simple printing process without complex patterning has been used for constructing the sensor, and an interlayer is employed comprising elastomeric composites filled with silver nanowires. By increasing the relative permittivity, εr, of the composite interlayer induced by compression at high nanowire concentration, it has been possible to achieve a maximum sensitivity of 5.54 kPa(-1). The improvement in sensitivity did not sacrifice or undermine the other features of the sensor. Thanks to the silver nanowire electrodes, the sensor is flexible and stable after 200 cycles at a bending radius of 2 mm, and exhibits outstanding reproducibility without hysteresis under similar pressure pulses. The sensor has been readily integrated onto an adhesive bandage and has been successful in detecting human movements. In addition to measuring pressure in direct contact, non-contact pressures such as air flow can also be detected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c4nr06494a

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adding conductive fillers into the dielectric just below the percolation threshold increases the effective dielectric constant, because compression shortens the distance between the fillers, leading to an increased dielectric constant under pressure.

    “Another strategy to increase the effective dielectric constant is to add conductive fillers into the dielectric just below the percolation threshold.[153] Compression shortens the distance between the fillers, leading to an increased dielectric constant under pressure.”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [153]

  • Wearable strain sensors with a large strain detection range are widely used to monitor body motions, including finger bending, forearm muscle movements, and knee motions.

    “Wearable strain sensors with a large strain detection range are widely used to monitor body motions, including finger bending, [41,52,120,123,126] forearm muscle movements, [21,44,52,103,120,123,153] and knee motions.[41,121,153]”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [153]

  • A multitude of pressure sensing arrays have been demonstrated to capture the spatial pressure distributions induced by different sources, such as a static object placed onto the sensing array, gas flow, bouncing of a water droplet, finger touch, and acoustic vibration.

    “A multitude of pressure sensing arrays have been demonstrated to capture the spatial pressure distributions induced by different sources, such as a static object placed onto the sensing array, [57,139,141,158,203] gas flow, [141,144,153] bouncing of a water droplet (Figure 11a), [139] finger touch, [144,161] and acoustic vibration.[144,203]”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [153]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Jiu, J., Nogi, M., Sugahara, T., Nagao, S., Koga, H., He, P., & Suganuma, K.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Jiu, Jinting
  • He, Peng
Venue
Nanoscale
Published
2015
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
2926-2932
ISSN
  • 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-3372
OpenAlex
W1966066957
Cited by
293
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10
FWCI
11.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanoscale (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Keywords
pressure sensors, silver nanowires, printed electrodes, dielectric constant, sensor sensitivity, flexible electronics, electronic skin, wearable devices, human motion monitoring, bending stability
MeSH terms
Arm, Elasticity, Electrodes, Electronics, Equipment Design, Fingers, Humans, Leg, Materials Testing, Polyethylene Terephthalates, Pressure, Robotics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Silver, Surface Properties, Reproducibility of Results, Skin, Artificial, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Elastomers, Electric Capacitance, Nanotechnology, Metal Nanoparticles, Nanowires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review